Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Cop 27: Impasse on fossil fuels despite last hour push

  • Spanish Market: Crude oil, Natural gas
  • 24/11/22

The final text from the UN Cop 27 climate summit fell short on efforts to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with no mention of additional curbs on fossil fuels, the largest contributors to global warming, although the issue was debated until the very last minutes of the conference.

This year's Cop was set against a backdrop of rising energy costs and concerns about energy security, with the summit designed to tackle the climate crisis — the third issue of the energy trilemma.

More than 80 countries supported phasing out unabated fossil fuels, EU executive vice-president and lead negotiator Frans Timmermans said. "Sadly, we don't see this reflected here [in the final text]", Timmermans said in his closing speech as the plenary wrapped up on 20 November.

The call for language around curbing fossil fuels did not seem to be one united effort, and the EU cautioned against including coal and gas in the same group, given how much more polluting coal is.

The inclusion of fossil fuels in the final text remained up for discussion until the final few hours of the conference — which ran over by almost two days, and was the second-longest Cop on record — delegates told Argus on the sidelines. Countries with varying degrees of ambition but supportive of phasing out fossil fuels — including Norway, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the UK, Colombia and several vulnerable and small island developing states — made "very strong statements", but they faced a battle even to uphold last year's Glasgow Climate Pact, ministers said. The text was "backsliding" from Glasgow's, even in the final hours of negotiations, Tuvalu's finance minister Seve Paeniu told Argus.

"Those of us who came to Egypt to keep 1.5° alive… have had to fight relentlessly to hold the line", UK lead negotiator and Cop 26 president Alok Sharma said in his closing speech on 20 November, in reference to the Paris Agreement's commitment to limit global warming to 1.5°C.

"Many parties, too many parties, are not ready to make more progress today in the fight against the climate crisis. There were too many attempts to even roll back what we agreed in Glasgow", Timmermans said on 20 November.

The final text treads very lightly on any language around fossil fuels, instead calling on parties "to transition towards low-emission energy systems, including by rapidly scaling up the deployment of clean power generation and energy efficiency measures, including accelerating efforts towards the phase down of unabated coal power and phase out of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies". This is a repeat of the Cop 26 text and represents no increase in ambition on the topic.

Tough sell

Saudia Arabia was one of several countries that pushed against the use of language targeting fossil fuels in the final text, delegates said. "The convention needs to address emissions and not the origin of the emissions", a member of the Saudi delegation, speaking on behalf of the 22 countries in the Arab League, said on 20 November.

The inclusion of broader language on fossil fuels was destined to be tricky in Egypt. The country's oil minister Tarek el-Molla said last month that natural gas will continue to play a key role in the future energy mix, calling it "the cleanest hydrocarbon fuel" at a meeting of the Gas Exporting Countries Forum.

It could be an even tougher sell in the UAE, which will host Cop 28 next year and which holds some of the largest spare reserves of the Opec+ coalition. The country's president Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, speaking at the opening of Cop 27, said that the UAE will continue to supply oil and gas "for as long as the world needs it", stressing the country's role as a responsible supplier.

The global energy crisis was a clear undercurrent at Cop, largely framed in energy security terms. The final Cop 27 text referenced the "unprecedented global energy crisis" and the "urgency to rapidly transform energy systems to be more secure, reliable, and resilient, including by accelerating clean and just transitions to renewable energy during this critical decade of action". It also said that the "increasingly complex and challenging global geopolitical situation… should not be used as a pretext for backtracking, backsliding or deprioritising climate action".

Energy security pressures

But the energy crisis weakened developed countries' hands this year, as they sought to replace Russian fossil fuel supplies. Many developing countries concentrated on this, setting out their arguments for producing oil and gas, and noting European "hypocrisy" on fossil fuel use.

Germany, seeking to cut its dependency on Russian gas, has signalled its interest in working with Senegal to develop its gas resources. Timmermans, speaking at a Cop side event on 16 November, told economic advisor to the Namibian government James Mnyupe: "I don't want to prevent you from using your fossil fuels, and especially natural gas". But for imports, the EU has been clear that additional gas infrastructure must be pre-fitted so that it can carry hydrogen.

Scrutiny was directed in particular towards the EU — which has of late ramped up coal-fired power generation as it swerves from Russian gas imports — and ministers saw off criticism. The bloc is on track to reduce emissions by 57pc by 2030, from 1990 levels, Timmermans reiterated during Cop. The EU repeatedly said that the only way to bolster energy security and boost energy access in Africa was through renewables.

"Low-emission" fuels

But even the mention of enhancing a clean energy mix through renewable energy proved difficult to push through, which led to the last-minute addition of "low-emission" energy.

