Update: UAW expands strike against Ford, GM

Spanish Market: Metals, Petrochemicals
29/09/23

Adds Ford comments in paragraph 5

The United Auto Workers (UAW) union is expanding strikes against US automakers Ford and General Motors (GM).

The union will strike Ford's Chicago SUV assembly plant and GM's Lansing Delta Township, Michigan, SUV plant, bringing the total number of striking workers to 25,000 out of the UAW's almost 150,000 union-represented auto workers.

The adjacent Lansing Regional Stamping plant will not strike, UAW president Shawn Fain said in a Facebook Live event today.

"Sadly, despite our willingness to bargain, Ford and GM have refused to make meaningful progress at the table," Fain said. "To be clear, negotiations haven't broken down. We're still talking with all three companies and I'm still hopeful we can reach a deal."

GM's executive vice-president of global manufacturing Gerald Johnson said a "comprehensive counteroffer from UAW leadership" had not been received after the company's 21 September contract proposal.

"Calling more strikes is just for the headlines, not real progress," Johnson said. "The number of people negatively impacted by these strikes is growing and includes our customers who buy and love the products we build."

In a statement this afternoon, Ford said the UAW is holding up a contract agreement over future battery plants that will be coming on line in the next two to three years.

"If the UAW's goal is a record contract, they have already achieved this," Ford chief executive Jim Farley said. "It is grossly irresponsible to escalate these strikes and hurt thousands of families."

Fain cited new progress on the UAW's demands with Stellantis, including the restoration of benefits lost during the 2008/2009 financial crisis, as to why that company did not see additional strike actions.

"Moments before this broadcast Stellantis made significant progress on the 2009 cost of living allowance, the right not to cross a picket line, as well as the right to strike over product amendments, plant closures and outsourcing moratoriums," Fain said.

On 15 September, the UAW struck three assembly plants — one each at Ford, GM and Stellantis — targeting all three companies at the same time for the first time in the union's history. It then expanded the strike on 22 September to 36 parts distribution centers at GM and Stellantis, saying that enough progress had been made at the time with Ford to exclude the company from further actions.

The original strike led GM to idle its Fairfax, Kansas, plant because of a lack of parts, while Stellantis curtailed production and laid off workers at one of its parts facilities in Ohio and later at two plants in Kokomo, Indiana. Ford also had to lay off workers at its Wayne, Michigan, plant that was among the original strike targets.

Integrated steelmaker US Steel idled the remaining blast furnace at its Granite City, Illinois, steel mill in response to the strike.

By Rye Druzin

UAW struck auto plants and associated idlings

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

11/04/25

Recycled resin importers caught in tariff uncertainty

Houston, 11 April (Argus) — US President Donald Trump's evolving tariff policies have created tremendous uncertainty for US importers of recycled polymers, and constant halts and flip-flopping from the administration have led some to pause their US operations. Multiple importers told Argus that the constantly changing US tariffs on goods have upended business plans, and forced them to pause their US operations for the time being due to uncertainty about the taxes their material will face when it reaches US shores. "You have to have some confidence that conditions will hold in order to import," one trader told Argus . Trump's tariff rollout began on 1 February, when he announced that China would face a 10pc universal tariff, and the US's two largest trading partners, Mexico and Canada, would face 25pc universal tariffs. At the time, market participants speculated that the 25pc tariffs on Canada and Mexico would make operations and sales more expensive for Mexican and Canadian recyclers, particularly those that trade bales or finished resin across the US border. After some negotiations between world leaders, the tariffs on Canada and Mexico were delayed for 30 days, though the 10pc tariff on China went into effect as planned. The 25pc universal tariffs on Canada and Mexico were pushed back again on 6 March, but tariffs on aluminum — a significant competitor to rPET packaging — went into place on 12 March. The tariffs on aluminum have not been rescinded or paused, and the extra cost for imported aluminum as a result of the tariff could incentivize US consumer goods companies to use more PET in their packaging. On 9 April, the US put into place varying reciprocal tariffs on a number of countries that export recycled resin to the US, including India, Malaysia and Vietnam. While rPET and vPET pellets were excluded from the reciprocal tariffs, importers of rPE, rPP and PET waste were not excluded from the tariff. The same day, the reciprocal tariffs were pushed back 90 days in favor of a 10pc universal tariff that excludes Canada and Mexico. China and the US's reciprocal tariffs have escalated into a trade war, and currently material from China faces a 145pc tariff. Since the price is too high for most importers to be willing to pay, in essence all recycled resin imports from China are halted. China is one of the largest buyers of US virgin polyethylene https://direct.argusmedia.com/newsandanalysis/article/2675420), and the current trade war with China has the potential to increase domestic supply as exporters are forced to find new buyers for resin. Increased competition from oversupplied virgin resin could pull down recycled resin pricing. Until some stability in tariff policy returns to the US, traders and importers will continue to turn to other destinations outside the US to sell their recycled resin. By Zach Kluver Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US consumer sentiment 2nd lowest on record: Survey

