Latest Market News

US coal demand to fall despite retirement shift

  • Spanish Market: Coal, Electricity
  • 02/01/24

Coal demand in the US may continue its downward trend in 2024 even though fewer power plant units are scheduled to close and some retirements have been delayed.

Coal-fired power plant unit retirements in 2024 are projected to number between six and eight, according to US Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates and company announcements recorded by Argus. That is down from 22 units permanently closed in 2023.

The current expectation for 2024 coal plant retirements also is slightly lower than what the EIA was projecting at the start of 2023. In addition, four fewer coal units closed in 2023 than had been expected at the start of the year. Some power plant retirements have been delayed or have been flagged by grid operators as temporarily necessary for grid reliability.

But market fundamentals, including more competitive natural gas prices and expanding renewable generation capacity, are expected to continue to be less supportive of coal-fired generation and coal demand this year.

"There's a lot of questions that go into these coal unit [retirement] delays, including how long grids need these units to continue operating during peak demand," said Ian Lange, associate professor at Colorado School of Mines. "It could just be for a few hours or a few days in the winter... but the short period of operation makes me think it will probably not significantly impact coal demand."

The latest projections from the EIA have coal consumption by US electric power plants falling by 10pc this year to 346.5mn short tons (314.3mn metric tonnes).

The biggest shift in coal retirements in 2023 appears to have been in the PJM Interconnection. The grid operator initially had 11 coal units retiring in the first half of 2023, taking a combined capacity of 5,681.2MW offline. But two of those unit retirements were withdrawn after Omnis Fuel Technologies in August reopened the 1,200MW Pleasants power station in West Virginia with plans to eventually add technology to extract hydrogen from coal and run the plant on hydrogen.

For 2024, PJM so far has only one plant scheduled to close, AES' 180MW Warrior Run plant, according to the generation deactivations page on the grid operator's website.

Two coal units in the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) — WEC Energy's South Oak Creek units 5 and 6 — are expected to close in 2024. WEC previously was expected to also retire South Oak Creek units 7 and 8 in 2024, but announced in June 2022 that it was going to extend operations of those units until "late 2025."

Elsewhere, Duke Energy delayed retirement plans of the remaining two coal units of the GG Allen plant in North Carolina to "by 2025" instead of the end of 2023. And the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission recently approved plans for MISO to extend its system support reliability agreement with Ameren's Rush Island plant in Missouri until at least 1 September 2024. MISO also has asked for permission to extend the reliability agreement it has with Manitowoc Public Utilities' Lakefront 9 plant in Wisconsin beyond its 31 January 2024 expiration date.

PJM has also identified some potential reliability issues that would affect zones that stretch into six states in the grid if Talen Energy were to deactivate the Brandon Shores power plant in 2025, shutting down 1,281.6MW of generating capacity.

Many utilities are likely to use units they have extended retirement dates for as reserve capacity for peak demand seasons instead of using them as baseload generation, Lange said. Some generators already have been operating older coal units at lower rates both because of market conditions as well as environmental regulations. They also are girding for potential tighter regulations in the future.

Even if utilities use the units more frequently, they may have little need to make significant coal purchases. Inventories at most power plants remained above normal going into 2024, following lower than expected coal-fired generation and consumption in 2023.

Coal-fired generation in PJM and MISO has lagged behind year-earlier levels from January-November, while natural gas generation rose for nearly all of 2023 because of lower prices and increased capacity. Average renewable generation fell slightly from year earlier levels even though generators installed more wind, solar and other technology.

In addition, some utility buyers have asked producers to stall shipments that were scheduled for 2023. That, along with other market fundamentals, will likely offset any increase in coal-fired generation that could have been expected from the slower capacity cuts.

