US Postal Service finishes plan with limited EVs

Spanish Market: Crude oil, Electricity, Emissions, Oil products
23/02/22

The US Postal Service has finalized a plan under which the vast majority of delivery trucks it acquires will have gasoline engines, dealing a setback to President Joe Biden's push for more electric vehicles.

The Postal Service issued a record of decision today for a plan under which at least 10pc of 50,000-165,000 next-generation mail trucks it plans to acquire over the next decade will be electric. The independently-run agency today rejected criticisms about the environmental review behind the decision and said it needed to start replacing an existing fleet of trucks now averaging 30 years old.

"The men and women of the US Postal Service have waited long enough for safer, cleaner vehicles to fulfill on our universal service obligation," postmaster general Louis DeJoy said.

Biden last year set a goal for the federal government to only acquire zero-emission vehicles by 2035. But the Postal Service cited the high initial cost of electric vehicles and its limited budget to support its decision. Efforts by Democrats to offer funding for electric mail trucks through a $1.85 trillion budget bill have stalled.

The Postal Service expects its new gasoline-engine mail delivery trucks will achieve a fuel-efficiency of 8.6 miles/USG with air conditioning on or 14.7 miles/USG without, compared to 8.2 miles/USG with its existing fleet of "right-hand drive" delivery trucks that do not have any air conditioning. The US Environmental Protection Agency, in comments on the plan, said the truck acquisition plan "barely" improved fuel-economy over the existing 30-year-old fleet.

By Chris Knight

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

05/11/24

Latin America mulls nuclear power revival

New York, 5 November (Argus) — Nuclear power is gaining traction in Latin America as countries see small modular reactors (SMRs) as options for remote regions that are not connected to power grids. "The advent of SMRs are behind Latin America's new interest in nuclear energy, because they do not need to be large and do not require large investments," said Modesto Montoya, a nuclear physicist and former president of the Peruvian Institute for Nuclear Energy. Nuclear power is not a prevalent source of electricity in Latin America, producing around 2pc of the region's power consumption. There are seven nuclear power plants with a total capacity of 5.07GW in operation in the region, located in Argentina, Mexico and Brazil. Argentina has a 32MW SMR plant under construction. But the role of nuclear could increase in the region. Argentina, Brazil and Mexico are providing technical advice to countries that are considering including the technology in their power systems. Earlier this month, El Salvador approved a nuclear energy law and signed a memorandum with the Argentinian government for scientific and technology cooperation for nuclear power. Daniel Alvarez, director of the Agency for Implementation of the Nuclear Energy Program in El Salvador, told Argus that the country was "following the book to develop nuclear power. We want to convert El Salvador into a nuclear country." The country needs to replace fossil fuels as half of the country's power capacity is fueled by bunker fuel. It has 204MW of geothermal capacity installed and, while solar energy is possible, the country's size limits the amount of physical space to add large solar plants. The government's plan is to have a research reactor and 400 people trained to manage a nuclear plant within seven years. The next step would be the construction of SMR. "We have to include alternatives for power generation and SMRs are a very good option. We want to include them in our transition to 2050,"Alvarez said. SMRs are also seen as a solution to the energy problem in the northern jungle city of Iquitos, in Peru, energy and mines minister Romulo Mucho said. It is one of the world's largest cities that is not accessible by road and not connected to the national grid, relying primarily on fuel oil for power generation. Peru has had experience with nuclear technology since 1988, when it opened the nuclear research facility, RASCO. Neighboring Bolivia has been working on a small nuclear program since the previous decade with Russia's Rosatom. It has a center for nuclear medicine and is finishing a small research reactor. Ronald Veizaga, deputy minister of electricity and renewable energies, said Bolivia began the program to improve medical treatment for cancer, but has changed gears. "Critics claim SMRs are expensive, but it is more expensive to have blackouts affecting your population and industry," he said. Traditional nuclear Paraguay is considering a more ambitious path, looking at a traditional nuclear plant. "We need to make political decisions if we want to explore a SMR or a large-scale plant to generate 1GW or more," said Jorge Molina, executive secretary of Paraguay's Radiology and Nuclear Authority. Paraguay could work with Argentina and Brazil to create a regional platform. "Our idea is part of regional integration. Our neighbors are already helping us develop our regulations," he said. But the construction of nuclear plants comes with challenges including high costs, time, labor and materials. Brazil began work on the 1.4GW Angra 3 nuclear plant in 1984 but works have been halted and resumed several times since then. The plant is roughly 67pc complete and has been in limbo since 2015. The country's Bndes development bank recently concluded that abandoning the construction of the project would be less costly than completing it. By Lucien Chauvin Countries with installed nuclear capacity in Latin America GW Country Capacity Argentina 1.64 Brazil 1.88 Mexico 1.55 — Ons, Cammesa, Cenace Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Japan’s 53MW Chokai Minami biomass plant comes on line

