Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Africa seeks trillions in climate finance at Cop 29

  • Spanish Market: Crude oil
  • 07/10/24

Africa faces the heaviest economic burden from climate change, and the most uncertainty over funding, writes Elaine Mills

A key priority for African countries at the UN Cop 29 climate talks in Baku next month is to secure a new climate finance goal for developing countries. But as well as serious commitments on an amount, the continent wants increased accessibility and cheaper funding.

Regional alliance the African Group of Negotiators (AGN) is seeking a climate finance commitment from developed countries of $1.3 trillion/yr by 2030, under a new climate finance goal currently being negotiated — the so-called new collective and quantified goal (NCQG). The NCQG is the next stage of the $100bn/yr target that developed countries agreed to deliver to developing countries over 2020-25. It was met for the first time in 2022, according to the OECD, but some countries in Africa have complained that the money never reached them.

The AGN wants to steer clear of the old target, contesting whether it has even been met. The group says it wants lessons to be learned, especially regarding the quality of the finance and the difficulties countries have had in accessing it. Uganda asks that the new goal avoids "political statements that are not implemented", referring to uncertainties over how the finance was counted and accessed. African states want the funding to come mostly from public sources, largely in the form of grants and highly concessional loans. This should improve borrowing costs and ease debt burdens, which are forcing countries to make trade-offs with critical development needs. The group does not want market-based loans to be counted as climatefinance — the majority of multilateral climate loans were market-based in 2016-22.

Most African countries face an unsustainable debt situation that has been worsened by higher global interest rates, AGN chair Ali Mohamed says. "Our focus is on agreed obligations within the multilateral climate process and the need to improve investments to unlock the continent's potential to tackle the climate crisis, which is paralysing most economies," he says. Africa receives only 2pc of total global climate finance, according to think-tank Climate Policy Initiative. The new NCQG must create the right conditions to push that share to at least 30pc, "otherwise it is a failed process", a South Africa negotiator said last month.

The heaviest price

The first global stocktake at Cop 28 in Dubai last year acknowledged the world is off track in meeting the Paris Agreement's goals, with significant ambition and implementation gaps in mitigation and adaptation, as well as loss and damage, Mohamed says. African countries submitted ambitious nationally determined contributions, but there has not been corresponding financial and technical support for their implementation. "We lack clarity on the amount of current and future funding, capacity building and technical support," Kenya's cabinet secretary for environment, climate change and forestry, Aden Bare Duale, says. This vagueness undermines transparency of support under the Paris accord, and addressing it should be prioritised in the forthcoming negotiations, he says.

African countries lose 2-5pc of their GDPs annually and many divert up to 9pc of their budgets responding to climate extremes, according to the State of the Climate in Africa 2023 report by the World Meteorological Organisation. The report serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need for climate action in Africa, where extreme weather events disproportionately impact the continent's socio-economic development, Zambian environment minister Mike Mposha says. "It is African nations who pay the heaviest price," Simon Stiell, head of UN climate body the UNFCCC, says. "But it would be incorrect for any world leader — especially in the G20 — to think ‘It's not my problem'. The economic and political reality — in an interdependent world — is we are all in this crisis together."