PJM coal shipmentsst
StateJan-Oct 2022Jan-Oct 2023±
Delaware83,97171,789-15%
Illinois23,184,01419,119,430-18%
Indiana20,035,94918,421,354-8%
Kentucky22,987,04123,078,7580%
Maryland1,583,187926,993-41%
Michigan15,404,73711,260,903-27%
New Jersey183,955 - -100%
North Carolina4,863,0894,614,632-5%
Ohio14,242,14312,672,343-11%
Pennsylvania 11,080,6415,115,860-54%
Tennessee4,244,6602,835,083-33%
Virginia1,584,570916,898-42%
West Virginia 18,746,44117,052,955-9%
TOTAL138,224,398116,086,998-16%
MISO coal shipmentsst
StateJan-Oct 2022Jan-Oct 2023±
Arkansas10,725,338317,518-97%
Illinois23,184,01419,119,430-18%
Indiana20,035,94918,421,354-8%
Iowa10,735,30210,802,9111%
Kentucky22,987,04123,078,7580%
Louisiana4,545,4624,377,569-4%
Michigan15,404,73711,260,903-27%
Minnesota8,775,7466,959,659-21%
Mississippi4,043,1263,388,542-16%
Missouri24,511,35423,026,633-6%
Montana5,826,0465,486,268-6%
North Dakota17,981,34016,489,642-8%
South Dakota1,254,330856,134-32%
Texas48,562,24745,502,403-6%
Wisconsin10,377,64410,605,5982%
TOTAL195,040,324180,256,374-8%

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

03/12/24

German 2030 coal phase-out called into question

German 2030 coal phase-out called into question

London, 3 December (Argus) — Germany's coal phase-out targets are being reassessed owing to the likelihood of further delays to the passing of the power plant security act (KWSG), as well as decisions already taken on the future design of the electricity market. Germany has pledged to phase out coal and lignite-fired generation by 2038 at the latest, but energy ministry BMWK said an earlier, market-driven phase-out by 2030 is possible . Grid regulator Bnetza said 21GW of new gas-fired capacity — which should in the future be hydrogen-ready — would be needed by 2031 for a complete coal phase-out. Utility Leag said it does not see the current government changing the legal phase-out deadline. But "any further delay" to adding controllable replacement capacities would create an "urgent" situation, it said. And utility EnBW told Argus that it remains committed to phasing out coal by 2038 at the latest, while adding that "security of supply must not be jeopardised". At a transmission system operators' (TSO) forum held in November, TSO Amprion's Peter Lopion said the KWSG is vital to encourage plant construction in the south, where more gas-fired capacity is crucial if coal is to be phased out. He also raised concerns about Germany's target to phase out gas-fired power by 2045 — the year in which the country aims to reach climate neutrality — given the lack of a hydrogen economy and hydrogen production. Earlier this month, the CDU/CSU opposition parties commissioned an investigation into the feasibility of reactivating decommissioned nuclear plants, seeing the shutdown of Germany's final nuclear plant in April 2023 as "ideologically wrong". EnBW has told Argus that the decommissioning of its 1.4GW GKN II plant — the dismantling of which began in May 2023 — is "virtually irreversible". By Bea Leverett and John Horstmann Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

