New Mexico fails to pass clean hydrogen bill

Spanish Market: Emissions, Hydrogen
17/02/22

New Mexico Democrats' push to pass legislation that would turn the state into a hub for clean hydrogen production faltered this week.

House speaker Brian Egolf's (D) office confirmed that he had moved HB 228 to the "speaker's table," which means it would not come to a vote if no further action was taken. The 2022 legislative session ended today, effectively killing the bill.

HB 228 was just the latest iteration of a proposal to boost clean hydrogen production in the state, an effort laid out as a priority for this year's session by governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (D).

"Pure and simple, we cannot meet our decarbonization goals as a state without hydrogen," said representative Nathan Small (D), who co-sponsored the initial bill.

The plan's supporters had hoped to offer increasingly generous tax incentives to companies based on the carbon intensity of their hydrogen production, but environmental groups contended that the proposed incentives were too generous and would delay the state's transition away from fossil fuels.

"A conversation as complex as that around hydrogen just requires more time," said Camilla Feibelman, director of the Rio Grande chapter of the Sierra Club, who wants to see more federal guidance on low-carbon hydrogen before New Mexico lawmakers consider future policies to boost the fuel.

While the New Mexico Environment Department's initial proposal suggested awarding incentives for projects with a carbon intensity equal to or less than 6kg of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) per kilogram of hydrogen produced, the maximum threshold had been reduced to 4kg CO2e/kg H2 by the time the bill was first introduced.

That legislation was put on hold by the House Energy, Environment, and Natural Resources Committee when it came for a vote in January, after Republicans and some Democrats voiced their opposition.

It was further updated to lower the maximum carbon intensity for qualified projects to 2kg CO2/kg H2. But Egolf tabled that bill last week before it could come to a vote in a new committee.

Representative Patricia Lundstrom (D), another sponsor of the initial bill, introduced another version that removed all proposed income tax credits for companies pursuing hydrogen projects, kept smaller provisions setting guidelines for hydrogen-related public-private partnerships, and established a fund that could dole out grants and loans to some qualifying hydrogen projects.

But this week, Egolf tabled the revised bill too.

Hydrogen has been an especially contentious issue for legislators all session. Last week, a Senate bill to allow electricity produced using hydrogen to count toward the state's clean energy mandate failed in committee.

New Mexico lawmakers this week finalized a state budget, which leaves out funds that are explicitly dedicated to boosting hydrogen. An earlier provision that allocated $125mn for a hydrogen hub project fund, which environmental groups criticized as excessive, was replaced in recent days with $50mn for a "public-private partnership project fund" to finance transportation and broadband projects. It is unclear whether future hydrogen projects could qualify for such money.

By Cole Martin

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

27/11/24

Australia on track for 2030 GHG emissions target

Sydney, 27 November (Argus) — Australia is on track to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 42.6pc by 2030 from 2005 levels, nearly within the country's 43pc target, climate change and energy minister Chris Bowen announced today. The forecast is based on the baseline scenario from the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW)'s emissions projections 2024 report, which will be released on 28 November, according to Bowen. It compares to a 37pc reduction estimated in the 2023 report under the baseline scenario and is slightly above the previous report's 42pc projection under a scenario "with additional measures", as those policies have now been incorporated into the baseline assumptions. The inaugural emissions projections report, published at the end of 2022 , showed forecast reductions of 32pc in the baseline scenario and 40pc in the additional measures scenario. The main policies incorporated are the expanded Capacity Investment Scheme (CIS) and the fuel efficiency standards for new passenger and light commercial vehicles, Bowen said. Under the CIS, Australia will support 32GW of new capacity consisting of 23GW of renewable capacity such as solar, wind and hydro, as well as 9GW of dispatchable capacity such as pumped hydro and grid-scale batteries. Tenders will run every six months until 2026-27 and winners will need to start operating their assets by 2030, in time to help the Labor government meet its target of sourcing 82pc of electricity from renewable sources by 2030. Bowen last month announced tender volumes would be accelerated on the back of strong interest in the initial 6GW tender in May. NEM review The government separately announced the start of a review of the National Electricity Market (NEM) wholesale market settings, which will need to be changed following the conclusion of the CIS tenders in 2027 and as Australia transitions to more renewables from its aging coal-fired plants. The tenders will give up to 15 years of support, but new settings will be needed to promote investment in firmed renewable generation and storage capacity into the 2030s and beyond, especially as the Renewable Energy Target scheme will come to an end on 31 December 2030 . An expert independent panel will carry out widespread consultation and make final recommendations to energy and climate ministers in late 2025. The panel will need to consider the importance of decarbonising Australia's electricity system to achieve the 43pc emissions reduction target by 2030 and net zero emissions by 2050, according to the government. But the panel "will not consider" options that involve implementation of carbon trading schemes or carbon markets, or that entail governments supporting new fossil fuel generation, it added. The federal government will need to co-ordinate and introduce a "clear and enduring" carbon signal in the energy sector to adapt the 25-year-old NEM to a "post-coal era" , domestic think-tank Grattan Institute said earlier this year. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Uruguay's left-wing candidate wins presidency

