Latest Market News

European sulphuric acid market squeezed on outages

  • Spanish Market: Fertilizers
  • 22/07/24

The European sulphuric acid market is going through a period of tight supply following outages at smelters and lower production rates at sulphur burners, which have impacted overall availability of acid in the domestic market.

The industry is working on a week-by-week basis as availability remains variable because of lack of availability from smelters and lower availability of molten sulphur impacting sulphur burner operations.

As a result, sellers and distributors face uncertainty as the volatile supply has resulted in order cancellations as they cannot guarantee quantities to their offtakers further than two weeks ahead for both types of acid, in some cases.

The supply shortage has been reflected in an increase in the third-quarter contract settlements for both smelter and sulphur-burnt acid, which settled on 18 July.

Smelter-based acid contracts for the third quarter rose by around €10-15/t on the previous quarter, while third-quarter sulphur-burnt acid contracts rose by €30-40/t on the previous quarter.

There are concerns in the domestic market that start-up issues at a key supplier in northwest Europe will tighten availability further.

Aurubis' Hamburg plant — which produces high-quality acid — faced problems following its return from maintenance on 11 July. The smelter had been off line undergoing heavy maintenance since early May.

The shortfall in smelter acid from the Aurubis closure could in turn have a knock-on effect on refinery sulphur production by limiting availability of higher grade sulphuric acid for the alkylation process.

It is not yet clear how long production at the plant could be curtailed, but it has further squeezed the market of high-quality sulphuric acid.

Overall, the market is likely to be short of supply in July and into the first half of August with industry sources concerned about the limited supply to cover the requirements for the domestic industry.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

Egypt’s NCIC issues fertilizer sales tender


22/07/24
22/07/24

Egypt’s NCIC issues fertilizer sales tender

London, 22 July (Argus) — Egyptian fertilizer producer NCIC has issued a tender to sell 50,000t of fertilizers for loading by the end of August, closing on 26 July. The breakdown of the products offered is as follows: 30,000t of DAP 10,000t of TSP 5,000t of CAN 27 5,000t of urea The cargoes will be sold on fob basis. NCIC wants buyers to pay 30pc in advance, 40pc two days before the shipment date and 30pc in cash against documents. If paying through letters of credit, buyers can pay 30pc in cash in advance and the remaining 70pc by letter of credit. NCIC did not issue a tender to sell July-loading product. It reported selling 40,000t of DAP at $562/t fob and 30,000t of TSP at $435/t fob under its tender to sell June-loading product at the end of May. Since then, Egyptian DAP prices have risen to $610-620/t fob. NCIC reduced its DAP production rates to 80pc capacity last week because of low gas supplies. It had resumed DAP production earlier this month. Argus assessed TSP prices in Brazil at $505-515/t cfr last week, netting back to the $480s/t fob up to the low $490s/t fob Egypt. NCIC sold 5,000t of urea at $362/t fob and a further 5,000t at $367/t fob, reported last week . Argus understands NCIC stopped producing urea last week. There has been no indication that production has resumed. By Tom Hampson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

India's June NP/NPK output and sales up, imports down


19/07/24
19/07/24

India's June NP/NPK output and sales up, imports down

London, 19 July (Argus) — India's output of NP/NPK fertilizers rose on the year in June, while domestic sales climbed sharply, but imports fell. June NP/NPK production rose by 4.9pc on the year to 917,400t, as imports decreased by 5.4pc to 264,000t, provisional government data show. Sales under India's direct benefit transfer (DBT) system reached 1.343mn t last month, up by 51pc year on year. The data for trade and production imply total NP/NPK stocks in India of just over 5.168mn t at the end of June, down by 3.1pc on the month and 1.6pc on the year. Domestic NP/NPK production in April-June — the first three months of India's 2024-25 financial year — reached almost 2.512mn t, up by 2.9pc on the corresponding period of 2023-24. April-June DBT sales were up by 42.1pc on the year at 2.185mn t, while imports decreased by 20.1pc to 709,000t, the data show. India's import market for complex fertilizers has been in a quiet phase as participants focus on a pricing-based impasse around DAP . A resolution of the DAP situation should in turn lead to a rise in import activity around NPS and NPK grades, including key formulae 20-20-0+13S and 10-26-26. Prices for these products are set to climb in next business, in line with a general firming of the global market for complex fertilizers. By David Maher Indian NP/NPK stocks, output, imports, and DBT sales Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Indian DAP stocks fall by 430,000t in June


