Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Venezuelan fertilizer giant wins US sanctions waiver

  • Spanish Market: Fertilizers, Petrochemicals
  • 12/06/19

Venezuelan state-owned fertilizer producer Monomeros Colombo Venezolanos, now in the hands of Venezuela's political opposition, says it expects to regain its leading share of the Colombian market in less than a year.

New interim chief executive Jon Bilbao, who was named head of Monomeros' ad hoc board of directors in March by Venezuela's self-declared interim president Juan Guaido, said the US Treasury issued a letter on 7 June exempting the Barranquilla-based company from sanctions against its parent firm, Venezuelan state-owned petrochemicals company Pequiven and state-owned oil company PdV.

"Monomeros now has complete freedom to re-establish unlimited commercial relations with raw material suppliers and with Colombian banks," Bilbao said in the statement obtained by Argus.

The Treasury license was issued after Colombia's government through its embassy in Washington and Guaido's designated ambassador to Colombia Humberto Calderon Berti interceded on the company's behalf.

The new license from the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (Ofac) "permits Monomeros to freely engage without any restrictions in financial operations with Colombian and international banks," Calderon said in a statement. "The license also allows suppliers, banks and third parties to engage in all types of financial and commercial transactions without any type of restrictions or sanctions by Ofac."

The sanctions prohibited Monomeros from commercially financing raw material purchases for more than 30 days and shut down its access to credit lines. The license permits Monomeros to resume normal commercial financing of up to 120 days for its local and imported raw material purchases. Credit lines with Colombian and other non-Venezuelan banks already are being re-established, the statement from Monomeros adds.

Before the US sanctions were imposed against PdV and Pequiven, Monomeros was generating over $450mn in annual revenues and had a market capitalization of about $270mn.

Bilbao said the license will allow it to ramp up fertilizers production from about 40pc of capacity to nearly 100pc within six months. Raising output at Monomeros during second-half 2019 should erase by no later than the end of first quarter 2020 combined losses of almost $26mn that were accumulated from January 2018 to May 2019 due to the US sanctions.

Monomeros aims within a year to expand its share of the Colombian fertilizer market to as high as 60pc from about 40pc.

Revenues and profits generated by Monomeros will not be repatriated to Pequiven, PdV or any entity representing the government of disputed president Nicolas Maduro, the company says. Details on how Monomeros will administrate its finances including any profits were not disclosed, but an aide to Guaido in Caracas tells Argus that "revenues that belong to the Venezuelan people will be safeguarded transparently."

Monomeros will not re-establish commercial relations with its parent firm Pequiven or any other Pequiven subsidiaries that remain subject to US sanctions, including the 2.8mn t/yr Fertinitro urea and ammonia producer. Urea and ammonia that Monomeros formerly imported from Venezuela to manufacture fertilizer will be sourced elsewhere, including suppliers in the US, Europe and Middle East.

Monomeros eventually hopes to re-establish commercial links with Pequiven after a new government is elected in Venezuela and US sanctions are lifted, Guaido's aide indicated.

But restoring Pequiven's ammonia and urea production facilities including the inoperative Moron complex in Carabobo state and the mothballed Fertinitro complex in Anzoategui state likely will take several years to achieve from the date sanctions are finally removed, the aide added.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

13/01/25

Mexico’s industrial output up 0.1pc in November

Mexico’s industrial output up 0.1pc in November

Mexico City, 13 January (Argus) — Mexico's industrial production edged up 0.1pc in November, as gains in autos and other manufacturing offset weaker construction, national statistics agency Inegi said. Mexican bank Banorte described the monthly increase as "rather small," noting it followed a 1.1pc decline in October and was largely driven by base comparison effects. The bank added that the overall industrial outlook remained "fragile." Manufacturing, which represents 63pc of Inegi's seasonally adjusted industrial activity indicator (IMAI), increased by 0.7pc in November, though it failed to fully recover from a 1.7pc drop in October. Transportation manufacturing, a key subsector accounting for 12pc of the sector, rose by 3.8pc after a steep 4.3pc decline the prior month. Despite recent volatility, Mexico's auto sector achieved record annual light vehicle production in 2024, reaching 3.99mn units. Yet, automaker association AMIA warned of potential challenges in 2025 because of economic uncertainty, which could affect investment and demand. Mining, which makes up 12pc of the IMAI, increased by 0.1pc in November following a 1.1pc decline in October. Growth was driven by a 41.4pc jump in mining-related services, while oil and gas output fell by 2.4pc, marking a fifth consecutive monthly decline for hydrocarbons. Construction, representing 19pc of the IMAI, contracted by 1.8pc in November after modest gains of 0.2pc in October and 1.1pc in September. As industry eyes potential policy shifts under US president-elect Donald Trump, Banorte projected a weak start to 2025 for Mexico's industrial output. But it expects momentum to build as government spending on priority infrastructure projects "moves more decisively." By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Nutrient affordability remains weak into 2025