German stakeholders doubt power plant strategy passing


03/12/24
03/12/24

German stakeholders doubt power plant strategy passing

London, 3 December (Argus) — The collapse of the German government on 6 November has led to uncertainty over the future of Germany's power market, particularly with regard to the passing of the power plant strategy (KWSG) before federal elections scheduled for 23 February. Under the power plant strategy, economic and climate ministry BMWK proposed tenders for the construction of 12.5GW of power plant capacity and 500MW of long-term storage over the next few years. This includes 10GW of hydrogen-ready gas-fired capacity, of which 5GW was planned to be offered next year, with the government aiming to hold tenders in early 2025 . Renewables association BEE announced on 26 November that BMWK had submitted a KWSG draft for industry consultation over 72 hours, indicating the minority government's urgent desire to enact the law before the elections. Incumbent energy minister Robert Habeck previously said politicians from the opposition CDU party had been "constantly" writing letters to ask when the power plant strategy would "finally" be passed. But the deputy head of the CDU/CSU, Jens Spahn, told an industry event last week that owing to the former coalition's sidelining of the opposition when drawing up the strategy, the CDU/CSU cannot be expected to support it. Utility EnBW told Argus in November that it expects the KWSG to be "supported" under the next government owing to a cross-party consensus on the need for more capacity. EnBW said it would be prepared to take part in the tenders "if the conditions allow it", whereas utility Leag told Argus that while "considerable progress" had been made in its preparations for the tenders, it is unable to do anything "concrete" until the regulatory framework has been clarified. But it voiced doubts over whether the KWSG will be passed before the elections. And utility RWE told Argus that while it would not "speculate" on the KWSG's passing, it will "not put planning efforts on hold" and will "proceed as usual" in its preparations. Vattenfall declined to comment, while Uniper was not immediately available. At an electricity market forum hosted by the country's four transmission system operators last month, grid regulator Bnetza's Tobias Lengner-Ludwig said that Bnetza and potential investors will need at least six months to prepare for the tenders, which could cause further delays. But in its position paper on the KWSG in response to BMWK's consultation, energy and water association BDEW said investing in the tenders in their current form is unattractive, as risks are too high owing to a potential lack of hydrogen supply, possible delays in the setting up of hydrogen infrastructure and short implementation timeframes. And while BEE told Argus that it does not expect the KWSG to be passed in this legislative period, it is not demanding its passage, as it views the proposal to invest in hydrogen-ready gas-fired plants unfavourably. Such a strong commitment to hydrogen risks fossil fuel lock-ins and high electricity prices, it said, particularly owing to the initially limited availability of green hydrogen. It said the government should focus on adding flexible renewable capacity by maximising the potential of existing sources, including hydropower, geothermal, battery storage and combined heat and power. German solar association BSW told Argus that alternatives to conventional generation — such as flexible bioenergy and storage systems — should be expanded to add dispatchable capacity. Even if the KWSG were passed in this legislative period, it would only have an impact in the early 2030s, it said. While clean spark spreads for lower-efficiency units for each year to 2027 have remained mostly negative this year, clean spark spreads for higher-efficiency units for 2025 turned negative in September after being in the money for most of 2024. And clean spark spreads for higher-efficiency units for 2026 and 2027 have averaged around €0.25/MWh and minus €1.40/MWh this year, despite the latter almost consistently being positive since the start of September. By Bea Leverett and John Horstmann Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

French government faces no confidence vote


02/12/24
02/12/24

French government faces no confidence vote

London, 2 December (Argus) — The French government could be set to fall within days, leaving its energy programme up in the air, after far-right party Rassemblement National (RN) declared it would launch a vote of no confidence. Prime minister Michel Barnier today announced he would use a parliamentary manoeuvre to push through a budget for the social security system without a vote. Since his nomination in September, Barnier has been attempting to achieve consensus on state budgets for 2025, while lacking a majority in the parliament. Left-wing and right-wing groups responded to today's move by promising to launch motions of no confidence. The RN had previously tacitly supported Barnier, preserving him in office as he prepares the budget, which must be finished before the end of the year. A successful vote of no confidence on 4 December at the earliest would require 289 deputies, a majority of the national assembly, to vote in favour. A previous confidence vote on 8 October garnered 197 in favour, falling short. But the 121 RN deputies supported the government on that occasion, and their switch to the opposition could provide enough votes for the measure to pass. If the government falls, no new parliamentary elections can be held until June. President Emmanuel Macron could name a new prime minister, but this appointee would not have a majority either. And left- and right-wing groups have called on him to resign and trigger new presidential elections. If the budget does not pass, the government's energy programme could be delayed or ignored. A potential way forward out of the budget deadlock could be to pass a special budget law, which would carry forward measures already in place this year, extending them for a month at a time until a permanent budget can be voted through. Changes which could not go forward in this situation could include a mooted increase to the tax on electricity — taking it up to roughly €30/MWh from 1 February 2025, from current levels of €21-21.50/MWh. Others include changes planned to subsidies for domestic energy efficiency measures and electric vehicles. By Rhys Talbot Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia’s Dartbrook mine prepares for first coal sale


