Latest Market News

Viewpoint: HSFO to face continued strain

  • Spanish Market: Freight, Oil products
  • 18/12/23

Supply pressures will continue to elevate European fuel oil prices in 2024, with relief coming from hitherto less significant exporters a possibility, while bunkering hubs outside Europe might grow in prominence.

EU states pivoted away from Russia for their high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) imports after sanctions started in 2023. Vortexa data show that after 5 February, half of HSFO departures signalling for European ports — excluding those in Turkey — came from the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. In contrast, across all of 2022, Russia accounted for nearly 80pc of seaborne HSFO deliveries.

Relying on these middle Eastern countries for HSFO and crude oil supplies in 2024 will probably tighten supplies over the summer, as was the case in 2023, when HSFO discounts to Ice Brent crude futures flipped to a premium for the first time in 30 years.

Further establishing flows between newer exporters will be important to European buyers and refiners in 2024. Venezuela, whose oil industry was sanctioned by the US until October, has been touted as a potential supplier of sour crude and fuel oil to the west in the coming months, which could provide some relief to HSFO undersupply in northwest Europe. Likewise, Venezuelan volumes going to the Mediterranean may incentivise transportation of the product within the region, where HSFO paucity has at times disincentivised refiners from paying rising freight costs to move smaller than desired cargoes.

HSFO demand from non-European countries such as China may also draw the attention of large exporters of sour crude and feedstocks. China recently released a new set of import quotas for foreign HSFO after independent refiners reached their crude import limit.](https://direct.argusmedia.com/newsandanalysis/article/2514634) Demand for imported fuel oil from the Chinese refining sector has approached historic highs this year. But some refinery sources in China reckon the government's tax rebate policy will be adjusted to reduce these flows.

Eastern promises

The market is predicting lower demand for marine fuels, largely consisting of very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO), in Europe across 2024, partly because of the marine sector preparing for its greenhouse gas emissions to be incorporated in the EU's emissions trading scheme (ETS).

From January, the ETS will cover CO2 emitted from all large vessels entering EU ports, with shipping companies in 2025 having to surrender emissions allowances for 40pc of those emissions. In the short run this will push vessels to bunker outside EU waters, as the transition to green marine fuels gets underway.

Bunker fuel demand has generally tapered off towards the end of 2023, leading many suppliers to shift large volumes to Singapore, the world's main bunkering hub. Singaporean demand for bunker fuels generally rallied in the last quarter.

VLSFO stocks have also been moved east out of Europe because of the tightness of supply in Singapore in recent months, a knock-on effect of technical disruption at refineries east of Suez. Producers and suppliers in Europe are keeping a weather eye on the state-owned 615,000 b/d al-Zour refinery in Kuwait, a potentially huge supplier of VLSFO in the east next year. Al-Zour was hit by many technical disruptions in the latter part of 2023, at one point having to draw operations to a near complete halt. With a consequently reduced output of VLSFO, producers in Europe have been able to capture margins by selling to Singaporean buyers. In 2024, whether KPC can end problems at al-Zour will play a big part in determining whether the 0.5pc sulphur product continues to flow east, and whether pressure on stocks in Europe will rise or fall.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

