PdV oil wave to Cuba drains ports, restocks island
Venezuela's tidal wave of oil shipments to Cuba since September has met the dual purpose of clearing out an export backlog caused by US sanctions and alleviating the island's severe energy crisis.
Venezuela's state-owned PdV has dramatically expanded crude and refined products supply to Cuba in recent weeks, enabling the company to restore some of the production and blending operations that it had been forced to shut in because it had no where left to store unsold barrels.
The supply surge from Venezuela to Cuba was first reported by Argus in early October. A month later, the result is reflected in higher Venezuelan crude production.
The US-sanctioned Opec country produced around 770,000 b/d in October, up from 650,000 b/d in September, according toArgus estimates. The sharp uptick shows how PdV overcame a narrowing of export options partly by boosting supply into Cuba, Venezuela's closest political ally. PdV has supplied oil to Cuba in exchange for Cuban advisers and experts in a range of fields, from health care to security, under a state-to-state agreement signed in 2000.
The recent Venezuelan oil flows into Cuba have defied US sanctions on an expanding list of tankers and shipping companies aimed at severing the supply chain. Washington blames Havana for propping up Venezuela's president Nicolas Maduro, whom the US and a handful of neighboring countries are seeking to force out of power in favor of opposition leader Juan Guaido. Guaido's team has pressed Washington to take stronger action to stop the trade, but the US administration is taking a more cautious approach to imposing additional sanctions on shipping, after a recent Iran-related sanctions action threw the tanker charter market into turmoil.
Among the Panama-flagged tankers that have been shuttling between the Venezuelan terminals of Jose, Puerto La Cruz, Guaraguao and Amuay and the Cuban ports of Matanzas, Cienfuegos and Felton, are the Panamaxes Sandino and Petion, and the Aframax Giralt. None are on the sanctions roster.
Shipping data shows the cargoes listed as FOB Cubametales, a Cuban state-owned fuel buyer, delivered to Cuvenpetrol, a state-owned refinery operator. Cuvenpetrol had been a joint venture between Cupet and PdV until the Cubans quietly took it over last year.
The cargoes are labeled as Venezuela's heavy sour Merey blend as well as fuel oil, although shipping sources do not discount the potential for misidentification. Tanker signaling in Cuban waters has long been obscured, a practice that is now commonplace in Venezuela as well.
Inside Cuba, fuel and electricity shortages that Cubans had begun to liken to the 1990s "special period" of acute deprivation following the fall of the Soviet Union have begun to ease.
Cuban government officials tell Argus that increased imports from "traditional sources" are closing the supply gap although some refined products are still lacking. This will continue "until supplies are stabilized."
Cupet has raised crude runs at its 65,000 b/d Cienfuegos refinery, and all the plant's production lines are operating, the officials said, without specifying throughput. The refinery processed around 37,000 b/d in 2018, up from 24,000 b/d in 2017, according to official Cuban documents and statements.
The expanded oil supply has also eased blackouts from Cuban power plants.
"The fuel shortage has eased and public transportation has been expanded in the past two weeks," a Caribbean diplomat in Havana said. "Bus and train services are now more frequent than a month ago, and there are shorter lines at many of Havana's gas stations. We are still experiencing blackouts, but these are not as frequent as a month ago."
The Venezuelan supply into Cuba in recent weeks far surpasses Cuban demand that is officially estimated at around 160,000 b/d. Domestic production meets 48pc of Cuba's oil needs, president Miguel Diaz Canel said in September.
The fundamentals suggest that PdV is using Cuban storage tanks to park its oil until markets open up, although it is unclear if the trend will continue. There is no recent evidence that Cuba is reselling Venezuelan oil.
Washington imposed an economic embargo on Havana in 1960, and more recently expanded sanctions as an offshoot of its campaign to oust Maduro. The US levied oil sanctions on Caracas in late January, on top of financial sanctions dating from 2017.
