Latest Market News

SE Asian POME sellers seek support from EU legislators

  • Spanish Market: Biofuels
  • 25/05/21

Southeast Asian palm oil mill effluent (POME) producers are eyeing legislative developments in Europe with concern after Germany decided to not double count the product towards its renewable mandate.

Germany is increasing its greenhouse gas reduction obligation to 25pc by 2030 from 6pc currently with a minimum 2.6pc share of advanced feedstocks, which include POME, listed under Annex IX part A of the Renewable Energy Directive II (RED II).

But anything blended above the minimum share will be eligible for double counting towards mandates, except for POME, and Berlin is calling for it to be struck off the list completely.

POME is considered an advanced feedstock because it is derived from waste water generated from the palm oil production process and thus has a much smaller carbon footprint than crop-based feedstocks.

But its lingering connotations with palm oil make it politically toxic for many stakeholders as environmental groups cite long-running deforestation and sustainability concerns with its cultivation. The US even banned Malaysian palm oil producers Sime Darby and FGV last year because of alleged human rights abuses at their plantations, heaping further scorn on the vegetable oil.

RED II already states that palm oil should be phased out of the biofuels mix by 2030 because of its high indirect land use change cost and several EU member states are bringing this target forward despite Malaysian and Indonesian palm oil producers contesting the changes with the World Trade Organisation.

Germany will ban palm-based biofuels from 2023, following in the footsteps of France, Austria and the Netherlands, which have either already administered or planned banishment of the vegetable oil by next year.

There has also been additional scrutiny surrounding the quality of POME with reports of bad batches being delivered, off-specification product or supplies mixed with other cheaper oils, further denting its reputation.

But POME suppliers maintain that their wares are a waste material that will be produced anyway and in doing so offers much higher greenhouse gas (GHG) savings than palm oil, which is why it is listed under part A in the first place.

Traders also pointed out that POME is not widely used in Germany and that it will still contribute to the 2.6pc part A target so the impact may be limited, though their optimism was tempered by the possibility of a domino effect across other EU countries, which may follow the lead of the German parliament in disincentivising the product.

This would not be without precedent as palm fatty acid distillate was once in a similar position where it was being double counted towards European mandates, before attitude towards it soured and governments one by one reined in stimulus packages, with Finland the only country that still classifies it as a waste product.

If the same scenario plays out for POME, it may cause havoc for biofuels producers and blenders already struggling with a dearth of waste-based feedstocks.

Of the raw materials listed under part A, POME has so far been the most scalable and widely used, with a huge chunk going to Chinese renewable diesel producers, which then ship their product to Europe. But because of their processes, Chinese producers — which use multiple feedstocks, mainly POME and UCO — will find it difficult to separate the final product according to the feedstock used.

Actual POME consumption in the biofuels mix is difficult to establish as it trades and is listed under various HS codes, but the maximum potential volumes out of Malaysia and Indonesia are estimated at around 1.2mn-1.3mn t/yr.

If these supplies are no longer available, blenders across Europe will struggle to meet ambitious renewable transport targets, particularly in the short to medium term, until other part A feedstocks are able to pick up the slack.

Pressure will be further heaped on used cooking oil (UCO), which is already the most widely used waste-based feedstock and trading at record-high prices of close to $1,300/t fob China bulk because of excess demand.

UCO is listed under Annex IX part B and so while it is double counted towards mandates, it has a soft cap of 1.7pc under RED II, though several countries have stipulated in excess of this, including Germany pitching a 1.9pc share of the renewable transport fuel mix.