02/10/24

California adds oilseed limits as vote nears: Update

California adds oilseed limits as vote nears: Update

Updates throughout with more detail on revisions. Houston, 2 October (Argus) — California regulators advanced stricter limits on crop-based biofuels as revisions to a key North American low-carbon incentive program drew closer to a vote. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) late yesterday added sunflower oil — a feedstock with no current approved users or previous indicated use in the program — to restrictions first proposed in August on canola and soybean oil feedstocks for biomass-based diesel. The new language maintained a proposal to make the program's annual targets 9pc tougher in 2025 and to achieve by 2030 a 30pc reduction from 2010 transportation fuel carbon intensity levels. Board decisions that could come as early as 8 November may reconfigure the flow of low-carbon fuels across North America. The state credits anchor a bouquet of incentives that have driven the rapid buildout of renewable diesel capacity and dairy biogas capture systems far beyond California's borders, and inspired similar, but separate, programs along the US west coast and in Canada. CARB staff's latest proposals, published a little before midnight ET on 1 October, offer comparatively minor adjustments to the shock August revisions that spurred a nearly $20 after-hours rally in LCFS prompt prices. Prompt credits early in Wednesday's session traded higher by $3 than they closed the previous trading day before slipping back by midday. LCFS programs require yearly reductions in transportation fuel carbon intensity. Higher-carbon fuels that exceed these annual limits incur deficits that suppliers must offset with credits generated from the distribution to the market of approved, lower-carbon alternatives. California's program has helped spur a rush of new US renewable diesel production capacity, swamping west coast fuel markets and inundating the state's LCFS program with compliance credits. CARB reported more than 26mn metric tonnes of credits on hand by April this year — more than enough to satisfy all new deficits generated in 2023. Staff have sought through this year's rulemaking to restore incentives to more deeply decarbonize state transportation than thought possible during revisions last made in 2019. Participants have generally supported tougher targets, with some fuel suppliers warning about potential price increases and credit generators urging CARB to take a still more aggressive approach. But proposals to limit credit generation to only 20pc of the volume of fuel a supplier made from canola, soybean and now sunflower has found little public support. Environmental opponents have argued that the CARB proposals fall short of what is necessary to add protections against cropland expansion and fuel competition with food supply. Agribusiness and some fuel producers have warned the concept, proposed in August, ran counter to the premise of a neutral, carbon-focused program and against staff's own view last spring. The proposal exceeded what CARB could do without beginning a new rulemaking, some argued. CARB yesterday proposed a grace period for facilities already using the feedstocks to continue generating credits while seeking alternatives. Facilities certified to use those feedstocks before changes are formally adopted could continue using those sources until 2028, compared to a 2026 cut off proposed in August. No facilities currently supplying California have certified sunflower feedstock, and it was not clear that any were planned. "We're not aware of any proposed pathway or lifecycle analysis for sunflower oil, so that addition is just baffling," said Cory-Ann Wind, Clean Fuels Alliance America director of state regulatory affairs. "Clearly not based in science." The latest revisions include a change to how staff communicate a new, proposed automatic adjustment mechanism (AAM). The mechanism would automatically advance to tougher, future targets when credits exceed deficits by a certain amount. Supporters consider this a more responsive approach to market conditions than the years of rulemaking effort already underway. Opponents argue such a mechanism cedes important authority and responsibility from the board. Staff proposed quarterly, rather than annual, updates on whether conditions would trigger an adjustment, and to use conditions during the most recent four quarters, rather than by calendar year. Obligations and targets would continue to work on a calendar-year basis. CARB staff clarified that verifying electric vehicle charging credits would not require site visits to the thousands of charging stations eligible to participate in the program. Staff also clarified how long dairy or swine biogas harvesting projects could continue to generate credits if built this decade, with a proposed reduction in credit periods only applying to projects certified after the new rules were adopted. California formally began this rulemaking process in early January after publishing draft proposals in late December. Regulators initially proposed adjusting 2025 targets lower by 5pc for 2025 — a one-time decrease called a stepdown — to work toward a 30pc reduction target for 2030. CARB set its sights on 21 March for adoption. But staff pulled that proposal in February as hundreds of comments in response poured in. Updated language released on 12 August proposed a steeper stepdown for 2025 of 9pc while keeping the 30pc target for 2030. Public comment on yesterday's publication will continue to 16 October. By Elliott Blackburn Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US dockworkers, shippers strike positions entrenched


