The European gas market showed only a limited downward reaction this morning to the US election result, and while some market participants expect a second Donald Trump presidency to ease geopolitical tensions, others see the potential for destabilising effects in the medium term.
While vote counting was still ongoing at the time of publication and vice-president Kamala Harris has yet to concede defeat, the Associated Press and major US television networks have concluded that Trump secured enough votes in the Electoral College to win the presidency. European gas prices fell during morning trading, despite the US dollar strengthening by about two basis points against the euro. European gas prices typically move higher in euro terms when the US dollar strengthens to offset the higher cost of dollar-denominated LNG supply.
Some market participants attributed the small price fall during morning trading to the expectation that a second Trump administration would seek de-escalation on several geopolitical fronts — such as in Ukraine and the Middle East — which, they say, had supported gas prices in recent weeks.
But European gas prices reversed their limited gains by the 16:30 GMT market close. And the European gas price reaction was notably muted relative to the considerable volatility of less than a week ago when a media report had raised the prospect of an imminent deal between European buyers and Azerbaijan for gas transit through Ukraine. These European buyers later denied that a contract would soon be signed.
Few market participants foresee a material effect on the gas market stemming from the US election result.
"The impact is too vague to really price in," a trading firm said.
"Given the tight global supply-demand balance, any setback will be short-lived," another market participant said.
The result may fuel speculation that the war between Russia and Ukraine could come to an end sooner, but with the new president set to take office in late January, the change in presidency will have no effect on the possibility of reaching a deal that would allow Russian gas flows through Ukraine to continue beyond the expiry of the transit contract and interconnection agreements between the two countries at the end of this year.
If a normalisation of relations with Russia leads a Trump administration to unblock sanctions preventing the use of the Novatek-led 19.8mn t/yr Arctic LNG 2 export terminal, this might bring more LNG supply to the market in 2025 than previously envisaged.
Looking further ahead, Trump's pledge to reverse incumbent president Joe Biden administration's LNG licensing pause and speed up the approval of new liquefaction projects may have boosted expectations of global LNG supply towards the end of this decade.
But other market participants expressed concern about a potential threat to US LNG exports to Europe in the medium term if the new administration opts not to co-operate with the EU on establishing a framework for monitoring, reporting and verifying methane emissions, which may hamper US-EU LNG trade flows once the EU methane emissions regulation is fully implemented. This, coupled with a "drill, baby, drill" policy in the US domestic market, may lead to a deeper gulf between the two markets, some said.
Trump's pledge to impose tariffs on imports into the US, particularly against China, may trigger the risk of retaliation that could affect LNG flows from existing facilities — as was the case in 2019, when deliveries of US LNG to China fell to zero as a result of the trade war between the two countries, before rebounding sharply in 2021 after the two countries agreed on a preliminary trade deal. Only one Chinese buyer had US offtake at the time, but many more subsequently signed on for US LNG, totalling about 22mn t/yr from existing and planned liquefaction projects.
