Asean energy transition faces financing challenges
Southeast Asian countries need much more funding to meet their energy transition goals, and blended financing is key, speakers at the Singapore International Energy Week conference said.
But the region faces significant challenges in achieving the right mix of public and private financing.
Financing for decarbonisation projects in southeast Asia takes three forms, said senior research fellow at the Energy Studies Institute of the National University of Singapore, Kim Jeong Won. The first is bilateral or multilateral official development assistance (ODA), or international public climate finance. The second is domestic public or private climate finance, which entails government expenditure and financial products such as green bonds and loans. The third is private investment consisting of foreign direct investment or domestic investment.
Asean has received $2.24bn worth of ODA between 2012-21 for renewable energy generation projects, said Kim. Indonesia and Vietnam received the bulk of these investments, with shares of 44pc and 34pc respectively. Green bonds and loans for Asean members totalled $12.8bn in 2022, with cumulative amounts between 2016 and 2022 reaching $50.6bn. Almost 80pc of these funds have gone into green building and energy.
According to renewable energy agency Irena's calculations, global investments in energy technologies reached $1.3 trillion in 2022, but additional investments of $4.4 trillion/yr are required to further develop renewable energy technologies to meet Paris climate agreement targets, and in southeast Asia, this amounts to $6 trillion by 2050, director of external relations at the Energy Market Authority of Singapore, Jonathan Goh said.
Developing economies in southeast Asia hence require substantial amounts of private investment to reach their energy transition goals. Blended financing could allow for this if ODA, government funding and private sector financing is structured in a way that supports private sector investment in the renewables sector, said Jennifer Tay, Asia-Pacific infrastructure leader at PwC Singapore.
Private capital still elusive
But receiving private investment is currently challenging, as many energy transition projects on the table still have not crossed the threshold for bankability, which means that private capital cannot come in, said managing director of the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Ravi Menon.
Many coal-fired power plants in Europe are ageing, making them easier to phase out. In comparison, in Asean, "we have a very young fleet of coal-fired power plants, and whereas a lot of private capital [has gone into] renewable energy… almost no capital, except for the Energy Transition Mechanism by the ADB, is going to the coal phase-out," Tay said, reiterating that for developing countries, energy security will take priority, and the most economically viable and affordable option will be chosen to drive economic growth.
Blended finance is hence essential "because it encapsulates the way public-private partnerships can work," said Menon. ODA is important in areas that are not receiving private sector funding, so that "the project gets off the ground before private sector money wants to come in," according to Tay. ODA also helps to de-risk projects as "you need a layer of concessionary capital to reduce the overall cost of capital, so that private capital can come in," Menon said.
But ODA money in the renewable energy generation sector in Asean will likely not increase, said Kim, as these funds are not intended only for this region. Multilateral ODAs will likely prioritise less developed countries outside of Asean, she added.
This was echoed by senior energy specialist at the Asian Development Bank (ADB), Architrandi Priambodo, who said that while the ADB provides financing for developing member countries, "what we see in Asean, because many of the countries have already reached [upper or middle level] income, for us as a multilateral development bank, it's more difficult to [provide] concessional financing for those types of countries".
But support can be provided in other ways, said Priambodo, using the example of the ADB's Energy Transition Mechanism, where public and private investments from governments, multilateral banks, philanthropies and long-term investors can help to retire coal power assets on an earlier schedule than if they were to remain with current owners. Power purchase agreements for coal-fired power still have a few years left on them before they expire, "so if there is no incentive to restructure these PPAs, the coal-fired power plants will continue to operate", Priambodo said.
Critical to financial firms' ability to support the transition away from coal and other fossil fuels are clearer government-set sectoral pathways, said Menon, providing Malaysia's energy transition roadmap as an example. Pathways set out by the IEA, for example, are also important "because financial institutions need to refer to them and determine whether [they are] on a pathway that is consistent with net zero, otherwise there is reputational risk and there's project risk". In the managed phase-out of coal, for instance, "you need clarity about [whether] when the coal plant is retired early, no new coal plants will be built," he added.
