Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Von der Leyen puts forward EU commissioner candidates

  • Spanish Market: Electricity, Emissions, Natural gas
  • 17/09/24

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen today presented candidates for commissioner posts, confirming names put forward for portfolios including climate, energy, agriculture and trade.

Von der Leyen — who was confirmed by European Parliament as Commission president on 18 July — has committed to doubling down on climate and energy policy. Her 2024-29 mandate stipulates greenhouse gas emissions cuts of at least 90pc by 2040 compared with 1990.

Her commissioners, if appointed, will implement those policies. She is nominating Teresa Ribera to oversee competition policy but also "clean, just and competitive transition" that would include energy, climate, environment and other Green Deal files. Ribera is Spain's deputy prime minister and responsible for the country's ecological transition.

Von der Leyen has proposed the current EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra for the portfolio of climate, net-zero and clean growth. Hoekstra, who replaced previous Green Deal commissioner Frans Timmermans, will also be responsible for taxation.

Other nominees include former Danish climate minister Dan Jorgensen, up for energy and housing commissioner. Former Swedish minister for EU affairs Jessika Roswall is proposed for a portfolio including environment and circular economy, and Luxembourgish Christophe Hansen, a former member of EU parliament, is proposed as agriculture and food commissioner.

Von der Leyen now needs to ensure that candidate-commissioners are approved by parliamentary committees and then by plenary. Hearings will also focus on candidates' abilities to implement policies. "Parliamentary scrutiny will not cut corners," European Parliament president Roberta Metsola said.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

01/04/25

French nuclear modulation to step up this summer

French nuclear modulation to step up this summer

London, 1 April (Argus) — Modulation in the French nuclear fleet, and the consequent gap between nuclear availability and output, is set to grow in the coming weeks as consumption falls in summer and solar output picks up. But the fleet's ability to modulate, touted as one of its great strengths, could be put to the test by growing amounts of intermittent renewable capacity, without any accompanying rise in consumption or in flexible storage capacity. France's flexible nuclear plants are unusual in being able to modulate their output downwards, with each reactor capable of dropping twice a day to 20pc of rated output. Nuclear reactors by their nature have high fixed costs and low variable costs. But operator EdF still reduces production in hours in which prices fall below these low variable costs, widening the gap between the theoretical available capacity and actual production. And low-priced hours became more common last year, particularly in the summer, in the middle of the day and on weekends, as low demand coincided with high nuclear and renewable production. The gap between availability and output across the fleet typically has held at 1-2GW on a monthly basis in recent years. But last summer, it jumped to 4GW on average in each month from April-August ( see availability-output gap graph ). And so far this year it has averaged 2GW, compared with 1.8GW in the same period last year. Modulation has held higher too, with the difference between maximum and minimum daily nuclear output averaging 4.6GW, up from 3.2GW last year ( see modulation graph ). Solar output so far this year has averaged 2.4GW, up by 35pc on 1.8GW in the same period in 2024, after France's solar fleet grew by 5GW, or roughly a quarter, over 2024. As output increases with longer days, this will begin translating into increasingly more output centred around midday, driving stronger modulation. Modulation becomes political Modulation has this year become a political football, with the government promoting the parallel growth of nuclear and intermittent renewables, while an insurgent faction, typically on the political right, claims that more renewables are at best wasteful and at worst actively damage the nuclear fleet. France's nuclear fleet has always modulated, as its large size means residual demand is lower than capacity in low consumption periods. But the extent of this modulation grew sharply last year. Lower consumption contributed to this, as did the growth of renewables. Much of France's renewable capacity is not exposed to market prices, as it is remunerated by feed-in tariffs, and has no incentive to shut down when prices fall below zero. Even the minority of capacity that is required to halt production when prices fall below zero in order to retain subsidy still can produce at prices only slightly above zero, or below the marginal cost that drives EdF to modulate down nuclear output. Operator EdF defends its ability to modulate. The firm's nuclear chief, Etienne Dutheil, last year told a senate commission that the fleet's ability to modulate was the "envy" of other operators. And modulation has "very few effects" as long as it is partial and does not require a total shutdown that makes the plant cool down, he said. The firm told the senate enquiry that thus far, there is "no proven statistical link between modulation and a possible loss of production or increased failures of plants". But modulation could increase wear on reactors' secondary circuits and consequently increase maintenance needs, it said. Proponents of a combined nuclear and renewables approach say that meeting France's goals for electrifying end-uses will require a large volume of extra electricity in the coming years, which potential new nuclear plants — planned for the second half of the next decade at the earliest — will not be able to deliver in time. But opponents decry the combination of nuclear and renewables as wasteful, given that EdF does not save on any of its hefty fixed costs when modulating down nuclear plants to make way for zero-marginal cost renewable output, essentially putting a double burden on consumers that have to pay twice for two separate generating fleets. And others put forward the damage that they say modulation does to the nuclear fleet. Rassemblement National (RN) leader Marine Le Pen raised the topic in a written question to the government last month, asserting that modulation "prematurely ages pipes and welds of reactors". And even some internal EdF documents present modulation in a less benign light than the firm's chiefs. The combination of renewables and nuclear leads to power output fluctuations that are "never insignificant in terms of safety, especially of the control of the reactor core, and the maintainability, longevity and operating costs of our facilities", according to a 2024 report by the company's chief nuclear safety inspector. The PPE3 energy plan, which the government hopes to finalise in law imminently, commits France to rapid increases in renewables deployment. If the plan's objectives are followed, intermittent output will grow in the coming years. The plan also aims for a rapid increase in consumption to soak up the extra power produced. But potential drivers of electrification such as heat pumps and electric vehicles had their subsidies slashed in the 2025 budget. Increased storage capacity could be a way to integrate more intermittent renewables. France already has pumped-storage sites that can add up to 3.8GW of flexible demand during peak output periods. But battery storage is little developed in France, thanks partly to these pumped-storage sites and to nuclear modulation, both of which limit intra-day spreads. As battery capacity grows, it typically quickly saturates the ancillary services market and these wholesale spreads will become increasingly important for making battery projects profitable. By Rhys Talbot Nuclear availability-output gap GW Daily nuclear modulation (max-min output) Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Singapore, Peru sign Article 6 carbon deal