02/10/24
02/10/24

US dockworkers, shippers strike positions entrenched

New York, 2 October (Argus) — The US dockworker strike gripping east coast and Gulf coast container terminals may not be short-lived given the wide gap between union demands and the offer from an alliance of containership owners, terminal operators and port associations. The United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) said its latest proposal for a 50pc wage increase, made on 30 September just before the strike started, "exceeds every other recent union settlement while addressing inflation". But the International Longshoremen's Association (ILA) rebuked USMX's characterization of the offer late Tuesday, saying it fails to address the many years it takes for the port workers it represents to realize the higher wages, and factors like workers being on unpaid on-call status. The last-minute timing of the 50pc wage increase offer itself undermines the USMX's position as good faith negotiators, ILA said. "[The] USMX's claim that they are ready to bargain rings hollow when they waited until the eve of the potential strike to present this offer," the ILA said. "The last offer from [the] USMX was back in February 2023." Dockworkers started to picket container terminals in New England, New York, New Jersey, Houston, Texas, New Orleans, Louisiana, and other locations on 1 October . Containership loading and unloading has come to a halt at those terminals, while no trucks where queued at unmanned loading checkpoints. The union has pointed to a perceived unfairness in record profits reported by shipping companies since the Covid-19 pandemic not being shared with ILA members who were "keeping ports open and the economy moving" during that time. The union is also sticking to demands for no new automation technology at US ports that would replace workers, describing this position as "non-negotiable", and the right to 100pc of the "container royalties" funds, a type of welfare paid out by employers to protect US longshoremen from the loss of work brought on by the containerization of cargo. No fed intervention expected US president Joe Biden continued to indicate the federal government would not intervene in the strike, saying collective bargaining between the ILA and the USMX is the best way for workers to achieve their goals. In a statement this week Biden also pointed out that the USMX "represents a group of foreign-owned [ocean] carriers" and insisted that they should "present a fair offer" to the ILA. "It is time for [the] USMX to negotiate a fair contract with the longshoremen that reflects the substantial contribution they've been making to our economic comeback," Biden said. Vice-president Kamala Harris, who is running to replace Biden, doubled-down on that position today. "This strike is about fairness," Harris said in a statement. "Foreign-owned shipping companies have made record profits and executive compensation has grown. The Longshoremen, who play a vital role transporting essential goods across America, deserve a fair share of these record profits." Few commodities curtailed for now Ports and the companies that rely on them have been anticipating the strike for many weeks . Movements of dry bulk cargo, such as coal and grains, are expected to be less affected by the work stoppage, though there could be side effects from the congestion of other products being rerouted to ports not affected by the strike. Movement of crude, refined products and many petrochemicals are not expected to be interrupted, but some polymers that are moved by container, including polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene (PE), and polypropylene (PP), could be disrupted. A segment of US steel imports could also be disrupted by the strike, as about 9pc of those imports come in via containers , according to data from Global Trade Tracker. A prolonged strike could begin to curtail some downstream manufacturing of equipment that requires parts that move by containers. By Ross Griffith Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

California eyes more oilseed limits as LCFS vote nears


02/10/24
02/10/24

California eyes more oilseed limits as LCFS vote nears

Houston, 2 October (Argus) — California regulators proposed late Tuesday expanding limits on the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) credits certain oilseeds may generate while keeping the program's tougher targets and adoption schedule unchanged. The latest proposed California Air Resources Board (CARB) revisions add sunflower oil — a feedstock with no current approved users or previous indicated use in the program — to restrictions first proposed in August on canola and soybean oil feedstocks for biomass-based diesel. The new language maintained a proposal to make the program's annual targets 9pc tougher in 2025 and to achieve by 2030 a 30pc reduction from 2010 transportation fuel carbon intensity levels. CARB staff's latest proposals, published a little before midnight ET on 1 October, offer comparatively minor adjustments to the shock August revisions that spurred a nearly $20 after-hours rally in LCFS prompt prices. Prompt credits early in Wednesday's session traded higher by $3 than they closed the previous trading day. LCFS programs require yearly reductions in transportation fuel carbon intensity. Higher-carbon fuels that exceed these annual limits incur deficits that suppliers must offset with credits generated from the distribution to the market of approved, lower-carbon alternatives. California's program has helped spur a rush of new US renewable diesel production capacity, swamping west coast fuel markets and inundating the state's LCFS program with compliance credits. CARB reported more than 26mn metric tonnes of credits on hand by April this year — more than double the number of new program deficits generated in all of 2023. Staff have sought through this year's rulemaking to restore incentives to more deeply decarbonize state transportation than thought possible during revisions last made in 2019. California formally began this rulemaking process in early January after publishing draft proposals in late December. Regulators initially proposed adjusting 2025 targets lower by 5pc for 2025 — a one-time decrease called a stepdown — to work toward a 30pc reduction target for 2030. CARB set its sights on 21 March for adoption. But staff pulled that proposal in February as hundreds of comments in response poured in. Updated language released on 12 August proposed a steeper stepdown for 2025 of 9pc while keeping the 30pc target for 2030. The proposal also added a limit on credit generation from certain crop-based feedstocks, to 20pc of the associated volume delivered to California in certain cases. Respondents generally supported the tougher targets, though fuel suppliers warned of higher prices and some credit generators argued that the state should be even more ambitious. No one praised the proposed limits on credit generation. Environmental advocates said the proposal fell short of the protections they sought against crop conversion and other risks; agribusiness warned that the concept distorted the LCFS and could spark lawsuits. By Elliott Blackburn Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Asian gasoline market in contango as supply surges