Climate finance flows and needs in Africa

Bilateral climate finance loans in 2016-2022

Multilateral climate finance loans 2016-2022

Multilateral climate finance loans 2016-2022

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

19/02/25

Investor group urges BP to allow new climate vote

Investor group urges BP to allow new climate vote

London, 19 February (Argus) — A group of 46 BP institutional investors has voiced concerns that the company may ditch a target to reduce its oil and gas production to 2mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d) by the end of the decade, urging a new shareholder vote be allowed on its net-zero strategy. The letter's signatories include several UK and European pension fund managers and other investors, including Aegon, Investec and Robeco. It comes ahead of BP's capital markets day on 26 February, when the company has said it will "fundamentally reset" its strategy. The group calls on BP to give another opportunity to vote on its net-zero plans at its 2025 annual general meeting, pointing out that shareholders in 2022 endorsed a BP plan to cut hydrocarbon production by 40pc, to 1.5mn boe/d, by 2030. That achieved 88.5pc support from shareholders, but the group of investors behind the letter note that nine months later BP revised upwards its target for 2030 to 2mn boe/d. BP's output averaged 2.36mn boe/d in 2024. The investors are now concerned that increased spending by BP on oil and gas output, due to subsequent strategy tweaks, will raise "potential exposure to stranded assets as the energy transition progresses." The letter notes there is opportunity for BP to explain how emissions budgets in Paris Agreement-aligned scenarios are considered in the sanctioning of new projects. "Showing where projects will sit on the global merit curve of producing assets would also allow investors to assess the relative competitiveness and resilience of BP's portfolio and capital expenditure," it states. In a statement to Argus a signatory to the letter, Royal London Asset Management, said it recognised BP's past efforts toward the energy transition but it is "concerned about the company's continued investment in fossil fuel expansion. "If BP has decided to scrap its production target, we seek clarity on how capital allocation will shift to ensure resilience through the energy transition," it said. "Will BP scale up investments in renewable energy, carbon capture, and emerging technologies to future-proof the business against regulatory, market, and climate risks?" Royal London urged BP "to strengthen governance and transparency around transition planning, ensuring that future capex decisions align with a net-zero pathway rather than locking in further emissions growth." It added: "Robust oversight and clear long-term strategies are essential to delivering value while managing the risks of an accelerating energy transition." A BP spokesman said the company had received the letter and "will respond in due course." Environmental pressure group Greenpeace said BP can expect this kind of pushback and challenge from its shareholders "at every turn if it doubles down on fossil fuels". "Government policies will also need to prioritise renewable power, and as extreme weather puts pressure on insurance models policymakers will be looking to fossil fuel profits as a way to fund extreme weather recovery," Greenpeace said. "BP might want to seriously put the brakes on this U-turn." Earlier this month BP's shares jumped on media reports that activist hedge fund Elliott Investment Management was building a stake in the UK major. Investment bank analysts that follow BP expect Elliott to attempt to bring about a boardroom shake-up as it has at other resources companies, including at Canadian oil sands business Suncor Energy in 2022. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

UK Gulfsands Petroleum eyes return to Syria's upstream


19/02/25
19/02/25

UK Gulfsands Petroleum eyes return to Syria's upstream

Dubai, 19 February (Argus) — London-listed Gulfsands Petroleum plans to return to Syria's upstream as soon as sanctions on the country are lifted and "circumstances allow," the company's managing director John Bell said. "Sanctions discussions are occurring not only in the EU, but also in the UK and US," Bell told Argus . "In summary, we view these developments as generally positive. Gulfsands has always intended to return to its operation in Syria when the circumstances allow." Gulfsands holds a 50pc operating stake in two oil fields in Syria's block 26, in the country's northeast near the border with Iraq, an area long controlled by the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). Chinese state-owned Sinochem holds the remaining 50pc. Force majeure was declared in December 2011 with respect to the contract after the introduction of EU sanctions against Syria. The fields were producing 24,000 b/d at the time. Since then, control of the fields has been unclear at times. By 2017 Gulfsands said production was averaging around 15,000-20,000 b/d, although it added that was without its participation. Bell said the company can only return "if the current relevant energy sanctions in the EU, UK and US as revised and hence international companies are permitted to return to their operations, bringing with them vital investment, people, equipment and know-how." In January, the EU's high representative for foreign affairs Kaja Kallas said the bloc would begin easing sanctions against Syria within weeks , starting with economic and energy restrictions. More recently she said the EU would meet on 24 February to discuss the lifting of sanctions on Syria, and told Argus the prospect of this "is looking promising" albeit internal European politics could slow the process. Road to recovery Once a 600,000 b/d-plus producer, Syria's crude output has been on the decline over the past three decades. Just before the start of the civil war in 2011, production had was below 400,000 b/d, and by May 2012 it had fallen to 200,000 b/d, the Syrian government said. Today it is less than 100,000 b/d, with only around 16,000 b/d or so coming from fields in areas under the former Assad government's control. "At the moment, oil production in Syria is largely opaque, illicit, unsafe, destined for the black market and causing enormous environmental damage… [and] production volumes have decreased recently due to these unsustainable practices," Gulfsands' Bell said. Whether Syria can reverse this downward production trend "will depend on the approach taken by the new Syrian government," he said. If they properly leverage existing centralised government institutions and work with returning international energy companies, Bell said he could see crude output returning to not only pre-2011 levels, but even as high as 500,000 b/d "within several years." By Nader Itayim and Rithika Krishna Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Guyana unfazed by Trump’s ‘drill, baby, drill’ vow