19/07/24
19/07/24

Indian DAP stocks fall by 430,000t in June

London, 19 July (Argus) — A major lack of DAP imports into India has caused stocks to fall by over 400,000t in June, according to Fertilizer Association of India (FAI) data, with Argus estimating stocks are currently at 2mn t. Imports have slowed considerably because of the current maximum retail price and subsidy in India, which effectively makes importing above $500/t cfr uneconomic. But global prices are way above this level. Chinese fob prices at $580/t imply landed costs close to $600/t cfr India, while neighbouring Pakistan has paid above this level over the last few days. Reports emerging from India on 18 July suggested that the government was mulling a special subsidy on DAP of 3,000-3,500 rupees/t ($36-42/t) to plug some of the shortfall. India produced 343,600t of DAP in June, imported 273,000t and sold 1.05mn t. Stock draw/build, equivalent to production plus imports minus consumption, was thus at -430,000t. Cumulative production fell by 15pc on the year to 1mn t for April-June for the kharif season so far, with imports down by 48pc at 1.12mn t, and sales also falling by 11pc to 1.93mn t. Imports are at around 376,000t, comprising tonnage from Russia, China, Saudi Arabia and Morocco, show Argus line-up data for July so far. This would bring imports for kharif so far to nearly 1.5mn t for April-July, compared to 2.7mn t in the same period of 2023. By Mike Nash Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EU fertilizer industry calls for support: Q&A


17/07/24
17/07/24

EU fertilizer industry calls for support: Q&A

London, 17 July (Argus) — As the EU gears up to install a new European Commission for 2024-2029, LAT Nitrogen's chief executive officer Leo Alders tells Argus political support remains necessary to tackle a range of challenges threatening EU industry, including subsidised US ammonia production with carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS), and the EU's 'unrealistic' goal of cutting net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 90pc by 2040. But Alders sees growing political "goodwill" to help EU industry against cheap fertilizer imports from Russia, which are used to fund the country's war against Ukraine. Edited highlights follow. What does the fertilizer industry want from the next European Commission? Clear points are effectively releasing emissions trading system (ETS) funds for converting the industry to green fertilizers. We also want carbon sequestration to be allowed as it is in the US. And we need a policy on nutrient efficiency, which has never really happened. For us, too, spillage is not the desired objective. The international context, too, is important. Grey ammonia produced in Europe could move to the same cost levels as US blue ammonia with subsidised CO2 sequestration. If or when that happens, then Europe will see massive imports of US blue ammonia. We think that by 2027 or 2028, volumes coming out of the US will grow exponentially. That's a trend that we think is unstoppable. The underlying issue, of course, is that energy in Europe is at higher price levels than on any other continent. We need to stay in Europe with our production capacity. But the threat is there. Are 90pc GHG cuts by 2040 feasible for you? When discussing the ETS measures, the carbon border adjustment mechanism, and so on, we took a positive approach as an industry. And we go alon g with the zero [carbon] target for 2050. That's all right. But now the [2040] target is not official, more a desired milestone that emissions will be cut by 90pc by 2040. As an industry, we think that target is totally unrealistic and cannot support it. That's a clear point of view. Converting to a green industry will require massive capital. Technologically, it takes time to do all of this. Is the ETS working well for the fertilizer industry? Proceeds from ETS certificates go partly to national budgets and partly to the EU budget. That's all nice. But our industry needs to invest massively to complete the transition. We pay massive amounts of money for CO2 certificates. There was the promise that national and EU levels would subsidise decarbonisation projects from the ETS. In reality, we've seen very few subsidies materialising. So we actually have a counter-proposal: why not allow the industry to park the money for green investments? In theory, the national level is obliged to reinvest 50pc of ETS income back into the industry. The reality is different. Isn't the EU still wary of prohibitive €100-150/t tariffs on Russian fertilizers? A ban on Russian fertilizer imports would require unanimity. Tariffs, though, require majority support among EU states. That seems feasible. At least 15 states appear to support the idea. There is actually no supply issue. We don't have any issues replacing Russian volumes. There may be a possible time element and rebalancing in the first three or four months. But after that, the European industry would be fully capable of supplying our farms. So political support is growing? More and more people understand how Russian gas is being transformed into fertilizer. They've understood that routing gas to Europe is becoming more and more difficult. The EU has been totally unsuccessful in pushing back against Russian urea, so Russia is building some 650,000 t/yr in extra capacity, expected on line next year or thereafter. As an industry, we don't want to be shutting down units in Europe because of cheap subsidised Russian fertilizers. And then, what happens if one day Russia decides to cut or weaponise fertilizer supplies? By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more