Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Activists take Arctic oil fight to European court

  • Spanish Market: Crude oil, Emissions, Natural gas
  • 15/06/21

Climate activists aiming to stop new oil and gas drilling in Norway's Arctic territory are taking the issue to the European Court of Human Rights.

Environmental groups Greenpeace Nordic and Young Friends of the Earth Norway alongside six activists have filed an application to the court arguing that Norway has breached fundamental human rights by allowing new oil drilling in the midst of a climate crisis. In December, the Supreme Court of Norway dismissed their attempt to halt oil exploration in the Arctic.

Their latest effort follows a Dutch court ruling last month that ordered Shell to sharply reduce its CO2 emissions this decade, and a scenario published by the IEA warning that new fossil-fuel investments must stop if the world is to stand a chance of cutting net emissions to zero by 2050.

Norway's oil policy has drawn criticism from politicians and climate activists who say the country's approach is at odds with its drive to cut emissions. Last year the Norwegian parliament approved fiscal stimulus measures for the oil industry to spur spending and protect jobs. And only last week the Norwegian government published a white paper that showed no change to oil policy, although there was an increased focus on renewables.

"The petroleum sector will remain a significant factor in the Norwegian economy in the years to come, although not on the same scale as today," the government said. "The government will facilitate long-term economic growth in the petroleum industry within the framework of our climate policy and our commitments under the Paris Agreement."


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

10/01/25

US issues 45Z tax guidance for low-carbon fuels

US issues 45Z tax guidance for low-carbon fuels

Washington, 10 January (Argus) — US producers of low-carbon fuels can start claiming the "45Z" tax credit providing up to $1/USG for road use and $1.75/USG for aviation, following the US Treasury Department's release today of proposed guidance for the credit. The guidance includes proposed regulations and other tools to determine the eligibility of fuels for the 45Z tax credit, which was created by the Inflation Reduction Act to replace a suite of incentives for biofuels that expired at the end of last year. Biofuel producers have been clamoring for guidance from the US Treasury Department so they can start claiming the tax credit, which is available for fuels produced from 1 January 2025 through the end of 2027. "This guidance will help put America on the cutting-edge of future innovation in aviation and renewable fuel while also lowering transportation costs for consumers," US deputy treasury secretary Wally Adeymo said. "Decarbonizing transportation and lowering costs is a win-win for America." The creation of the 45Z tax credit has already prompted a change in US biofuels markets by shifting federal subsidies from blenders to producers. Because the value of tax credit increases for fuels with the lowest lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, it could encourage refiners to source more waste feedstocks such as used cooking oil, rather than conventional crop-based feedstocks. While the guidance is still just a proposal, taxpayers are able to "immediately" use the guidance to claim the 45Z tax credit, until Treasury issues additional guidance, an administration official said. The guidance on 45Z released today affirms that only the producer for the fuel is eligible to claim the credit, not blenders. To be eligible for the tax credit, the fuel must have a "practical or commercial fitness for use in a highway vehicle or aircraft" by itself or when blended into a mixture, Treasury said. Marine diesel and methanol suitable for highway or aircraft use are also eligible for 45Z, as is renewable natural gas that can be used as a transportation fuel. Treasury also released an "annual emissions rate table" offering providers a methodology for determining the lifecycle GHG of fuel. Treasury said a key emissions model from the US Department of Energy, called 45ZCF-GREET, used to calculate the value of the 45Z tax credit is anticipated to be released today, although industry officials said it may be delayed until next week. Treasury said it intends to propose regulations at "a future date" for calculating the GHG emissions benefits of "climate smart agriculture" practices for "cultivating domestic corn, soybeans, and sorghum as feedstocks" for fuel. Those regulations could lower the calculated lifecycle emissions of fuel from those crop-based feedstocks and increase the relative 45Z tax credit. US biofuel producers said they are still awaiting key details on the 45Z tax credit, including the update to the GREET model. Among the outstanding questions is if the guidance released today provides "enough certainty to negotiate feedstock and fuel offtake agreements going forward", said the Clean Fuels America Alliance, an industry group that represents the biodiesel, renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel industries. It is unclear how president-elect Donald Trump intends to approach this proposed approach for the 45Z credit, which will be subject to a 90-day public comment period. Trump has promised to "rescind all unspent funds" from the Inflation Reduction Act. But outright repealing 45Z would leave biofuels producers and farmers without a subsidy they say is needed to sustain growth, after the expiration last year of a $1/USG blender tax credit and a tax credit of up to $1.75/USG for sustainable aviation fuel. Biofuel and soybean groups were unsuccessful in a push last year to extend the expiring biofuel tax credits. The 45Z credit is likely to be debated in Congress this year, as Republicans consider repealing parts of the Inflation Reduction Act. House Republicans have already asked for input on revisions to the 45Z credit, signaling they could modify the incentive. In a tightly divided Congress, farm-state lawmakers may hold enough leverage to ensure some type of biofuel incentive — and potentially one friendlier to agricultural producers than 45Z — survives. By Chris Knight and Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Opec+ aims to reverse output falls in 2025