Related news posts
UK eyes new environmental guidance for oil, gas: Update
UK eyes new environmental guidance for oil, gas: Update
Adds comment from Shell London, 29 August (Argus) — The UK government will develop new environmental guidance for oil and gas firms, in the light of a recent Supreme Court decision that ruled consent for an oil development was unlawful, as the scope 3 emissions — those from burning the oil produced — were not considered. The ruling means that "end use emissions from the burning of extracted hydrocarbons need to be assessed", the government said today. The government will consult on the new guidance and aims to conclude the process "by spring 2025", it said today. It will in the meantime halt and defer the assessment of any environmental statements related to oil and gas extraction and storage activities until the new guidance is in place, including statements that are already being assessed. The Supreme Court in June ruled that Surrey County Council's decision to permit an oil development was "unlawful because the end use atmospheric emissions from burning the extracted oil were not assessed as part of the environmental impact assessment". The government also confirmed that it will not challenge judicial reviews brought against the development consent granted to the Jackdaw and Rosebank oil and gas fields in the North Sea. A judicial review in the UK is a challenge to the way in which a decision has been made by a public body, focusing on the procedures followed rather than the conclusion reached. Environmental campaign groups Greenpeace and Uplift launched legal challenges in December seeking a judicial review of the government's decision to permit Rosebank. Norway's state-owned Equinor and London-listed Ithaca hold 80pc and 20pc of Rosebank, respectively. Greenpeace in July 2022 separately filed a legal challenge against the permitting of Shell's Jackdaw field. "This litigation does not mean the licences for Jackdaw and Rosebank have been withdrawn", the government said. The Labour government, voted into office in July , pledged not to issue any new oil, gas or coal licences, but also promised not to revoke existing ones. Equinor is "currently assessing the implications of today's announcement and will maintain close collaboration with all relevant stakeholders to advance the project. Rosebank is a vital project for the UK and is bringing benefits in terms of investment, job creation and energy security", the company told Argus today. Shell is "carefully considering the implications of today's announcement... we believe the Jackdaw field remains an important development for the UK, providing fuel to heat 1.4mn homes and supporting energy security, as other older gas fields reach the end of production", the company told Argus . North Sea oil and gas production "will be a key component of the UK energy landscape for decades to come", the government said today. The UK government introduced a climate compatibility checkpoint in September 2022, designed to ensure that oil and gas licensing fits UK climate goals. The UK has a legally-binding target of net zero emissions by 2050. The checkpoint, though, does not take into account scope 3 emissions. These typically make up between 80pc and 95pc of total oil and gas company emissions. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
UK plans new environmental guidance for oil and gas
UK plans new environmental guidance for oil and gas
London, 29 August (Argus) — The UK government will develop new environmental guidance for oil and gas firms, in the light of a recent Supreme Court decision that ruled consent for an oil development was unlawful, as the scope 3 emissions — those from burning the oil produced — were not considered. The ruling means that "end use emissions from the burning of extracted hydrocarbons need to be assessed", the government said today. The government will consult on the new guidance and aims to conclude the process "by spring 2025", it said today. It will in the meantime halt and defer the assessment of any environmental statements related to oil and gas extraction and storage activities until the new guidance is in place, including statements that are already being assessed. The Supreme Court in June ruled that Surrey County Council's decision to permit an oil development was "unlawful because the end use atmospheric emissions from burning the extracted oil were not assessed as part of the environmental impact assessment". The government also confirmed that it will not challenge judicial reviews brought against the development consent granted to the Jackdaw and Rosebank oil and gas fields in the North Sea. A judicial review in the UK is a challenge to the way in which a decision