02/12/24
02/12/24

Australia’s Dartbrook mine prepares for first coal sale

Sydney, 2 December (Argus) — New South Wales mining firm Australian Pacific Coal (APC) is planning to ship its first load of unwashed coal from the underground Dartbrook mine in December 2024, two months after reopening its Hunter Valley facility. APC will focus on producing thermal coal at the mine, and is also planning to test the coking potential of deposits around the site in early 2025. The company recently announced plans to produce 20,000t of coal at Dartbrook by November 2024, ramping up to 2.4mn t/yr by late 2026. APC is planning to increase coal production at Dartbrook during a period of weakening thermal coal demand. Coal exports from the Port Waratah Coal Terminals at the Port of Newcastle fell on the year in November for the second consecutive month. The Australian Office of the Chief Economist announced in September it was forecasting a 21.6pc drop in thermal coal exports between the July 2023 to June 2024 and 2025-26 financial years. Dartbrook sits alongside the Hunter Valley Rail Network, a set of lines connecting dozens of coal mines in New South Wales to the Port of Newcastle. However, APC will not be able to use the lines until it negotiates an access agreement with network operator the Australian Rail Track Corporation. The company must also sign agreements with terminal operators at the Port of Newcastle before it can ship coal out of New South Wales. APC's original Dartbrook resource consent was scheduled to expire in December 2022, but New South Wales' Land and Environment Court granted the company a five-year consent extension in late 2021. The company had been appealing for an extension for two years after an initial unsuccessful attempt. APC is currently working on another application to extend its consent by six years through to December 2033. APC's export preparations come alongside managerial changes at the firm. The company announced the resignation of its chief executive and managing director, Ayten Saridas, the same day it updated investors on Dartbrook. By Avinash Govind Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

LNG use poses risk to Cambodia's energy security: IEEFA


28/11/24
28/11/24

LNG use poses risk to Cambodia's energy security: IEEFA

Singapore, 28 November (Argus) — Cambodia's increasing reliance on LNG for power generation could be detrimental to its energy security because of instability in LNG markets, according to Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA). Rapid economic growth and electrification have led to Cambodia's electricity demand growing by 16pc/yr since 2009, according to IEEFA's report released on 26 November. Its power generation is mostly from hydropower and coal, but the country aims to boost its gas-fired power generation to meet its decarbonisation targets. Cambodia has a net zero by 2050 goal, and aims to reach 70pc renewable energy generation by 2030. The share of coal in Cambodia's power mix was 45pc in 2023, with hydropower representing 44pc, solar 5pc and imports from neighbouring countries making up the remaining 6pc. The country in 2021 declared that it would not build new coal plants beyond those already approved. Natural gas had not played a role in the country's power mix until recently, but "optimism has grown in recent years regarding the ability of new LNG-to-power projects to help the country meet rising electricity demand," stated the report. Gas operator Cambodian Natural Gas imported the country's first LNG shipment in 2020 from China's state-owned firm CNOOC, according to IEEFA. The firm also planned to complete a 1,200MW LNG-fired power plant and a 3mn t/yr import terminal by 2023, although there has been no progress as of June this year. Cambodian officials in November 2023 announced the cancellation of a 700MW coal project, which will be replaced with a 800MW gas-fired power plant instead. Cambodia is seeking to build these large LNG-fired power plants because of concerns over the intermittency of renewables such as wind and power, and LNG is viewed as a suitable transition fuel for grid reliability. The government expects LNG-fired capacity to reach 900MW by 2040, which would require roughly 840,000 t/yr of imports. When considering long-term wholesale prices of $8-16/mn Btu, Cambodia's LNG import bill could range between $361mn-722mn/yr, according to IEEFA. Some forecasts estimate that Cambodia's LNG-fired capacity could rise to as much as 2,700MW by 2040 and 8,700MW by 2050, stated the report. This would entail import requirements of 2.53mn t/yr in 2040 and 8.14mn t/yr in 2050. The fuel import costs for 2,700MW of LNG-fired capacity could amount to $1.08bn-2.17bn. LNG volatility LNG markets have been volatile over the past two years, because of factors such as geopolitical tensions and outages at supply facilities. Other emerging Asian economies such as Pakistan and Bangladesh faced fuel and power shortages because they have been unable to secure affordable LNG supplies, and this "demonstrates the evident risks of LNG importation for developing countries," states the report. Cambodia already has one of the highest electricity tariffs in Asia at $0.16/kWh, so higher LNG prices could require higher tariffs. LNG prices in Asia have been roughly $14/mn Btu and would have to fall below $5mn/mn Btu to compete with other electricity sources, according to IEEFA, but these low price levels are rare. The ANEA price, the Argus assessment for spot LNG deliveries to northeast Asia for the front-half month, stood at $15.08/mn Btu on 27 November. Cambodia's LNG demand and LNG-fired power plant expansions remain uncertain, so long-term offtake commitments will be challenging and the country will likely have to initially source cargoes from the sport market, according to the report. But the spot market poses risks in terms of supply security and price stability. Establishing an LNG supply chain also entails rigid long-term contracts that lock in fossil fuel infrastructure for decades. By Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more