Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

China customs maintains restrictions on coal imports

  • Market: Coal, Coking coal
  • 15/11/18

China's customs will maintain strict volume quotas for coal in an effort to reverse growth in imports that run counter to the policy goals of the country's main planning agency.

This year's coal import quota will not be extended to February 2019 as some market participants expected, but customs will maintain restrictions at south China ports for the rest of this year and step up restrictions at north China ports.

The strictest controls on coal imports have previously been placed on south China ports, as the coastal steel producers and power plants import the largest amount of coal. China's coal imports have risen by 11pc to 252.04mn t during January-October, according to customs data. But importers face a quota set to no more than the 2017 total of 270.9mn t. Coking coal accounted for 70mn t of the 2017 total.

The general administration of customs stressed during meetings yesterday in various Chinese provinces that strict controls will have to be maintained because there is just 9mn t of coal import quotas remaining for all Chinese ports this year.

Participants in the coking coal market have stressed that these import restrictions are aimed towards limiting thermal coal imports so that domestic thermal coal prices do not come off too much. But since Chinese customs do not differentiate between thermal and coking coal imports, any restrictions on coal imports will have a ripple effect on coking coal.

Officials from China's main economic planning agency the NDRC at the meetings yesterday dismissed as untrue earlier discussions about a complete ban on all coal imports, saying existing policies on coal imports are unchanged.

North China sees delays

Restrictions at north China ports have been slowly coming up before meetings yesterday, market participants said. There is no outright ban on coal imports, but vessels have begun to see extended waiting times to berth and to clear customs inspections. The delays are aimed at discouraging coal imports by making it more difficult for buyers.

In some ways, power plants are expected to have some leeway in maneuvering through restrictions.

"Should a utility really need to import a cargo of thermal coal for instance, customs will allow them to do so but on a case-by-case basis, depending on the actual demand and needs of the utility in question," an attendee at one of the meetings said. "But the authorities' stand on coking coal is clearly a negative, coking coal is not an essential commodity in their eyes."

The changes will have the biggest impact at Jingtang port in Hebei province, which until now remained one of the few ports that trading firms could berth and unload coking coal cargoes with little limits. Portside coking coal trades at Jingtang port have been active over the past month, driven by high seaborne cargo offers and long waiting times to berth vessels shifting buyers to portside markets.

"We heard that Jingtang port will temporarily only allow locally registered companies to declare their cargoes to customs. Companies registered in other cities will not be allowed to declare cargoes," a Beijing-based trader said. "There is also talk of Jingtang port possibly further tightening their policies on coal imports soon."

"We do not expect these enhanced restrictions to change our procurement strategy much," a south China steel producer said. "At the very most we will just put off procuring December-loading cargoes until the situation becomes clearer."

December cargoes affected

North China steel producers that previously had intentions to import premium low-volatile hard coking coals might have to postpone these plans.

Prior to the meetings, some Chinese steel producers had planned to buy top-tier seaborne coking coal cargoes loading in December, in anticipation of port import quotas being reset at the end of the calendar year. With about 20 days required for cargoes to reach China from Australia, any cargoes loaded in December will arrive in China just after the start of the 2019 when there is more than sufficient quota volumes.

But steel producers are apprehensive as they are now poised to lose an important alternative source of coking coal.

"We do not import much seaborne coal, but the quality of Australian coking coal is virtually unmatched," the same south China steel producer said. "We have complained to the authorities that we might face problems producing if we are barred from importing coal, but their response is simply for us to buy up the remaining domestic coking coal inventories from north China ports."

"The quality of domestic coking coal quality can never match that of Australia," he added. "Domestic coals are simply too high in sulphur and phosphorus for us to use them without flouting environmental protection rules. We are being squeezed from both sides."

"We have two more imported coking coal cargoes that will arrive by the end of this year, so we're currently liaising with customs to see how we can manage the situation," a north China steel producer said. "But we're not too worried as we have enough inventories."


