EU sees no credibility issue in 2040 GHG target delay

Spanish Market: Emissions
04/04/25

The lack of a proposal for a 2040 greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target is not a credibility issue for the European Commission, officials said.

The commission will have an "ambitious" 2040 GHG proposal in time to derive a 2035 climate plan for the EU "well in time" for the UN Cop 30 climate talks in Belem, Brazil, over 10-21 November.

The commission was expected to make a legislative proposal for a 2040 EU climate target no later than six months after the conclusion of the first global stocktake under the Paris climate agreement, which concluded at Cop 28 in December 2023, as per the bloc's European Climate Law.

The process is "quite late nationally and also globally", the commission acknowledged. But officials insist that the update to the climate law, setting a 2040 GHG target, will come "well in time" for the Cop process. The EU will then derive its nationally determined contribution (NDC) to the Paris deal for 2035 from 2040. The official deadline for parties to submit their updated NDC was 10 February, but only 12 countries made timely submissions.

"The credibility issue is much less to do with the agenda now," climate spokesperson Anna-Kaisa Itkonen said. EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra has made "very, very clear" that the commission is preparing for an "ambitious climate law".

"Ninety per cent is currently in the political guidelines," Itkonen said. "It is the starting point for these discussions," she added, underlining the extreme importance of presenting a 2040 proposal that has a "substantial majority".

Another EU source noted that the commission is discussing various options and scenarios with EU member states and the European Parliament. "We want to keep the ambition as high as possible. So our starting point of discussion is 90pc," the source said.

Discussion of 2040 flexibility — such as following a weaker trajectory toward climate neutrality, or using international credits — would have "severely negative" implications for the EU's standing in international climate action, NGO Bellona Europa's senior manager for carbon accounting, Mark Preston Aragones, said.

"The commission should not come with an already watered-down proposal even before negotiations formally begin with the European Parliament and EU member states," he said.

By Dafydd ab Iago

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

10/04/25

Norway plans to cut GHGs, but remain oil, gas producer

London, 10 April (Argus) — Norway's government has proposed a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction of a minimum 70-75pc by 2035, from a 1990 baseline, but has also committed to the country remaining "a stable and predictable supplier of oil and gas produced with low emissions". The government today set out plans for a 2035 GHG reduction target, as well as a wider climate plan for the country. The 2035 GHG reduction targets build on Norway's 2030 goal of "at least" a 55pc reduction in GHGs, again from 1990 levels. Norway has a legislated goal of "a low-emission society" by 2050 — GHG reductions of 90-95pc from the 1990 baseline. Norway's government underlined its commitment to Paris climate agreement goals and phasing out the use of fossil fuels "towards 2050", but also said that it would "not prepare a strategy for the end phase of Norwegian oil and gas". "The government's plan is about phasing out emissions, not industries", it said, noting that Norway is "a significant contributor to Europe's energy security". Norway is the largest producer and only net exporter of oil and gas in Europe. "The government will further develop the petroleum industry and facilitate the future provision of fields… production will continue to be efficient and with low emissions," the government said. It aims for the country's oil and gas sector — the country's highest-emitting industry — to bring emissions from production to net zero in 2050. The bulk of oil and gas emissions are from downstream use — known as scope 3. Norway plans to achieve the majority of its proposed 70-75pc GHG cuts through national measures, including reduced fossil fuel use and both technical and nature-based carbon removals. It also plans to purchase emissions reductions from outside the EU and European Economic Area. This refers to internationally transferred mitigation outcomes (ITMOs) — emission credits — under Article 6 of the Paris climate agreement. Norway's parliament will consider the proposals. Once legislated in the country's climate act, Norway plans to communicate its updated plans to the UN. Signatories to the Paris climate agreement are expected to submit updated climate plans — known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs) — to UN climate body the UNFCCC every five years. The deadline for NDCs setting out climate goals up to 2035 was in February, but many countries have yet to submit plans . By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Trump coal plant bailout renews first term fight

