Latest Market News

Ammonia most exposed fertilizer to Ukraine conflict

  • Spanish Market: Fertilizers
  • 02/03/22

Russia is a major supplier of mineral fertilizer to global agriculture and it will be difficult to replace should ratcheting western sanctions begin to restrict the country's access to the world's markets.

It possesses substantial potash and phosphate reserves, as well as one of the largest natural gas resources in the world, providing the country a large N, P and K production base. And while Russian supply is vitally important to the global fertilizer market, we believe that individual fertilizer commodity exposure to western sanctions will vary substantially for structural reasons.

We have assessed the potential impact of the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine on each of the eight major fertilizers we track, using six measures to quantify each commodity's exposure to sanctions.

The first five measures are designed to assess the direct exposure of each industry to sanctions on Russian fertilizer in the near term. They measure the share of global supply operated within Russia and share of Russian exporters in the global and OECD markets, and their access to them. Our assumption is that most OECD markets — except for Turkey — are likely to limit access to Russian fertilizers should the EU or US sanction specific HS codes or companies in the way that measures are currently enforced against Iranian urea or Belarusian potash.

The last metric is our attempt to gauge the level of disruption to longer-term fertilizer supply that restricted capital flows will have on ongoing Russian fertilizer construction and planned Russian investments.

Based on our early analysis, the ammonia industry is going to be the most exposed, followed by the potash and urea industries, while the sulphuric acid industry looks like it will be the least affected. The other major fertilizers fall along a spectrum between those two extremes.

Sanctions so far…

The initial impact has been limited in terms of physical supply disruptions but huge in terms of psychological shock, greatly increasing the risk profile of fertilizer trade. Booking freight from Russian ports is looking to be an early and growing problem and may result in Russian producers offering discounts on fob sales to offset from risk premiums faced by vessels loading at Russian ports.

Ammonia has been the most affected in the early days of the conflict. Around 2.4mn t of ammonia shipped from Pivdenny port (Odessa) in 2021, of which only 150,000t were Ukrainian. The balance is Russian ammonia shipped through the pipeline from TogliattiAzot and Rossosh. Typically, these Russian exporters move 1.8mn t/yr and 0.5mn t/yr, respectively, through Pivdenny.

The conflict in Ukraine has forced the closure of the Togliatti-Pivdenny ammonia pipeline and all ammonia has ceased shipping from Ukraine. This will have huge implications for supply and prices west of Suez. The largest offtakers from Pivdenny last year were Morocco (800,000t), Turkey (600,000t), India (360,000t) and Tunisia (190,000t). This means that non-integrated (with ammonia) DAP and MAP producers in north Africa will be the most disrupted in the near term.

Potash is also in a uniquely difficult position given the disruption to trade that the industry has already experienced from the sanctions against Belarus' potash sector. Direct sanctions on Russian potash would cause a combined 40pc of global exports to become unviable for Europe and the US, as US sanctions' extraterritorial effects have seen buyers in both regions largely move away from Belarusian supply.

The impact of the removal of Russia from the Swift financial transaction system and the sanctioning of Russian banks on Russian fertilizer sales is uncertain. Many Russian producers process fertilizer transactions through Swiss trading subsidiaries and we are unsure of how these will be affected in the short run.

But despite no direct sanctioning of Russian fertilizer trade and EU ports remaining open to Russian cargoes, we are already seeing impacts on fertilizer shipping decisions. Nominated vessels are loading as normal, but the fixing of future fertilizer cargoes appears increasingly problematic for Russia.

We are already hearing reports of ‘self-sanctioning' as some western companies that would normally be importing Russian fertilizer pre-empt tighter sanctions. Only sales to those European or American buyers worried about the optics of taking Russian fertilizer cargoes are likely to be affected by this, but others outside of the EU may be growing concerned about the extraterritorial effects that tighter US sanctions are likely to have.

Gas markets already pricing in risk premiums, with implications for nitrogen producers

So far, we have only considered the impacts of direct sanctions on Russian fertilizer trade and indirect effects from sanctioning of Russian financial institutions.

