

Weight of Freight: Size Matters – owners and charterers adjust to a changing tanker market
From 1967 until the oil crisis of 1973 there were orders for about 80 very large crude carriers (VLCC) and 40 ultra large crude carriers (ULCC), according to engine manufacturer Wartsila. This boom was followed by the total collapse of the newbuild market for these tankers until the middle of the 1980s. Since then, over 400 VLCC have been ordered, but it took more than 20 years before the next ULCC contract was signed.
The new TI class of ULCCs were delivered in the early 2000s, but within a decade most had been converted to floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels (FSOs) for use in the Mideast Gulf and southeast Asia. Prizing quantity over flexibility, these ships were wider than the new Panama Canal locks (begun in 2007 and completed in 2016), and could not travel through the Suez Canal unless on a ballast voyage.
Their massive capacity of more than 3mn barrels of crude oil reflected climbing global oil demand – almost double what it was in 1973 – and China’s arrival as the world's largest importer of crude oil. Some forecasters now predict oil demand will peak in 2030, reducing the need for supertankers, but other forces have seen shipowners and others return to newbuilding markets for VLCCs in recent months.
Pandemics, infrastructure projects, price wars and actual wars have moved and lengthened trade flows in the last four years, making larger vessels more attractive because of their economies of scale. These have impacted the make-up of the global tanker fleet in other ways as well, such as prompting a small recovery in interest in small Panamax tankers, which have long been sliding out of existence.
The role of vessel size in tanker freight markets is sometimes underappreciated. In the wake of the G7+ ban on imports of Russian crude and oil and products, and attacks on merchant shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden by Yemen’s Houthi militants, flows of crude oil have had to make massive diversions. Russian crude oil is flowing now to India and China rather than to Europe, while Europe’s imports of oil, diesel and jet fuel from the Mideast Gulf are taking two weeks longer, going around the Cape of Good Hope to avoid Houthi attacks. This has pushed up tonne-miles – a measure of shipping demand – to record levels. Global clean Long Range 2 (LR2) tanker tonne-miles rose to a record high in May this year, data from analytics firm Kpler show, while tonne-miles for dirty Aframax tankers rose to a record high in May last year. It has also supported freight rates.
High freight rates have brought smaller vessels into competition with larger tankers, at the same time as long routes have increased the appeal of larger ships. The Atlantic basin appears to be key site for increases in production (from the US, Brazil, Guyana and even Namibia), and an eastward shift in refining capacity globally will further entrench these long routes and demand for economies of scale.
Aframax and LR2 tankers are the same sized ships carrying around 80,000-120,000t of crude oil or products. LR2 tankers have coated tanks, which allows them to carry both dirty and clean cargoes, and shipowners may switch their
LR2/Aframax vessels between the clean and dirty markets, with expensive cleaning, depending on which offers them the best returns. But an unusually high number of VLCCs – at least six – have also switched from dirty to clean recently. Shipowner Okeanis, which now has three of its VLCCs transporting clean products, said it had cleaned up another one in the third quarter.
A VLCC switching from crude to products is very rare. Switching to clean products from crude is estimated to cost around $1mn for a VLCC. It takes several days to clean the vessel's tanks, during which time the tanker is not generating revenue. But a seasonal slide in VLCC rates in the northern hemisphere this summer has made cleaning an attractive option for shipowners, while their economies of scale make the larger tankers more attractive to clean charterers as product voyages lengthen.
Argus assessed the cost of shipping a 280,000t VLCC of crude from the Mideast Gulf to northwest Europe or the Mediterranean averaged $10.52/t in June, much lower than the average cost of $67.94/t for shipping a 90,000t LR2 clean oil cargo on the same route in the same period. It is likely these vessels will stay in the products market, as cleaning a ship is a costly undertaking for a single voyage.
Typically, a VLCC will only carry a clean cargo when it is new and on its inaugural voyage, but just one new VLCC has joined the fleet this year, further incentivising traders to clean up vessels as demand for larger ones increases. This year has seen a jump in demand for new VLCCs, with 29 ordered so far. There were 20 ordered in 2023, just six in 2023 and 32 in the whole of 2021, Kpler data show. But the vast majority of these new VLCCs will not hit the water until 2026, 2027 or later because of a shortage of shipyard capacity.
Last year and 2024 also saw the first substantial newbuilding orders for Panamax tankers, also called LR1s, since 2017. Product tanker owner Hafnia and trader Mercuria recently partnered to launch a Panamax pool. The rationale may be that Panamax vessels can pass through the older locks at the Panama Canal, and so are not subject to the same draft restrictions imposed because of drought that has throttled transits and led to shipowners paying exorbitant auction fees to transit.
Aframaxes and MRs will remain the workhorses of crude and product tanker markets respectively, but the stretching and discombobulation of trade routes (which appear likely to stay) has already driven changes in which vessels are used and which are ordered. When these ships hit the water, they will join a tanker market very different to the one owners and charterers were operating in just four years ago.
