Latest Market News

Aemetis optimistic about LCFS update, tax credit

  • Spanish Market: Biofuels, Emissions, Natural gas
  • 02/08/24

US biofuels producer Aemetis expects supportive regulatory changes to boost profits, which have struggled recently on lower prices.

Chief executive Eric McAfee said Thursday that expected policy changes in the next year will "significantly increase the value of our products," which include ethanol and renewable natural gas. He cited the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) upcoming meeting in November in which regulators will consider updates to the state's low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS), as well as an Inflation Reduction Act federal tax credit for clean fuels kicking off in January and Environmental Protection Agency action to approve higher E15 ethanol blends in more of the country next year.

In California, regulators are weighing tougher targets for the LCFS program, where sagging credit prices over the last year could deter investments in decarbonizing transportation. They have floated an initial step down in carbon intensity limits in 2025 of 7pc or more. McAfee predicted that CARB would ultimately determine that a 9pc stepdown "basically is the minimum required, not the maximum, but the minimum required to move major oil companies forward on buying more credits now".

He said that in discussions with CARB officials, it was "pretty clear" that the growth in unused credits available for compliance in future years had exceeded expectations. The bank of credits, which do not expire, hit a record high at the end of the first quarter, according to data released this week.

The Inflation Reduction Act's 45Z tax credit, which will tie incentives to a fuel's lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, could also benefit the company's expanding biogas business. McAfee said there is a "wide range" of potential outcomes, since it is unclear how federal regulators will account for fuels with negative carbon intensity. But he expects a worst-case scenario would still be a subsidy of around $7.20/mmBTU.

That credit will also be more generous to sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), although it is unclear when Aemetis' planned SAF and renewable diesel production facility in Riverbank, California, will come on line. The company received key air permits from local regulators in the first quarter this year and that it was "discussing the use of innovative pricing structures with our airline customers to accelerate the financing, construction, and operation of the SAF plant", McAfee said. Aemetis has signed offtake agreements with companies such as Delta Air Lines and Alaska Airlines.

The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment on its timeline for starting up the plant, which could produce 90mn USG/yr of SAF and renewable diesel.

Aemetis this week reported a net loss of $29.2mn in the second quarter this year, up from a net loss of $25.3mn during the same period last year. The company sold more ethanol and renewable natural gas in the US and less biodiesel in India but received lower prices for many of its products.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

27/12/24

Viewpoint: Consolidation looms in US methanol

Viewpoint: Consolidation looms in US methanol

Houston, 27 December (Argus) — The sale of Netherlands-based OCI's methanol production assets to rival producer Methanex is set to shift the market, with US methanol production most affected by the move. Methanex in the third quarter of 2024 announced the $2bn acquisition, which is expected to close in the first half of 2025. The boards of directors of both companies and OCI's shareholders approved the transaction, but it is subject to regulatory approvals. OCI operates the 1mn t/yr OCI Beaumont plant and is a 50:50 partner in Natgasoline, a 1.7mn t/yr joint-venture plant between OCI and Proman. Methanex operates three plants in the US, all in Geismar, Louisiana. These plants carry a collective 4mn t/yr capacity and represent one-third of total US methanol capacity. At front and center of the acquisition is the Natgasoline plant in Beaumont. Natgasoline, when operational, represents 14pc of domestic production. The plant opened in 2018, and throughout those six years, the plant has seen its share of operational issues. The most recent was a fire at the reformer unit in early October, resulting in a complete shutdown lasting nearly three months. When the deal was announced, Methanex made it clear that the transaction was subject to approvals by OCI shareholders, as well as a pending legal decision between OCI and Proman. "If it is not settled within a certain period, Methanex has the option to carve out the purchase of the Natgasoline joint venture and close only on the remainder of the transaction," the company said in September. Methanex and OCI declined to give further details, as the deal is still pending. Proman did not respond to a request for comment. If it goes through, the acquisition would result in the exodus of OCI from the US methanol market. But the issue of liquidity in the US spot barge market is also looming. Market participants said OCI is a frequent buyer when the Natgasoline plant goes down. In October, when Natgasoline was completely shut down, 340,000 bl of methanol moved for delivery at ITC, the terminal on the Houston Ship Channel where methanol is exchanged, according to Argus data. Market participants expect liquidity to be about the same until some time after the deal closes. When a plant goes down, a producer will emerge in the spot market for purchases. In the longer term, there are some questions around international distribution and where US methanol exports find a home. Methanex is a major exporter to Asia, whereas OCI sells into the European market. The low-carbon methanol sector will also experience some shakeup. OCI is a major participant in the bio-methanol space, selling volume into Europe. Methanex produces carbon-captured methanol, also known as blue methanol, which has not penetrated the EU market. By Steven McGinn Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Viewpoint: California-Quebec carbon faces murky 2025


