Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Australia's carbon credit issuances nearly match demand

  • : Emissions
  • 25/04/15

Demand for Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) rose almost six-fold in the first compliance year of Australia's reformed safeguard mechanism, although total carbon unit surrenders were nearly matched by issuances of the new safeguard mechanism credits (SMCs).

A total of 138 facilities out of 219 covered under the scheme surrendered 7.05mn ACCUs and 1.38mn SMCs for the July 2023-June 2024 financial year to manage their excess emissions, up sharply from 1.22mn units a year earlier, according to data released by the Clean Energy Regulator (CER) on 15 April. But the combined 8.44mn units surrendered were nearly matched by 8.3mn of SMC issuances to 63 facilities — of which almost 7mn will be now held for future compliance, potentially weighing on market sentiment around ACCUs in the short to medium term.

The final SMC issuances for 2023-24 were below the maximum potential of 9.2mn first disclosed by the Climate Change Authority in November 2024. But that was significantly higher than initially forecast and impacted ACCU spot prices in the following months.

Some market participants had been expecting most of the SMCs to have been issued to coal miners, who benefitted from a change in the method used to estimate fugitive methane emissions, but oil and gas extraction accounted for just as many issuances as coal mining, each with around 3.07mn units, or 37pc of the total, CER data released on 15 April. Metal ore mining and processing, including ferrous, non-ferrous and precious metals, accounted for around 13pc of all issuances, followed by chemicals and other industries.

Biggest SMC issuances and surrenders

Shell has emerged as the company that received the largest number of SMCs at a facility level, with its Prelude floating LNG (FLNG) terminal issued with 1.07mn units as it reported scope 1 emissions of 1.85mn t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) for a baseline of 2.93mn t of CO2e.

UK-South African firm Anglo American received a higher combined volume of 1.64mn SMCs, of which 1.02mn came from its Capcoal coal mine and 622,997 from its Grosvenor coal mine in Queensland. Chevron received 622,554 SMCs across its Gorgon and Wheatstone operations, while Australian independent Santos was issued 205,500 units across four facilities (see table).

Meanwhile, SMC surrenders were registered across 27 facilities. Coal miners in New South Wales (NSW) and Queensland made the bulk of these surrenders at 991,857 units, including Anglo American and Australian mining company Stanmore Resources (see table).

Net emissions fall

Baselines were reset under the reformed safeguard mechanism, which applies to facilities that emit more than 100,000t of CO2e in a compliance year across several sectors, and now face a 4.9pc/yr decline rate until 2029-30. Scope 1 emissions covered under the scheme fell from 138.7mn t of CO2e in 2022-23 to approximately 136mn t of CO2e in 2023-24, representing 31pc Australia's total emissions in that year.

Net safeguard emissions fell to 127.8mn t of CO2e from 137.9mn t of CO2e a year earlier following the surrender of ACCUs and SMCs.

The total liability in 2023-24 reached around 9.2mn t of CO2e across 142 facilities, of which around 0.8mn t CO2e remained in an excess situation on 1 April 2025, according to the CER. The 0.8mn t of CO2e is from five facilities under the operational control of three companies, two of which are in voluntary administration.

The third company, Australian independent Fitzroy, failed to manage an excess of 583,079t of CO2e for its Ironbark No. 1 and Carborough Downs Coal Mine facilities for 2023-24. It has entered an enforceable undertaking with the CER and has committed to surrender the required units, start feasibility studies to investigate carbon abatement opportunities at the two facilities, and ensure neither is in an excess emissions situation for the 2024-25 year on 1 April 2026.