The elasticity of the language potentially keeps the door open for significant amounts of technology — nuclear, biomass, biofuels, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and even gas. The language is even pliable enough to keep the use of carbon offsets on the table — an option that factors heavily in corporate decarbonisation plans. UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres has cautioned against the lack of "rigour" in voluntary carbon market credits, while biomass and biofuels often attract concerns over indirect land use change and deforestation, and CCS remains an emerging technology.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

15/01/25

Inpex wins Norwegian offshore exploration licences

Inpex wins Norwegian offshore exploration licences

Tokyo, 15 January (Argus) — Japanese upstream firm Inpex has won eight oil and gas exploration permits offshore Norway, expanding its operations in the country, Inpex said today. Inpex was awarded exploration licences PL1263, PL318D, PL1264, PL1257, and PL636D located between the northern North Sea and the southern Norwegian Sea, along with PL 1276, PL1274 and PL1194C in the northern Norwegian Sea through its local subsidiary Inpex Idemitsu Norge (IIN). The successful bid was part of the awards in the pre-defined areas (APA) 2024 licensing round . IIN secured five licenses in the 2023 APA round . The APA rounds are held every year and focus on mature areas of the Norwegian continental shelf. The aim is to facilitate the discovery and production of remaining oil and gas resources in these areas before existing infrastructure is shut down. In the latest round, 33 of the licences are in the North Sea, 19 in the Norwegian Sea and one in the Barents Sea. The latest licences will contribute to expanding its Norwegian business portfolio, Inpex said, given the potential of jointly developing the new assets with existing assets in the surrounding area. The company has continued stable production at the Snorre and Fram oil fields in the northern North Sea. The Japanese firm aims to strengthen its upstream business as part of its long-term strategy, while it invests in renewable energy such as green ammonia. By Yusuke Maekawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

IEA warns of supply squeeze from Russia, Iran sanctions


15/01/25
15/01/25

IEA warns of supply squeeze from Russia, Iran sanctions

London, 15 January (Argus) — The IEA sees a slightly tighter oil market this year than it previously forecast and said new US sanctions on Russia and Iran could further squeeze balances. The outgoing administration of US President Joe Biden announced additional sanctions on Russia's energy exports earlier this month, and moved to tighten sanctions on Iran's oil exports in December. "We maintain our supply forecasts for both countries until the full impact of sanctions becomes more apparent, but the new measures could result in a tightening of crude and product balances," the IEA said today in its latest monthly Oil Market Report (OMR). But the effect of incoming US President Donald Trump on Russian and Iranian supply remains a key variable. As things stand, the IEA projects a 720,000 b/d supply surplus this year — showing a well cushioned oil market. This is around 230,000 b/d less than its previous forecast. For 2024, the IEA's balances show a small supply surplus of 20,000 b/d. The Paris-based agency sees global oil supply growing by 1.8mn b/d to 104.7mn b/d in 2025, compared to growth of 1.9mn b/d in its December report. Almost all of the 2025 growth — 1.5mn b/d — will come from non-Opec+ countries such as US, Brazil, Guyana, Canada and Argentina. The IEA continues to assume all current Opec+ cuts will remain in place this year, although the alliance plans to start increasing output from April. The IEA said global oil supply grew by 650,000 b/d in 2024. The agency sees global oil demand growing by 1.05mn b/d, down by 30,000 b/d from its December forecast. This should see oil demand reach 104.0mn b/d, with most of the gains driven by "a gradually improving economic outlook for developed economies, while lower oil prices will also incentivise consumption." China, which has long driven global oil demand growth but whose economy is now slowing, will add 220,000 b/d in 2025, compared with 180,000 b/d in 2024 and 1.35mn b/d in 2023. But the IEA revised up its oil demand growth estimates for 2024 by 90,000 b/d to 940,000 b/d. This was mostly due to better-than-expected growth in the fourth quarter, which at 1.5mn b/d was highest since the same period in 2023 and 260,000 b/d above than its previous forecast. This increase was mostly due to lower fuel prices, colder weather and abundant petrochemical feedstocks, the IEA said. The IEA said global observed oil stocks increased by 12.2mn bl in November, with higher crude stocks on land and water offsetting refined product draws. It said preliminary data show a further stock build in December. By Aydin Calik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

New York to propose GHG market rules in 'coming months’


14/01/25
14/01/25

New York to propose GHG market rules in 'coming months’