09/04/25

Trump coal plant bailout renews first term fight

Washington, 9 April (Argus) — President Donald Trump's effort to stop the retirement of coal-fired power plants is reminiscent of a 2017 attempt that faltered in the face of widespread industry opposition. Trump, in an executive order signed on Tuesday, directed the US Department of Energy (DOE) to tap into emergency powers to stop the retirement of coal-fired plants and other large plants it believes are critical to grid reliability. The order sets a 30-day deadline for DOE to decide which plants are critical based on a new methodology that will analyze if reserve margins, or the percent of unused capacity at peak demand, are at an "acceptable" level. The initiative shares similarities to Trump's unsuccessful effort in his first term to bail out coal and nuclear plants. In the 2017 effort, Trump backed a "grid resiliency" proposal to compensate power plants with 90 days of on-site fuel. But an unusual coalition of natural gas industry groups, manufacturers, renewable producers and environmentalists united against the idea, warning it would upend power markets and cost consumers billions of dollars each year. The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission voted 5-0 to reject the proposal. It remains unclear if a similarly sized coalition will emerge to fight Trump's latest proposal, under which DOE would use emergency powers in section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act to keep some coal plants and other large power plants operating. Industry groups have largely been avoiding taking positions that could be seen as critical of Trump. Environmentalists say they strongly oppose keeping coal plants operating using emergency powers. Doing so would mean more air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, they say, and higher costs for consumers. Environmental groups say they are hoping other industries affected by the potential bailout will eventually speak out against the initiative. "The silence from those who know better is deafening," Center for Biological Diversity climate law institute legal director Jason Rylander said. "I hope that we will start to see more resistance to these dangerous policies before significant damage is done." DOE said it was "already hard at work" to implement Trump's executive order, which was paired with other orders that were meant to support coal mining and coal production. US energy secretary Chris Wright said today that reviving coal will increase the reliability of the electrical grid and bring down electricity costs, but he has not shared further details on the 202(c) initiative. Trying to litigate the program could be "tricky", and section 202(c) orders have never successfully been challenged in court, in part because they are usually short-term orders, Harvard Law School Electricity Law Initiative director Ari Peskoe said. But opponents could challenge them by focusing on "numerous legal problems", he said, such as not allowing public comment or running afoul of a US Supreme Court precedent that prohibits agencies from attempting to decide "major questions" without clear congressional authorization. "Here DOE would use a little-used statute explicitly written for short-term emergencies in order to PREVENT a change in the US energy mix," Peskoe said. A projected 8.1GW of coal-fired generation is set to retire this year, equivalent to nearly 5pc of the coal fleet, the US Energy Information Administration said last month. Electric utilities often decide which plants to retire years in advance, allowing them to defer maintenance and to forgo capital investments in aging facilities. Keeping coal plants running could require exemptions from environmental rules or pricey capital investments, the costs of which would likely be distributed among other ratepayers. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

German coalition eyes 'limited' foreign carbon credits

09/04/25

German coalition eyes 'limited' foreign carbon credits

Berlin, 9 April (Argus) — The parties likely to form Germany's next government today presented their coalition treaty, which pledges to allow the use of foreign carbon credits to reach the country's 2040 climate target. The treaty, presented in Berlin by the four party leaders Friedrich Merz of the CDU — the likely next federal chancellor — Lars Klingbeil and Saskia Esken of the SPD, and Markus Soeder of the CDU's Bavarian sister party CSU, stresses the parties' commitment to German and European climate targets, the Paris climate agreement, and reaching climate neutrality in Germany by 2045 "by combining climate action, economic competitiveness and social balance, and by focusing on innovation". "We want to remain an industrialised country and become climate neutral," the treaty reads. The parties' support for the EU's suggested interim target to reduce its emissions 90pc by 2040 compared with 1990 levels is conditional on two points. Germany must not be expected to go beyond its 88pc reduction target for 2040 enshrined in the country's climate action law. And its companies must be allowed, with a view to reducing their residual emissions in an "economically viable" way, to resort to "permanent and sustainable negative emissions", and to "credible CO2 reduction through highly qualified, certified and permanent projects" in "non-European partner countries". Making use of the latter activities should be permissible for up to three percentage points of the 2040 reduction target, although the "priority" for companies will be to reduce carbon emissions. And allowing these options must be reflected in the European Climate Law and the EU emissions trading system (ETS), the parties stipulate. The treaty also underlines the importance of "effective" carbon leakage protection to preserve Germany's "industrial value creation". The treaty calls for the European Green Deal and Clean Industrial Act to be further developed to "bring competitiveness and climate action together", and stresses the importance of carbon pricing instruments, which more countries should be persuaded to introduce. The parties also flag the importance of social acceptance, advocating an "economically viable price development" and pledging to ensure the smooth transition of Germany's domestic carbon price for the heating and transport sectors into the EU ETS 2 on the latter's launch in 2027. The parties pledge "immediately" to adopt a legislative package that enables carbon capture, transport, use and storage (CCU/CCS), particularly for industrial emissions that are difficult to avoid, and also for gas-fired power plants — a disputed issue within the SPD, and the reason why CCS legislation did not pass under the outgoing SPD-Green-led federal government. The new government said it will legally enshrine the "overriding public interest" of the construction of CCS infrastructure, as well as pledging to give the "highest priority" to ratifying the [amendment to the] London Protocol, allowing cross-border CO2 transportation, and to enter bilateral agreements with neighbouring countries on storing carbon. The new government will enable CO2 storage offshore in Germany's exclusive economic zone and the North Sea, as well as onshore where geologically suitable and accepted. The parties see direct air capture as a "possible" future technology to "leverage negative emissions". By Chloe Jardine Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US faults EU carbon fee during tariff fight

