Latest Market News

US argues against Citgo sale: Update

  • Spanish Market: Crude oil, Oil products
  • 17/07/20

Adds detail from hearing.

Advancing the sale of Venezuela's US refining subsidiary Citgo could damage US foreign policy goals and that country's struggling opposition beyond repair, President Donald Trump's administration wrote in an 11th-hour filing ahead of today's oral arguments on the refiner's future.

Letters from the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and US Special Representative for Venezuela Elliott Abrams argued that establishing a process to satisfy an international arbitration award with shares of the roughly 770,000 b/d refining business would only complicate US strategy there.

Moving forward with efforts by defunct Canadian mining firm and arbitration winner Crystallex would instead damage Venezuelan support for the US-recognized opposition working to remove President Nicolas Maduro from power, Abrams wrote.

"Every Venezuelan knows of this company and it is viewed, as are Venezuela's oil reserves, as a central piece of the national patrimony," Abrams wrote. "The impact on [US-recognized interim president Juan] Guaido, the interim government and US foreign policy goals in Venezuela would be greatly damaging and perhaps beyond recuperation."

Abrams supported Guaido's arguments that his US-recognized leadership should dissolve a 2018 ruling exposing Citgo to the billions of dollars sought by Venezuela's creditors. And OFAC denied Crystallex arguments that determining how to proceed with a sale would help the office decide whether to grant the company a license to execute it.

Opposition leaders have long hoped for executive branch assistance in the US District of Delaware case that has come perilously close to ending Venezuelan control of one of its most valuable overseas assets. Yesterday's late filing arrived more than seven months after an initial invitation from the court to respond, two months after another solicitation of executive interest and less than 15 hours before today's teleconference on whether to develop sale proceedings on shares of Citgo to help satisfy a $1.4bn arbitration award.

"The US sincerely apologizes to the court and the parties for any inconvenience caused by filing so close to the hearing date," the Justice Department said.

US attorneys participated in the hearing but did not expand on letters filed last night.

US support of Guaido is not news to the court, which accepted the opposition leader's representatives on behalf of Venezuela soon after the executive branch recognized him as interim president in January 2019. Guaido's appointed ad hoc boards represent Citgo and Venezuelan national oil firm PdV in US courts.

His representatives argued unsuccessfully against a sale in appeals last summer before the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, and failed to attract consideration from the US Supreme Court this year.

But the opposition government can still persuade the US District Court of Delaware that circumstances have changed enough to remove a ruling argued in 2018 by Maduro representatives.

The court at that time determined that Maduro's government had so closely controlled Citgo that it functioned as an alter ego of the state. The decision pierced the corporate legal structure that normally protects such companies in the US from that exposure. Crystallex, now controlled by New York hedge fund Tenor Management, could seek shares of Citgo's holding company to satisfy an international award for mining interests expropriated under former president Hugo Chavez in 2011.

Has Venezuela changed?

The case proceeded on two tracks this summer.

The first considers whether circumstances have changed enough, as Guaido argues, to throw out the 2018 ruling. Though Venezuela has lost appeals of that decision, the judge could determine that enough has changed in Citgo's circumstances, as argued by Abrams, to render the original, proper decision now moot. US judge Leonard Stark asked why the case should go forward given the consequences that the government warned.

"It is not a malefactor cleaning up its act — it is a new sheriff in town," Venezuelan counsel Donald Virrelli said. "It is a new sovereign government asserting authority at considerable risk to its leaders in order to rescue the country from disaster and restore the rule of law."

Crystallex has pointed to the Guaido government's lack of control over any Venezuelan institutions outside the US. The opposition has no access to Citgo's revenue and cannot ship its gasoline to Venezuela because of US sanctions. The court must follow Trump's recognition of the Guaido government as the accepted representatives of Venezuela. But the court did not need to also ignore the reality of the opposition control, or further delay Crystallex's certified award to hope for conditions to change, Crystallex attorney Miguel Estrada said.

"Mr. Abrams may care intensely for the new, fledgling regime in Venezuela," Estrada said. "That is not a legal argument."

US judge Leonard Stark questioned arguments by Citgo and Venezuelan national oil company PdV that the companies were not in possession of the shares Crystallex sought and that arguments should shift to state law considerations. The attorney agreed with Stark that the parties had previously made the court aware that the "illegal Maduro regime" could have the shares in their possession, because they had not received any clear answers until Guaido appointed a new board.