Houston, 14 January (Argus) — Draft rules for New York's carbon market will be ready in the "coming months," governor Kathy Hochul (D) said today. Regulators from the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) "will take steps forward on" establishing a cap-and-invest program and propose new emissions reporting requirements for sources while also creating "a robust investment planning process," Hochul said during her state of the state message. But the governor did not provide a timeline for the process beyond saying the agency's work do this work "over the coming months." Hochul's remarks come after regulators in September delayed plans to begin implementing New York's cap-and-invest program (NYCI) to 2026. At the time, DEC deputy commissioner Jon Binder said that draft regulations would be released "in the next few months." DEC, NYSERDA and Hochul's office each did not respond to requests for comment. Some environmental groups applauded Hochul's remarks, while also expressing concern about the state's next steps. Evergreen Action noted that the timeline for NYCI "appears uncertain" and called on lawmakers to "commit to this program in the 2025 budget." "For New York's economy, environment and legacy, we hope the governor commits to finalizing a cap-and-invest program this year," the group said. State law from 2019 requires New York to achieve a 40pc reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from 1990 levels by 2030 and an 85pc reduction by 2050. A state advisory group in 2022 issued a scoping plan that recommended the creation of an economy-wide carbon market to help the state reach those goals. By Ida Balakrishna Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Canada's tariff response may be ‘unprecedented’: Ford


14/01/25
14/01/25

Canada's tariff response may be ‘unprecedented’: Ford

Calgary, 14 January (Argus) — Tariffs threatened by president-elect Donald Trump against Canada will hurt the province of Ontario the most, the premier of the country's most populated province said this week, so all options must be considered should retaliation be required. "We have to use all the tools possible," said Ontario premier Doug Ford in 13 January press conference, less than one week before Trump's inauguration and the potential imposition of 25pc tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico. "We might have to do things that are unprecedented," which could include withholding shipments of minerals, Ford said. Ontario accounts for about 40pc of Canada's gross domestic product (GDP) and is known for its manufacturing, automotive and critical mineral industries. Ford's position runs in contrast to comments made earlier by Alberta premier Danielle Smith that cutting off Canadian energy flows to the US is a non-starter and would not happen . "Well, that's Danielle Smith, she's speaking for Alberta, she's not speaking for the country," Ford said. "I'm speaking for Ontario, that's going to get hurt a lot more. They aren't going to go after the oil, they're coming after Ontario." "I want to ship him more critical minerals, I want to ship him more energy, but make no mistake about it, if they're coming full-tilt at us I won't hesitate to pull out every single tool we have until they can feel the pain," Ford said. "But that's the last thing I want to do." Smith met with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida over the weekend, which was a welcome move by Ford, who said he has been working the phones calling American politicians daily. Even so, Canada's response needs to come from the federal government, which has so far been lacking, in Ford's view. "This is their jurisdiction," said Ford. "They need to come up with a strong plan. They need to be doing everything, every single day to make sure we avoid these tariffs." Premiers will meet with prime minister Justin Trudeau this week to strategize how to deal with potential tariffs. Trudeau said last week he planned to resign amid low polls and party infighting with a new leader to be chosen on 9 March. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US tariffs on Canada likely, oil cut-off not: Alberta


13/01/25
13/01/25

US tariffs on Canada likely, oil cut-off not: Alberta

Calgary, 13 January (Argus) — Tariffs threatened by the US against Canada will become a reality, according to the premier of oil-rich Alberta , but any retaliation will not entail cutting off energy exports. "They're likely to come in on January 20th," Alberta premier Danielle Smith said of the tariffs on Monday after she met with US president-elect Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida over the weekend. "I haven't seen anything that suggests that he's changing course." Trump in late-November said he plans to impose a 25pc tariff against all imports from Canada, citing inadequate border controls and a US trade deficit. Canada has since pledged to spend more money on border security while Smith reckons Canada would have a deficit if not for energy trade. "We actually buy more goods and services from the US than they buy from us," Smith said in an online interview with reporters. "We actually have $58bn in a trade deficit with the Americans when you take energy out." Smith wanted assurances the US is still interested in buying Canadian oil and gas, with her province being the heart of the country's energy sector. "Oil and gas is going to be key for being able to get a breakthrough, once the tariffs do come in, in getting them off," said Smith. Canadian foreign affairs minister Mélanie Joly said in a 12 January interview broadcast on CTV that the country could consider stopping the flow of Canadian energy in retaliation to tariffs. But Smith said that would not happen since the oil are owned by the province, not the federal government. "[The federal government] will have a national unity crisis on their hands at the same time as having a crisis with our US trade partners," said Smith. About 80pc of Canada's 5mn b/d of crude production is consumed by refineries in the US, with many in the Midcontinent having no practical alternative , according to the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM). The region imported 2.7mn b/d of Canadian crude in October, the latest data point from the Energy Information Administration (EIA). "I hope cooler heads prevail," said Smith, adding that Trump seemed interested in buying more oil and gas. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more