Related news posts
Elliott bids $7.3bn for Citgo assets
Elliott bids $7.3bn for Citgo assets
Houston, 27 September (Argus) — An affiliate of private equity group Elliott Investment Management has been selected as the top bidder in an auction for US refiner Citgo, with a bid of $7.286bn. The special master for the auction, being held in the US District Court for the District of Delaware, will need to make a final formal recommendation the court choose the Elliott affiliate, Amber Energy, pending a 1 October hearing with parties disputing the auction. But a final a hearing to ratify the sale of over 800,000 b/d of refining capacity could be held in November. Final bids for Citgo's US refineries, lubricant plants, midstream and retail assets were submitted on 11 June, with the auction aiming to satisfy debts owed by the company's parent firm, Venezuelan state-owned PdV. If the sale to Amber moves forward, following a successful November hearing, it will mark the largest purchase of US refining assets since Andeavor's acquisition by Marathon Petroleum in 2018. Since 2019 Citgo has operated under a board appointed by the Venezuelan opposition and vetted by the US government after the US rejected Venezuela's 2018 presidential election as illegitimate. But its ultimate parent company, state-owned PdV, remains under control of the Maduro government. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
SAF market is far from takeoff: Airlines
SAF market is far from takeoff: Airlines
New York, 27 September (Argus) — Airline executives descended on climate events in New York this week to emphasize their commitments to use more sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) — and to hint that these goals will prove difficult absent additional government support. At events tied to the UN General Assembly and Climate Week NYC, supporters of alternative jet fuels said that a range of policies were growing the market, including tax incentives, US states' low-carbon fuel standards and increasingly stringent mandates for SAF usage in the EU. While US production capacity of SAF is expected to rise significantly in the coming years, there is still concern that limited supply and a steep premium to conventional petroleum jet fuel will hinder adoption. SAF "will always be more expensive because it's a better product," said Aaron Robinson, vice president of US SAF for the International Airlines Group, a holding company that includes British Airways and Iberia. Executives, while calling generally for more policies to stimulate supply and demand, were more inclined to support subsidies over mandates. The airline industry already runs on tight margins, and executives fear that prospective customers could stay home instead of paying more for lower-carbon flights. "I think the worst thing we could do right now is choose a very short-term solution that takes that green premium and directly saddles it onto our customers," said Delta Air Lines chief sustainability officer Amelia DeLuca. She argued that the EU's SAF mandates were "pushing the fuel forward a little bit too fast in terms of where the supply and the green premium are." Still, the most prominent government subsidy for SAF — a tax credit kicking off next year in the US that will offer up to $1.75/USG for domestic SAF producers — was described as helpful but insufficient. The Inflation Reduction Act, which included that credit, was "historic, monumental, not good enough," said United Airlines chief sustainability officer Lauren Riley. President Joe Biden's administration has frustrated US biofuel groups by not yet providing guidance around qualifying for that credit, known as "45Z," which requires SAF to meet an initial carbon intensity threshold and increases the subsidy as the fuel's greenhouse gas emissions fall. Regardless, airlines and fuel producers say that the credit — which expires at the end of 2027 — is too short-lived to build up a supply chain. Policies like the 45Z credit should "have an end" but the end needs to be "far enough into the future," ExxonMobil vice president of strategy and planning for product solutions Tanya Vetter said this week at a clean energy event in Washington, DC. Competing interests Prolonging the 45Z credit would require legislation, but reopening a debate over clean fuels incentives in Congress could divide groups generally supportive of SAF. Airlines and refiners support more flexibility around feedstocks — including fuels produced from foreign sources like Chinese used cooking oil and fuels produced by co-processing petroleum — while farm groups want policy to increase demand for domestically produced vegetable oils and corn ethanol. A bipartisan group of farm state lawmakers this week introduced legislation that pairs an extension of the 45Z credit through 2034 with restrictions on fuels sourced from foreign feedstocks. With Congress set to debate tax policy next year regardless of who controls the White House, airlines supportive of more generous and longer-lasting SAF subsidies will also have to contend with Republicans that want to repeal much of the Inflation Reduction Act and with competing lobbies that would rather devote funds to extending other incentives. For instance, Justine Fisher — the chief financial officer at the Canadian carbon capture company Svante — signaled interest this week in increasing a tax credit for carbon capture, utilization, and storage that is included in the law. The incentive, which offers $85/metric tonne for captured carbon and is more popular than other parts of the law among oil and gas companies, is currently not "high enough to make project economics work," she said. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Haftar’s lucrative oil blockade