"Why should Crystallex and the court have any confidence, based on the arguments you are making, that these shares are not really attached and are going to be transacted?" Stark asked.

How to sell

The second track would determine the appropriate way to sell shares of Citgo to satisfy the roughly $1bn remaining to be paid on the award. The court will address this at a future hearing after major disruptions from uncontrolled hold music halted the nearly three-hour proceeding twice.

Crystallex has sought a straightforward auction under Delaware law. Venezuela, Citgo and other creditors, including ConocoPhillips, have said such a proceeding could undervalue the refiner — leaving nothing left after satisfying the Crystallex debt. ConocoPhillips proposed a receivership, similar to US bankruptcy. Venezuela argues that if a sale must proceed, it should be carried out by PdV to ensure the highest possible value.

"Crystallex has no incentive to minimize the number of shares sold or respect the due process rights of others, including PdV," the national oil company said.

Such a sale would leave the legitimacy of the opposition government "severely eroded" if it took place with Maduro still in power, Abrams warned.

"Should these assets be advertised for public auction at this time, the Venezuelan people would seriously question the interim government ability to protect the nation's assets, thereby weakening it and US policy in Venezuela today," Abrams said.

Maduro has meanwhile moved to clip Guaido's remaining influence in Venezuela. Guaido's claim as interim president, recognized by dozens of western governments, relies on his leadership of the National Assembly. Venezuela's supreme court ratified a rival leadership in May, and a new Maduro-aligned electoral board was appointed last month. Opposition leaders have not decided whether to recognize or participate in elections under those circumstances later this year.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

20/12/24

US House votes to avert government shutdown

US House votes to avert government shutdown

Washington, 20 December (Argus) — The US House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly today to extend funding for US federal government agencies and avoid a partial government shutdown. The Republican-controlled House, by a 366-34 vote, approved a measure that would maintain funding for the government at current levels until 14 March, deliver $10bn in agricultural aid and provide $100bn in disaster relief. Its passage was in doubt until voting began in the House at 5pm ET, following a chaotic intervention two days earlier by president-elect Donald Trump and his allies, including Tesla chief executive Elon Musk. The Democratic-led Senate is expected to approve the measure, and President Joe Biden has promised to sign it. Trump and Musk on 18 December derailed a spending deal House speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) had negotiated with Democratic lawmakers in the House and the Senate. Trump lobbied for a more streamlined version that would have suspended the ceiling on federal debt until 30 January 2027. But that version of the bill failed in the House on Thursday, because of opposition from 38 Republicans who bucked the preference of their party leader. Trump and Musk opposed the bipartisan spending package, contending that it would fund Democratic priorities, such as rebuilding the collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland. But doing away with that bill killed many other initiatives that his party members have advanced, including a provision authorizing year-round 15pc ethanol gasoline (E15) sales. Depending on the timing of the Senate action and the presidential signature, funding for US government agencies could lapse briefly beginning on Saturday. Key US agencies tasked with energy sector regulatory oversight and permitting activities have indicated that a brief shutdown would not significantly interfere with their operations. But the episode previews potential legislative disarray when Republicans take full control of Congress on 3 January and Trump returns to the White House on 20 January. Extending government funding beyond 14 March is likely to feature as an element in the Republicans' attempts to extend corporate tax cuts set to expire at the end of 2025, which is a key priority for Trump. The Republicans will have a 53-47 majority in the Senate next month, but their hold on the House will be even narrower than this year, at 219-215 initially. Trump has picked two House Republican members to serve in his administration, so the House Republican majority could briefly drop to 217-215 just as funding for the government would expire in mid-March. Congress will separately have to tackle the issue of raising the debt limit. Conservative advocacy group Economic Policy Innovation Center projects that US borrowing could reach that limit as early as June. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US government agencies set to shut down