A detrimental impact on POME prices will also be inevitable, the extent of which will depend on legislative support, or lack thereof, provided by European governments.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

15/11/24

Adv Fame marine blend premiums to fossil hit year lows

Adv Fame marine blend premiums to fossil hit year lows

London, 15 November (Argus) — The premiums of advanced fatty acid methyl ester (Fame) 0 ARA marine biodiesel blends to fossil fuel counterparts were marked at 2024 lows on 14 November, according to Argus assessments. Calculated B30 Advanced Fame 0 dob ARA prices fell by $31.54/t to $623.25/t, the lowest since March 2023. Calculated B100 Advanced Fame 0 dob ARA values tumbled by $102.77/t to just over $820/t, their lowest since 22 November last year. Consequently, the outright premium held by the B30 blend against very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) dob ARA narrowed by $30.54/t on the day to $123.25/t on 14 November — its narrowest since 29 December 2023. B100 held a $158.52/t premium to marine gasoil (MGO) dob ARA, down by $106.77/t on the day and its lowest premium this year. EU emissions trading system (ETS) prices were assessed at $71.79/t on 14 November. Accounting for EU ETS costs on the same day, ETS-inclusive premiums held by Advanced Fame blends against their fossil counterparts hit their lowest since the introduction of EU ETS into maritime at the turn of the year. B30 Advanced Fame 0's ETS-incorporated premium against VLSFO narrowed by $31.27/t to $96.11/t on the day to 14 November. B100 Advanced Fame 0's premium against MGO dropped by $109.28/t to $66.45/t when ETS costs were accounted for. Advanced Fame marine biodiesel blend values declined with thin spot demand owing to a shift in voluntary demand east of Suez. As a result, containerships seeking to deliver proof of sustainability (PoS) documentation to their customers, to offset the latter's scope 3 emissions, shifted their marine biodiesel demand to Singapore when feasible. PoS can be obtained on a mass-balance system, allowing shipowners flexibility with regards to the port at which a blend can be bunkered. Lacklustre demand for the blends was complimented by soaring values for Dutch renewable tickets. The calculated Advanced Fame dob ARA range prices incorporate a deduction for HBE-Gs. These are a class of Dutch renewable fuels units, or HBEs, used by companies that bring liquid or gaseous fossil fuels into general circulation and are obligated to pay excise duty/energy tax on fuels. Dutch renewable HBE-G tickets were marked at €22/GJ on 14 November, their highest since Argus assessments began. Soaring HBE-G values were attributed](https://direct.argusmedia.com/newsandanalysis/article/2628738) to gains in European hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) prices, tight supply because of a decline in tickets from biofuels used in shipping and less overall biofuel blending in the fourth quarter. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Advanced Fame ARA marine biodiesel blends hit 2024 lows


14/11/24
14/11/24

Advanced Fame ARA marine biodiesel blends hit 2024 lows

London, 14 November (Argus) — Marine biodiesel blends comprising Advanced Fatty acid methyl ester (Fame) 0 hit their lowest prices so far this year on 13 November, according to Argus assessments. Calculated B30 Advanced Fame 0 dob ARA prices fell by $15.05/t to $654.79/t, the lowest since 14 December 2023. Calculated B100 Advanced Fame 0 dob ARA values tumbled by $70.60/t to $922.79/t, their lowest since 29 December 2023. The calculated dob ARA range prices incorporate a deduction for HBE-Gs. These are a class of Dutch renewable fuels units, or HBEs, used by companies that bring liquid or gaseous fossil fuels into general circulation and are obligated to pay excise duty/energy tax on fuels. The sharp drop in blend values came despite firming prices in Advanced Fame 0 fob ARA range values, which rose by $11.50/t to $1,481.25/t on 13 November — their highest since 8 July. Fossil markets also rebounded from recent drops that day, with front-month Ice Brent crude futures and gasoil futures contracts edging higher by 16:30 BST. Market participants had pointed to sluggish demand for European marine biodiesel blends in recent sessions, which may have added pressure on Advanced Fame 0 blend prices. HBE-G values have soared, weighing on the blend values for which it is accounted as a deduction. Prices for 2024 HBE-Gs had almost doubled on the month at €18.75-18.95/GJ by 13 November, up from €9.70-9.90/GJ four weeks prior. Market participants attributed the increase in 2024 prices to recent gains in European hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) prices, tight supply because of a decline in tickets from biofuels used in shipping and less overall biofuel blending in the fourth quarter. HBE-Gs surpassed the like-for-like cost physical blending of HVO class IV by 13 November, albeit marginally, which could encourage physical blending. But high demand in a tightly supplied market in the Netherlands is continuing to drive HVO prices higher. The supply tightness is the result of a combination of fewer imports, with provisional anti-dumping duties in place on Chinese volumes, and some production problems. Italy's Eni confirmed on 7 November that it has halted output at its Gela HVO unit on Sicily, for planned maintenance. Finnish producer Neste said it stopped production at its plant in Rotterdam because of a fire on 8 November. France's TotalEnergies said that the shutdown of unspecified units at its La Mede plant would result in flaring on 8 November. By Hussein Al-Khalisy and Evelina Lungu Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Singapore bunker sales jump 19.5pc in October