has been made by a public body, focusing on the procedures followed rather than the conclusion reached. Environmental campaign groups Greenpeace and Uplift launched legal challenges in December seeking a judicial review of the government's decision to permit Rosebank. Norway's state-owned Equinor and London-listed Ithaca hold 80pc and 20pc of Rosebank, respectively. Greenpeace in July 2022 separately filed a legal challenge against the permitting of Shell's Jackdaw field. "This litigation does not mean the licences for Jackdaw and Rosebank have been withdrawn", the government said. The Labour government, voted into office in July , pledged not to issue any new oil, gas or coal licences, but also promised not to revoke existing ones. Equinor is "currently assessing the implications of today's announcement and will maintain close collaboration with all relevant stakeholders to advance the project. Rosebank is a vital project for the UK and is bringing benefits in terms of investment, job creation and energy security", the company told Argus today. North Sea oil and gas production "will be a key component of the UK energy landscape for decades to come", the government said today. Argus has also contacted Shell for comment. The UK government introduced a climate compatibility checkpoint in September 2022, designed to ensure that oil and gas licensing fits UK climate goals. The UK has a legally-binding target of net zero emissions by 2050. The checkpoint, though, does not take into account scope 3 emissions. These typically make up between 80pc and 95pc of total oil and gas company emissions. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US, Italy, Germany miss goal to cut fossil fuel finance
US, Italy, Germany miss goal to cut fossil fuel finance
Edinburgh, 28 August (Argus) — Countries including the US, Italy and Germany continued to finance international fossil fuel projects last year despite committing to stop doing so by the end of 2022, according to a report by think-tank the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and civil society organisation Oil Change International. A total of 39 countries and development banks, including the US, Canada, Germany, the UK, France and Italy, promised to end international public finance for unabated fossil fuels by the end of 2022. The Glasgow pledge — the Clean Energy Transition Partnership (CETP) — signed on the sidelines of the UN Cop 26 climate talks has exemptions for "limited and clearly defined circumstances consistent with a 1.5°C warming limit and the goals of the Paris Agreement". The report found that the US invested $3.2bn in 10 overseas projects last year and its export-import bank approved $500mn for 300 oil and gas well in Bahrain. The US is "currently considering at least five fossil fuel megaprojects that are all steeped in controversy, including gas projects in Guyana, Papua New Guinea and Mozambique", the report said. The organisations said Switzerland approved five fossil fuel projects abroad last year for a total of $1.4bn, Italy and Germany approved $1bn each and Italy's export credit agency SACE provided $4.3bn for petrochemical projects. Italy's policy contains "numerous wide-ranging loopholes" that essentially allow SACE "to continue its fossil finance virtually unhindered", the organisations said. The report also pointed out that the Netherlands committed $321mn to an oil and gas project in Brazil's Santos basin. Environmental organisations had warned last year that energy security concerns would mean some countries including the US, Germany and Italy would miss the pledge made in Glasgow . But fossil fuel finance is decreasing even among signatories with policies that do not match the ambition of the CETP, according to the report. "A year after the deadline, most CETP signatories — including Canada, the UK, France and the European Investment Bank — have met their promise," IISD and Oil Change said. And the commitments have shifted billions away from fossil fuel investments towards clean energy. The report found that signatories have collectively reduced their international public finance for fossil fuel projects by around $10bn-15bn from a 2019-21 average to around $5.2bn in 2023. International investment in clean energy rose by 16pc in the same period to $21.3bn. "Signatories particularly need to adopt ambitious and quantitative targets for rapidly scaling up finance for clean energy, commit to a high standard for the quality of this financing, as well as prioritise financing for key enabling energy sub-sectors and for the countries that need it most," the organisations said. The report found that the largest recipients of the pledge signatories' finance were upper and upper-middle income countries rather than low-income nations. The top three recipients of the signatories' international public finance for clean energy last year were Spain, Germany and Poland, they said. By Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Japan seeks $11bn green budget funding