13/01/25
13/01/25

Nutrient affordability remains weak into 2025

London, 13 January (Argus) — Global fertilizer affordability is still weak into 2025 as high fertilizer prices — mainly for urea — continue to weigh on farmer affordability. Nutrient affordability fell to 0.94 points in the first week of January, unable to recover from a declining trend that started in October 2024. An affordability index — comprised of a fertilizer and a crop index — above one indicates that fertilizers are more affordable, compared with the base year, which was set in 2004. An index below one indicates lower nutrient affordability. The fertilizer index — ⁠which includes global prices for urea, DAP and potash, adjusted by global usage — ⁠reached the highest value since October, driven by firmer urea prices, which weighs heavily on the fertilizer index owing to the relatively higher global usage when compared with DAP and potash fertilizers. Prices for urea climbed to levels last seen in late 2023, with activity ramping up across the globe. Prices appear well supported through the month with India entering the market over the weekend, seeking 1.5mn t of urea for loading by early March. A slight increase in the crop index owing to a rise in the first week of January for corn and soybeans was unable to offset higher fertilizer prices as the new year started. Crop prices for corn and soybeans, which represent 52pc of global consumption for key crops, also rose into early January following lower production estimates made by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) for the upcoming crop campaign in the US. The USDA revised earlier estimates made for the 2024-25 corn and soybeans crop by 1.8pc and 2pc, respectively. By Lili Minton and Harry Minihan Global fertilizer affordability Index Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US physical trade in ethane, propane, rose in 2024


09/01/25
09/01/25

US physical trade in ethane, propane, rose in 2024

Houston, 9 January (Argus) — Growing natural gas liquids (NGL) production in the US last year led to higher volumes of physical trading for ethane and propane in 2024, according to Argus data. Volumes of physical ethane traded at the Enterprise (EPC) storage cavern in Texas surged last year by 43pc to 90.12mn bl from 63.2mn bl in 2023, according to trades recorded by Argus . The gains in physical in-well trading activity at Mont Belvieu, the world's largest storage hub for the feedstock, came even as spot ethane prices fell in 2024 to an average of 19.03¢/USG, down from 24.59¢/USG the previous year, on the back of production gains and weaker prices for natural gas. US ethane production from gas processing averaged 2.8mn b/d in the first 10 months of 2024, up from 2.64mn b/d during the same period in 2023, according to the latest US Energy Information Administration (EIA) data. Gains in US ethane production come amid growing demand from petrochemical buyers in China and Europe, which has bolstered US ethane exports and led to additional investments by both Enterprise Products Partners and Energy Transfer in additional dock capacity for the feedstock. US ethane exports averaged 478,800 b/d in the first 10 months of 2024, down by 1.8pc from 487,600 b/d in 2023, due in part to loading delays associated with tie-in work for additional refrigeration at Gulf coast facilities. But exports in January-October 2024 were up by 17pc from the same period in 2022 on additional term contracts with international ethylene producers. Higher trading volumes in 2024 were not limited to ethane. Physical in-well trading of propane at Energy Transfer's LST storage cavern in Mont Belvieu rose by 30pc to 44.7mn bl in 2024, and in-well trading of propane at Enterprise's EPC storage cavern rose by 19pc to 68.3mn bl in 2024 versus 2023, according to trades recorded by Argus . US propane production from gas processing averaged 2.13mn b/d in January-October 2024, according to the latest available EIA data, up from 2mn b/d during the same period in 2023. LST and EPC propane prices rose in 2024 versus 2023 alongside increases in crude. Prompt-month LST propane averaged 77.12¢/USG during 2024, up from 71.13¢/USG in 2023. EPC propane averaged 77.63¢/USG in 2024, up from 70.83¢/USG in 2023. Argus publishes volume-weighted averages of physical trading at Mont Belvieu in addition to daily ranges. Ethane's traded midpoint averaged a 0.009¢/USG premium over the volume-weighted average in 2024. LST propane's traded range averaged a 0.037¢/USG discount to the volume-weighted average, and EPC propane's traded midpoint averaged a 0.143¢/USG discount to the volume-weighted average last year. By Amy Strahan Physical trading '000 bl Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Submissions in under EABC’s DAP buy-tender: Update