20/12/24
20/12/24

US government agencies set to shut down

Washington, 20 December (Argus) — US federal agencies would have to furlough millions of workers and curtail permitting and regulatory services if no agreement is reached by Friday at 11:59pm ET to extend funding for the government. US president-elect Donald Trump and his allies — including Tesla chief executive Elon Musk — on 18 December upended a spending deal US House of Representatives speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) had negotiated with Democratic lawmakers in the House and the Senate. Trump endorsed an alternative proposal that Johnson put together, but that measure failed in a 174-235 vote late on Thursday, with 38 Republicans and nearly every Democrat voting against it. Trump via social media today indicated he would not push for a new funding bill. "If there is going to be a shutdown of government, let it begin now, under the Biden Administration, not after January 20th, under 'TRUMP,'" he wrote. There was little to indicate as of Friday morning that Trump, Republican congressional leadership and lawmakers were negotiating in earnest to avert a shutdown. The House Republican conference is due to meet in the afternoon to weigh its next steps. President Joe Biden said he would support the first funding deal that Johnson negotiated with the Democratic lawmakers. "Republicans are doing the bidding of their billionaire benefactors at the expense of hardworking Americans," the White House said. Any agreement on funding the government will have to secure the approval of the House Republican leadership and all factions of the Republican majority in the House, who appear to be looking for cues from Trump and Musk on how to proceed. Any deal would then require the support of at least 60 House Democrats to clear the procedural barriers, before it reaches the Senate where the Democrats hold a majority. The same factors will be in play even if the shutdown extends into early 2025. The Republicans are set to take the majority in the Senate when new Congress meets on 3 January. But their House majority will be even slimmer, at 219-215, requiring cooperation of Democratic lawmakers and the Biden administration. What happens when the government shuts down? Some agencies are able to continue operations in the event of a funding lapse. Air travel is unlikely to face immediate interruptions because key federal workers are considered "essential," but some work on permits, agricultural and import data, and regulations could be curtailed. The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has funding to get through a "short-term" shutdown but could be affected by a longer shutdown, chairman Willie Phillips said. The US Department of Energy, which includes the Energy Information Administration and its critical energy data provision services, expects "no disruptions" if funding lapses for 1-5 days, according to its shutdown plan. The US Environmental Protection Agency would furlough about 90pc of its nearly 17,000 staff in the event of a shutdown, according to a plan it updated earlier this year. The Interior Department's shutdown contingency plan calls for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to furlough 4,900 out of its nearly 10,000 employees. BLM, which is responsible for permitting oil, gas and coal activities on the US federal land, would cease nearly all functions other than law enforcement and emergency response. Interior's Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, which oversees offshore leases, would continue permitting activities but would furlough 60pc of its staff after its funding lapses. The US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management will keep processing some oil and gas exploration plans with an on-call group of 40 exempted personnel, such as time-sensitive actions related to ongoing work. The shutdown also affects multiple other regulatory and permitting functions across other government agencies, including the Departments of Agriculture, Transportation and Treasury. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Viewpoint: More changes for Dated crude benchmark ahead


20/12/24
20/12/24

Viewpoint: More changes for Dated crude benchmark ahead

London, 20 December (Argus) — The crude market has adjusted to the presence of US WTI in the Dated basket, but the past year has revealed some hiccups, suggesting more changes will be needed to the benchmark's structure. WTI has been a part of Dated for more than a year, in which time it has bought much-needed liquidity to a shrinking amount of physical crude underpinning the benchmark, and has encouraged a return of some old, long-absent market participants and the entry of a few new ones. WTI has introduced more transparency to Dated, making it much more easily accessible. While some traders feared the grade would arrest any volatility, which is necessary for trading companies to thrive, this has not happened. Instead, WTI has effectively tied the European market to the US one, with European Ice Brent futures following WTI Nymex futures very closely. But recent months have exposed some flaws, suggesting some more changes to the benchmark are needed. European refiners run as much as 4.5mn b/d of light sweet crude, Vortexa data show. Dated was designed to represent the price moves of this large market via a few crudes produced, and mostly consumed, in the region. But production of several component grades have shrunk because of natural decline at North Sea fields. Production of Brent, the benchmark's namesake grade, has fallen from above 400,000 b/d in 2001 to just 38,000 b/d this year. Forties' exports dropped from more than 600,000 b/d to 175,000 b/d in the same time. Therefore it seemed fair when Dated was set by WTI nearly half of the time, as it is the single largest crude that European refiners buy, accounting for around 14pc of all their supplies. The situation reversed in the last weeks of 2024. WTI has not set Dated since 11 October, with that duty mostly shared between Oseberg, Ekofisk and Troll. But values of these grades — especially Oseberg and Troll — are rather theoretical, due to low liquidity of just 2-5 cargoes a month. It is not uncommon to see bids for those grades in the window, when the scarce supplies loading on the dates covered by bids are already placed. The same applies to Brent, for which loadings range between just 1-2 cargoes every month. WTI and Forties have greater liquidity, allowing them to be more representative of Europe's light sweet market, but their recent marginal role in setting the benchmark price raises a question if grades like Brent, Oseberg and Troll need to be in the basket at all. QPs an almighty relic of the past It might feel counterintuitive that smaller and more expensive grades affect the price of Dated — which is set by the cheapest grade in the basket. But Oseberg, Ekofisk and Troll, which are typically more expensive on a fob basis than is WTI on a delivered-Europe basis, are adjusted by quality premiums (QPs) for benchmarking purposes. QPs are calculated at 60pc of the difference between each grade and the most competitive of the six benchmark grades in the second month prior to the month of loading. The mechanism was made for a basket of crudes that originate in the North Sea and trade on a fob basis. Inclusion of WTI, which in turn is adjusted by intra-European freight to make it a fob price in the North Sea, has widened QPs for the three grades. With price spreads between pricier and cheaper benchmark grades increasingly dependent on volumes of WTI coming to Europe, such an adjustment does not seem to serve its purpose anymore. By Lina Bulyk Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Shell and Prax call off deal on German refinery stake