10/01/25
10/01/25

Opec+ aims to reverse output falls in 2025

London, 10 January (Argus) — Opec+ production cuts in 2024 saw the alliance reduce its crude output to lower than even in the pandemic-hit years of 2021 and 2022. And while Opec+ plans to start unwinding some of these cuts this year, it is far from clear that there will be sufficient room in the market for this additional supply. Opec+ members subject to targets reduced crude output by 1.66mn b/d to 33.96mn b/d in 2024, Argus estimates. This was an even bigger decrease than 2023's 1.44mn b/d and means that the alliance has taken 3.1mn b/d off line over the past two years — equal to about 3pc of global oil supply. Saudi Arabia cut production by 650,000 b/d to 8.96mn b/d last year, the lowest since 2010. Russian production fell by 430,000 b/d to 9.15mn b/d, the lowest since at least 2010. Other big falls came from Kuwait, whose output dropped by 190,000 b/d to 2.43mn b/d, and Iraq, where production declined by 160,000 b/d to 4.13mn b/d — although this was still well above its 4mn b/d target. Opec+ can at least claim that it has so far achieved its stated objective of ensuring oil market stability — average prices for Atlantic basin benchmark North Sea Dated in 2024 were only around $2/bl lower than in 2023 at around $80/bl. But this has come at a cost. While Opec+ has capped its output, countries outside the alliance have continued to boost production — eating into Opec+ market share. Whether Opec+ will stick to this approach is a key factor to watch in 2025. Pressure has been building from some members who want to increase output as soon as possible. As things stand, Opec+ members are set to start unwinding 2.2mn b/d of voluntary crude production cuts starting in April over an 18-month period. But this is not certain, given that most forecasts show a market surplus this year. Opec+ continues to stress that the return of 2.2mn b/d — one of three cuts it is implementing — will depend on market conditions. For now, the alliance is in wait-and-see mode, particularly given the uncertainties associated with the return of Donald Trump as US president and its impact on the global economy. As always, the extent to which Opec+ members complied with their individual output targets was a big issue in 2024. But on balance, the alliance's output last year was 40,000 b/d under its collective target. While serial overproducers such as Iraq, Kazakhstan and Russia attracted a lot of scrutiny and pledged to compensate for exceeding their targets, members such as Azerbaijan, South Sudan and Nigeria produced well below their own targets. Without target Another key development in 2024 was growing production from members of the group that do not adhere to targets — Iran, Libya and Venezuela. Iran boosted output by 380,000 b/d to 3.32mn b/d, the highest since 2018, despite the continuation of US sanctions on its oil exports. Similarly, sanctions-hit Venezuela increased production by 110,000 b/d to a six-year high of 870,000 b/d. Libya saw its production fall by 60,000 b/d to 1.11mn b/d — mostly owing to politically motivated shutdowns — but it ended the year at 1.4mn b/d, the highest in over a decade. On a monthly basis, members subject to cuts saw very little change in their collective output in December, with production edging up by 10,000 b/d to 33.57mn b/d. This was 270,000 b/d below the group's target for the month. Notable changes included a 50,000 b/d increase from Nigeria, which saw its output climb to 1.54mn b/d — the highest since July 2020 — while Kuwaiti output increased by 40,000 b/d to 2.44mn b/d. But these increases were almost entirely offset by a drop from the UAE, whose production fell by 120,000 b/d to 2.85mn b/d owing to maintenance at one of its onshore fields. Opec+ crude production mn b/d Dec Nov* Dec target† ± target Opec 9 21.23 21.22 21.23 +0.00 Non-Opec 9 12.34 12.36 12.62 -0.28 Total 33.57 33.58 33.85 -0.28 *revised †includes additional cuts where applicable Opec wellhead production mn b/d Dec Nov* Dec target† ± target Saudi Arabia 8.91 8.93 8.98 -0.07 Iraq 3.99 3.98 4.00 -0.01 Kuwait 2.44 2.40 2.41 +0.03 UAE 2.85 2.97 2.91 -0.06 Algeria 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.00 Nigeria 1.55 1.50 1.50 +0.05 Congo (Brazzaville) 0.27 0.25 0.28 -0.01 Gabon 0.24 0.22 0.17 +0.07 Equatorial Guinea 0.07 0.06 0.07 +0.00 Opec 9 21.23 21.22 21.23 +0.00 Iran 3.40 3.36 na na Libya 1.31 1.24 na na Venezuela 0.90 0.88 na na Total Opec 12^ 26.84 26.70 na na *revised †includes additional cuts where applicable ^Iran, Libya and Venezuela are exempt from production targets Non-Opec crude production mn b/d Dec Nov* Dec target† ± target Russia 8.97 8.97 8.98 -0.01 Oman 0.75 0.75 0.76 -0.01 Azerbaijan 0.48 0.49 0.55 -0.07 Kazakhstan 1.44 1.45 1.47 -0.03 Malaysia 0.36 0.36 0.40 -0.04 Bahrain 0.18 0.18 0.20 -0.02 Brunei 0.08 0.08 0.08 -0.00 Sudan 0.02 0.02 0.06 -0.04 South Sudan 0.06 0.06 0.12 -0.06 Total non-Opec 12.34 12.36 12.62 -0.28 *revised †includes additional cuts where applicable Opec+ crude production* Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Finnish and Baltic gas consumption up by 9pc in 2024