The European gas market has pre-emptively priced in a risk premium of around $10/mn Btu, moving from the mid-$20/mn Btu range to the mid-$30/mn Btu level. This will disproportionally affect the nitrogen industry given the industry's gas-based cost structure and that EU nitrogen producers have been setting the industry's marginal cost over the last year.

Our risk analysis in Figure 1 is focused on trade and does not include this risk premium on European gas. Nor does it consider any future increase to European gas prices should gas flows to the EU from Russia be physically disrupted by the conflict or EU sanctions.

In Figure 2, we have analysed the impact of the premium that EU gas markets are currently pricing in at the Dutch TTF hub on European nitrogen producers. We have assumed pre-conflict TTF gas pricing at $25/mn Btu and post-conflict at $35/mn Btu and $45/mn Btu, with carbon priced at $80/t CO2 equivalent (CO2e) in all instances.

Initial thoughts as US and EU sanctions ratchet up

As sanctions on Russia expand, all fertilizer products will face upwards price pressure should sanctions directly target fertilizer HS codes, fertilizer producers or their owners. Any limits on Russian exports will make global fertilizer markets less efficient. This means that buyers within the sanctioning jurisdictions — primarily the EU, US, UK and Japan — will lose bargaining power as the pool of available sellers decreases with the enforced absence of Russia and Belarus, while longer journeys to less-optimal markets will also reduce Russian producer netbacks.

In addition to any trade disruption, ammonia and other nitrogen fertilizer prices will undergo a substantial cost-push as the risk premiums on gas increase the industry's marginal cost of supply. Actual disruption to Russian gas flows has the potential to push gas prices and nitrogen costs higher still.

Ammonia is already facing both outcomes, with the loss of almost 2.4mn t of supply from Ukraine — and Russia through Ukraine — and the substantial increase in EU gas prices as European markets attempt to price in Russian risk.

And potash buyers in the west that are already adapting to the sanctioning of Belarusian exports face the prospect of losing access to Russian supplies, should the conflict continue and western sanctions begin targeting Russia's physical trade flows.

Figure 2

Figure 1

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

Elevated nitrate levels found in Iowa water: EPA


20/11/24
20/11/24

Elevated nitrate levels found in Iowa water: EPA

Houston, 20 November (Argus) — The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) added seven Iowa water segments to its impaired US waters list, saying they are all polluted with nitrate, possibly stemming from nitrogen fertilizer runoff. The EPA added these seven water segments to the list of impaired waters on 12 November, determining each was laden with nitrate pollution. The EPA invoked water restoration plans in partnership with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (DNR). This is in addition to the 712 water segments in Iowa that are already on the state's list of water segments that need a restoration plan under the Clean Water Act, according to the EPA. The largest contributor to nitrate pollution is manure and commercial fertilizer that runs off farm fields, according Pam Taylor, director of the Iowa Sierra Club Chapter. Nearly 85pc of land in Iowa is farmland, using nearly 149 lbs of nitrogen fertilizer per acre annually,the US Department of Agriculture said. The Iowa DNR initially submitted a list of water segments that need restoration attention on 9 May, which was only partially approved by the EPA. This triggered the agency to place these additional water segments on public notice until 12 December. Once that date has passed, the EPA can implement a restoration plan in partnership with the Iowa DNR. The Iowa Chapter of the Sierra Club is in support of the EPA's decision. It alleged that the DNR purposefully used an incorrect method to determine nitrate pollution, which may have enabled the DNR to excuse certain water segments from the list of impaired bodies. Separately, a letter was also sent to the EPA on 16 April by several Iowa agencies requesting the EPA apply its emergency powers to address nitrate groundwater contamination in northeastern Iowa. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Cameroon's CNPC-C issues NPK tender to buy