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
10/04/25

US inflation eased for 2nd month in March

US inflation eased for 2nd month in March

Houston, 10 April (Argus) — US inflation slowed more than forecast in March, pulled lower by falling gasoline prices and slowing shelter inflation, as the new US administration's tariff policies have prompted concerns of a global economic slowdown. The consumer price index (CPI) slowed to an annual rate of 2.4pc in March, down from 2.8pc in February and the lowest rate since November 2024, the Labor Department reported Thursday. Analysts surveyed by Trading Economics had forecast a 2.6pc rate for March. Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy, rose at a 2.8pc annual rate, down from a 3pc annual rate the prior month and the lowest since March 2021. The deceleration in inflation came a month after President Donald Trump began to levy tariffs on imports from China and on steel, aluminum and automobiles, starting in February. Several tariff deadlines were pushed back, including a three-month pause enacted this week on much steeper tariffs for most countries. The tariffs have prompted companies and consumers to pull back on investments and some purchases while shaking up financial markets, and heightening concerns of a global recession. The energy index fell by an annual 3.3pc in March following a 0.2pc annual decline in February. Gasoline fell by 9.8pc after a 3.1pc decline. Piped natural gas rose by 9.4pc. Food rose by an annual 3pc, accelerating from 2.6pc. Eggs surged by an annual 60.4pc, as avian flu has slashed supply. Shelter rose by an annual 4pc in March, slowing from 4.2pc in February and the smallest increase since November 2021. Services less energy services rose by 3.7pc, slowing from 4.1pc in February. New vehicles were unchanged after an annual 0.3pc drop in February. Transportation services, which includes what maintenance and repair, insurance and airfares, rose by an annual 3.1pc, slowing from 6pc in February. Car insurance was up by an annual 7.5pc and airline fares fell by 5.2pc. CPI fell by 0.1pc in March after a monthly 0.2pc gain in February. Core inflation rose by 0.1pc for the month. By Bob Willis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Trump coal plant bailout renews first term fight


09/04/25
News
09/04/25

Trump coal plant bailout renews first term fight

Washington, 9 April (Argus) — President Donald Trump's effort to stop the retirement of coal-fired power plants is reminiscent of a 2017 attempt that faltered in the face of widespread industry opposition. Trump, in an executive order signed on Tuesday, directed the US Department of Energy (DOE) to tap into emergency powers to stop the retirement of coal-fired plants and other large plants it believes are critical to grid reliability. The order sets a 30-day deadline for DOE to decide which plants are critical based on a new methodology that will analyze if reserve margins, or the percent of unused capacity at peak demand, are at an "acceptable" level. The initiative shares similarities to Trump's unsuccessful effort in his first term to bail out coal and nuclear plants. In the 2017 effort, Trump backed a "grid resiliency" proposal to compensate power plants with 90 days of on-site fuel. But an unusual coalition of natural gas industry groups, manufacturers, renewable producers and environmentalists united against the idea, warning it would upend power markets and cost consumers billions of dollars each year. The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission voted 5-0 to reject the proposal. It remains unclear if a similarly sized coalition will emerge to fight Trump's latest proposal, under which DOE would use emergency powers in section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act to keep some coal plants and other large power plants operating. Industry groups have largely been avoiding taking positions that could be seen as critical of Trump. Environmentalists say they strongly oppose keeping coal plants operating using emergency powers. Doing so would mean more air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, they say, and higher costs for consumers. Environmental groups say they are hoping other industries affected by the potential bailout will eventually speak out against the initiative. "The silence from those who know better is deafening," Center for Biological Diversity climate law institute legal director Jason Rylander said. "I hope that we will start to see more resistance to these dangerous policies before significant damage is done." DOE said it was "already hard at work" to implement Trump's executive order, which was paired with other orders that were meant to support coal mining and coal production. US energy secretary Chris Wright said today that reviving coal will increase the reliability of the electrical grid and bring down electricity costs, but he has not shared further details on the 202(c) initiative. Trying to litigate the program could be "tricky", and section 202(c) orders have never successfully been challenged in court, in part because they are usually short-term orders, Harvard Law School Electricity Law Initiative director Ari Peskoe said. But opponents could challenge them by focusing on "numerous legal problems", he said, such as not allowing public comment or running afoul of a US Supreme Court precedent that prohibits agencies from attempting to decide "major questions" without clear congressional authorization. "Here DOE would use a little-used statute explicitly written for short-term emergencies in order to PREVENT a change in the US energy mix," Peskoe said. A projected 8.1GW of coal-fired generation is set to retire this year, equivalent to nearly 5pc of the coal fleet, the US Energy Information Administration said last month. Electric utilities often decide which plants to retire years in advance, allowing them to defer maintenance and to forgo capital investments in aging facilities. Keeping coal plants running could require exemptions from environmental rules or pricey capital investments, the costs of which would likely be distributed among other ratepayers. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Peabody reviews Anglo's Australian coal assets buyout