27/12/24
27/12/24

Viewpoint: California-Quebec carbon faces murky 2025

Houston, 27 December (Argus) — The joint California-Quebec climate market, known as the Western Climate Initiative (WCI), is on tenterhooks going into 2025, stymied by rulemaking delays but on the cusp of a more mature phase. Both California and Quebec are eyeing more-stringent future programs and have floated a series of changes over the past year and a half designed to achieve those goals. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is considering moving its program's mandate from the present 2030 target of a 40pc reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, compared with 1990 levels, to a 48pc reduction to keep the state on target to meet its 2045 goal of net-zero emissions. In line with this increased ambition, CARB will need to remove at least 180mn metric tonnes (t) of allowances from the 2026-2030 auction and allocation annual budgets to start with, and up to 265mn t in total from the program budgets from 2026-2045. CARB has floated other changes , including toughening corporate relationship disclosure requirements, increasing the program's cost-containment allowance price tiers and updating a portion of the program's carbon offset protocols. Quebec has considered removing 17.5mn t of allowances, which correspond to carbon offset uses for compliance in the province over 2013-2020. The Quebec Environmental Ministry proposed to address this by removing these allowances from the province's 2025-2030 auction budgets in a November 2023 workshop. Quebec is also mulling changing the current three-year compliance period to align with statutory 2030 and 2050 GHG targets. But this a move that California, which had discussed similar compliance period changes in April , has not revisited since. Quebec is considering tapering the limit for carbon offset use for compliance in the province by 2030 and transitioning over to a provincial reduction purchase mechanism in 2031, although regulators have not gone in-depth on how a replacement system would function. The WCI rulemakings have been marked by a series of delays over this year, pushing past projections from the end of last year that it would finalize program changes by the second half of 2024. Quebec, which was set to deliver a draft of program amendments in September, rescheduled to early 2025, with implementation expected in spring 2025. While the regulation was nearly complete in late September, the Quebec Environmental Ministry chose to postpone, since it cannot publish before California, said Jean-Yves Benoit, the agency's director general of carbon regulation and emissions data. CARB has signaled it intends to publish its package of rulemaking amendments in early 2025. The agency on 19 December confirmed it expects to "complete and release the regulatory package for a 45-day public comment period" in early 2025 but did not explain the delay. The agency may be waiting for a formal extension of the cap-and-trade program when the legislature resumes on 6 January. California lawmakers have given CARB explicit authority to utilize a cap-and-trade system to reduce GHG emissions out to 2030. CARB maintains it has authority to operate a cap-and-trade program past 2030, but program participants have stressed the need for formal certainty around the program to aid future planning. CARB will begin invoking the post-2030 budgets starting in 2028 for the program's advance auctions. The various delays have compressed the timelines California and Quebec must achieve their statutory target ambitions, making 2025 a potentially pivotal year. By Denise Cathey Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Viewpoint: Mild weather may pressure gas prices in 2025