20/11/24
20/11/24

Cameroon's CNPC-C issues NPK tender to buy

London, 20 November (Argus) — The national confederation of cotton producers (CNPC-C) has issued a tender to purchase 32,000t of complex fertilizers, closing on 9 December. The CNPC-C requests 16,000t of 22-23-15+5S+1B and 16,000t of 15-20-15+5S+1B, both in 50kg bags, for delivery on an ex-works basis in Douala on or before 28 February. CNPC-C had opened offers against its 24 October tender to buy 45,000t of complex fertilizers and 12,000t of urea. But there were no valid offers for the 16,000t of 22-23-15+5S+1B it requested. It received five valid offers against its request for 29,000t of 14-23-14+5S+1B or 15-20-15+5S+1B, but is now seeking more competitive offers under the fresh tender. By Nykole King Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Major amsul producers increase pricing for 1Q


19/11/24
19/11/24

Major amsul producers increase pricing for 1Q

Houston, 19 November (Argus) — US ammonium sulfate producers Interoceanic Corporation (IOC) and AdvanSix have increased prices for first-quarter deliveries. IOC increased its first-quarter offers by $20-35/st at all distribution points except for its Houston plant , which will remain at $345/st fob. The low end of the range offered was $335/st fob at Nola, while the high end was $405/st rail delivered for Northern Plains. AdvanSix increased amsul prices by $25/st for all locations for first-quarter delivery. The Hopewell, Virginia, value rose to $355/st fob. Upper Mississippi River warehouses increased to $385/st fob, while Ohio River and Granite City, Illinois, prices increased to $380/st fob. Inland warehouses and rail quotes will maintain traditional premiums over river locations, AdvanSix said. Amsul values continue to rise into the winter pre-pay season because of short domestic supply, driven by high input costs inflating market values. By Meghan Yoyotte IOC's Ammonium Sulfate Prices for 1Q $/st Location Value Nola Barge $335/st FOB Houston $345/st St Louis and Delta Terminals $380/st Upper Mississippi River Terminals $385/st Illinois River Terminals $385/st Ohio River Terminals $380/st FOB Sioux City/Omaha/Casselton, ND $405/st Rail Delivered Northern Plains $405/st — IOC AdvanSix's Amsul prices for 1Q $/st Location Value FOB Hopewell, VA $355/st Upper Mississippi River $385/st Ohio River/Granite City, IL $380/st — AdvanSix Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

IPL forecasts higher Phosphate Hill output in FY25


19/11/24
19/11/24

IPL forecasts higher Phosphate Hill output in FY25

Sydney, 19 November (Argus) — Australian chemicals and fertilizer producer Incitec Pivot (IPL) has forecasted higher output from its Phosphate Hill mine over the next financial year in its annual report. IPL forecasts there will be 790,000-860,000t of DAP/MAP output from its Phosphate Hill site located in northeast Queensland, Australia, up from 739,500t of output in FY24 . IPL plans to conduct repairs and other work to increase site reliability over the next financial year. Owing to these planned outages, production at Phosphate Hill is expected to be lower in the first half of the financial year, with 40-45pc of total volumes expected during that time. IPL highlighted that Phosphate Hill's production is vulnerable to circumstances outside its control, such as equipment breakdowns, energy or water disruptions and severe weather events. IPL also mentioned its reliance on Glencore's nearby Mount Isa Mines copper smelter staying open. Sulphuric acid is a by-product of copper smelting. Should the smelter close, sulphuric acid supply in the region would fall and with it being a major raw material required to produce DAP/MAP, Phosphate Hill would be negatively impacted. This could also impact phosphate production at Agriflex's Ardmore phosphate project in Queensland. Glencore recently announced it expects the operation of the smelter to continue to 2030 pending capital approvals. IPL is continuing to work on alternative sources to mitigate the loss of sulphuric acid supply in case of Glencore's potential closure or reduced production. The annual report also said IPL continues to use a mix of gas supply sources, including gas supplied under a contract with Power and Water Corporation (PWC), and top-up gas from Northern Territory and east coast suppliers. The diversity of gas supply ensured Phosphate Hill production was not affected by the reduction of contracted gas supply from PWC. A further update on Phosphate Hill supply will be made mid-2025 and a "strategic review" of the site is expected to be completed no later than September 2025. By Tom Woodlock Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more