Spotlight content
Related news
EU prepares CBAM export scheme
EU prepares CBAM export scheme
Brussels, 17 March (Argus) — The European Commission is preparing a "solution" for exported goods under the bloc's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), to be presented before the end of the year. The commission will also expand the scope of the CBAM to "certain" steel and aluminium-intensive downstream products. The changes to the CBAM will be announced as part of a European steel and metals plan. In a draft of the plan to be formally presented on 19 March, the commission points to the need to address the problem of carbon leakage for CBAM goods exported from the EU to non-EU countries. The draft also notes that the commission is currently "quantifying" risks, before proposing an extension of the CBAM to "certain" steel and aluminium-intensive downstream products, so as to address the risk of European producers relocating outside the bloc to avoid higher carbon costs. The metals plan also announces an anti-circumvention strategy for the CBAM to be presented in the second half of 2025. The commission points to the risk of goods from low-carbon production facilities in non-EU countries being redirected to European customers, while carbon-intensive production continues for other markets. The metals plan also points to the risk of "greenwashing" carbon accounting practices, with "electro-intensive metals production benefiting from market-based instruments to appear low-carbon". The commission put forward proposals last month to simplify the CBAM, exempting some 90pc of the firms currently covered by the mechanism. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Timing for EU's 2040 climate goal slips
Timing for EU's 2040 climate goal slips
Brussels, 17 March (Argus) — The European Commission appears to have pushed back an official proposal for a 2040 climate target for the EU, which will further delay the bloc's submission of a 2035 climate plan to the UN. The commission's agenda does not include the presentation of a legal proposal for a 2040 climate target before the end of the first quarter. The commission in February 2024 confirmed its preference for a 90pc cut in greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) by 2040, from a 1990 baseline — but this was not a formal proposal. The commission had scheduled an amendment to the European Climate Law for the first quarter of 2025. That amendment would write an intermediate target for 2040 into EU law. The 2040 target would also provide the basis for the EU's updated nationally determined contribution (NDC) — or climate plan — to UN climate body the UNFCCC. Countries and jurisdictions were expected to submit updated NDCs, covering up to 2035, to the UNFCCC by 10 February. Officials said work is "ongoing" on the bloc's 2040 climate target. It would be presented "sooner rather than later" and there is still "time left until the end of the first quarter". An EU source indicated reluctance to present a 2040 climate plan before Poland's presidential elections on 18 May, which may have a runoff on 1 June. Poland chairs meetings of EU ministers until 1 July. The source also said several other parties to the UNFCCC have missed the 10 February deadline to submit their 2035 emissions reduction targets. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
UK launches anti-dumping probe into US-origin HVO
UK launches anti-dumping probe into US-origin HVO
London, 17 March (Argus) — The UK today began an anti-dumping investigation into hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) from the US. An application for the investigation was lodged by the UK Renewable Transport Fuel Association (RTFA) and UK-based biofuels producers Greenergy, Argent Energy and Olleco. The goods subject to investigation are "biodiesel obtained from synthesis or hydrotreatment of oils and fats of non-fossil origin, in pure form or as included in a blend". The UK trade remedies authority (TRA) specified that sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is excluded from this definition. The investigation period spans from 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2024. During this time, the applicants allege HVO was imported into the UK at prices below the "normal value". They say this alleged dumping led to an actual and potential decline in production, domestic sales, and profitability. The UK removed transposed EU anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of HVO from the US and Canada in 2022. The EU first imposed anti-dumping duties for US-origin HVO in 2009 , and the current duties are in place until August 2026. Those in the market said the effect of the UK investigation is being mitigated by proposed guidance on the US 45Z clean fuel production credits released earlier this year. This has already slowed discussions around new imports of US-origin HVO into T1 duty markets. The guidance does not allow US producers to claim the tax credit using imported used cooking oil (UCO), meaning US supply of UCO-based HVO could decrease or be reserved for the domestic market, participants said. HVO, or renewable diesel, is a drop-in biofuel that can go well beyond the European 7pc blend wall for biodiesel. UK HVO consumption increased by 38pc on the year in 2024 to 699mn l, according to the latest provisional release of UK Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation statistics . This was mostly due to increased imports of US-origin HVO, according to market participants. Interested parties must register by 1 April, after which they will be able to submit comments. The TRA aims to make a final recommendation in March 2026. By Evelina Lungu Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Energean-Carlyle gas assets deal under threat
Energean-Carlyle gas assets deal under threat
London, 17 March (Argus) — Greek independent Energean has said a deal to sell its gas assets in Egypt, Italy and Croatia to US private equity fund Carlyle may collapse owing to incomplete government approvals. Carlyle has still not received certain regulatory approvals from Italy and Egypt and has only three days left do so under the terms of the original agreement, Energean said. Energean said it has been unable to agree with Carlyle to extend the deadline beyond 20 March. Carlyle had agreed to pay up to $945mn for the assets , which it expects to produce 47,000 b/d of oil equivalent. The collapse of the deal would throw into doubt Carlyle's plan to set up a Mediterranean-focused exploration and production company led by ex-BP chief executive Tony Hayward. For Energean, the deal was set to help pay down debt and focus its resources on Israel and Morocco. The company said it is still committed to closing the transaction. By Aydin Calik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