Australia's SMC issuances 2023-24t CO2e
FacilityOperatorSectorSMCs issued
FLNGSHELL AUSTRALIA Oil and gas extraction1,077,261
Capcoal MineANGLO COAL (CAPCOAL MANAGEMENT) Coal mining 1,022,648
Ichthys LNG ProjectINPEX Operations Australia Oil and gas extraction768,900
Grosvenor MineANGLO COAL (MORANBAH NORTH MANAGEMENT)Coal mining 622,997
Gudai-Darri MineMount Bruce Mining Metal ore mining 474,391
Kooragang IslandORICA AUSTRALIA Other basic chemical product 430,751
Gorgon OperationsCHEVRON AUSTRALIA Oil and gas extraction388,803
Carmichael Coal MineAdani Mining Coal mining 351,232
APN01 Appin Colliery - ICHENDEAVOUR COAL Coal mining 320,457
TAHMOOR COAL MINETAHMOOR COAL Coal mining 269,773
Wheatstone OperationsCHEVRON AUSTRALIA Oil and gas extraction233,751
Port Kembla SteelworksBLUESCOPE STEEL (AIS)Basic ferrous metal 232,088
Myuna CollieryCENTENNIAL MYUNA Coal mining 155,043
Ravenswood MineRAVENSWOOD GOLD Metal ore mining 132,501
Bulga Coal ComplexBULGA COAL MANAGEMENT Coal mining 128,269
WOR01South32 Worsley Alumina Basic non-ferrous metal 117,189
Newman Power StationAPA TRANSMISSION (ROY HILL) Electricity generation114,505
Condabri Talinga OranaORIGIN ENERGY UPSTREAM OPERATOROil and gas extraction104,047
Wambo Coal MineWAMBO COAL Coal mining 82,414
Spring Gully Reedy Creek CombabulaORIGIN ENERGY UPSTREAM OPERATOR Oil and gas extraction81,761
FairviewSantos Oil and gas extraction74,850
Pluto LNGWoodside Burrup Oil and gas extraction73,370
Pinjarra Alumina RefineryAlcoa of Australia Basic non-ferrous metal 70,123
Virgin Australia National Transport VIRGIN AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS Air and space transport67,430
CEM NSW Berrima MaldonBoral Cement, lime, plaster and concrete 63,844
MoranbahIncitec Pivot Other basic chemical product 63,529
CSBP Kwinana FacilityCSBP Fertiliser and pesticide 62,865
Curtis Island GLNG PlantGLNG OPERATIONS Oil and gas extraction60,273
ArcadiaSantos Oil and gas extraction57,996
Nowra PlantShoalhaven Starches Grain mill and cereal product 52,520
Ningaloo Vision FPSOSantos Oil and gas extraction51,109
Solomon Power StationFMG SOLOMON Electricity generation49,749
QGC UpstreamQGC PTY Oil and gas extraction47,428
King of the HillsGREENSTONE RESOURCES (WA) Metal ore mining 40,725
Arrow Surat OperationsArrow Energy Holdings Oil and gas extraction37,987
Birkenhead OperationsADBRI Cement, lime, plaster and concrete 29,000
Moorvale Coal MinePEABODY ENERGY AUSTRALIA Coal mining 26,921
Roma HubSantos Oil and gas extraction21,545
Clermont Coal OperationsClermont Coal OperationsCoal mining 21,521
V/LineV/Line CorporationRail passenger transport 20,960
Lake Vermont MineTHIESS Coal mining 19,541
NKS01 Nickel West KalgoorlieBHP NICKEL WEST Basic non-ferrous metal 17,666
Duketon South OperationsRegis Resources Metal ore mining 16,319
Daunia MineBM Alliance Coal Operations Coal mining 15,936
Fisherman's LandingCEMENT AUSTRALIA (QUEENSLAND) Cement, lime, plaster and concrete 15,005
Cockburn OperationsADBRI Cement, lime, plaster and concrete 14,615