Haftar’s lucrative oil blockade
The general's eastern power base appears to be benefiting financially, but the country's economy is suffering, writes Aydin Calik London, 27 September (Argus) — Libya's oil blockade has entered its second month with more than half of its typical crude production of 1.2mn b/d off line. Although the UN's Libya mission reports progress in efforts to resolve a leadership crisis at the central bank that sparked the blockade, a workable solution could yet prove elusive. But whether the blockade is lifted in days or endures for weeks, the shutdowns have demonstrated eastern-based general Khalifa Haftar's ability to choke his rivals in the west of oil revenues at little cost to himself. Previous wide-scale blockades instituted by Haftar exacted a heavy toll on both the internationally recognised administration in the west and parallel administrations he has propped up in the east. But this time around, Haftar has managed to design the blockade to avoid the financial and political costs associated with past shutdowns. For one, the current shutdowns at oil fields can only really be described as a partial oil blockade. Libya has exported more than 400,000 b/d of crude so far this month, with almost all of this from eastern terminals where operations were ordered to stop in late August. Argus estimates Opec member Libya's current crude production at about 500,000 b/d. Most of this production is part of state-owned NOC's crude-for-products programme, which feeds a booming fuel-smuggling industry in the east. There has been no let-up here. Imports of refined products this month are at their highest on record at 300,000 b/d, according to Kpler, far beyond Libya's real domestic needs. Some crude is also being exported by eastern-based Libyan firm Arkenu Oil, which analysts suspect was set up to create a direct oil revenue stream independent of the central bank in Tripoli. "The Haftar family has managed the feat of orchestrating an economically lucrative oil blockade," senior fellow at the Atlantic Council Emadeddin Badi says. And some crude output is being kept on line to feed domestic refineries and allow associated gas production to supply power plants. Past blockades have tended to cause power cuts and reduce domestic supplies of diesel and gasoline, putting pressure on Haftar to lift them. But now, he can keep revenue channels open and mostly absolve himself from any backlash resulting from insufficient domestic energy supplies. General practice Haftar's ability to design the blockade to suit his interests partly derives from an informal deal in July 2022 that saw him end a months-long oil blockade in return for installing Farhat ben Gudara as chairman of NOC. In this role, ben Gudara has proven far more co-operative than his predecessor Mustafa Sanalla, who refused to allow Haftar to benefit from any blockade he imposed. That "deal" had underpinned the relative peace between the country's east and west since. If a durable solution to the current leadership crisis at the central bank is to be achieved, a new arrangement between east and west will need to be worked out. Horse-trading behind the scenes continues. "There's still a lot of negotiations to go as far as Libyan politics is concerned," an oil industry source says on the possibility of the blockade being lifted. The longer the central bank crisis persists, the more precarious Libya's economic predicament becomes. Oil revenues that usually flow into the bank have all but stopped and its ability to conduct international financial transactions has been degraded. But even if a resolution is found and oil production returns to normal levels, this would at best represent a fragile and temporary solution to a long-term problem — the lack of a coherent central authority. Worryingly, Libya is a long way from any sort of political process that could heal its divisions. Libya crude production Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Jet Zero gets $9.6mn in grants for Australia SAF plant
Jet Zero gets $9.6mn in grants for Australia SAF plant
Sydney, 27 September (Argus) — Australian bioenergy developer Jet Zero gets A$14mn ($9.6mn) of grants from federal and state governments for its proposed Project Ulysses, a sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) project in the northern Queensland state city of Townsville. The joint funding consists of A$9mn from the federal Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Arena) and A$5mn from Queensland's state government to develop the local production plant and build SAF value chains. Project Ulysses plans to utilise agricultural by-products to manufacture 102mn litres/yr of SAF and 11mn l/yr renewable diesel. Jet Zero will use the funds to complete front-end engineering and design of the plant and progress commercial deployment of alcohol-to-jet (AtJ) SAF technology. Jet Zero in February signed a licence and engineering agreement to use US sustainable fuels company LanzaJet's AtJ technology which converts bioethanol into SAF and renewable diesel. The funding complements an A$30mn investment by project partners Qantas, Airbus and Idemitsu Kosan, Jet Zero said on 27 September. The transport sector accounts for about one fifth of Australia's total greenhouse gas emissions but scheduled closure of coal-fired electricity generators means it could be the largest source by 2030, as Canberra turns its attention to decarbonising the industry via a certification scheme for low-carbon liquid fuels. . By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more