14/11/24
14/11/24

Singapore bunker sales jump 19.5pc in October

Singapore, 14 November (Argus) — Bunker fuel demand at the port of Singapore rose by 19.5pc on the month to 4.8mn t in October, supported by stronger enquiries from shipowners. It takes total bunker consumption at the port to 45.3mn t in the first 10 months of the year, putting Singapore on course to break last year's record high sales of 51.8mn t. The latest statistics release from the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) show consumption of both conventional and alternative marine fuels rose strongly last month as more ships refuelled in Singapore. Bio-bunkers and B24 demand hit a new record monthly high of 116,200t, taking the total for January-October to 586,500t. Consumption has already exceeded last year's 518,000t, driven by shipping emissions compliance requirements set by the EU and IMO. Demand for B24 is expected to steadily rise in the coming months ahead of the implementation of the FuelEU regulations from January 2025. Demand for LNG as a marine fuel at the port of Singapore increased by 37pc from September to 50,600t in October, which was also a new record high for monthly consumption. "In general, we are seeing bigger enquiries in the last month or so," said a London-based trader. Sales of very low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) in Singapore rose by 11.8pc from September to 2.5mn t last month, while high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) consumption jumped by 11pc to 1.8mn t. By Mahua Chakravarty Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

California RD plant signals later start up


12/11/24
12/11/24

California RD plant signals later start up

New York, 12 November (Argus) — An long-delayed project to convert a Bakersfield, California, oil refinery to produce renewable diesel (RD) has been given another extension for start up. Global Clean Energy Holdings, working to open a 15,000 b/d RD refinery, and trading house Vitol agreed last week to adjust the terms of a supply and offtake deal singed in June. The initial agreement said that Vitol could exit the agreement if the refinery was not producing at least 5,000 b/d of renewable diesel by the end of October, but that deadline has now been moved to 15 December. Global Clean Energy told Argus last month that it still has "plans in place to complete the remaining work and start up the facility" despite recently cancelling an agreement with its principal contractor. Vitol, after an initial three-year term, can now request up to three one-year extensions of the contract, up from two in the initial deal. The agreement, which cleared the way for former business partner ExxonMobil to exit, stipulates that Vitol will be the exclusive supplier of feedstocks to the plant and exclusive marketer of all fuel and environmental attributes. The revised agreement also says that if Global Clean Energy modifies its credit agreement to allow for more than $330mn in debt financing, then the renewable fuels producer will have to pay Vitol an additional fee that increases as more funds are borrowed. Global Clean Energy declined to clarify whether it had already triggered the obligation to pay Vitol the excess fee, saying that it could not provide more information ahead of filing its quarterly investor report "in the near future." If the plant begins operations as planned, it will have to contend with a challenging investment environment for biorefineries given recently low environmental credit prices and uncertainty around how president-elect Donald Trump will enforce a new federal clean fuels tax credit. At the same time, California regulators agreed last week to update the state low-carbon fuel standard, including by setting stricter carbon intensity targets that start next year. The regulatory updates lifted the prices of credits used for program compliance, which are a crucial source of revenue for companies bringing lower-carbon fuels like renewable diesel into the state. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Q&A: Low-carbon marine options to grow: Baseblue