27/12/24
27/12/24

Viewpoint: Mild weather may pressure gas prices in 2025

Houston, 27 December (Argus) — The US natural gas market has worked to lower inventories and bring prices up this year, but a warm 2024-25 winter may once again keep storage levels elevated in the new year. US natural gas inventories at the end of the 2023-24 winter season were well above average due to minimal heating demand caused by mild winter weather and robust US production. Storage levels ended the season on 29 March at 2.259 Tcf (64bn m³) — 39pc higher than the five-year average and 23pc higher than a year earlier. The higher inventories pushed down gas prices by minimizing concerns about supply shortfalls and disincentivized production this year, as large natural gas producers such as Chesapeake Energy and EQT reduced output on low prices and minimal expected demand. These interventions helped reduce the supply glut. Total US gas inventories for the week ending 1 November were 3.932 Tcf, entering the 2024-25 winter season only 6pc higher than the five-year average and 4pc higher than a year earlier. In addition, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) predicted in its November Short Term Energy Outlook (STEO) that production in 2025 would be up 1pc from 2024 as lower inventories push up prices and once again incentivize production. EIA estimates that demand this winter will exceed last year's levels and keep inventories only just above average. According to December's STEO, inventories are expected to be 1.92 Tcf at the end of March 2025, only 2pc higher than the five-year average . However, the mild weather that has covered much of the country this November and December risks once again sharply cutting into heating demand, leaving inventories at the start of 2025's spring injection season high enough to again put downward pressure on gas prices. Heating demand in November was 12pc below the seasonal average, according to the National Weather Service (NWS). The mild weather caused prices at the Henry Hub, the US benchmark, to average roughly $2/mmBtu in November. However, EIA's December STEO predicted that prices at the Henry Hub would average just under $3/mmBtu for the rest of the winter heating season on expectations for cold weather. That cold weather has yet to fully materialize. While demand in the first week of December was 20pc higher than average on cold snap, temperatures since then have been above seasonal norms, with heating demand in the week ending 20 December landing at 22pc below average and demand in the week ending 28 December expected to be 26pc below average. If below-average demand continues into 2025, it is unlikely that inventories will drop as much as forecast. Prices this winter would be close to $3/mmBtu if withdrawals this season are close to 2.1 Tcf , East Daley Analytics senior director Jack Weixel said in September. US inventories had that level of withdrawal in winter from 2020-22. However, if temperatures this winter are once again well above average, Weixel said inventories could end the season more than 530 Bcf above average, cutting average prices to $2.50/mmBtu and undoing price from the smaller-than-average injection season. Prices may be especially pressured by rising production in the Permian basin of west Texas and southeastern New Mexico. Since most of the gas output from the Permian comes from oil wells, low gas prices may not affect production, as drilling decisions there are influenced by oil production rather than gas production. Prices may still rally this winter if temperatures dip low enough in January and February, offsetting the mild weather of November and December. In addition, the rise of LNG exports next year may boost demand and subsequently raise prices. Several LNG projects or expansions are currently underway in the US with the Golden Pass export terminal, the Plaquemines export terminal and the stage 3 expansion at Cheniere's Corpus Christi liquefaction terminal all expected to start up in 2025. By Anna Muthalaly Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Viewpoint: SE Asian IMO2 MRs to rise on EU policy


27/12/24
27/12/24

Viewpoint: SE Asian IMO2 MRs to rise on EU policy

London, 27 December (Argus) — Rates for specialised Medium Range (MR) tankers in southeast Asia will be driven up in 2025 by changes in EU policy on deforestation, higher biofuels blending mandates, and new mandates in the aviation sector, all of which will support exports of biodiesels, feedstocks and palm oil. Demand for specialised MRs in southeast Asia is ruled by exports of palm oil to Europe and the US Gulf coast. Palm oil does not usually need to travel on IMO2 ships and can be moved on IMO3 vessels. But it is often moved as a part-cargo of between 5,000-15,000t so is often picked up by IMO2 or IMO2/3 vessels, which are more suitable as they have a higher number of segregated tanks. Kpler data show around 6.3mn t of palm oil was exported from Indonesia and Malaysia to the US Gulf and Europe in the January-November 2024 period. Palm oil deliveries from southeast Asia have been trending lower since 2020 with the product becoming less popular in Europe because of deforestation issues. On 4 December, an agreement was reached between the European Council and the European Parliament to delay the application of the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) by one year. This means larger companies will not be required to prove that their products, such as palm oil, did not contribute to deforestation until 30 December 2025. This has averted a potential rapid loss in palm oil exports to Europe in 2025 but there will probably be a substantial decline in exports later in the year as businesses prepare for the EUDR. In the short term, the decision to postpone the EUDR will probably boost cargo numbers heading to Europe as traders had been holding off for clear regulatory guidance. This will support freight rates for IMO2 MRs in the new year by pulling more IMO2/3s and IMO3s away from the market and by increasing the number of part cargoes available for IMO2s. Feedstock exports ramp up Indonesia and Malaysia also export many specialised products that require IMO2s, such as waste based feedstocks palm oil mill effluent (POME), palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD) and used cooking oil (UCO), as well as finished biodiesels like Ucome. Kpler puts exports of these products to Europe at around 2.8mn t in the first 11 months of 2024, with POME cargoes making up 42pc of all shipments or around 1.2mn t. POME was included in Annex IX Part A of the EU's renewable energy directive (RED), meaning member states can count it twice towards their renewable energy goals. Exports of feedstocks and biodiesels to Europe will probably rise in 2025 as blending mandates rise and because of a reduction in the carryover of emissions tickets in Germany and the Netherlands. Argus estimates European demand for biodiesel Pomeme to rise by around 36pc on the quarter in first three months of 2025 to around 3.5mn litres. Higher requirements for biofuels and feedstocks in Europe should push up demand for products like POME, PFAD, and UCO from Malaysia and Indonesia and support higher IMO2 demand in southeast Asia. But this could be tempered by an Indonesian ruling to include an export permit for POME and PFAD that requires participants to fulfil their cooking oil domestic market obligation. SAF mandates begin in Europe Exports of HVO and SAF from Singapore to Europe also make up part-cargo demand for IMO2 MRs. Argus forecasts European HVO demand will rise by 85pc on the quarter to 2,582mn l in the first three months of 2025. New 2pc SAF mandates in the EU and UK in 2025 will provide a sizable rise in SAF demand. This should spur a jump in cargoes loading from Singapore — driving up demand for part-cargo space on IMO2 MRs. By Leonard Fisher-Matthews Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Viewpoint: Policy doubts hit Australia's biofuel sector