05/11/24

Japan’s 53MW Chokai Minami biomass plant comes on line

Tokyo, 5 November (Argus) — A joint venture led by Japanese utility Tohoku Electric Power has started commercial operations at the 53MW Chokai Minami biomass-fired power plant in Japan's Yamagata prefecture. Operations started on 2 November. The plant burns a combined 200,000 t/yr of imported wood pellets and palm kernel shells (PKS) to generate around 330 GWh/yr of electricity, which will be sold under the country's feed in tariff (FiT) scheme, the joint-venture company announced on 5 November. The plant is operated by Chokai Minami Biomass Power, which is 75pc owned by Tohoku Electric Power, 15pc by renewable energy developer Olympia and 10pc by a subsidiary of Japanese gas supplier Shizuoka Gas. Chokai Minami is Tohoku's first biomass-only combustion project. The company has also invested in the 50MW Niigata Higashikou biomass plant, which is planning to start operations in mid-November, later than October as initially scheduled. Tohoku has two other planned biomass projects, the 2MW Yokote and the 2MW Yuzawa plants. These facilities are scheduled to come on line in June 2026 and October 2026 respectively. By Takeshi Maeda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US railroad-labor contract talks heat up

04/11/24

US railroad-labor contract talks heat up

Washington, 4 November (Argus) — Negotiations to amend US rail labor contracts are becoming increasingly complicated as railroads split on negotiating tactics, potentially stalling operations at some carriers. The multiple negotiating pathways are reigniting fears of 2022, when some unions agreed to new contracts and others were on the verge of striking before President Joe Biden ordered them back to work . Shippers feared freight delays if strikes occurred. This round, two railroads are independently negotiating with unions. Most of the Class I railroads have traditionally used the National Carriers' Conference Committee to jointly negotiate contracts with the nation's largest labor unions. Eastern railroad CSX has already reached agreements with labor unions representing 17 job categories, which combined represent nearly 60pc of its unionized workforce. "This is the right approach for CSX," chief executive Joe Hinrichs said last month. Getting the national agreements on wages and benefits done will then let CSX work with employees on efficiency, safety and other issues, he said. Western carrier Union Pacific is taking a similar path. "We look forward to negotiating a deal that improves operating efficiency, helps provide the service we sold to our customers" and enables the railroad to thrive, it said. Some talks may be tough. The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET) and Union Pacific are in court over their most recent agreement. But BLET is meeting with Union Pacific chief executive Jim Vena next week, and with CSX officials the following week. Traditional group negotiation is also proceeding. BNSF, Norfolk Southern and the US arm of Canadian National last week initiated talks under the National Carriers' Conference Committee to amend existing contracts with 12 unions. Under the Railway Labor Act, rail labor contracts do not expire, a regulation designed to keep freight moving. But if railroads and unions again go months without reaching agreements, freight movements will again be at risk. By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Trump unlikely to fully end US clean energy policies

04/11/24

Trump unlikely to fully end US clean energy policies

Houston, 4 November (Argus) — Although former US president Donald Trump has promised to end climate policies enacted during the administration of President Joe Biden, the political complications of reversing course make a full change of direction unlikely should Trump return to the White House. Trump has frequently criticized Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), promising to terminate the " Green New Scam " and rescind all unspent funds in the Biden administration's climate policy suite, if he is elected to a second term. But fulfilling that pledge may be difficult for many reasons, not least of which is whether Republicans have control of both chambers of Congress after Tuesday's election, including the unlikely outcome of a 60-seat majority needed to bypass a Senate filibuster. Beyond the math, Republican districts are benefiting from IRA funding, with some lawmakers from Trump's party already opposing the turmoil that could arise from an about-face on tax policy. "There's no way they're going to be able to replace and repeal the IRA, in large part because so many of the dollars are flowing to [Republican] states," said David Shepheard, a partner at consultant Baringa who specializes in energy and resources. "I think the pieces of the IRA that are most at risk are the [electric vehicle] tax credits, potentially some of the stimulative pieces around offshore wind." The IRA established a host of federal incentives to support clean electricity growth and the associated domestic supply chain. Those include technology-agnostic production and investment tax credits for electricity generators based on their emissions intensities. But the law went well beyond the power sector and also established credits for hydrogen production, electric vehicles and the manufacture of components needed by clean electricity systems. Project developers are counting on a policy trajectory that does not match Trump's rhetoric, which would allow some incentives to stay on the books. Companies expect market forces, such as corporate demand, and state mandates to continue to drive growth for solar and onshore wind and energy storage, rather than national politics. But there is more trepidation around offshore wind, a less mature sector for which the federal government is effectively the landlord for project sites. "There is no doubt that the trajectory of the US offshore wind industry will be impacted by the November election," Liz Burdock, chief executive of offshore wind industry group Oceantic Network, said. "Its outcome will influence how we maintain our momentum." Uncertainty around the US presidential election has dampened private investment in the sector this year, according to Oceantic. At the same time, companies say the industry has come a long way since 2016, with a handful of projects now operating, while recent macroeconomic challenges are subsiding. Furthermore, demand for offshore wind would continue at the state level, and these factors could make the industry more resilient to headwinds. Executive decisions Trump still could use the executive branch to "stonewall" sectors helped by the IRA in the absence of a repeal, including by influence the timing or distribution of IRA funds, according to Shepheard. He could shift regulators' priorities to new oil and gas development, which, along with other actions, could make resources such as combined-cycle natural gas plants more attractive than renewables. "The extent that renewables and other cleaner energy assets are competing with gas, that'll be the big change from a Trump administration," Shepheard said. At the same time, funding for onshore wind and solar is "relatively safe", and tax credits for hydrogen and carbon capture are on comparably firm ground because of support from the oil and gas industry, Shepheard said. Some companies have expressed cautious optimism that some elements of the IRA, such as the advanced manufacturing tax credit, will survive. The incentive is not only important for the solar supply chain but also offshore wind, as state-level solicitations often require developers to invest in local manufacturing. Republican states in the US southeast have already benefited from new factories springing up on the back of the credits. For example, Enel chose Oklahoma for a new new module plant , First Solar located a factory in Alabama and Qcells has expanded production in Georgia. Moreover, removing that carrot could leave the US solar industry reliant on Chinese companies, which could run afoul of Trump's protectionist trade instincts. Trump's campaign did not respond to multiple requests to elaborate on his policy plans. By Patrick Zemanek Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Canada advances oil and gas GHG cap