11/11/24
11/11/24

Q&A: Low-carbon marine options to grow: Baseblue

New York, 11 November (Argus) — With marine fuel greenhouse gas emissions regulations tightening, ship owners are looking for financially feasible low-carbon fuels to add to their marine fuel repertoire. Argus spoke with Dionysis Diamantopoulos , head of alternative fuels at bunker supplier and trading firm Baseblue, about ship owners' options. Edited highlights follow. Do you expect onboard CO 2 capture and storage technology to become more important in the next five years? The big question for carbon capture technology is the storage capacity for the seized CO2. For example, if an available technology only allows 200t of CO2 to be captured on a voyage for the full capacity of CO2 tanks, then if we take into account that 1t of fuel produces on a tank-to-wake assessment context 3.2t of CO2, this means that after burning 62.5t of fuel oil/gasoil on the vessel that would fill the entirety of the storage capacity of the carbon capture equipment. Considering that this consumption could be a 2-3 day sail for some vessels running on 30-plus day voyages, the proportion of time "online" and "offline" of this technology would be inefficient. In addition, questions over the development of carbon capture technology is dependent on the availability of infrastructure worldwide to collect the captured CO2. If a vessel calls at, say, Brazil and then west Africa, and has a full carbon capture tank from the second day of the voyage and cannot discharge the captured CO2 at a west African port, we have further "offline" time of the capture technology. Other questions could include the space on deck/holds and further design considerations for the carbon capture technology. In 2030 what do you expect the global marine fuel mix to look like? In the immediate future, conventional fuel will remain the front runner, followed by biofuels due to the ability of existing fleets/engines to burn them. LNG usage could also increase if orders/deliveries of new building dual-fueled vessels increase. The IEA's director, Mr Birol, said recently that he expects LNG prices to drop due to the inflow of cargoes of LNG from the US and Qatar in the upcoming year. In the years to come, we will also see more methanol dual-fueled vessels on the water, and different areas worldwide will surely develop to supply these vessels with sustainable methanol types. Ammonia will eventually join the mix after infrastructure developments and protocols have been set for the safety of bunkering procedures. Do you think that next year's FuelEU regulation will be sufficient to encourage the move to sustainable marine fuels? The reality is that we must start somewhere, and FuelEU is a solid driving factor in pushing our industry to begin incorporating alternative fuels in the energy mix. It is vital that FuelEU and EU ETS is incorporated gradually into shipping. A charge to completely eradicate emissions within the next year or so would not be reasonable, viable or achievable. This phase-in period also assists in avoiding stranded assets and global trade disruptions. To comply with FuelEU, shipowners must know each alternative marine fuel's well-to-wake (full lifecycle) greenhouse gas emissions scores, but there is a lot of confusion around these. What well-to-wake emissions would you say each fuel has? It is not a question of my own or others opinion; it is rather what can be proven with the relevant documentation, for example, from the proof of sustainability documentation that ISCC-certified suppliers can publish. This also showcases why having a proper paper trail and documentation that officially accompanies the supplies is important. If we are talking about the default values, they would be: B100 16.37 gCO2eq/MJ; B30 MGO 70.18 gCO2eq/MJ; B30 VLSFO 71.73 gCO2eq/MJ. Fossil LNG are default values based on the type of engine. For LNG Diesel DF, it is 76.13 gCO2eq/MJ. We have not yet delivered bio-LNG or bio-methanol, so we are unsure of the GHG savings. China is lagging behind Singapore in terms of biodiesel bunker (B24) sales. Do you expect Chinese biodiesel bunker demand to pick up next year? Singapore is the king of bunkering in the region and ranks as one of the largest global bunkering hubs/ports. But Hong Kong's biofuel supplies, namely B24 VLSFO, have started and have picked up. Specifically, we at Baseblue already have recurring customers who lift biofuel blends in Hong Kong. Is conventional bunker trading this year more or less competitive than last year? Conventional bunker trading this year is more competitive compared to previous years. In my opinion, this has to do with various factors. First, crude oil prices have been under pressure. Whenever prices are under pressure, smaller trading houses try to take advantage of the fewer financing needs and appear more competitive. Next, bunker trading companies have sprouted exponentially over the last few years, which is enough to increase competition. By Stefka Wechsler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more