Latest market news

Oman signs land deal for new green hydrogen plant

  • Market: Fertilizers, Hydrogen
  • 24/08/21

Oman has signed a land allocation deal allowing privately-owned Indian renewables firm Acme to kick-start the development of a new green hydrogen and ammonia project at Duqm Port.

The proposed plant will cost an estimated $3.5bn to build and will be developed in phases, with the first planned to be commissioned as early as the end of 2022. It will use 3GW of solar and 500MW of wind energy to produce approximately 900,000 t/yr of ammonia for export, Acme said.

An initial agreement on the project was signed in March. Now that land has been allocated for the scheme, pre-construction activity can begin. "We plan to start the construction at Oman as soon as we commission our first green hydrogen and green ammonia plant at Bikaner in India," Acme chairman Manoj Upadhyay said.

In mid-May, Oman's state-owned energy firm OQ announced plans to develop the country's first green hydrogen project alongside Hong Kong-based InterContinental Energy and Kuwait's clean energy investment company Enertech. The project in Oman's central al-Wusta governorate will use 25GW of solar and wind power to produce 1.8mn t/yr of green hydrogen and up to 10mn t/yr of green ammonia. It is expected to start production around 2026.

Meanwhile, Muscat's General Authority for Special Economic Zones and Free Zones said it is negotiating with several international companies that have expressed an interest in establishing hydrogen projects at Salalah and Sohar.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

Strike at Port of Brisbane disrupts urea shipment


08/01/25
News
08/01/25

Strike at Port of Brisbane disrupts urea shipment

Sydney, 8 January (Argus) — Port operator Qube workers at Australia's Port of Brisbane have started a week-long strike today, which has likely already held up a urea shipment. The work stoppage will affect break-bulk operations, slowing the flow of commodities like fertilizers, steel and vehicles. This comes as a months-long dispute with the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) drags on across several key ports. The 42,493 deadweight tonne (dwt) Es Dignity , loaded with 32,559t of urea from Qatar, arrived near Brisbane on 7 January, according to trade analytics firm Kpler. This means the ship is unlikely to discharge on 8 January and will be delayed, according to market participants. The vessel previously discharged 8,397t of urea into Townsville on 2 January. Urea is a key fertilizer imported into Australia, and vessels carrying urea typically make multi-port discharges when making deliveries into Australia. The 37,657dwt Tientsin delivered 10,000t of urea into Brisbane on 22 December 2024, after making two 10,000t deliveries into Portland and Newcastle earlier that month. A urea supplier last offered granular urea at around A$760/t ($474/t) fca Brisbane this week. Urea prices in Australia have climbed rapidly in recent weeks, on the back of higher international fob levels in the Middle East and as a weaker Australian dollar made imports more expensive. Argus last assessed granular urea prices fca Geelong in Victoria at A$740-750/t (see graph) , but market participants indicated prices are now higher. But Australian demand for urea is currently low, so the delayed vessel is currently unlikely to impact local supply-demand dynamics significantly. A trader that regularly supplies Brisbane with urea cargoes expects the strikes to persist until at least March, when demand will have picked up and delays will have a larger impact. Port Kembla Qube and MUA have been negotiating an employment agreement since the middle of last year, prompting months of industrial action across the company's Australian ports. The Brisbane work stoppages come alongside an ongoing two-week work stoppage at Qube's facilities at Port Kembla, in New South Wales, which also affected break-bulk operations. "The [MUA's] industrial action has effectively stopped Qube's port operations at Port Kembla and forced our customers to make alternative stevedoring arrangements," a company representative told Argus at the start of the Port Kembla strike. The strikes at Port Kembla have had no impact on fertilizer deliveries so far, with GTT data showing no urea or phosphate deliveries made into the port in January or February in recent years. By Avinash Govind and Tom Woodlock Granular urea prices fca Geelong (A$/t) Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Yara raises CAN, AN offers to NW Europe for February


07/01/25
News
07/01/25

Yara raises CAN, AN offers to NW Europe for February

Amsterdam, 7 January (Argus) — Norwegian major producer Yara has announced its latest nitrate offers for northwest Europe for delivery next month, raising offers for CAN in German and Benelux markets, and AN in France. Yara is offering CAN 27 at €335/t cif Germany and Benelux for February delivery. This latest offer marks an increase from €317/t cif for January delivery to those markets, as announced in the first half of December . The producer has raised its AN 33.5 offer in France to €425/t cpt. Initial offers outlined in October had been €387/t cpt for December delivery. The higher offers reflect the overall strengthening of prices across the nitrogen complex since the start of December, with Egyptian urea irecenty hitting the highest level since October 2023. By Harry Minihan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US 45V rules draw guarded industry, greens nods