08/04/25

US faults EU carbon fee during tariff fight

Washington, 8 April (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration is citing the EU's upcoming tariff on carbon-intensive imports as one of the "unfair trade practices" that justified a tariff response. Trump has said a 20pc tariff on most EU goods and a higher tariff on many other key trading partners — set to take effect after midnight — are "reciprocal" to other countries' tariffs and non-tariff barriers, even though those tariffs are calculated based on each country's trade deficits and imports with the US. Trump has yet to even identify which trade policies he wants other countries to change before he would withdraw tariffs his administration expects will raise $600bn/yr in new revenue. But the US Trade Representative's office, in a social media post on Monday made in "honor" of Trump's tariffs, identified the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) — which will collect a carbon-based levy on imports such as steel, cement and fertilizer — as one of the examples of what it sees as an unfair trading practice. The Trump administration estimates $4.7bn/yr of US exports would be affected by the CBAM, which is set to take effect in 2026. "These EU regulations undermine fair competition, penalizing US companies while providing advantages to EU-based competitors," the US Trade Representative's office wrote in a series of posts on Tuesday that also criticized India and Thailand for imposing import restrictions on ethanol produced in the US. White House officials say more than 70 countries have approached the administration seeking deals on the tariffs since they were announced nearly a week ago. But with just hours before the tariffs take effect, Trump has yet to announce any definitive agreements to withdraw the tariffs. Instead, he has rejected offers from countries to zero out some of their tariffs. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen on Monday said the EU was "ready to negotiate" on tariffs, and would zero out its tariffs on industrial imports if the US agreed to do the same. But Trump on Monday said that offer was not enough. "We have a deficit with the European Union of $350bn, and it's gonna disappear fast," Trump said. "One of the ways that that can disappear easily and quickly is they're gonna have to buy our energy from us." Today, Trump said he had a "great call" with South Korea's acting president Han Duck-soo that created the "probability of a great DEAL for both countries." Trump cited a potential agreement that might include large-scale purchases of US LNG and investments tied to the 20mn t/yr Alaska LNG export project. Trump and his cabinet believe the tariffs will align with a goal to achieve "energy dominance" and increase the amount of US energy exported abroad. "At the end of the day, we're going to have growing American exports and reindustrialize the country," US energy secretary Chris Wright said today during an interview on CNBC. Trump's tariffs have already caused a selloff in equities and, according to many analysts on Wall Street, a higher likelihood of a recession. Oil prices have dropped because of a "sudden change in the economic outlook, whereas everyone just honestly 10 days ago was expecting modest but steady positive growth in the US", non-profit group Center for Strategic and International Studies' senior fellow Clayton Seigle said today. Republicans have largely backed Trump in his imposition of tariffs, with the hope the tariffs will be lifted as part of trade negotiations. But some Republicans have started criticizing the rationale for the tariff policy. "Whose throat do I get to choke if this proves to be wrong?" US senator Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina) said in a hearing today with the US trade representative Jamieson Greer. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Singapore, Chile sign Article 6 carbon credit deal

08/04/25

Singapore, Chile sign Article 6 carbon credit deal

Singapore, 8 April (Argus) — Singapore and Chile signed an implementation agreement on 7 April to collaborate on carbon credits under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. The countries will begin the ratification process and operationalise the agreement following the signing, according to Singapore's Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI). The collaboration will involve financing towards unlocking additional mitigation potential in Chile, and "will help Singapore to meet our climate target while bringing climate investments into Chile," said Singapore's minister for sustainability and the environment, Grace Fu. The implementation agreement sets up a framework for the generation and transfer of carbon credits from carbon mitigation projects under Article 6. More information on the authorisation process for the carbon credit projects and eligible carbon crediting methodologies will be published in due course, according to the MTI. Carbon credits traded under Article 6 count towards the buyer's nationally determined contribution (NDC). Singapore submitted its new emissions reduction target in February, aiming to reduce emissions to 45mn-50mn t of CO2 equivalent in 2035 as part of its NDC. This is Singapore's second deal with a Latin American country, following an agreement signed on 1 April with Peru . Singapore has signed similar agreements with Papua New Guinea, Ghana and Bhutan. By Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more