Boyne Smelters LimitedRIO TINTO ALUMINIUM Basic non-ferrous metal 9,745
MangoolaMANGOOLA COAL OPERATIONS Coal mining 9,018
Liberty Bell BayLiberty Bell Bay Basic ferrous metal 8,762
Port Latta Pelletising PlantGRANGE RESOURCES (TASMANIA) Basic ferrous product 7,519
Australian Gas Networks (Vic) Australian Gas Networks HoldingGas supply7,487
Opal Australian Paper Maryvale MillPAPER AUSTRALIA Pulp, paper and paperboard 7,041
Moolarben Coal MineMOOLARBEN COAL OPERATIONSCoal mining 4,609
Jax MineJax Coal Coal mining 4,082
Baralaba Coal MineBARALABA COAL COMPANY Coal mining 3,841
CTC WA FacilityCENTURION TRANSPORT CO. Road freight transport 3,527
Daunia MineWHITEHAVEN DAUNIA Coal mining 3,353
South West Queensland PipelineAPA (SWQP) Pipeline and other transport 2,633
Queensland Nitrates Ammonium Nitrate PlantQueensland Nitrates Basic chemical manufacturing2,382
Mount Pleasant OperationsMACH Energy Australia Coal mining 2,304
Dongara OperationsADBRI Cement, lime, plaster and concrete 2,264
Collinsville MineNC COAL COMPANYCoal mining 1,899
Bell Bay SmelterRIO TINTO ALUMINIUM (BELL BAY) Basic non-ferrous metal 1,770
Australia's SMC surrenders 2023-24t CO2e
Facility OperatorSectorACCUs surrenderedSMCs surrendered
DEN01Dendrobium Coal Coal mining40,000196,075
United Coal MineUNITED COLLIERIES Coal mining52,973190,000
Moranbah North MineANGLO COAL (MORANBAH NORTH MANAGEMENT) Coal mining0183,699
Mandalong MineCENTENNIAL MANDALONG Coal mining32,254155,043
South Walker CreekSTANMORE RESOURCES Coal mining36,538132,501
Hunter Valley Operations mineHV OPERATIONS Coal mining60,00085,876
APLNG FacilityCONOCOPHILLIPS AUSTRALIA OPERATIONS Oil and gas extraction085,774
Murrin Murrin OperationsMURRIN MURRIN OPERATIONS Metal ore mining045,593
Kwinana Pigment PlantTronox Management Basic chemical040,869
Kwinana Alumina RefineryAlcoa of Australia Basic non-ferrous metal52,72937,849
Dawson MineANGLO COAL (DAWSON MANAGEMENT)Coal mining24,05628,862
Wagerup Alumina RefineryAlcoa of Australia Basic non-ferrous metal 37,27126,498
Phosphate HillIncitec Pivot Fertiliser and pesticide025,168
Chandala Processing PlantTronox Management Basic chemical023,215
Cloudbreak MineCHICHESTER METALS Metal ore mining8,41119,262
Solomon MineFMG SOLOMON Metal ore mining42,92619,178
NKW01 Nickel West Kwinana FacilityBHP NICKEL WEST Basic non-ferrous metal62,72017,666
Coppabella Coal MinePEABODY ENERGY AUSTRALIA PCI Coal mining015,719
Qenos Altona ManufacturingQENOS Basic chemical013,601
RailTHE PILBARA INFRASTRUCTURERail freight transport4,0029,163
Angaston OperationsADBRI Cement, lime, plaster and concrete08,968
Western Port WorksBlueScope Steel Basic ferrous metal07,642
OtwayBEACH ENERGYOil and gas extraction22,8686,935
Multinet Network and South Gippsland PipelineMULTINET GAS (DB NO. 2) Gas supply04,545
Drake MineDrake Mine Management Coal mining2,2444,082
Iron Bridge MineIB Operations Metal ore mining2,4142,146
RailtonCEMENT AUSTRALIA (GOLIATH) Cement, lime, plaster and concrete0681