04/11/24

Canada advances oil and gas GHG cap

Houston, 4 November (Argus) — Canada is proposing to use a cap-and-trade system to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from its oil and gas sector, a long-promised but politically contentious move. The proposed program aims to reduce emissions from the sector by 35pc, compared to 2019 levels, by 2030-32, according to a draft rule published by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) on Monday. It would cover upstream production activities, both onshore and offshore, including for oil, natural gas and liquified natural gas. After an initial four-year phase-in over 2026-29, entities would then need to meet their emissions obligations over the first 2030-2032 compliance period. While all operators must report emissions, only those producing more than 365,000 b/yr of oil equivalent, equal roughly to 99pc of upstream emissions, would be covered by the trading program. Covered entities would receive free allowance allocations, which would decline in line with their emissions cap. Companies could also buy allowances on the secondary market if needed, use carbon offsets or contribute funds to a decarbonization program. The first three-year compliance period of 2030-31, would be set at 27pc below emissions reported for 2026, which ECCC said would be equivalent to the 35pc target. The federal program will not link with the California-Quebec joint carbon market, known as the Western Climate Initiative, regulators said. ECCC officials stressed that the resulting program would cap emissions, not production, for Canadian oil producers, pushing back at a common criticism from opponents. The federal move will keep the industry accountable to its own promise of net-zero by 2050 and result in a greener and more competitive industry, said Canada Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson. "As the world moves to reduce emissions generated by the production and combustion of fossil fuels, oil and gas extracted with the lowest production of emissions will have value in the world," Wilkinson said. But Alberta premier Danielle Smith claimed on Monday that the proposed program violates Canada's constitution. Provinces have exclusive authority over non-renewable natural resource development and the proposal ignores ongoing projects in the province, such as the Pathways Alliance, she said. Canadian Natural Resources, Cenovus, ConocoPhillips Canada, Imperial, MEG Energy and Suncor Energy are involved in the project. The program is a cap on production and will cost the province "anywhere from C$3bn-$7bn ($2.1-5bn)/yr" in absent royalty payments because of a loss of 1mn b/d in production, Smith said, promising future legal challenges against the federal government. "The only way to achieve these unrealistic targets is to shut in our production, I know it, they know it. We are calling them out on it, and they have to stop it," she said. Canada, a major net exporter of oil, has committed to reducing emissions by 40-45pc, compared to 2005 levels, by 2030 and net-zero by 2050. But emissions from the country's oil and gas sector remain an obstacle to meeting those goals. The sector accounts for 31pc, or 217mn metric tonnes, of the country's emissions in 2022 , according to the most recent federal data. Emissions from this sector increased by 83pc from 1990 to 2022. Over the past year Canada's federal government has focused on competitive climate change-related policies, from rolling out investment tax credits for decarbonization technologies to enforcement of the government's new Clean Fuel Regulations. But the road for the Liberal Party-led government to meet the climate goals remains a rocky one ahead of a federal election that must take place no later than October 2025. In September, the Conservative Party, led by Pierre Poilievre, attempted a no confidence measure on prime minister Justin Trudeau's government, fed by discontent around the federal carbon tax. While the motion failed, it highlights the balancing act for the Liberal Party ahead of the election. Trudeau has resisted calls from within his party to cede the field as his popularity waned, to the benefit of Poilievre. ECCC plans to request public comment on the proposal through 8 January 2025 and estimates it will finalize the regulations next year. By Denise Cathey Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more