Japan seeks $11bn green budget funding
Osaka, 28 August (Argus) — The Japanese government is expected to request around a ¥1.6 trillion ($11bn) budget for 2025-26 and the following fiscal years to help drive the country's green transformation (GX) strategy to achieve its net zero emissions goal by 2050. The GX implementation council led by premier Fumio Kishida on 27 August unveiled its draft budgetary request plan for sectors involved in the GX, which aims at securing at least ¥1.6 trillion, excluding projects whose costs are unspecified. Tokyo is considering seeking ¥1.2 trillion for 2025-26, while asking for the remaining budget to be allocated for 3-5 years. The initial GX-related budget for 2024-25 was around ¥1.7 trillion, including a supplementary budget for the previous fiscal year. The government plans to allocate ¥255.5bn, or 22pc, of its total budget request for 2025-26, to help set up domestic supply chains to drive its decarbonisation efforts. This includes further development of perovskite solar cells, offshore wind power, storage batteries, water electrolysers and fuel cells. Japan is anticipated to require more than ¥150 trillion of public-private investment to promote energy transition over 10 years from 2023-24. Tokyo plans to issue around ¥20 trillion of GX economic transition bonds over the decade to support the investment. Tokyo is now working on formulating the GX vision toward 2040, aiming to complete it by the end of this year. The council on 27 August proposed specific areas to accelerate discussions, including efforts to restart existing nuclear reactors and development of next-generation reactors, as well as renewable energy expansion, LNG and future fuel supply security and industry relocations. Kishida has promoted nuclear reactors to enhance the country's energy security under his GX strategy, updating the country's nuclear policies since he took office in October 2021. The nuclear-pro GX discussions may influence the continuing review of the country's strategy energy plan (SEP), which was last formulated in 2021 and calls for a reduction of the dependence on nuclear reactors as much as possible. Tokyo should clearly state in its new SEP that it is necessary to not only restart existing nuclear reactors but also build new ones, said Japan's Federation of Electric Power Companies previously. Kishida has decided to step down from his position as leader of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party next month. But he has emphasised he will make an effort to advance the GX strategy during the rest of his tenure, especially for nuclear restoration in east Japan where no reactors are currently operating. Kishida plans to hold a nuclear-related ministerial meeting next week to work on details of the government support to secure approval by local authorities to restart the 1,356MW Kashiwazaki-Kariwa No.7 reactor. The Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant is owned by Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco). It is Tepco's sole nuclear plant, after the Fukushima-Daiichi and its nearby Fukushima-Daini nuclear plants were scrapped in the wake of the country's 2011 nuclear disaster following a devastating earthquake and tsunami. By Motoko Hasegawa Japan 2025-26 draft GX-related budget request (¥bn) Introduction of EVs, PHEVs, FCVs 144.4 Introduction of highly insulated windows, high-efficiency water heaters 188.0 Retrofitting existing buildings 26.6 SAF production and supply chain 83.8 R&D of next generation nuclear reactors 82.9 Introduction of energy storage system 31.0 Establishing domestic supply chains such as: 255.5 Perovskite solar cells, Offshore wind power, storage batteries, water electrolysers, fuel cells Support for hard-to-abate industries 87.0 Introduction of production facility for zero emissions vessel 14.3 Support for advanced energy saving measures by small to medium enterprises 174.3 Circular economy 12.0 Support for deep-tech, start-up companies related to GX 40.0 Grant for regional decarbonisation, such as private micro grid 10.0 Total 1,149.8 Source: Japan cabinet secretariat Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
![](/_next/image?url=%2F-%2Fmedia%2Fproject%2Fargusmedia%2Fmainsite%2Fimages%2F14-generic-hero-banners%2Fherobanner_1600x530_generic-c.jpg%3Fh%3D530%26iar%3D0%26w%3D1600%26rev%3D-1%26hash%3DFC2BEDE406483FEF5FDB9549159BAC11&w=3840&q=75)
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more