25/11/24

Uruguay's left-wing candidate wins presidency

Montevideo, 25 November (Argus) — The left-wing opposition Frente Amplio will return to power in Uruguay after winning a hard-fought run-off election on 24 November. Yamandu Orsi, former mayor of the Canalones department, was elected president with close to 51pc of valid votes. He defeated Alvaro Delgado, of the ruling Partido Nacional. The Frente will control the senate, but will have a minority in the lower chamber. It last governed from 2015-2020. Orsi will take office on 1 March in one of Latin America's most stable economies, with the World Bank forecasting growth at 3.2pc for this year, much higher than the 1.9pc regional average. He will also inherit a country that has been making strides to implement a second energy transition geared toward continued decarbonization and new technologies, such as SAF and low-carbon hydrogen. He will also have to decide on future oil and natural gas exploration. Uruguay does not produce oil or gas, but has hopes that its offshore mimics that of Nambia, because of similar geology. TotalEnergies has made a major find there. The Frente's government plan states that it "will deepen the energy transition, focusing on the use of renewable energy, and decarbonization of the economy and transportation … gradually regulating so that public and cargo transportation can operate with hydrogen." On to hydrogen Uruguay is already the regional leader with renewable energy, with renewables covering 100pc of power demand on 24 November, according to the state-run power company, UTE. Wind accounted for 49pc, hydro 35pc, biomass 10pc and solar 6pc. Orsi will need to make decisions regarding high-profile projects for low-carbon hydrogen, as well as a push by the state-run Ancap to get private companies to ramp up oil and gas exploration on seven offshore blocks. The industry, energy and mining ministry lists four planned low-carbon hydrogen projects, including one between Chile's HIF and Ancap subsidiary Alur that would have a 1GW electrolyzer. Germany's Enertrag is working on an e-methanol project with a 150MW electrolyzer, while two Uruguayan groups are working on small projects with 2MW and 5MW electrolyzers, respectively. The Orsi government will also need to decide if it continues with Ancap's planned bidding process for four offshore blocks, each between 600-800km² (232-309 mi²), to generate up to 3.2GW of wind power to produce 200,000 t/yr of green hydrogen on floating platforms. The Frente has been noncommittal about the future of seven offshore oil and gas blocks, including three held by Shell, two by the UK's Challenger — which recently farmed in Chevron — and one each by Argentina's state-owned YPF and US-based APA Corporation. The Frente's government plan states that "a national dialogue will be called to analyze the impacts and alternatives to exploration and extraction of fossil fuels." By Lucien Chauvin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Clean NH3 integration needs CoC methods: Hinicio