01/04/25
01/04/25

Singapore, Peru sign Article 6 carbon deal

London, 1 April (Argus) — Singapore and Peru have signed an agreement to trade carbon credits under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. The deal will provide the foundation for Singapore to hit its climate targets by buying carbon credits from Peru, while channelling finance to the latter for scaling its climate projects. Carbon credits traded under Article 6 are called Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes (Itmos). They count towards the buyer's nationally determined contribution and must meet several criteria, such as featuring a letter of authorisation from the host country. Market sources have suggested that "logistical barriers" have complicated the issuance of letters of authorisation, heavily limiting the pool of credits that can be traded as Itmos. Towards the end of last month, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change issued a template for letters of authorisation establishing precisely what information a host country must receive from project developers in order to authorise their credits for trade credits under Article 6. The deal is Singapore's first with a Latin American country, which host some of the largest nature-based projects in the world in reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation and afforestation, reforestation and revegetation project areas. Singapore has signed similar Article 6 agreements with Papua New Guinea, Ghana and Bhutan. By Felix Todd Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EU publishes CO2 car standard tweak proposal


01/04/25
01/04/25

EU publishes CO2 car standard tweak proposal

Brussels, 1 April (Argus) — The European Commission has published the long-awaited proposal to give automobile manufacturers more flexibility in complying with the bloc's CO2 reduction targets for cars and passenger vehicles in 2025, 2026 and 2027. Those three years would be assessed jointly, rather than annually, averaging out fleet emission performance. EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said the additional compliance flexibility shows that the commission has "listened" but the EU is still maintaining its zero-emission targets [for new vehicles from 2035]. "Predictability in the sector is crucial for long-term investments," said Hoekstra. The commission urged the European Parliament and EU member states to reach agreement on the targeted amendment "without delay". German centre-right member Jens Gieseke said there is a "broad majority" in parliament to fast-track approval for May. He noted that the car industry faces over €15bn ($16bn) in penalties for non-compliance with the CO2 standards. A member of parliament's largest EPP group, Gieseke also called for the commission to go further towards technological neutrality. "We need different kinds of fuels, e-fuels, biofuels, every fuel which could help to reduce CO2 should be recognized," he added. This second step, withdrawing the phase-out of internal combustion engines (ICE) from 2035 onwards, Gieseke noted, should come in the last quarter of 2025. German Green MEP Michael Bloss disputed the figure of €15bn in potential fines put forward by automotive industry association ACEA. "Even in the worst-case scenario, the total fines for all car manufacturers would not exceed €1bn," said Bloss. "Car manufacturers have had enough time to adjust their production planning. Many have done so," Bloss said, pointing to Automaker Volvo. Under the current 2019 regulation, fines should be imposed on manufacturers for each year in 2025–2029 when they do not reach their specific fleet-wide target CO2 reductions, compared to 2021 values. But manufacturers have the option to form compliance pools with other firms. "European car manufacturers are already talking to Tesla or Chinese manufacturers about so-called pooling, which must be stopped quickly," said EPP climate and environment spokesman Peter Liese. "We want to maintain climate targets, but not make Elon Musk richer through European legislation," said Liese. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia's OCE sees higher LNG export earnings


