Bulk carriers mostly score low CII in 2023

Spanish Market: Natural gas, Oil products, Petrochemicals
20/08/24

More than half of bulk carriers scored carbon intensity indicator (CII) grades of C or lower on an A-E scale in 2023, according to International Maritime Organization (IMO) data.

About 61pc, or 9,127 of all bulk carriers sized 5,000 gross tonnes (gt) and over that reported their energy efficiency, scored C, D or E on the CII scale in 2023, according to the IMO data.

IMO's CII regulation, which came into force in January 2023, requires vessels over 5,000 gt to report their carbon intensity, which is then scored from A to E. A and B vessel scores are regarded as superior energy efficiency, while C, D and E are considered moderate to inferior scores.

The scoring levels are lowered yearly by about 2pc, so even a vessel with no change in CII could drop from from C to D in one year. If a vessel receives a D score three years in a row or E score in the previous year, the vessel owner must submit a corrective actions plan. To improve its CII score, a ship owner could reduce its speed and burn low-carbon fuels, among other solutions.

Global marine fuel demand from vessels of 5,000 gt and above dropped by 1pc to 211.1mn t in 2023, down from 213.4mn t in 2022, according to the latest IMO data. The drop could be attributed to the global economic slow-down in 2023, as well as vessels employing slow steaming to reduce marine fuel consumption.

Residual fuel oil bunker demand was down by 2pc to 170.9mn t in 2023 from the previous year, according to IMO data. The IMO does not report separately high-sulphur and low-sulphur fuel oil demand. Global marine gasoil (MGO) demand fell by 6pc to 26.6mn t. An increase in methanol and LNG for bunkering demand offset some of the conventional marine fuel declines. LNG for bunkering demand rose by 18pc to 12.9mn t and methanol increased by 2.6 times to 93,876t.

In 2023, container ships, bulk carriers and tankers accounted for 31pc, 30pc and 21pc, respectively, of global residual fuel oil bunker demand. Containers ships and bulk carriers accounted for the majority of the MGO demand, 18pc and 15pc, respectively. Tankers accounted for 93pc, or 87,319t, of total methanol demand and LNG carriers accounted for 89pc of LNG for bunkering demand, or 11.5mn t.

By Stefka Wechsler

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

14/01/25

Colonial shuts Line 1 due to Georgia spill: Update

Houston, 14 January (Argus) — Colonial Pipeline's main gasoline bearing line may be closed for more than a day as the company responds to a gasoline spill in Georgia detected on Tuesday. "Colonial has taken Line 1 out of service temporarily while we respond to a potential product release," the company said in a notice. "Normal operations continue on the remainder of the system." The spill occurred in Paulding County, Georgia, about 25 miles southwest of Marietta, Georgia. The company said it had crews on site responding to the incident. The company did not provide information on when the line would restart. Market sources said leak was small but it could take up to two days to resume operations. Line 1 has capacity to carry up to 1.3mn b/d of gasoline from Houston, Texas, to Greensboro, North Carolina. Cash prices for US Gulf coast 87 conventional gasoline in the Gulf coast ended Tuesday's session down by 3.19¢/USG at $2.115/USG, reversing gains from the previous session's 14-week high that was driven by higher blending demand. Liquidity fell during Tuesday's trading session with uncertainty over the length of the pipeline shut-down. The pipeline leak did not affect line space trading on Tuesday, which had already been falling. Values saw their sixth session of losses, shedding 0.25¢/USG day-over-day. A trade was reported at -1.5¢/USG, prior to the notice of the pipeline shut down, with no further trades reported for the remainder of the session. By Hannah Borai Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Biomethan: Missbrauchsverfahren gegen THE gestartet