09/04/25
News
09/04/25

Peabody reviews Anglo's Australian coal assets buyout

Sydney, 9 April (Argus) — US coal producer Peabody Energy is reviewing its decision to buy UK-South African mining firm Anglo American's coking coal assets in Australia, following a blast at Anglo's Moranbah North mine, the company said today. Peabody Energy agreed to buy four of Anglo American's mines — Moranbah North, Grosvenor, Aquila, and Capcoal — in a $3.8bn deal signed in November 2024 . The Moranbah North blast could trigger an adverse event clause in the acquisition contract, allowing Peabody to withdraw from the deal at a minimal cost, market participants told Argus on 9 April. This has not been confirmed by Peabody. The company said it remains in conversation with Anglo American to better understand the impacts of the event. Two of Anglo American's Australian coking coal mines, Grosvenor and Moranbah North, are currently non-operational because of safety issues. Resources Safety and Health Queensland (RSHQ) — one of Australia's mining regulators — shut Moranbah North after a suspected carbon monoxide explosion on 31 March. Anglo American declared force majeure on coking coal from Moranbah North on 3 April in a notice backdated to the day of the blast. Anglo American's 5mn t/yr Grosvenor mine has also been non-operational since July 2024, when a fire severely damaged the underground site. The company did not disclose a reopening timeline for the site in its 2025 production guidance released in February. The firm previously shut the Grosvenor site over March-May 2022 after a fatal accident. Anglo American is not the only coking coal miner currently dealing with safety challenges. Australian producer GM³ halted production at its 3mn-3.5mn t/yr Appin mine in New South Wales on 6 April, following a blast that injured four workers. The company and state regulators are investigating the incident, with Appin closed until further notice. Argus ' metallurgical coal premium hard low-vol fob Australia has been falling over the past month, dropping from $183/t on 10 March to $174/t on 8 April. But the price rose from $166/t on 3 April to $174/t on 4 April after Anglo American declared force majeure on Moranbah North shipments. By Avinash Govind Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump issues executive orders to boost coal


08/04/25
News
08/04/25

Trump issues executive orders to boost coal

Cheyenne, 8 April (Argus) — US president Donald Trump signed four executive orders today aimed at increasing the country's coal production and use, including directing agencies to possibly expand access to federal land and use emergency authority to keep coal-fired power plants open. The orders follow up on a pledge Trump made on 17 March to authorize his administration "to immediately begin producing Energy with BEAUTIFUL, CLEAN COAL." At the time of Trump's social media post, the White House did not elaborate on his plans. The executive orders signed today are primarily focused on US coal use and production. These include directing the chair of the National Energy Dominance Council to designate coal as a "mineral" covered under a previous executive order signed in March that uses emergency power granted under the Federal Power Act to fast track permit reviews for critical mineral projects. Today's orders also direct agencies to revoke policies that aim to move the US away from coal production or favor other generation resources over coal. This includes authorizing the Department of Justice to investigate state policies considered to be prejudicial against coal. The orders also direct agencies to identify coal resources on federal land and prioritize coal leasing on those lands, and orders the Secretary of the Interior to make it clear that a moratorium on federal coal leasing that was initially in effect from 2016-17 and reinstated from 2022-24 is no longer active. Trump also signed a proclamation allowing some coal plants to comply with a less stringent version of the EPA's mercury and air toxics standards for two years. Another order signed today directs the Secretary of Energy to "streamline, systemize, and expedite processes for issuing emergency orders under the Federal Power Act during forecasted grid interruptions." "We're slashing unnecessary regulations that targeted beautiful, clean coal" and "will end the government bias against coal", Trump said today before signing the orders at an event featuring coal miners and lawmakers from coal-producing states. The US is "going to produce energy the likes nobody has seen before." He said his administration is going to devise a "guarantee" that will ensure the industry and investment in coal projects will be protected from "the ups and downs" of politics, but did not elaborate on what that would be. Other parts of the orders have the Council of Environmental Quality assisting agencies in making some exclusions for coal under the National Environmental Policy Act, encourage coal-fired generation for artificial intelligence and call for the Secretary of Energy to consider whether coal used for steel production can be defined as a critical mineral. The orders also aim to promote coal and coal technology exports, including by possibly facilitating international offtake agreements for US coal. US coal exports rose in 2023 and 2024 but trading activity has faltered lately amid restrained steel production, limited coal-fired generation in some countries and uncertainty over recent tariffs and the US Trade Representatives proposal to charge Chinese-built and operated ships that do business in the US. The National Mining Association praised Trump's actions. "It's a stark shift from the prior administration's punitive regulatory agenda, hostile energy policies and unlawful land grabs," NMA chief executive officer Rich Nolan said before Trump signed the order. But environmental group Sierra Club warned the order will be costly. "Forcing coal plants to stay on line will cost Americans more, get more people sick with respiratory and heart conditions, and lead to more premature deaths," Sierra Club executive director Ben Jealous said. By Courtney Schlisserman Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Flooding on US rivers mires barge transit