09/01/25
09/01/25

Submissions in under EABC’s DAP buy-tender: Update

Updates ETG's offer for lot 6 and details on Bio Green's offer for lot 6 London, 9 January (Argus) — Six trading firms submitted prices ranging from $600-639/t fob in response to Ethiopian Agricultural Businesses (EABC)'s counterbids under its 23 December tender to buy DAP. ETG, Samsung, Montage Oil, Promising International, Bio Green and Aditya Birla offered nine DAP cargoes from Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Russia and Egypt. The cargoes will likely be 50,000-60,000t. EABC has not awarded any of these latest offers yet. Argus understands that Bio Green offered Kazakh DAP, but its offer has been cancelled. EABC had initially received offers for 13 DAP cargoes from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan and China at prices ranging $639-705/t fob under the tender. It then countered , requesting revised offers at $639/t fob or below. The importer awarded lot 4 — laycan 9-15 February — to trading firm Midgulf International at $639/t fob, quoted as Jordanian product. But supplier backing for this cargo has yet to be confirmed. By Tom Hampson Submissions to EABC 23 December DAP buy tender Lot number Offering party Origin Loading port Laycan Price 1 ETG Saudi Arabia Ras Al-Khair 16-22/1/2025 $639/t fob 2 Samsung Jordan Aqaba 25-30/1/2025 $638.75/t fob 2 Montage Oil Russia Ust-Luga 25-30/1/2025 $630/t fob 5 Montage Oil Russia Ust-Luga 10-15/2/2025 $630/t fob 5 Promising International Egypt Adabiya 10-15/2/2025 $639/t fob 6 Promising International Egypt Adabiya 21-25/2/2025 $639/t fob 6 Bio Green Kazakhstan Jebel Ali 21-25/2/2025 $600/t fob 6 Aditya Birla Jordan Aqaba 21-25/2/2025 $639/t fob TBC ETG Saudi Arabia Ras Al-Khair March $639/t fob Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Q&A: Germany's PtX Fund to ramp up in round 2