06/01/25
News
06/01/25

US 45V rules draw guarded industry, greens nods

Houston, 6 January (Argus) — Revised federal guidelines released last week for what will be billions of dollars worth of hydrogen production tax credits drew guarded approval from both industry and environmental groups. Energy companies and associated lobbying groups hailed greater flexibility for nuclear and natural gas producers to access subsidies of as much as $3/kg of hydrogen, while climate groups cautiously cheered the administration for upholding a so-called "three-pillars" model of regulations intended to ensure hydrogen production does not increase emissions. "This framework offers an opportunity for natural gas, when paired with carbon capture and storage, to compete more fairly in new markets," said the American Petroleum Institute. Katie Ellet, chief executive of ETCH, a decarbonization technology company which aims to produce hydrogen from natural gas, called the updated guidelines "a significant step forward" and hailed new standards that adopt life-cycle emission assessments for projects using natural gas. The updated guidelines also open more pathways for renewable natural gas (RNG) developers to access tax credits, which one lobbying group said could unlock thousands of potential projects. "The final rules address key issues...including removing the first productive use penalty, which effectively treated existing sources of RNG like conventional natural gas," said the American Biogas Council. There are currently 2,400 biogas projects in operation in the US compared to a potential 24,000, said the council. "These new rules will support increased production.". Electrolytic producers, which use nuclear or renewable power to split water into hydrogen, also responded positively to the changes. "We are pleased that the US Treasure Department changed course and that the final rule allows a significant portion of the existing merchant nuclear fleet to earn credits for hydrogen production," said power utility Constellation Energy chief executive Joe Dominguez in a statement. Constellation previously warned that it would be forced to cancel a proposed $900mn hydrogen plant in Illinois if the administration did not amend rules intended to prohibit new hydrogen projects from displacing other consumers of renewable power. A prior rule stipulating projects to draw power from energy assets built no more than 36 months in advance of the hydrogen start up effectively shut out nuclear producers from accessing the subsidies. Constellation says it is still reviewing how the new rules will impact its project at the LaSalle Clean Energy Center, which is a partner at the federally funded Midwest Alliance for Clean Hydrogen (MachH2) hub. Solid pillars Environmental groups gave subdued praise to the Biden administration's decision to largely leave in place restrictions pertaining to the additionality, temporality and regionality of new renewable-power based projects. "While the final rule includes several potentially concerning exemptions, it still broadly relies on the three pillars," said Sierra Club director of climate policy Patrick Drupp in a statement. Similarly, Earthjustice nodded towards the survival of the three pillars framework but noted the tweaks still included "several significant loopholes for dirty hydrogen producers to enjoy the benefits of this important climate program." The Union of Concerned Scientists noted that final 45V rules "firmly reject the most egregious" of the loopholes sought by industry players, but still leave room for some what they call heavily polluting hydrogen projects through ongoing questions of carbon accounting. By Jasmina Kelemen Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Carbon management a must for EU clean industry: ZEP


06/01/25
News
06/01/25

Carbon management a must for EU clean industry: ZEP

Brussels, 6 January (Argus) — The European Commission must move beyond just renewables and electrification to a more holistic approach to decarbonisation, Zero Emissions Platform (ZEP) secretary-general Eadbhard Pernot told Argus ahead of the commission's expected Clean Industrial Deal proposal on 26 February. How important is this Clean Industrial Deal? The industrial sector is directly responsible for some 20-25pc of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally. If you factor in all energy emissions linked to the industrial sector — whether in power or other sectors — then you're looking at 40-45pc of GHG emissions. Under existing tools like the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), globally traded industrial products such as steel or aluminium will still be imported at lower cost from other regions, such as China, with massive oversupply. In many cases, exporters will shift existing clean production to Europe and send other carbon-intensive products elsewhere. Or they will simply import finished products like cars here without accounting for those emissions. It's a lose-lose. What other specific concrete adjustments can the EU or Clean Industrial Deal bring? Creating a market for decarbonised cement, fertilisers, steel and aluminium, for example, should be on the list of things in the Clean Industrial Deal. In many cases, governments themselves are the ones procuring products — think of bridges and other major infrastructure. That entails reform of EU procurement rules and having long-term offtake agreements. We've got a lot of industrial sites that are going to start producing decarbonised products within the next year or so. If we look at Norway's Longship Project — with multiple emitters, including the Norcem cement plant in Brevik, fertiliser producer Yara, and Haflsund's waste to energy facility — multiple industrial producers are going to be producing decarbonised products and services in the next years, built around common infrastructure projects. We have to ensure a market exists for them. How do you see the wider industrial carbon management strategy unfolding? With the EU elections in June and the start of a new commission, 2024 wasn't an ordinary year. But things are moving in the background. So far, there's been a particular focus on where the best areas are in Europe to develop commercial carbon capture and storage (CCS) sites, like the North Sea, but now it's clear that CCS is essential for the whole of Europe. Central, eastern and southern European countries are taking action. What other legislative solutions do you want to see? Currently, there are no clear EU-wide rules on how the CCS market functions — unlike for gas, power and hydrogen. So we need to secure a regulatory framework for CO2 transport, tackling competitive issues, pricing, ownership of infrastructure and third-party access. We need rules of the game for emitters, storage sites, pipelines and shippers. We hope to see that EU framework within the next 18 months. This is really important for investors and lenders too. At the moment, we only have a patchwork with the 2009 CCS Directive. And the only country with a detailed comprehensive framework is outside the EU — the UK. Do you think the EU really has the political will to push for CCS? Given the role that CCS and carbon capture and use (CCU) will have to play in emissions reductions as well as removals, industrial carbon management is essential to meet the EU's net 90pc GHG CO2 reduction target for 2040. It's non-negotiable, and politicians recognise this now across the political spectrum. Can hydrogen help decarbonise industry? Clean hydrogen certainly has the potential to decarbonise some hard-to-abate industrial processes in the long term. The hydrogen industry is also currently responsible for a significant chunk of European emissions, and that isn't discussed enough. When making grey hydrogen, we need to stop venting CO2 into the atmosphere that could otherwise just be permanently geologically stored. Our focus in the recent EU delegated act on low-carbon hydrogen was to ensure the criteria for carbon stored outside Europe meet the same standard as ours in the EU. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more