25/11/24

Clean NH3 integration needs CoC methods: Hinicio

London, 25 November (Argus) — Some ammonia producers are implementing their own chain of custody (CoC) approaches in order to incorporate upcoming reduced carbon tonnes into existing ammonia supply chains, ahead of unified regulation, certification or wide-scale clean ammonia availability. But approaches will vary, depending on whether producers are targeting regulatory or voluntary markets, Belgian-headquartered consulting firm Hinicio told Argus ahead of the Clean Ammonia Europe Conference in Rotterdam this month. Hinicio is consulting on three different ammonia certification schemes currently under development. The schemes are being developed in partnership with Fertilizers Europe, the Fertilizer Institute in the US and the Ammonia Energy Association, which is developing a global scheme. The schemes have a mix of both mass balance or book and claim CoC methods, as producers and buyers seek to optimise on cost and carbon intensity (CI) when clean ammonia tonnes become available. Clean ammonia includes renewable ammonia produced with electrolysis and renewable electricity, or ammonia produced with a natural gas feedstock that uses carbon capture and storage (CCS) to reduce carbon emissions. The mass balance approach is well established in other values chains and has been set forth by the EU as the regulatory standard in the Renewable Energy Directive, FuelEU Maritime and the Gas Directive. And the CoC method has already been adopted by ammonia producers such as Yara and OCI. In a mass balance approach, the ratio of sustainable material incorporated into the value chain is tracked and reflected in the products produced and sold to customers. Physical trade flow is accounted for and a defined time (reconciliation) period is assigned. "When talking about chain of custody, the European regulation really dictates to use mass balance for everything you want to call RFNBO or low-carbon in Europe, or for anything that you want to bring to Europe," Hinicio manager Thomas Winkel said. But a ‘book-and-claim' system grants significantly more flexibility for economic operators that are looking to trade in voluntary markets — where companies buying reduced carbon ammonia are looking to reduce scope 3 emissions or EU ETS obligations. Book and claim allows for physical flow of a product to be completely decoupled from attributes like CI. Characteristics are ‘booked' into a central registry to be ‘claimed' by consumers, without a connection to the physical material, like renewable electricity certificates. "The voluntary market is going towards a combination of mass balance and book and claim," Winkel said. Elements of book and claim can be employed if required, within geographic or other constrictions. But Europe's stance on CoC could force companies to employ mass balancing. "I think many players around the world are looking at Europe as their main export market and they are starting to understand their criteria well," Winkel said. Europe currently accounts for around one-fifth of global ammonia imports, or around 4mn-5mn t/yr, according to Argus line-up data. And at least a quarter of the 40-plus offtake agreements Argus is tracking from clean ammonia projects are likely to supply the European market. Renewable ammonia projects in India and Canada have received pre-certification of RFNBO compliance from certification body Certifhy, with European offtakers already lined up. Under currently announced agreements alone, at least 500,000t of renewable ammonia will be shipping to Europe from 2027, pending project delivery, with the potential for a substantial scale-up in volume as the decade draws to a close. That is excluding large-scale ammonia projects with CCS that are scheduled for start-up in the US in 2025-26 and are also eyeing the European market for export opportunities. "Mass balance is the standard — the schemes that are being developed that are for voluntary purposes allow a bit more flexibility otherwise," Winkle said. For most jurisdictions, the regulatory playbook is still being written. Australia, Japan, South Korea, the US and the UK are still developing regulations surrounding low-carbon fuels. But in the meantime, fledgling supply agreements for voluntary markets may opt for book and claim where possible. But regulatory markets in Europe have declared mass balance as the standard. The development of regulatory and certification schemes in other regions will determine global standards moving forward. By Lizzy Lancaster Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Cop: Talks leave ‘mountain of work’ for Brazil in 2025

24/11/24

Cop: Talks leave ‘mountain of work’ for Brazil in 2025

Baku, 24 November (Argus) — The UN Cop 30 climate talks in Brazil next year may take on a new level of importance after countries at the now-completed Cop 29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, left some significant issues on the table, most notably now to keep the world on track to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. Negotiators in Baku completed their work just after 05:30 local time (01:30 GMT) on Sunday — nearly a day and a half after the scheduled end of the Cop — with a deal on climate finance that has left developing countries furious. The Indian negotiator called the finance agreement, which the country opposed after it was gavelled, "nothing more than an optical illusion". She complained that the text was adopted even though they had informed the secretariat they wanted to make a statement before its adoption. Nigeria and Bolivia came out in support to India to say were rejecting the deal, with the latter calling the agreement "an insult". Known as the new collective quantified goal (NCQG), the deal sets a target of "at least" $300bn/yr for developing countries by 2035, with developed countries "taking the lead". The goal is meant to build on the $100bn/yr that developed countries agreed to deliver to developing countries over 2020-25. The finance will come from "a wide variety of sources, public and private, bilateral and multilateral, including alternative sources". This is more than the $250bn/yr first proposed by developed countries. But this is well below the $1.3 trillion, including $440bn-600bn/yr in public finance mostly in grants and concessional finance, sought by developing economies. The delegations salvaged what for a time appeared to be talks headed for collapse, with two groups temporarily walking out of the negotiations. But developing countries indicated that the Baku deals falls far short of what they need to deal with climate change and support their energy transition. "They were never going to be enough," special envoy for climate change and environment for Vanuatu Ralph Regenvanu said. "And even then, based on our experience with such pledges in the past, we know they will not be fulfilled," he said. India's negotiator pointed to the "unwillingness from developed countries to fulfill their responsibilities". This will severely impact growth in developing nations, she added. EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra, the only developed party to take the floor just after the finance deal was agreed, said that increasing the goal three-fold, from $100bn/yr, "is ambitious, needed, realistic and achievable". He said that with the help of the multilateral development banks (MDBs), the bloc is confident $1.3 trillion/yr of climate finance for developing economies could be reached. Baku to Belem The finance deal agreed in Baku calls on all actors "to enable the scaling up of financing" from all public and private sources to at least $1.3 trillion per year by 2035. A "Baku to Belem Roadmap to $1.3 trillion", was launched to that effect. The only other major decision to come out of Baku was the adoption of the rules that will operationalise the international carbon market under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Progress on the implementation of the first global stocktake — the main outcome document from Cop 28, which included the historic call to transition away from fossil fuels — was left for next year. The talks failed to overcome a broad north-south divide and were hampered by the finance talks and efforts by some delegations to undo past decisions. Developed countries called for stronger global action on emissions reductions, but developing nations responded that they cannot implement an energy transition without adequate finance. Many Latin American and African nations, as well as island states, also complained during the talks about the lack of mitigation ambition. But countries including Saudi Arabia opposed including language on fossil fuels, or any mention that countries should undertake deep emissions cuts. India even pushed back on the 1.5°C temperature limit of the Paris Agreement, which was reinforced in Dubai last year. The rejected draft text for the stocktake reaffirms "the need for deep, rapid and sustained reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in line with 1.5 °C pathways". It refers to the energy package without going into details, and keeps the door open to "transitional fuels". Parties will revisit mitigation next year in Belem, leaving Baku "with a mountain of work to do," according to UN climate body UNFCCC executive secretary Simon Stiell. Mitigation was always going to be the focus of Cop 30, particularly with countries due to submit their new emissions-reduction pledges, or nationally determined contributions (NDCs), to the UNFCCC by February. But the struggle in Baku could bring new pressure to the Brazilian government. The country's environment minister Maria Silva on Saturday warned that failure in Baku would likely damage the UN process, especially with the US, one of the world's leading emitters, expected to exit the Paris Agreement again after former president Donald Trump takes office in January. By Michael Ball and Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Cop: Carbon market rules adopted as finance talks stall