18/02/25
18/02/25

Guyana unfazed by Trump’s ‘drill, baby, drill’ vow

Georgetown, 18 February (Argus) — Guyana, one of the fastest-growing crude producers in the world, sees little threat from US President Donald Trump's pledge to flood global markets with cheap supplies. Despite Trump's vow to scrap a slew of regulations he claims are holding back US oil producers, Guyana's vice president Bharrat Jagdeo does not expect there to be a "major supply response." "If the prices come down, as President Trump wants, then it would also make some of the existing operations in the US — particular with (hydraulic fracturing) fracking — it may make them not feasible," Jagdeo said on the first day of the Guyana Energy Conference and Supply Chain Expo in Georgetown, Guyana, on Tuesday. Guyana's low breakeven costs and the quality of its crude will help it to maintain a competitive advantage going forward, he said. The vice president shrugged off concerns over the oil market as concerns grow over waning demand from China, the top importer. He pointed out that ExxonMobil just started the approval process for its seventh and eighth projects in the giant Stabroek block offshore Guyana, where the discovery of oil in 2015 has transformed the economic fortunes of the tiny South American nation. "They (ExxonMobil) study the oil markets, they probably know the oil markets more than any government official," Jagdeo said. "Clearly they see in the future a demand for fossil fuel, and they believe that in Guyana we have a unique opportunity to supply that market." Demand for fossil fuels is likely to remain "relatively high" for the foreseeable future while renewable sources lag behind, he said. Guyana, located on South America's northern coast bordering Venezuela, Suriname, and Brazil, has become a fast-growing non-Opec supplier since oil was first pumped in 2019. Output has accelerated to 650,000 b/d from zero in the space of around five years. And gross output is seen growing further to 1.3mn b/d by the end of the decade as new projects come online. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US to seek 'disapproval' of California tailpipe rule


18/02/25
18/02/25

US to seek 'disapproval' of California tailpipe rule

Washington, 18 February (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration is taking a procedural step to enable the Republican-led US Congress to block a California program requiring 100pc of in-state sales of new cars and trucks to be electric, plug-in hybrid and hydrogen models by 2035. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said it plans to subject its previous approval of the program to "disapproval" under the Congressional Review Act, which could allow a vote to halt the standards without a potential filibuster. Oil groups backed such an approach, hoping to kill off a state program that threatened long-term demand for gasoline and diesel in California and nearly a dozen other states that are following its lead. California's program, called Advanced Clean Cars II, requires 35pc of new vehicles sold in the state in model year 2026 to be zero emission vehicles, rising to 100pc of vehicles by 2035. Under former president Joe Biden, EPA granted federal waivers that authorized the program and a separate California plan for limiting emissions from heavy-duty trucks. The Biden administration said its approval of the waivers were not subject to the Congressional Review Act, which aligned with a formal opinion by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO). But EPA administrator Lee Zeldin, on 14 February, said he would reverse course and "submit" all the waivers for potential disapproval. The prior administration attempted to prevent Congress from having input on an "extremely consequential action", Zeldin said, "and the Trump administration is "transparently correcting this wrong". It remains unclear the pathway for a vote to disapprove the EPA waivers, given the conflicting opinion by GAO, which for years has served as an independent arbiter of what actions Congress could disapprove. But some outside attorneys have argued that once an agency action is made subject to the Congressional Review Act, federal courts would not have jurisdiction to "second-guess" a decision to hold a vote. The US Supreme Court separately plans to hold oral arguments in the coming months on a lawsuit by refiners and biofuel producers that want the ability to sue EPA over its approval of an earlier version of the tailpipe program that runs through model year 2025. A federal appeals court last year said the case could not proceed. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Нефтетранспорт - НТС: правила на рынке меняются