07/04/25
News
07/04/25

Flooding on US rivers mires barge transit

Houston, 7 April (Argus) — Barge transit slowed across the Arkansas, Ohio and lower Mississippi rivers over the weekend because of flooding, which prompted the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to close locks and issue transit restrictions along the waterways. The Corps advised all small craft to limit or halt transit on the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System (MCKARNS) in Arkansas because flows reached above 200,000 cubic feet per second (cfs), nearly three times the high-water flow. The heavy flow is expected to persist throughout the week, posing risks to those transiting the river system, said the Corps. Some barges have halted movement on the river, temporarily miring fertilizer resupply efforts in Arkansas and Oklahoma in the middle of the urea application season. The Corps forecasts high flows to continue into Friday, and the National Weather Service predicts several locations along the MCKARNS will maintain a moderate to minor flood stage into Friday as well. Both the Arthur V Ormond Lock and the Toad Suck Ferry Lock, upriver from Little Rock, Arkansas, shut on 6 April because of the high flows. Flows along the Little Rock Corps district reached 271,600cfs on 7 April. The Corps forecasts high flows to continue into Friday. Ohio and lower Mississippi rivers The Corps restricted barge transit between Cincinnati, Ohio, and Cairo, Illinois, on the Ohio River to mitigate barge transportation risks, with the Corps closing two locks on the Ohio River on 6 April and potentially four more in the coming days. Major barge carrier American Commercial Barge Line (ACBL) anticipates dock and fleeting operations will be suspended at certain locations along the Mississippi and Ohio rivers as a result of the flooding. NWS forecasters anticipate major flooding levels to persist through the following week. Barge carriers also expect a backlog of up to two weeks in the region. To alleviate flooding at Cairo, Illinois, where the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers meet, the Corps increased water releases at the Barkley Dam on the Cumberland River and the Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The Markland Lock, downriver from Cincinnati, Ohio, and the Newburgh lock near Owensboro, Kentucky, closed on 6 April. The Corps expects the full closure to remain until each location reaches its crest of nearly 57ft, which could occur on 8 or 9 April, according to the National Weather Service (NWS). Around 50 vessels or more are waiting to transit each lock, according to the Lock Status Report published by the Corps on 7 April. The Corps also shut a chamber at both Cannelton and McAlpine locks. The John T Myers and Smithland locks may close on 7 April as well, the Corps said. The Olmsted Lock, the final lock before the Ohio and Mississippi rivers, will require a 3mph limit for any traffic passing through. The NWS expects roughly 10-15 inches of precipitation fell along the Ohio and Mississippi River valleys earlier this month, inducing severe flooding across the Ohio and Mississippi River valleys. A preliminary estimate from AccuWeather stated an estimated loss of $80-90bn in damages from the extreme flooding. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more