02/10/24
02/10/24

Asian gasoline market in contango as supply surges

Singapore, 2 October (Argus) — The Asian gasoline market structure flipped into contango — where later deliveries are priced at a premium to prompt arrivals — on 1 October because of an influx of cargoes from Saudi Arabia and China. The balance October and November spread was assessed around $0.05-0.10/bl in contango. The last time the market structure was in contango was on 20 June when the spread fell to -$0.05/bl. The gasoline crack spread, or the Argus Singapore 92R gasoline spot assessments against Ice Brent, also reflected the weakness as it fell to $3.05/bl yesterday, the lowest since 20 October 2023 when the crack spread was at $3.01/bl. The reason for the drop could be because of an influx in gasoline cargoes from Saudi Arabia, market participants said. There are a number of gasoline cargoes loading from Jizan, Saudi Arabia in September and are making their way towards Singapore, gasoline traders said. This could be related to the fall in spreads, said a Dubai-based gasoline trader. About 113,000t (955,000 bl) of gasoline could be loading from the Jizan refinery around 9-13 September and is expected to arrive in end-September, according to global trade analytics platform, Kpler. This marks a significant increase from August's volumes of just 12,000t and is the highest since February, Kpler data show. This increase was also reflected in data from oil analytics firm Vortexa, which showed about 85,000t expected to ply the route in September as compared to below 10,000t in August. The Jizan refinery has been exporting gasoline cargoes but mainly to the US. The US accounted for 61pc and 28pc of total export volumes in July and August respectively, according to Kpler. An anticipated surge in Chinese gasoline exports in October also placed a cap on crack spreads. Exports are expected to increase in October because of improved export economics and the rapid development of new energy vehicles (NEVs) which reduces domestic demand and margins for gasoline. Chinese companies plan to export 190,000 b/d of gasoline in October, a rise of 60,000 b/d or 44pc from September, although the volume is 20,000 b/d or 11pc lower from a year earlier. The release of Chinese export quota also eased concerns of a tight market in the fourth quarter. China exported around 26.17mn t of clean products from January to August 2024, GTT customs data show. An Argus survey suggests that China could also be exporting an estimated 5.29mn t from September to October 2024, bringing the total export volume to around 31.46mn t, which means about 9.54mn t quota left will remain for November to December 2024. Based on the January-September clean product export split, there should be more than 1mn t/months of quota for gasoline exports during November to December. In comparison, China exported an average of 750,000t of gasoline each month from January to October 2024. By Aldric Chew Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Calif. minimum gasoline reserve bill heads to Senate


01/10/24
01/10/24

Calif. minimum gasoline reserve bill heads to Senate

Houston, 1 October (Argus) — The California State Assembly today passed a bill that would authorize the state's energy regulator to require refiners to maintain minimum gasoline inventories, the latest measure in governor Gavin Newsom's ongoing legislative efforts to mitigate price spikes at the pump. The assembly today passed AB X2-1 with a 44-17 vote, sending the bill to the California Senate for committee and then floor hearings. The bill, if passed by the Senate and signed into law by Newsom, would authorize the California Energy Commission (CEC) to regulate, develop and impose requirements for in-state refiners to maintain minimum stocks of gasoline and gasoline blending components. The CEC would have the authority to penalize refiners who fail to comply. The bill comes on the back of a transportation fuels analysis by the CEC's Division of Petroleum Market Oversight (DPMO) that concluded days of refined product supply in California is a key driver of price spikes. A minimum road fuels inventory requirement is unprecedented in the US but has been implemented in various forms in Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines and Mexico. Proponents of the bill say maintaining "normal" inventory levels of gasoline will mitigate against price spikes for consumers. Critics, such as the west coast refining industry, say the government has misdiagnosed what it a broader supply problem for California where limited refining capacity and import infrastructure have created a "fuel island". By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more