18/02/25
18/02/25

Нефтетранспорт - НТС: правила на рынке меняются

Moscow, 18 February (Argus) — Ситуация в сегменте железнодорожной транспортировки нефтеналивных грузов остается сложной. О причинах, приведших к этому, взаимодействии с грузоотправителями и планах строительства нового парка рассказал Argus генеральный директор Нефтетранссервиса (НТС) Сергей Ермолаев. — Как вы охарактеризуете текущую ситуацию на рынке перевозок нефтяных грузов по железной дороге? — Наблюдаем падение грузооборота и тоннажа отправок. Меры РЖД, которые должны были вернуть отправителям веру в надежное обеспечение парком, а также дать гарантии вывоза груза, пока не привели к результату. — Какие факторы к этому привели? В чем основные сложности для НТС? — Сегодня всем непросто, и наше положение не отличается от других субъектов экономики. Ограничения экспорта топлива из России, полное закрытие границ Казахстана на заезд порожнего парка цистерн, атаки на перерабатывающую и транспортную инфраструктуру, тарифные инициативы перевозчика, рост ключевой ставки Центрального банка России (ЦБР) — все это делает невозможным долгосрочный прогноз. А без прогноза нет инвестиций. В такой ситуации рынок выбирает простые схемы купил-продал. Это давит на переработку, на наших клиентов и на нас, соответственно. — НТС является одним из основных перевозчиков нефтеналивных грузов с заводов Роснефти. Как оцениваете итоги работы по этим долгосрочным контрактам? Как, на ваш взгляд, будет строиться дальнейшее сотрудничество с нефтяной компанией после завершения договора в конце I квартала 2026 г.? — Роснефть — наш главный клиент. Несмотря на то, что ни один из основных параметров, лежавших в основе долгосрочных договорных отношений, не сохранился в изначальном виде, компания чутко и оперативно адаптируется к новым обстоятельствам. В настоящее время мы совместно с коллегами выверяем позиции перед будущим тендером. У всех появился новый опыт, который должен быть учтен в новом цикле. Работа непростая, времени осталось совсем немного, но мы надеемся успеть вовремя. Разумеется, речь о ценах пока не идет. Нашей задачей является описать взаимные обязательства так, чтобы они имели ясные критерии исполнения и могли бы быть оцифрованы ставкой в ходе тендера. — Рынок в этом году столкнется со значительным выбытием нефтебензиновых цистерн. Планирует ли НТС покупки новых вагонов? — Мы ждем снижения ставки ЦБР, а точнее сужения разрыва между инфляцией и стоимостью кредитов. Также мы ждем, что из-за уменьшения заказов на постройку нового парка вагоностроители пересмотрят свою рентабельность до разумных уровней. Вероятно, после этого мы сможем начать постройку парка. Не исключено и принудительное снижение срока службы вагонов. Это создаст дефицит, увеличит требования к доходности нового парка из-за неопределенности будущего срока окупаемости. Тогда тоже можно будет строить. Но мы надеемся, что этого не произойдет: в условиях ограниченных ресурсов вряд ли нужно утилизировать то, что еще может послужить. Да и нагружать экспортеров новыми затратами странно, когда Россия нуждается в экспортных доходах. — Планирует ли НТС в ближайшее время развивать перевозки другой номенклатуры грузов, помимо нефтеналивных? — Мы всегда в поиске. Но вход в новые рынки требует хорошей аналитики, а сейчас мы находимся в ситуации отмены всех известных нам правил и принципов. В результате вся предыдущая статистика оказывается слабо применима. Если какие-то идеи выдержат и эти условия, обязательно их реализуем. Нефтетранссервис (НТС) Является одним из лидеров на рынке железнодорожных перевозок нефти и нефтепродуктов, парк в управлении превышает 35 тыс. единиц. Помимо вагонов-цистерн и локомотивов, холдингу принадлежат производственные предприятия в Центральном, Приволжском, Южном и Дальневосточном федеральных округах. Более 19 лет НТС сотрудничает с ведущими компаниями топливно-энергетического комплекса России. Сергей Ермолаев В 1997 г. окончил Московскую государственную академию приборостроения и информатики, в 2009 г. — Академию народного хозяйства при правительстве Москвы. В разные периоды времени занимал руководящие должности в сфере организации железнодорожных перевозок сначала в Северной грузовой компании, а затем в НТС, где в течение 2013—2021 гг. возглавлял коммерческое управление перевозок наливных грузов, направления логистики и эксплуатации подвижного состава. В начале 2022 г. был приглашен в Национальную транспортную компанию на должность коммерческого директора. С июня 2024 г. — генеральный директор НТС. Вы можете присылать комментарии по адресу или запросить дополнительную информацию feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Группа Argus Media . Все права защищены.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more