

Weight of Freight: Size Matters – owners and charterers adjust to a changing tanker market
From 1967 until the oil crisis of 1973 there were orders for about 80 very large crude carriers (VLCC) and 40 ultra large crude carriers (ULCC), according to engine manufacturer Wartsila. This boom was followed by the total collapse of the newbuild market for these tankers until the middle of the 1980s. Since then, over 400 VLCC have been ordered, but it took more than 20 years before the next ULCC contract was signed.
The new TI class of ULCCs were delivered in the early 2000s, but within a decade most had been converted to floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels (FSOs) for use in the Mideast Gulf and southeast Asia. Prizing quantity over flexibility, these ships were wider than the new Panama Canal locks (begun in 2007 and completed in 2016), and could not travel through the Suez Canal unless on a ballast voyage.
Their massive capacity of more than 3mn barrels of crude oil reflected climbing global oil demand – almost double what it was in 1973 – and China’s arrival as the world's largest importer of crude oil. Some forecasters now predict oil demand will peak in 2030, reducing the need for supertankers, but other forces have seen shipowners and others return to newbuilding markets for VLCCs in recent months.
Pandemics, infrastructure projects, price wars and actual wars have moved and lengthened trade flows in the last four years, making larger vessels more attractive because of their economies of scale. These have impacted the make-up of the global tanker fleet in other ways as well, such as prompting a small recovery in interest in small Panamax tankers, which have long been sliding out of existence.
The role of vessel size in tanker freight markets is sometimes underappreciated. In the wake of the G7+ ban on imports of Russian crude and oil and products, and attacks on merchant shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden by Yemen’s Houthi militants, flows of crude oil have had to make massive diversions. Russian crude oil is flowing now to India and China rather than to Europe, while Europe’s imports of oil, diesel and jet fuel from the Mideast Gulf are taking two weeks longer, going around the Cape of Good Hope to avoid Houthi attacks. This has pushed up tonne-miles – a measure of shipping demand – to record levels. Global clean Long Range 2 (LR2) tanker tonne-miles rose to a record high in May this year, data from analytics firm Kpler show, while tonne-miles for dirty Aframax tankers rose to a record high in May last year. It has also supported freight rates.
High freight rates have brought smaller vessels into competition with larger tankers, at the same time as long routes have increased the appeal of larger ships. The Atlantic basin appears to be key site for increases in production (from the US, Brazil, Guyana and even Namibia), and an eastward shift in refining capacity globally will further entrench these long routes and demand for economies of scale.
Aframax and LR2 tankers are the same sized ships carrying around 80,000-120,000t of crude oil or products. LR2 tankers have coated tanks, which allows them to carry both dirty and clean cargoes, and shipowners may switch their
LR2/Aframax vessels between the clean and dirty markets, with expensive cleaning, depending on which offers them the best returns. But an unusually high number of VLCCs – at least six – have also switched from dirty to clean recently. Shipowner Okeanis, which now has three of its VLCCs transporting clean products, said it had cleaned up another one in the third quarter.
A VLCC switching from crude to products is very rare. Switching to clean products from crude is estimated to cost around $1mn for a VLCC. It takes several days to clean the vessel's tanks, during which time the tanker is not generating revenue. But a seasonal slide in VLCC rates in the northern hemisphere this summer has made cleaning an attractive option for shipowners, while their economies of scale make the larger tankers more attractive to clean charterers as product voyages lengthen.
Argus assessed the cost of shipping a 280,000t VLCC of crude from the Mideast Gulf to northwest Europe or the Mediterranean averaged $10.52/t in June, much lower than the average cost of $67.94/t for shipping a 90,000t LR2 clean oil cargo on the same route in the same period. It is likely these vessels will stay in the products market, as cleaning a ship is a costly undertaking for a single voyage.
Typically, a VLCC will only carry a clean cargo when it is new and on its inaugural voyage, but just one new VLCC has joined the fleet this year, further incentivising traders to clean up vessels as demand for larger ones increases. This year has seen a jump in demand for new VLCCs, with 29 ordered so far. There were 20 ordered in 2023, just six in 2023 and 32 in the whole of 2021, Kpler data show. But the vast majority of these new VLCCs will not hit the water until 2026, 2027 or later because of a shortage of shipyard capacity.