10/01/25
10/01/25

Finnish and Baltic gas consumption up by 9pc in 2024

London, 10 January (Argus) — Combined Finnish and Baltic gas consumption rose by 9pc on the year in 2024, with demand higher in all four countries and Lithuania leading the increase. Consumption across Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Finland totalled roughly 43.6TWh in 2024, up from 40TWh in both 2022 and 2023 but still well below the 2019-21 average of 67.2 TWh/yr ( see combined consumption graph, data and download ). Demand increased across all four countries, but Lithuanian consumption rose the most in both absolute and percentage terms, jumping by 14pc on the year to nearly 17.1TWh. This was mostly driven by higher demand from fertiliser producer Achema and gas-fired power generators, transmission system operator Amber Grid's commercial director, Justas Cerniauskas, said. Achema, the region's single largest gas user, increased its consumption by roughly 1TWh on the year, while power-sector gas demand rose by around 600GWh, Cerniauskas said. Large consumers with direct connections to the grid consumed 9.8TWh last year, according to Amber Grid data, up from 8.4TWh a year earlier, while demand from the local distribution zone increased by a more moderate 600GWh. Lithuanian gas-fired power generation totalled around 820GWh, compared with 640GWh in 2023, data from Fraunhofer ISE show. In Finland, gas-fired power production fell to 1.2TWh from 1.8TWh in 2023, as much stronger renewable output reduced gas' share of the generation mix. Renewable generation rose to 40.8TWh from 34.6TWh, with onshore wind accounting for almost the entire increase. Total Finnish gas demand rose by nearly 5pc on the year to just over 14TWh, despite the fall in gas-fired generation. Given that household demand accounts for a small part of overall consumption owing to the predominance of electric and district heating in Finland, this suggests that industrial demand continued its recovery. The paper and paper products sector is Finland's most gas-intensive, and appears to have performed better than in 2023 — output on a 2021 basis of 100 averaged 87.5 in January-October compared with 82.6 in all of 2023, data from Eurostat show. In Latvia, the main demand driver is the power sector, particularly state-owned utility Latvenergo's large combined heat and power plants. Latvian gas-fired power generation rose by nearly 19pc on the year to 1.6TWh, as weaker hydro generation left more room in the mix for gas. In Estonia, the region's smallest consumer, gas demand rose by more than 8pc on the year to 3.7TWh. Total gas-fired power generation across the four countries fell to 3.68TWh from 3.84TWh in 2023 ( see table ). Combined sendout from the Inkoo, Hamina and Klaipeda LNG terminals totalled 43.4TWh last year, compared with 47TWh in 2023 and 32.4TWh in 2022 ( see data and download ). A six week dry-docking period for the Klaipeda floating storage and regasification unit (FSRU) weighed on sendout in Lithuania, which was down by around 8TWh. Conversely, a long shutdown on the Balticconnector increased the call on Finland's Inkoo terminal to fill the supply shortfall in the first quarter. Sendout from Inkoo rose to 19.3TWh last year from 14.3TWh in 2023. This pattern is likely to flip in 2025, with Inkoo's Exemplar FSRU due to undergo its own six week dry-docking, which in combination with extensive maintenance on the Balticconnector has left only slightly more than half the year's slots booked . This is likely to increase the usage of Klaipeda, where slots for 2025 are nearly fully booked . There were net withdrawals from Latvia's Incukalns storage facility of 1.54TWh in the 2024 calendar year, flipped from net injections of 6.6TWh in 2023, and compared with 776GWh of withdrawals in 2022. Nearly 4.4TWh of gas was rolled over from the 2023-24 storage year into the next. By Brendan A'Hearn Total annual gas-fired power generation GWh 2021 2022 2023 2024 Finland 4,170 1,790 1,810 1,230 Lithuania 1,110 500 640 820 Latvia 1,820 1,100 1,350 1,600 Estonia 20 30 40 30 Total 7,120 3,420 3,840 3,680 — Fraunhofer ISE Numbers rounded to nearest 10 Annual gas demand by country GWh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Next Canadian PM to be chosen on 9 March