27/12/24
27/12/24

Viewpoint: Policy doubts hit Australia's biofuel sector

Sydney, 27 December (Argus) — Australia's biofuels sector has garnered significant interest during the first 2½ years of the current federal Labor government, but uncertainty over key policy support measures has stymied investment and led developers to question whether 2025 will be a year of reform. Labor secured its first majority government since 2007 in the mid-2022 election and subsequently pledged to cut Australia's greenhouse gas emissions by 43pc on 2005 levels by 2030. But the country is not on track to meet this ambitious target because of slow progress decarbonising its electricity and transport sectors. Biofuels have become increasingly popular, given decarbonising hard-to-abate transport industries is seen as key to reaching the 2030 goal. Canberra has committed to a low carbon liquid fuels (LCLF) standard, which the industry views as crucial to enabling investment in processing, refineries and new feedstock crops. In its May 2024 budget, the federal government expressed a desire to develop sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and renewable diesel (HVO) industries. The outcomes of consultations are expected to be released imminently. On the demand side, a regulatory impact analysis of the costs and benefits associated with mandates for LCLF has been promised, but no timeframe has been released. Domestic refiners Ampol and Viva, as well as BP at its former Kwinana refinery, have expressed interest in biofuel production but all require certainty on demand and supply-side support mechanisms. Australian bioenergy developer Jet Zero and a consortium including major airlines aim to build a 113mn litres/yr plant in the northern part of Queensland state, but initial engineering for the concept has not yet been completed. The consortium plans to convert bioethanol from domestic agricultural byproducts like sugarcane molasses into SAF and HVO through the alcohol-to-jet pathway, with production expected to start in 2027. Jet Zero is also planning to produce SAF through the Hydrotreated Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) production pathway in a 50:50 joint venture with Aperion Bioenergy. But the project, which is still in its feasibility stage, is facing hurdles in pricing the feedstock offtake agreements or term contracts. Complicating the picture, heavy transport is now showing greater signs of electrification, as demonstrated by iron ore producer Fortescue's major order for new electric haul trucks. Regardless, the introduction of new safeguard mechanism laws requiring large emitters to reduce pollution has led Australia's fuel companies to increase HVO sales, with 500,000l contracts now signed on a regular basis despite the higher costs. Australian coal mining firm Stanmore has tested a 20pc HVO blend at its Bowen basin Poitrel mine, demonstrating an increasing acceptance of biofuels by customers. Ampol and Viva both sell fatty acid methyl esters (Fame) based biofuel blends at 5pc, 10pc and 20pc. Ampol has two projects in the pipeline: a co-processing facility that would supply up to 60mn l/yr by 2026 and the Brisbane renewable fuels joint venture, which would be a larger project of 0.5bn-1bn l/yr and is due for a final investment decision by late 2025. Viva has been less forthcoming about its plans for biofuel production since it announced a new biofuel blending venture at its 120,000 b/d Geelong refinery in 2023. There will be a federal election no later than mid-May 2025 and both major parties are keen to enhance their green image while supporting regional communities and manufacturing jobs. New regulatory support is crucial if Australia is to transition from supplying significant quantities of feedstock for biofuels to other countries, particularly tallow and canola seed, to producing its own renewable fuels. Australia's increasing reliance on imported oil products and foreign crude, along with a worsening geopolitical backdrop, has started to raise concerns in Canberra. This could be the deciding factor in whether the government will create the required regulatory environment for a local biofuels industry to thrive. By Tom Major and Tom Woodlock Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more