23/11/24

Cop: Carbon market rules adopted as finance talks stall

Baku, 23 November (Argus) — Countries at the UN Cop 29 climate talks in Baku, Azerbaijan, on late Saturday adopted the rules for international carbon trading under the Paris Agreement, a rare bright spot in contentious negotiations that have dragged on well past their scheduled end. After adopting rules for Article 6.2 and Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement during a late evening plenary, ministers and negotiators applauded in recognition of their efforts. The decisions come a year after the carbon market rules were supposed to have been adopted at Cop 28 in Dubai, nine years after Cop 29 in Paris, and about 24 hours after the Baku talks were scheduled to end. "We have ended a decade-long wait and unlocked a critical tool for keeping 1.5 degrees in reach," Cop 29 president Mukhtar Babayev said. "Climate change is a transnational challenge and Article 6 will enable transnational solutions. Because the atmosphere does not care where emissions savings are made." Article 6.2 and Article 6.4 govern how countries can use carbon credits to meet their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions-reduction pledges, known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Article 6 aims to help set rules on global carbon trade. Article 6 discussions helped get Cop 29 off to a positive start, with the adoption of key standards for the creation of carbon credits under the Paris accord. But after that, negotiators still had to resolve a number of issues, most notably the design of an international registry to keep track of the credits. The talks ultimately settled on a "dual layer" approach, agreed to create a registry to issue and trade credits that would be run by the UN and would be separate from the Article 6 registry, which would only serve an accounting function. The text also says that the inclusion of any emissions credits — known as internationally transferable mitigation outcome (Itmo) units — in the UN registry does not represent any sort of validation of their environmental integrity, in response to concerns raised by the US and others. Further refinements were made to the decision text over the last three days before the Saturday night decision, including the details on what countries need to include in electronic reporting of the credits. Carbon market supporters have generally backed the Baku texts, although some do not agree with all of the details. But they say the text does not harm or constrain international carbon trading, meeting their main objective for Baku. Saturday standoff But Cop 29 has reached a stalemate in negotiations on a new climate finance goal, as developed and developing countries struggle to bridge a huge divide on how much the latter should receive from the former. The lack of progress has raised the possibility the talks could collapse and end without any agreement at all. "This is the final stretch you have all been working very hard and I know that none of us want to leave Baku without a good outcome," Babayev said. "However, time is not on our side." The cop presidency suspended the plenary after the Article 6 decisions to give countries more time to try to reach an agreement, saying it would resume "later tonight." Earlier in the evening, delegates from the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) group staged a temporary walkout to protest what they say has been a process that lacks inclusion. "The process is not including us as much as it should be, and when it does, and we provide input, our inputs are being ignored," said Evans Njewa, a Malawai environment official who chairs the LDC Group. The most recent negotiating text , released on Friday, angered developing country officials by proposing that developed economies provide $250bn/yr in climate finance by 2035, from a broad range of sources, not just public funds. Developing economies earlier this week floated numbers of $440bn-$600mn/yr for a public finance layer. They also called for $1.3 trillion/yr in total climate finance from developed countries, a sum which the latest draft instead calls for "all actors" to work toward. As a potential compromise, some countries, including Brazil and Somalia, have suggested at least $300bn/yr and up to $350bn/yr or $390bn/yr. Further eroding trust among delegates were reports that an official from Saudi Arabia had been allowed to make changes to negotiating text. "At Cop 29, we are witnessing a geopolitical power play by some fossil fuel states at the expense of the poorest. As the EU, we strongly oppose abandoning the path set in Dubai," German foreign affairs minister Annalena Baerbock said. By Michael Ball Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more