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/04/16

Japan to develop geothermal power under net zero plan

Japan to develop geothermal power under net zero plan

Osaka, 16 April (Argus) — The Japanese government is gearing up to develop geothermal energy, as the clean power can help to decarbonise the power sector with stable output, unlike weather-dependent renewables such as solar and wind. The trade and industry ministry Meti on 14 April launched a public-private council to discuss the development of next-generation geothermal energy, aiming to formulate a draft guideline, including capacity and cost targets, by around October this year. The new technology could lift the country's potential geothermal capacity to at least 77GW, compared with 23.5GW based on conventional methods, according to the council. The draft plan aims to establish the next-generation geothermal technology as early as the 2030s, to expand the use of the clean energy with competitive prices toward 2040, while tacking geological challenges, such as fault and complex geology, in Japan. Should the next-generation technology, such as closed-loop and supercritical geothermal, prove practical, Japan could utilise its potential, said Meti minister Yoji Muto on 15 April. Japan could consider exporting the next-generation technology globally, as it has around 70pc global share in conventional geothermal turbines, he added. The geothermal strategy is in line with the country's new strategic energy plan (SEP) , which was published in February, as well as prime minister Shigeru Ishiba's push to develop geothermal capacity. Ishiba had focused on less-utilised and high potential geothermal, as well as micro-hydropower, during his [campaign for the ruling Liberal Democratic Party presidential election](https://direct.argusmedia.com/newsandanalysis/article/2608517) last year. The SEP assumes geothermal will account for 1-2pc of Japan's power mix in the April 2040-March 2041 fiscal year, which is relatively marginal compared with other renewables such as solar at 23-29pc, wind at 4-8pc, hydroelectric at 8-10pc and biomass at 5-6pc. But even the small share would be much higher compared with its actual share of 0.3pc of total power generation in 2023-24. Diversification of renewable power sources would be necessary to achieve Japan's plan to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 60pc in 2035-36 and by 73pc in 2040-41, respectively, against the 2013-14 level, before achieving its net zero goal in 2050. Under the SEP, Tokyo aims to reduce its dependence on thermal power to 30-40pc in 2040-41 from 71pc in 2024. Japanese private firms are already involved in further developing domestic and overseas geothermal projects. Japanese utility Hokkaido Electric Power and construction firm Obayashi said on 16 April that they will study potential geothermal resources in Hokkaido during April 2025-February 2026, taking advantage of subsidies provided by state-owned energy agency Jogmec. Japanese battery maker Panasonic Energy said on 8 April that it has signed a power purchase agreement with regional utility Kyushu Electric Power's renewable arm Kyushu Mirai Energy to secure around 50GWh/yr of geothermal-based electricity from 1 April. The stable geothermal supplies, unaffected by weather, could double a renewable ratio in its domestic power consumption to around 30pc, Panasonic said. By Motoko Hasegawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia's Fortescue announces electric drills deal


25/04/16
25/04/16

Australia's Fortescue announces electric drills deal

Sydney, 16 April (Argus) — Australian iron ore and energy company Fortescue has announced a A$350mn ($222mn) deal with Swedish firm Epiroc to buy over 50 electric drill rigs aimed at reducing emissions at its iron ore operations in Western Australia (WA). Fortescue expects the drills to reduce annual diesel consumption by around 35mn litres once it fully replaces diesel-powered equipment by 2030. The new fleet will cut more than 90,000t of CO2 emissions annually, Fortescue Metals chief executive officer Dino Otranto said on 16 April. The fleet includes autonomous electric platform and contour drills, and the first equipment arrived at Fortescue's Solomon mine in early April. The deal is part of the company's plan to replace its diesel-powered equipment by 2030. It signed a $2.8bn deal with Swiss-German manufacturer Liebherr in 2024 for a battery-powered truck fleet for its mining operations. Fortescue plans to replace around 800 pieces of heavy mining equipment with zero emissions equivalents and deploy 2-3GW of renewable energy and battery storage across the Pilbara region by the end of this decade, Otranto said. Fortescue is currently building a 190MW solar farm at its Cloudbreak mine, which will reduce annual diesel consumption by a further 125mn l. Safeguard mechanism results The company reported covered scope 1 emissions of 1.96mn t of CO2e across seven facilities in the first compliance year of Australia's reformed safeguard mechanism , which was just over 100,000t of CO2e above a combined baseline of 1.85mn t of CO2e. Facilities earn Safeguard Mechanism Credits (SMCs) under the scheme if their emissions are below baseline or must surrender Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) or SMCs if emissions are above the threshold. Fortescue earned 49,749 SMCs for its Solomon Power Station and surrendered the units across four other facilities that exceeded their baselines. It also surrendered 57,753 ACCUs, while two of its facilities — the Christmas Creek Mine and Eliwana Mine — will have to manage a combined excess of 49,382t of CO2e in future under applications for multi-year monitoring periods (MYMP), which allow eligible facilities to report under the safeguard scheme for periods of up to five years ( see table ). Fortescue expected to exceed emissions baselines by around 120,000t of CO2e in the 2023-24 year, it said in 2024. ACCU generic, generic (No AD) and human-induced regeneration (HIR) spot prices have remained below A$35 ($22) over the past two months, having declined steadily from mid-November because of lower buying interest from safeguard companies and strong SMC issuances. By Juan Weik and Susannah Cornford Fortescue's 2023-24 safeguard mechanism results t CO2e Facility Covered emissions Baseline ACCUs surrendered SMCs surrendered SMCs issued MYMP net position Solomon Mine 452,137 390,033 42,926 19,178 Solomon Power Station 316,859 366,608 49,749 Christmas Creek Mine 372,251 351,986 20,265 Cloudbreak Mine 295,132 267,459 8,411 19,262 Rail 254,871 241,706 4,002 9,163 Eliwana Mine 164,894 135,777 29,117 Iron Bridge Mine 104,560 100,000 2,414 2,146 Total 1,960,704 1,853,569 57,753 49,749 49,749 49,382 Source: Clean Energy Regulator Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Dozens of US coal plants eligible for MATS extension