20/12/24
20/12/24

Shell and Prax call off deal on German refinery stake

Hamburg, 20 December (Argus) — Shell's planned sale of its 37.5pc stake in Germany's 226,000 b/d Schwedt refinery to UK energy firm Prax has fallen through. "Both parties have taken the decision not to proceed with the transaction," Prax said, without elaborating. The refinery will continue to operate as normal, it said. Shell said the companies had reached the end of an agreed timeframe for closing the deal. It said it is still looking to sell the stake. The deal with Prax, which was announced a year ago , was initially due to be completed in the first half of 2024. Shell owns its stake in Schwedt through the PCK joint venture, which also includes Italy's Eni and Rosneft Deutschland, one of the Russian firm's two German subsidiaries. Shell previously attempted to sell its PCK share to Austria-based Alcmene in 2021 but that deal failed to complete after Rosneft Deutschland exercised its pre-emption rights later that year. Rosneft was unable to buy the stake after the German government placed its two German subsidiaries under trust administration in 2022 in the wake of Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, forcing Shell to seek an alternative buyer. In October, a court in Germany rejected a complaint by Rosneft Deutschland against Shell's plan to sell its PCK stake to Prax. By Svea Winter Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Trump backs new deal to avoid shutdown: Update


19/12/24
19/12/24

Trump backs new deal to avoid shutdown: Update

Adds updates throughout Washington, 19 December (Argus) — US president-elect Donald Trump is offering his support for a rewritten spending bill that would avoid a government shutdown but leave out a provision authorizing year-round 15pc ethanol gasoline (E15) sales. The bill — which Republicans rewrote today after Trump attacked an earlier bipartisan agreement — would avoid a government shutdown starting Saturday, deliver agricultural aid and provide disaster relief. Trump said the bill was a "very good deal" that would also include a two-year suspension of the "very unnecessary" ceiling on federal debt, until 30 January 2027. "All Republicans, and even the Democrats, should do what is best for our Country, and vote 'YES' for this Bill, TONIGHT!" Trump wrote in a social media post. Passing the bill would require support from Democrats, who are still reeling after Trump and his allies — including Tesla chief executive Elon Musk — upended a spending deal they had spent weeks negotiating with US House speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana). Democrats have not yet said if they would vote against the new agreement. "We are prepared to move forward with the bipartisan agreement that we thought was negotiated in good faith with House Republicans," House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) said earlier today. That earlier deal would have kept the government funded through 14 March, in addition to providing a one-year extension to the farm bill, $100bn in disaster relief and $10bn in aid for farmers. The bill would also provide a waiver that would avoid a looming ban on summertime sales of E15 across much of the US. Ethanol industry officials said they would urge lawmakers to vote against any package without the E15 provision. "Pulling E15 out of the bill makes absolutely no sense and is an insult to America's farmers and renewable fuel producers," Renewable Fuels Association chief executive Geoff Cooper said. If no agreement is reached by Friday at 11:59pm ET, federal agencies would have to furlough millions of workers and curtail services, although some agencies are able to continue operations in the event of a short-term funding lapse. Air travel is unlikely to face immediate interruptions because key federal workers are considered "essential," but some work on permits, agricultural and import data, and regulations could be curtailed. The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has funding to get through a "short-term" shutdown but could be affected by a longer shutdown, chairman Willie Phillips said. The US Department of Energy expects "no disruptions" if funding lapses for 1-5 days, according to its shutdown plan. The US Environmental Protection Agency would furlough about 90pc of its nearly 17,000 staff in the event of a shutdown, according to a plan it updated earlier this year. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more