Last year and 2024 also saw the first substantial newbuilding orders for Panamax tankers, also called LR1s, since 2017. Product tanker owner Hafnia and trader Mercuria recently partnered to launch a Panamax pool. The rationale may be that Panamax vessels can pass through the older locks at the Panama Canal, and so are not subject to the same draft restrictions imposed because of drought that has throttled transits and led to shipowners paying exorbitant auction fees to transit.
Aframaxes and MRs will remain the workhorses of crude and product tanker markets respectively, but the stretching and discombobulation of trade routes (which appear likely to stay) has already driven changes in which vessels are used and which are ordered. When these ships hit the water, they will join a tanker market very different to the one owners and charterers were operating in just four years ago.
Spotlight content
Related news
Timing for EU's 2040 climate goal slips
Timing for EU's 2040 climate goal slips
Brussels, 17 March (Argus) — The European Commission appears to have pushed back an official proposal for a 2040 climate target for the EU, which will further delay the bloc's submission of a 2035 climate plan to the UN. The commission's agenda does not include the presentation of a legal proposal for a 2040 climate target before the end of the first quarter. The commission in February 2024 confirmed its preference for a 90pc cut in greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) by 2040, from a 1990 baseline — but this was not a formal proposal. The commission had scheduled an amendment to the European Climate Law for the first quarter of 2025. That amendment would write an intermediate target for 2040 into EU law. The 2040 target would also provide the basis for the EU's updated nationally determined contribution (NDC) — or climate plan — to UN climate body the UNFCCC. Countries and jurisdictions were expected to submit updated NDCs, covering up to 2035, to the UNFCCC by 10 February. Officials said work is "ongoing" on the bloc's 2040 climate target. It would be presented "sooner rather than later" and there is still "time left until the end of the first quarter". An EU source indicated reluctance to present a 2040 climate plan before Poland's presidential elections on 18 May, which may have a runoff on 1 June. Poland chairs meetings of EU ministers until 1 July. The source also said several other parties to the UNFCCC have missed the 10 February deadline to submit their 2035 emissions reduction targets. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
UK launches anti-dumping probe into US-origin HVO
UK launches anti-dumping probe into US-origin HVO
London, 17 March (Argus) — The UK today began an anti-dumping investigation into hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) from the US. An application for the investigation was lodged by the UK Renewable Transport Fuel Association (RTFA) and UK-based biofuels producers Greenergy, Argent Energy and Olleco. The goods subject to investigation are "biodiesel obtained from synthesis or hydrotreatment of oils and fats of non-fossil origin, in pure form or as included in a blend". The UK trade remedies authority (TRA) specified that sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is excluded from this definition. The investigation period spans from 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2024. During this time, the applicants allege HVO was imported into the UK at prices below the "normal value". They say this alleged dumping led to an actual and potential decline in production, domestic sales, and profitability. The UK removed transposed EU anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of HVO from the US and Canada in 2022. The EU first imposed anti-dumping duties for US-origin HVO in 2009 , and the current duties are in place until August 2026. Those in the market said the effect of the UK investigation is being mitigated by proposed guidance on the US 45Z clean fuel production credits released earlier this year. This has already slowed discussions around new imports of US-origin HVO into T1 duty markets. The guidance does not allow US producers to claim the tax credit using imported used cooking oil (UCO), meaning US supply of UCO-based HVO could decrease or be reserved for the domestic market, participants said. HVO, or renewable diesel, is a drop-in biofuel that can go well beyond the European 7pc blend wall for biodiesel. UK HVO consumption increased by 38pc on the year in 2024 to 699mn l, according to the latest provisional release of UK Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation statistics . This was mostly due to increased imports of US-origin HVO, according to market participants. Interested parties must register by 1 April, after which they will be able to submit comments. The TRA aims to make a final recommendation in March 2026. By Evelina Lungu Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Energean-Carlyle gas assets deal under threat
Energean-Carlyle gas assets deal under threat
London, 17 March (Argus) — Greek independent Energean has said a deal to sell its gas assets in Egypt, Italy and Croatia to US private equity fund Carlyle may collapse owing to incomplete government approvals. Carlyle has still not received certain regulatory approvals from Italy and Egypt and has only three days left do so under the terms of the original agreement, Energean said. Energean said it has been unable to agree with Carlyle to extend the deadline beyond 20 March. Carlyle had agreed to pay up to $945mn for the assets , which it expects to produce 47,000 b/d of oil equivalent. The collapse of the deal would throw into doubt Carlyle's plan to set up a Mediterranean-focused exploration and production company led by ex-BP chief executive Tony Hayward. For Energean, the deal was set to help pay down debt and focus its resources on Israel and Morocco. The company said it is still committed to closing the transaction. By Aydin Calik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Support for 45V solidifies ahead of US budget tussle