11/04/25

US consumer sentiment 2nd lowest on record: Survey

Houston, 11 April (Argus) — US consumer sentiment fell for a fourth straight month in April, reaching lower levels than during the Great Recession in 2008, as inflation expectations surged to four-decade highs. The preliminary consumer sentiment gauge fell to 50.8 in April, below the 55.3 end-of-month level it reached in November 2008 during the start of the Great Recession, according to the University of Michigan's preliminary reading for April. The only lower reading in records going back to 1952 was in mid-2022 during Covid-19. Year-ahead inflation expectations surged to 6.7pc this month, the highest reading since 1981, from 5pc last month. Sentiment fell by 10.9pc from 57 in March and has lost more than 30pc since December 2024 "... amid growing worries about trade war developments that have oscillated over the course of the year." "Consumers report multiple warning signs that raise the risk of recession: expectations for business conditions, personal finances, incomes, inflation, and labor markets all continued to deteriorate," the survey said. The index of current economic conditions fell to 56.5 in April from 63.8 the prior month. The index of consumer expectations fell to 47.2 this month from 52.6 in March. The proportion of consumers who expect unemployment to rise in the year ahead rose for a fifth month and is more than double the November 2024 result. Interviews for the report were done between 25 March and 8 April, ending prior to the 9 April partial reversal of US tariffs. By Bob Willis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US inflation eased for 2nd month in March

10/04/25

US inflation eased for 2nd month in March

Houston, 10 April (Argus) — US inflation slowed more than forecast in March, pulled lower by falling gasoline prices and slowing shelter inflation, as the new US administration's tariff policies have prompted concerns of a global economic slowdown. The consumer price index (CPI) slowed to an annual rate of 2.4pc in March, down from 2.8pc in February and the lowest rate since November 2024, the Labor Department reported Thursday. Analysts surveyed by Trading Economics had forecast a 2.6pc rate for March. Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy, rose at a 2.8pc annual rate, down from a 3pc annual rate the prior month and the lowest since March 2021. The deceleration in inflation came a month after President Donald Trump began to levy tariffs on imports from China and on steel, aluminum and automobiles, starting in February. Several tariff deadlines were pushed back, including a three-month pause enacted this week on much steeper tariffs for most countries. The tariffs have prompted companies and consumers to pull back on investments and some purchases while shaking up financial markets, and heightening concerns of a global recession. The energy index fell by an annual 3.3pc in March following a 0.2pc annual decline in February. Gasoline fell by 9.8pc after a 3.1pc decline. Piped natural gas rose by 9.4pc. Food rose by an annual 3pc, accelerating from 2.6pc. Eggs surged by an annual 60.4pc, as avian flu has slashed supply. Shelter rose by an annual 4pc in March, slowing from 4.2pc in February and the smallest increase since November 2021. Services less energy services rose by 3.7pc, slowing from 4.1pc in February. New vehicles were unchanged after an annual 0.3pc drop in February. Transportation services, which includes what maintenance and repair, insurance and airfares, rose by an annual 3.1pc, slowing from 6pc in February. Car insurance was up by an annual 7.5pc and airline fares fell by 5.2pc. CPI fell by 0.1pc in March after a monthly 0.2pc gain in February. Core inflation rose by 0.1pc for the month. By Bob Willis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EU exempts most LLDPE imports from retaliatory tariffs

10/04/25

EU exempts most LLDPE imports from retaliatory tariffs

London, 10 April (Argus) — Most linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) imports will be exempt from EU retaliatory tariffs should the bloc go ahead with countermeasures against the US, according to a draft list of products seen by Argus . The EU has put the retaliatory tariffs on hold for now, after US president Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that he is pausing his planned "reciprocal" tariffs for 90 days. The European Commission has yet to publish the final list of US products that would be subject to any countermeasures, but before Trump's surprise move, the HS code 39014000 was removed. The list was approved by a majority vote of EU member states on Wednesday . Other HS codes of PE grades were included in the draft list and are earmarked for 25pc tariffs. It is now uncertain if and when the EU tariffs might be implemented. Prior to Trump's u-turn, 15 May was the likely date for EU tariffs on US PE imports. But "everything is paused," European Commission trade spokesperson Olof Gill told Argus . LLDPE imports into the EU are categorised under the HS codes 39014000 and 39011010. The former made up just over half of all PE imports to the EU from the US in 2024, while the latter accounted for less than 12pc. The EU's PE imports from the US totalled 1.8mn t last year. Market participants told Argus that the EU will remain dependant on LLDPE imports from the US for specific grades, which include LLDPE butene and metallocene LLDPE. The UK also excluded US-origin LLDPE imports falling under the HS code 390140 from its provisional list of products that could be subject to retaliatory tariffs. By Sam Hashmi and Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Japan’s JFE finalises investment in EAF steel plant

10/04/25

Japan’s JFE finalises investment in EAF steel plant

Tokyo, 10 April (Argus) — Japanese steel producer JFE has made the final investment decision on its first large-scale electric arc furnace (EAF) plant as part of the company's decarbonisation efforts, it announced today. JFE will invest ¥329bn ($2.2bn) in a 2mn t/yr EAF steel production facility in western Okayama, aiming to start commercial operations sometime during April-June 2028, according to the firm. This would make it the largest EAF facility by capacity in Japan, the firm said, adding that JFE is likely to replace its existing basic oxygen furnaces (BOF) plant although further details were yet undecided. JFE initially expected to start mass production in 2027 , but it delayed the project partly because the ¥105bn subsidy from the Japanese government was approved only on 9 April, the firm said. Major domestic steel producers using the BOF method are accelerating their shift to EAFs to meet decarbonisation goals. The country's largest steel mill Nippon Steel started EAF commercial operations in 2022 , and it plans to invest in another EAF plant in the southern Kyushu area. This is to replace the existing BOF facility that is producing 3.6mn t/yr of steel products, according to Nippon. Kobe Steel, the third-largest domestic steel firm, also announced in May 2024 that it will introduce a new EAF sometime during the 2030s, looking to replace one of the two BOFs at its Kakogawa steel works in the country's western Hyogo prefecture. Japan aims to hit its net zero emission goal by 2050 and it is critical to reduce greenhouse gas emission from the steel industry, which accounts for 35pc of total emissions in the country's manufacturing industry. By Yusuke Maekawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more