14/01/25

Biomethan: Missbrauchsverfahren gegen THE gestartet

Hamburg, 14 January (Argus) — Die Bundesnetzagentur hat auf Anfrage von acht Unternehmen der Biogasbranche ein besonderes Missbrauchsverfahren gegen Trading Hub Europe eingeleitet. Die deutsche Gasbörse hat die Bilanzkreise der Landwärme Service am 11. Oktober 2024 gekündigt. Dadurch sind Vertragspartnern wirtschaftliche Probleme entstanden. Ein Unternehmen, dem ein Bilanzkreis vom Marktgebietsverantwortlichen gekündigt wird, darf Biomethan weder liefern noch entgegennehmen. Vertragspartner der Landwärme Service (LWS) konnten deshalb von einem Tag auf den anderen nicht mehr auf die Mengen zugreifen, die von LWS oder ihnen selber zuvor schon in den Bilanzkreis eingespeist wurden. Somit haben sie für 2024 auch keinen Anspruch auf Nachweise über die Nachhaltigkeit ihres bereits erhaltenen oder eingespeisten Biomethans. Diese sind allerdings notwendig für Anlagenbetreiber, da diese in der Regel EEG-gefördert sind. Sollten sie bis Ende Februar keine entsprechenden Nachweise erhalten, könnten Unternehmen daher ihre EEG-Förderung verlieren. Kunden, Lieferanten und Produzenten, die einen Vertrag mit LWS hatten, mussten sich dementsprechend umorientieren und versuchten neue Lieferverträge zu etablieren. Dies steigerte auch die Nachfrage und verteuerte Biomethan in Deutschland im Oktober. Grund für die Anträge für ein Missbrauchsverfahren ist nun, dass die Vertragspartner von LWS noch immer keinen Zugriff auf ihre Mengen haben und auch keine Informationen erhalten haben, was mit diesen geschehen ist. Ein Antragsteller erklärte, dass er sich von dem Verfahren eine Wiederherstellung der Mengen oder eine finanzielle Kompensation erhofft. Trading Hub Europe soll den betroffenen Geschäftspartnern im November ein Angebot gemacht haben, zumindest einen Teil der Mengen gegen Zahlung eines Ausgleichsenergiepreises wieder in Biogasbilanzkreise einzustellen, so Unternehmen. Dieser Preis war für viele jedoch zu hoch angesetzt und hätte nur etwa 30 % der Mengen wiederhergestellt. Gleichzeitig wäre das Problem der Nachhaltigkeitszertifikate durch dieses Angebot weiterhin nicht gelöst. Viele der betroffenen Unternehmen wollten dieses Angebot nicht annehmen, da es weder attraktiv noch wirtschaftlich war. Die Anträge der Unternehmen gingen zwischen dem 17. Dezember und 20. Dezember 2024 bei der Bundesnetzagentur ein. Bei den Antragsstellern handelt es sich um die Biomethanproduzenten und -händler Verbio und EnviTec Energy, die Versorger STAWG – Stadt- und Städteregionswerke Aachen, Energie Schwaben und Stadtwerke Passau sowie die Biomethandienstleister und -händler GETEC Energy Management und GETEC Green Energy. Der genaue Grund für die Kündigung der Bilanzkreise ist nicht bekannt. Laut Trading Hub Europe (THE) ist eine außerordentliche Kündigung aus wichtigen Gründen möglich. Dies ist zum Beispiel der Fall, wenn gegen Bestimmungen trotz Abmahnung schwerwiegend verstoßen wurde, der Bilanzkreisverpflichtete seiner Verpflichtung einer Sicherheitsleistung oder Vorauszahlung nicht fristgerecht oder vollständig nachgekommen ist oder wenn dieser fahrlässig falsche oder unvollständige Angaben bei der Zulassung gemacht hat oder nicht über Änderungen der Angaben informiert hat. Ein weiterer Grund für eine Kündigung kann eine erhebliche Unterspeisung des Bilanzkreises sein, hier sei die Kündigung auch ohne wiederholten Verstoß und ohne Abmahnung möglich. Von Svea Winter Senden Sie Kommentare und fordern Sie weitere Informationen an feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Mexico’s industrial output up 0.1pc in November

13/01/25

Mexico’s industrial output up 0.1pc in November

Mexico City, 13 January (Argus) — Mexico's industrial production edged up 0.1pc in November, as gains in autos and other manufacturing offset weaker construction, national statistics agency Inegi said. Mexican bank Banorte described the monthly increase as "rather small," noting it followed a 1.1pc decline in October and was largely driven by base comparison effects. The bank added that the overall industrial outlook remained "fragile." Manufacturing, which represents 63pc of Inegi's seasonally adjusted industrial activity indicator (IMAI), increased by 0.7pc in November, though it failed to fully recover from a 1.7pc drop in October. Transportation manufacturing, a key subsector accounting for 12pc of the sector, rose by 3.8pc after a steep 4.3pc decline the prior month. Despite recent volatility, Mexico's auto sector achieved record annual light vehicle production in 2024, reaching 3.99mn units. Yet, automaker association AMIA warned of potential challenges in 2025 because of economic uncertainty, which could affect investment and demand. Mining, which makes up 12pc of the IMAI, increased by 0.1pc in November following a 1.1pc decline in October. Growth was driven by a 41.4pc jump in mining-related services, while oil and gas output fell by 2.4pc, marking a fifth consecutive monthly decline for hydrocarbons. Construction, representing 19pc of the IMAI, contracted by 1.8pc in November after modest gains of 0.2pc in October and 1.1pc in September. As industry eyes potential policy shifts under US president-elect Donald Trump, Banorte projected a weak start to 2025 for Mexico's industrial output. But it expects momentum to build as government spending on priority infrastructure projects "moves more decisively." By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