01/04/25
01/04/25

Australia's OCE sees higher LNG export earnings

Sydney, 1 April (Argus) — Australia's Office of the Chief Economist (OCE) has revised up its LNG export earnings forecasts for the present fiscal year and the next, given global supply issues and higher than expected prices. Seasonal pressures — including higher winter demand in Europe owing to lower renewable energy output and an end to Russian gas flows via Ukraine — have increased prices, the OCE's Resources and Energy Quarterly (REQ) March report said. The OCE raised its expectations for the average LNG price for the fiscal year to 30 June by 10pc ( see table ), while increasing its forecast for the following year by 14pc from its previous report. Receipts predicted in 2024-25 have been forecast A$8bn ($5bn) higher to A$72bn, while 2025-26 earnings will likely reach A$66bn, up from A$60bn in December's REQ. Asian demand continues to strengthen, even with Japan and South Korean import levels likely peaking. The OCE noted LNG's growing popularity as a transport fuel in China and record-high Indian imports last year, given increased pressure on power grids. Higher prices have failed to dampen demand in southeast Asia — including Malaysia, Bangladesh, Singapore and Thailand — while Taiwan's backtracking on renewable targets, coupled with artificial intelligence (AI) and semiconductor sector growth, will increase energy demand there. Qatari and US investment in new supply will add 5pc to global export volumes in 2025, while demand witll grow by just 2.5pc, but the REQ expects this year's imports and exports will gradually balance. Greenfield projects The biggest challenge for Australian projects appears to be a lack of greenfield projects, following the expected completion of the 8mn t/yr Scarborough and 3.7mn t/yr Barossa projects in July-December 2026 and July-September 2025 respectively. The impact of these backfill operations in offsetting gradual declines at the 14.4mn t/yr North West Shelf LNG facility will have ceased by 2029-30, with exports falling by 2mn t/yr to 78mn t/yr. But oil and gas exploration spending is increasing after years of declines, the OCE said, with onshore search expenditure rising from A$190mn in July-September last year to A$285mn in October-December 2024. Offshore spending rose from A$125mn to A$178mn in the same period, indicating that higher prices are driving greater confidence. The ANEA price — the Argus assessment for spot LNG deliveries to northeast Asia — for first and second-half May were assessed at $12.96/mn Btu and $12.995/mn Btu respectively on 28 March. The ASEA price — Argus' assessment for spot LNG deliveries to southeast Asia — for the same period was $12.72/mn Btu and $12.75/mn Btu. By Tom Major Australia LNG export forecasts 2023-24 2024-25 (f) 2025-26 (f) 2026-27 (z) 2027-28 (z) 2028-29 (z) 2029-30 (z) Exports (mn t) 81 80 80 82 80 80 78 Export receipts (A$bn) 70 72 68 64 63 57 51 Mar '25 LNG export price (A$/GJ) 16.1 17.1 16.3 14.9 14.8 13.4 12.5 Dec '24 LNG export price (A$/GJ) 16.1 15.6 14.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a Export price % ± (Mar vs Dec forecasts) 0 10 14 n/a n/a n/a n/a f - forecast z - projection Source: OCE REQ Argus gas prices ($/mn Btu) Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EU commission's CO2 tweak for cars imminent: Update


31/03/25
31/03/25

EU commission's CO2 tweak for cars imminent: Update

Updates with likely date for approval Brussels, 31 March (Argus) — The European commission could approve a legal proposal for a limited revision of the bloc's 2019 regulation setting CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and light commercial vehicles (LCVs) on 1 April, an official said. A draft proposal circulating does not change the substance of the 2019 rules but specifies a three-year compliance period (2025-2027) used to calculate potential excess emissions premiums. And the 29-page legal proposal does not alter the bloc's 2030 emissions reduction target to reduce economy-wide CO2 emissions by 55pc, compared to 1990. Nor does it lower the overall CO2 emission standards, the commission said. If agreed by the European Parliament and EU member states, the "one-off" three-year compliance period over 2025-2027, instead of an annual assessment, would provide additional flexibility for vehicles manufacturers, while maintaining investor certainty and predictability, the commission added. The 2019 regulation requires annual EU fleet-wide average CO2 emissions from new cars and new vans to be reduced in five-year intervals. For each year in 2025–2029, a target reduction of 15pc, compared with 2021 values, would normally be applied. Without any legal change approved by parliament and EU states, manufacturers exceeding their specific emissions targets, would have to pay excess emission premiums of €95 per g/km for each new vehicle registered. The commission is also "accelerating" work on a review that will commence "in good time this year", said the commission's energy and climate spokesperson Anna-Kaisa Itkonen. But she had "nothing new" on whether compliant fuels could be expanded beyond e-fuels to include other low-carbon and zero-carbon, such as biofuels. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more