Support for 45V solidifies ahead of US budget tussle
Houston, 17 March (Argus) — Hydrogen advocates and industry stakeholders have redoubled efforts in Washington DC to make sure 45V production tax credits survive what is expected to be a bruising battle to pay for GOP tax cuts. "After a period of silence in January, we're seeing a sense of unity within the industry and we've gotten a lot more reception from members of Congress and the administration," said Frank Wolak, chief executive officer of Fuel Cell & Hydrogen Energy Association (FCHEA), while attending the CERAWeek S&P Global conference in Houston, Texas, last week. "That is a huge, milestone difference from even a month ago. I'm guardedly optimistic." President Donald Trump's flurry of executive decisions targeting clean energy supports inserted a new round of uncertainty for developers hoping to tap the lucrative tax credit, which came out of former President Joe Biden's signature climate bill, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). While the tax credit is still intact, the administration's embrace of fossil fuels has ignited concerns that 45V could be vulnerable as the GOP seek offsets to pay for a multi-trillion-dollar tax cut. As a part of the tax code, 45V requires an act of Congress to overturn it, which protects the incentive from the vagaries of executive decisionmaking but still leaves it exposed to opposing interests in a budget fight. During negotiations related to the national debt, a special parliamentary procedure can be triggered to expedite federal budget legislation by overriding the need for a super majority of votes. "Everything is on the chopping block," said Wolak. Hydrogen proponents point to the broad coalition that has emerged as an encouraging sign, with oil and gas companies throwing their political heft into the effort to protect 45V and Republican lawmakers publicly lauding the job creation by IRA-related tax credits. Powerful friends One major energy company is advocating directly and indirectly through trade associations to keep 45V intact. It believes the credits are crucial to erecting a new industry in the US and will become less necessary as the market matures and drives down costs. ExxonMobil chief executive officer Darren Woods, who expressed support for the tax credit during the company's fourth-quarter earnings call, also said the credits are an interim step for a nascent market. "We believe these incentives are critical to establishing a fully market-based future where hydrogen competes head-to-head with traditional fuels," he said in January. Last week, 21 Republican legislators whose districts have benefited economically from investments driven by the IRA issued a letter of support for incentives amid what it called "efforts to repeal or reform current energy tax credits." "Affordable and abundant energy will be critical as the President works to onshore domestic manufacturing, supply chains, and good paying jobs, particularly in Republican-run states due to their business-friendly environments," said the letter, which was organized by Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R-New York.) Garbarino issued a similar letter last fall urging House leader Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) to protect IRA tax credits and picked up three more signatures this time. "This is significant," said Paul Dainora, chief commercial officer of electrolyzer maker Ohmium, in reference to the letter. "These tax credits are really important for our customers to build a business case." The Silicon Valley-based company is pursuing up to 250 megawatts of projects in the US this year but none of the larger projects will reach final investment decision before the fate of 45V is certain, said Dainora, who was also attending CERAWeek. The credits are considered so important for US hydrogen prospects that the chief executive officer of another global electrolyzer manufacturer has visited Washington from Europe multiple times in the last month to participate in efforts to buttress support for 45V, said a person involved in the visits who was unauthorized to speak publicly about them. Instead of focusing on hydrogen's cleaner emissions, industry talking points have coalesced around America's interest in maintaining energy dominance, said the person. Pointing to rising demand from the European Union and Asian countries like Japan and South Korea for cleaner burning fuels, 45V supporters are stressing that China is poised to dominate the industry if the US doesn't build its own hydrogen capacity. While businesses await an outcome, advocates take comfort from the fact that the process will wrap up in the next couple of months and allow companies to advance to FID. "We sat idle for two and a half years waiting for determination of what these tax rates would look like," said Wolak of the FCHEA, referring to the long period of uncertainty during which the Biden administration finalized the exact rules for 45V. "This next phase is make-or-break time but it's a short-term window. By Jasmina Kelemen Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