09/01/25
09/01/25

Q&A: Germany's PtX Fund to ramp up in round 2

London, 9 January (Argus) — Germany's state-backed Power-to-X (PtX) Development Fund aims to help unlock investment decisions for a handful of mature renewable hydrogen and derivatives (power-to-X) projects in select countries, thereby advancing environmental and social development goals. Berlin picked Bavaria-based fund manager KGAL to control the €270mn ($279mn) purse, and it recently awarded its first €30mn to a €500mn Egyptian project that will produce 70,000 t/yr renewable ammonia. Argus spoke with the fund's managing director Thomas Engelmann about lessons learned from the first round and hopes for round two, which opens 8 January – 5 March 2025. Edited highlights follow: Which countries are eligible in round 2, how is that decided? It is the mostly the same as round one — South Africa, Brazil, Morocco, Kenya, India, Egypt — plus Colombia as a new addition. The German government selects the countries most suited for this instrument from more than 60 partner countries co-operating with the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). Not all countries have the right ecological conditions. Participating countries ideally have a workforce that is prepared to support PtX, and some potential domestic offtakers in the country. Why was Colombia added for this round? Colombia has good conditions for renewables — its electricity mix is currently 65pc hydroelectric, 4pc solar, and 30pc fossil fuels. And it plans to add 3GW offshore wind in future via government-run auctions. So Colombia should have among the cheapest PtX production. Costs in northern Colombia may reach €3.3/kg ($3.4/kg) in 2030 and €2.7/kg ($2.8/kg) by 2040, according to German research institute Fraunhofer ISE. The strong government support from Colombia also helps our goal of social transformation. What size projects will the fund support? We haven't set a minimum size, but ideally the total capital costs should be in the range of €100mn–500mn. That means €5bn 'white elephant' projects are probably not for us. We have up to €30mn available, which is definitely not enough to change the investment decision for a €5bn project. What is the €30mn grant designed to do? We bridge the gap to financial close, so our €30mn grant agreement supports the banks, supports the sponsors, acting like an airbag for the project to mitigate any kind of risks or uncertainties in the project. For us, it's non-refundable — in return we expect to see ecological and social transformation that comes from financial close and commercial operation. What key ingredients do you look for in projects? We are bound by EU state aid law, so we check very early in the process if projects are eligible. Project feasibility and technical readiness are important. We check the source of the renewable power. We check it's a profitable and reasonable business model. Clearly, we are not seeking return on investment for the PtX Development Fund, but we need to check that the equity sponsors and debt partners see a project that is economically viable. We want projects that have secured land and will reach financial close in 6-12, maybe 15 months. If a project is further away, that doesn't mean it's a bad project, it's just not ready for the purposes of this instrument. Each project must do a very intensive environmental and social impact assessment based on the lending standards of the World Bank via its International Finance Corporation (IFC). That is the minimum for eligibility before we consider its level of positive impact. Regarding impact, we want greenhouse gas emission reduction or avoidance. We want replacement of fossil fuel resources, in particular coal. We want job creation in the country and a 'just transition'. It's interesting if a project is scalable, for example, if we help with a €200mn first phase that unlocks future phases for the partners even without us. Are those criteria typical for many financiers? Correct, so it's a huge plus for a project if our fund awards a grant, as it shows the overall concept of the project has been checked according to World Bank and IFC standards. Other banks coming later or in parallel to us know the project is sustainable, complies with renewable power additionality principles, does not conflict with local water uses, and its land is free from social or ecological conflicts. Does the fund have rules on who the offtaker should be? Ideally the project would have offtakers in the country to support our target of local value creation. But not all seven countries have the possibility to absorb 100pc of the product, and clearly, we need economically viable projects. In our first-round project, part of the ammonia stays in Egypt and part will go to Europe. What lessons can developers take from round one? We realised the name PtX Development Fund could be misinterpreted, as we often had to explain that we don't have development money available — our name just means we are supporting developing countries. Hopefully in round two, those projects will return with an extra year of maturity. Second, we must clarify that the environmental and social impact assessment is of utmost importance. We very often had discussions with developers that said, "my local government is not interested in doing impact assessments on ecological or social impacts," but we, as the PtX Development Fund, cannot accept that. On technology, the starting point must be electrolysis since this instrument aims to help bring it to market and lower its cost. Yes, e-fuels production needs some carbon molecules, but we don't want projects that are completely biomass with no electrolysis involved. And what did you learn about the wider PtX industry? We were positively surprised to get 98 expressions of interest totalling €150bn potential investment and 56GW electrolyser capacity across these countries. But most projects were still in feasibility studies. We followed up with around 10pc of interested parties, then after deeper due diligence, held negotiations with 2-3 projects. We see the technology for PtX is ready, but finding offtakers able to pay the premium for CO2-neutral products is hard. Mandates with penalties, like the EU's e-SAF quota, definitely stimulate the market, but it would be better if they started in 2025-26 rather than 2030. Green ammonia buying for now is mainly voluntary and it depends on fertilizer companies being able to attract a premium for it to work. A green steel market is emerging in Sweden, as carmakers can attract a premium for 'green' products. We hope the EU's Renewable Energy Directive III will set quotas for ammonia and steel, but the carbon border adjustment mechanism is of utmost necessity to ensure European industry is not disadvantaged. What are your expectations for round two? Round one gave us an overview of the countries, so we really know about the quality of the projects. Now in round two, we want to support possibly several projects. Projects may enter multiple rounds and increase their quality each time until they reach an attractive level. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more