25/04/15
25/04/15

Dozens of US coal plants eligible for MATS extension

Cheyenne, 15 April (Argus) — The White House has identified more than 60 fossil fuel-fired power plants that will have two extra years to comply with the more stringent mercury and air toxics standards (MATS) finalized in 2024. Under a proclamation signed by US president Donald Trump last week, the plants on the list will be able to operate under whatever existing mercury and air toxics standards they currently are subject to until 8 July 2029. That is two years after the compliance deadline put in place in May 2024. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules finalized last year tightened mercury and air toxics standards for coal- and oil-fired units by 67pc, included new emissions-monitoring requirements and added standards for lignite-fired coal plants that put them in line with those for other coal plants. EPA in March said it was reviewing the new standards and said companies could seek exemptions to the mercury rule and other emissions rules. Trump followed that up last week with a proclamation that certain generating facilities would be given a two-year exemption in complying with the 2024 rule. The White House released the list of exempt power plants late on 14 April. Most of the plants on the list are coal-fired generators, some of which were scheduled for retirement by the end of 2027. These include Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston plant and one unit of its Cumberland plant, as well as Vistra Energy's Kincaid, Baldwin and Newton plants and two coal units of Vistra's Miami Fort plant. The two coal units at Southern Company's Victor J Daniel plant in Mississippi also have been exempted from the new mercury and air toxics rules for two years. Southern had planned on retiring those units by the end of 2027, but in February, the Mississippi Public Service Commission approved two special contracts that were expected to need unit 2 of the Daniel plant and possibly a unit of a natural gas plant to run into the 2030s. Some other coal plant units owned by Southern, TVA and Vistra also are now exempt from the July 2027 mercury and air toxics compliance deadline. So are some plant units owned by East Kentucky Power Cooperative (EKPC), NRG, Ameren and Entergy. At least two natural gas plant units — unit 5 of Southern's Plant Barry and City Utilities of Springfield's John Twitty Energy Center, which has coal and natural gas generation — are exempt from the July 2027 deadline. So is unit 5 of Entergy's RS Nelson plant, which runs on petroleum coke. Essentially all of the other units in the White House's list are coal units, including Otter Tail Power's Big Stone and Coyote Station plants in North Dakota. Otter Tail said it had requested the exemptions "to avoid making unnecessary expenditures" if EPA decides to roll back the 2024 rule. EKPC said it was "grateful" its request to exempt the Spurlock and Cooper coal-fired power plants in Kentucky was granted and that the company "will continue to operate the plants in accordance with all market and environmental rules." NRG said it was still reviewing the order, but did not expect it to have any effect on its plans. TVA, Southern, Vistra and owners of other power plants given compliance extensions did not respond to requests for comment. By Courtney Schlisserman Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Net zero banking body ups flexibility for climate goals