AI may boom on gas power, then turn to nuclear

13/01/25

AI may boom on gas power, then turn to nuclear

New York, 13 January (Argus) — The first tranche of new US data centers coming on line this decade to run electricity-intensive artificial intelligence (AI) software will probably rely mostly on power generated by natural gas, while the nuclear renaissance hoped for by Big Tech comes later in the 2030s. Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook-parent Meta and Google-parent Alphabet want clean, reliable power as quickly as possible so they can be early movers in the development of AI, which is rapidly advancing and finding new user bases around the world. While these companies do not relish the optics of powering AI development with fossil fuels, gas-fired power is widely expected to fulfill most of the gap between current supply and future demand through at least 2030. Unlike wind and solar, gas can be relied upon for steady, baseload power, a necessary ingredient for always-on data centers. And crucially, unlike nuclear, gas-related infrastructure can be built out quickly. The most recent additions to the US nuclear fleet, Vogtle units 3 and 4 in Georgia, took 15 years to build and cost $30bn, double the expected time and cost. A few decommissioned nuclear reactors can be restarted, as Microsoft is paying to do with a unit of Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania. But this low-hanging fruit will be quickly exhausted. Questions around the meter While there is broad agreement that gas will power the AI data center boom through at least 2030, questions remain about what this rapid gas-fired power build-out will look like. Data center operators can secure power in two ways: wade through the long, arduous interconnection process through which new customers connect to the grid, or bypass the grid altogether and secure their own personal electricity supply through so-called "behind-the-meter" agreements. Many in the gas industry are betting tech companies' need for speed will force them to opt for the latter. "The data centers are not going to wait," Alan Armstrong, chief executive of Williams, the largest US gas pipeline company, told Argus in an interview. "They are going to go to states that allow you to go behind the meter." In this scenario, construction of an AI data center in a state like Louisiana, for instance, might accompany construction of a new intrastate pipeline connecting the state's prolific Haynesville gas field with a new gas-fired power plant. Intrastate pipelines bypass the federal oversight triggered by interstate pipeline construction, and new gas power plants only take 2-3 years to build, East Daley Analytics analyst Zachary Krause told Argus . Most of the incremental power needed to run AI data centers this decade will be generated by new gas plants, Krause said. Even ExxonMobil in December said it was in talks to provide "fully islanded" gas-fired power to AI data centers. It claimed it could even capture 90pc of the CO2 emissions from power generation, appeasing tech companies' climate ambitions. ExxonMobil's non-grid gas generation fleet is "independent of utility timelines, so they can be installed at a pace that other alternatives — including US nuclear — just can't match," ExxonMobil chief financial officer Kathy Mikells said. But connecting to the grid may offer better reliability and economics than behind-the-meter gas power. If an off-grid gas generator trips off line, for instance, an always-on data center without back-up generation depending on that facility would be in trouble. Grid connection also allows generators to sell excess power into the grid. For those reasons, most new data centers this decade will rely on the grid as their primary power source, Adam Robinson, research associate at consultancy Enverus, told Argus . Small modular future But if the 2020s become the decade of gas-powered AI, the 2030s may be when nuclear-powered AI gets its due. The long-awaited nuclear renaissance may come not from conventional reactors, but from next-generation small modular reactors (SMRs), which can theoretically be built much faster and cheaper. No US SMRs yet exist, but given the number of SMR start-ups with expected start dates before 2030, and money pouring into the sector from the likes of Google and Microsoft, at least one of these next-generation reactors should be operating by 2030, Adam Stein, director of nuclear energy innovation at research center Breakthrough Institute, told Argus . SMRs' smaller price tag relative to conventional 1 GW nuclear reactors may also accelerate their adoption, Stein said. "Not every utility needs a GW-scale plant of any kind, but they might need a 300 or 600MW plant," he said. "So the total addressable market is larger for SMRs." By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Singapore bunker prices rise to multi-month highs

13/01/25

Singapore bunker prices rise to multi-month highs

Singapore, 13 January (Argus) — Bunker fuel prices in the port of Singapore touched multi-month highs today, supported by a rally crude futures Ice Brent Singapore crude reached $81.23/bl by close of trading in the port city, following the announcement of sweeping sanctions by the US administration on Russian energy exports. Shipowners and bunker buyers in Singapore were cautious about procurement given the elevated prices. Many pushed back their bunker buying, preferring to monitor near-term market developments. Very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) prices on a delivered basis in Singapore jumped by $16.7/t to $590.72/t, the highest since 24 October 2024. Deals concluded by 19:00 Singapore time had touched $599/dob and could breach $600/t in the coming days if strength in the energy complex continues. "Market is firm… I would not dare to fix anything today," a ship owner said, adding that "buyers should be very careful" when making procurement decisions. Another vessel owner said its earliest VLSFO bunker requirement would be for delivery from 26 January, and it was not looking to trade at the moment. "It is very difficult to know how things will proceed, but think it might move higher," said a UK-based bunker trader. VLSFO supply availability is limited, which could further support upward movement in prices in the coming days. High sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) prices jumped by $34.67/t today to $507.67/t dob, the highest since 26 July 2024. Marine gasoil (MGO) prices were at a six-month high $731/t dob in Singapore, up by $30/t from the previous session. The upside in crude futures was reflected in marine biodiesel prices, with B24 rising in Singapore. B24, which is a blend of 24pc used cooking oil methy ester (Ucome) and 76pc VLSFO, were assessed by Argus $14-15/t higher at $721-726/t dob. Traders said B24 prices will follow the trend in VLSFO cargo prices, but spot liquidity may remain thin. "Today people are still trying to figure out what right value is," said a key shipowner and trader, adding that prices could rise further this week. By Mahua Chakravarty and Cassia Teo Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more