10/01/25
10/01/25

Next Canadian PM to be chosen on 9 March

Calgary, 10 January (Argus) — Canada's next prime minister will be chosen on 9 March after a leadership race among the governing Liberals, the party announced late 9 January. Prime minister Justin Trudeau announced on 6 January that he would resign from his roles as head of the federal government and party but stay on until a successor was found. Canada's governor general, at Trudeau's request, delayed a return to Parliament by two months, buying his party time before elected officials return to session, now scheduled for 24 March. Opposition parties have vowed to bring down the government and trigger a general election at first opportunity, prompting the Liberals to expedite the leadership race. With the process now set, candidates will need to declare their participation by 23 January. At least two high profile Liberal cabinet members have said they are not planning to run for the top job. Minister of foreign affairs Mélanie Joly and minister of finance and intergovernmental affairs Dominic LeBlanc both said the threat of tariffs and economic pressures from US president-elect Donald Trump require their full attention at their current posts. Recent polls indicate the centre-right Conservatives would win a majority of seats in the House of Commons if an election were held today, ending the Liberal's reign that began in 2015. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has focused efforts on criticising potential Liberal leadership candidates, leaning into their connection to Trudeau, the state of immigration and the Canadian economy, and the carbon tax. This includes Trudeau's former finance minister Chrystia Freeland; the Liberal's chair of economic growth Mark Carney who is a former governor of both the Bank of Canada and Bank of England; and former British Columbia premier Christy Clark. "They're all Justin Trudeau. They're all just like Justin," said Poilievre on 9 January. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Global agencies agree 2024 was hottest year recorded


10/01/25
10/01/25

Global agencies agree 2024 was hottest year recorded

London, 10 January (Argus) — Six international science and weather institutions have separately found that 2024 was the hottest year on record, the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) said today. The organisations co-ordinated to release their 2024 average temperature data on the same day, "to underline the exceptional conditions experienced during 2024," the WMO said. The WMO uses data from the six agencies — the UK's Met Office, Japan's Meteorological Agency (JMA), US non-profit Berkeley Earth, the EU's Copernicus and the US' National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Nasa). The global average surface temperature in 2024 was 1.55°C above the pre-industrial average, with a margin of uncertainty of 0.13°C either above or below that figure, WMO found in its analysis of the six datasets. This makes it "likely" that the world has experienced the first calendar year breaching the 1.5°C limit pursued by the Paris climate accord. Climate scientists use a timeframe of 1850-1900 for the pre-industrial average temperature. The Paris agreement seeks to limit global heating to "well below" 2°C above pre-industrial levels, and preferably to 1.5°C. All six datasets put 2024 as the hottest year on record and flag up the recent rate of warming, but "not all show the temperature anomaly above 1.5°C due to differing methodologies," WMO said. Copernicus found the global average temperature in 2024 was 1.6°C above pre-industrial levels. "Individual years pushing past the 1.5°C limit do not mean the long-term goal is shot," UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres said. "There's still time to avoid the worst of climate catastrophe. But leaders must act — now." He urged governments to submit new national climate action plans this year. The temperature limits sought by the Paris agreement work on a timeframe of 20 years or longer, Copernicus said. Long-term global warming is currently about 1.3°C above the pre-industrial baseline, a team of experts established by WMO found. "We've had not just one or two record-breaking years, but a full 10-year series," said WMO secretary-general Celeste Saulo. "This has been accompanied by devastating and extreme weather, rising sea levels and melting ice, all powered by record-breaking greenhouse gas levels due to human activities." The UK Met Office outlook finds that 2025 is likely to be one of the three warmest years, in terms of global average temperature, "falling in line just behind 2024 and 2023", it said today. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more