25/04/15
25/04/15

Net zero banking body ups flexibility for climate goals

London, 15 April (Argus) — The Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) will increase flexibility around climate targets in its framework, allowing its members to set targets aligned with the upper temperature limit sought by the Paris climate agreement. Members voted to introduce less stringent targets "in response to changing external circumstances and member needs", the NZBA said today. The NZBA is a voluntary global initiative with more than 120 banks as members. The group aims to align financing with reaching net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050 — in line with the Paris agreement. The Paris accord seeks to limit the rise in global temperature to "well below" 2°C above pre-industrial levels, while pursuing efforts to limit this to 1.5°C. Members "voted overwhelmingly in favour of adopting proposed changes", the NZBA said today. Banks that join the alliance commit to developing long-term and intermediate targets towards net zero GHG emissions and to reporting on progress towards these. The changes to the guidance "acknowledge a wider range of net zero pathways that align with the temperature goals of the Paris agreement… This acknowledgment increases flexibility for banks with exposures to a range of markets and sectors to manage targets and transition across their balance sheet", the NZBA said. The alliance also intends to further support members, including around sectoral engagement and to help members understand new and emerging practices and approaches. "Over 100 member banks have already set independent sectoral targets using net zero by 2050 1.5°C pathways. There is nothing in the adopted changes that would cause them to move away from this. 1.5°C remains the guiding star", an NZBA spokesperson told Argus . But the alliance noted that in recent years "the external landscape for banks has rapidly changed". The amended framework recognises that "net zero transitions in the real economy are progressing at different speeds across sectors and regions and that regulatory requirements for climate risk and disclosure have increased in some jurisdictions", the spokesperson said. Several large US banks exited the initiative earlier this year , days ahead of US President Donald Trump's return to the White House. Netherlands-based, sustainability-focused Triodos Bank today said that it would leave the NZBA, as "the new guidelines fall short of the needed urgency to align loans and investments portfolios" with the 1.5°C goal. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

UN carbon market advances on leakage, baseline issues


25/04/15
25/04/15

UN carbon market advances on leakage, baseline issues

Berlin, 15 April (Argus) — The UN's climate arm the UNFCCC has further refined rules relating to greenhouse gas (GHG) leakage and emissions reduction baselines for generating credits under the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (Pacm). The mechanism's methodological expert panel drew up a draft standard on addressing GHG leakage at its fifth meeting last week, clarifying definitions such as "positive" and "negative" leakage, the "activity boundary" and "controlled" sources of GHG. The standard clarifies that the avoidance or minimisation of leakage only applies to negative leakage, even while avoidance of leakage is not possible in all instances. The standard will apply to both emission reductions and removals, and will focus on project-level activities, with a future version to address larger-scale activities such as national crediting programmes. And a draft standard on setting the baseline against which emissions reductions are measured, to prevent over-crediting, outlined the importance of ensuring that the downward adjusted historical baseline of emissions is at least as low as the conservative business-as-usual scenario. The panel proposed future regular revisions of the standard to allow for advances in best available technology, or for mitigation actions implemented at larger and therefore more cost-efficient scales. The panel also suggested some guidance may be needed to determine the scenario for certain types of carbon removal activities. The two draft standards will be put to the Pacm regulator — the supervisory body of the mechanism's governing Article 6.4 of the Paris climate agreement — for adoption. The panel was set up in early 2024 after countries at the UN Cop 28 climate summit in December 2023 threw out the supervisory body's proposals for the mechanism. The panel at its meeting also made progress on the concept of "suppressed demand", which must be taken into account by the Pacm to allow some increase in emissions to enable a host country's socio-economic development. It agreed on the conservative level of 1,000kWh/per capita to "minimise" over-crediting. The panel also progressed on addressing the non-permanence of emissions reductions, with a focus on instances of late, incomplete or missing monitoring reports, deciding on appropriate notification timing and relevant consequences. And it continued work on revising methodologies from the Pacm's predecessor, the clean development mechanism (CDM). The Pacm's first credits will be from transitioned CDM projects. But from next year, all Pacm credits must adhere to their own methodologies. The panel will next meet at the end of May. Stakeholders planning to propose new methodologies and methodological tools for consideration at that meeting must submit them by 21 April. By Chloe Jardine Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more