Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Algeria faces challenge to export more gas to Europe

  • Spanish Market: Natural gas
  • 13/09/23

Algerian production is ramping up, but Italy may not want or be able to receive much more gas, writes Alexandra Vladimirova

Infrastructure constraints and low demand could forestall any tangible increase in Algerian gas exports to Europe this winter, despite a continued uptick in Algeria's upstream production.

The Italian government expects pipeline imports from Algeria to rise by 6bn m³ this year compared with 2021, and by 9bn m³ in 2024, according to a revised national energy and climate plan (NECP) it sent to Brussels in June. But flows are on course to fall well short of the expected increase. Deliveries at the Mazara entry point totalled 16.3bn m³ on 1 January-12 September. For aggregate Algerian pipeline receipts to total 27.1bn m³ — 6bn m³ more than in 2021 — flows would need to average 98mn m³/d on 13 September-31 December.

Pipeline deliveries to Italy have never reached that level over recent years, with maximum monthly flows of 83.9mn m³/d achieved in April this year. Bottlenecks in the Italian grid have prevented the Transmed pipeline between Algeria and Italy from operating at full capacity. Algerian flows are generally capped at 80mn-85mn m³/d, with some fluctuations depending on demand, Argus estimates.

Italian system operator Snam lists the pipeline's technical capacity as 108.7mn m³/d, but Tunisia typically absorbs about 11mn m³/d. Once Algerian gas reaches Italy, it blends with Libyan flows from the Gela entry point, where contracted capacity is about 13mn m³/d, and with domestically produced gas from fields offshore Sicily. Some of this combined supply is absorbed by consumers in the southern regions of Sicily and Calabria, which used 16.8mn m³/d in 2021. Flows from Sicily mix with up to 30mn m³/d of imports from Azerbaijan and additional supply from Italian fields. But the amount of residual supply that is able to reach Italy's larger demand centres in the north is capped at 126mn m³/d by a bottleneck in central Italy, preventing the three southern pipelines from operating at full capacity simultaneously. Combined flows from Algeria, Libya and Azerbaijan exceeded 126mn m³/d on only one day last winter, with Italy receiving 91.2mn m³ from Algeria, 26.6mn m³ from Azerbaijan and 11.4mn m³ from Libya on 19 December.

Similarly, Algerian flows to Spain have limited scope to rise significantly, particularly as most of the capacity on the Medgaz pipeline is allocated to long-term contracts. Algeria's exports to Spain averaged 254 GWh/d last winter, compared with overall contracted volumes through Medgaz of about 305 GWh/d. Flows only exceeded 305 GWh/d — by no more than 7 GWh/d — on 32 days during the period.

Contractual supplies vs physical flows

The increase in Algerian supply stated in Italy's NECP broadly matches the additional contractual volumes that Italy's Eni agreed with Algeria's state-owned Sonatrach in 2022, when the Algerian firm committed to add 3bn m³/yr from 2022-23, 6.2bn m³/yr from 2023-24 and 9bn m³/yr from 2024-25 to the existing long-term contract.

But there is potentially a mismatch between physical flows over a calendar year and deliveries under the contract, which includes a legacy component based on gas years — running from October to September — and the additional volumes agreed in 2022, which are instead meant to be delivered over storage years — from April to March. Moreover, an increase in contractual supply with one customer, albeit the largest one, may not necessarily translate into stronger aggregate flows to Italy, as it may reduce pipeline capacity available to other firms for spot deals. Sonatrach sold about 4bn m³ of spot gas last year, it says, without specifying the exact amounts purchased by Italy and Spain, or if the figure includes sales in the form of LNG.

But some firms may have opted to receive more Algerian volumes in the form of LNG, although this is likely to be primarily the result of spot deals. Italy's NECP does not foresee an increase in Algerian LNG deliveries, but the number of cargoes from Algeria unloading at Italian ports has risen so far in 2023. The 2.7mn t/yr Panigaglia terminal received 31 cargoes from Algeria in January-August, inching close to the 35 Algerian cargoes it received in the whole of 2022, and up from 25 cargoes in 2021. The 3.9mn t/yr OLT terminal received two ships from Algeria this summer, for the first time since 2021. And Algeria provided the first commercial cargo delivered to the recently commissioned 3.9mn t/yrPiombino terminal.

Demand is key

There is scope for an uptick in Algerian flows if Italian consumption is higher than last year. Supply from Algeria to Italy was expected to increase in winter 2022-23, but flows were lower than a year earlier because mild weather weighed on heating demand. Entry flows at Mazara totalled 11.2bn m³ over the six-month period, down from 11.5bn m³ in winter 2021-22.

Italian storage sites are close to 95pc full as of 13 September, and injection demand is expected to be lower than a year earlier until the end of the Italian stockbuild season on 31 October. This, coupled with consumption holding lower than in recent years in all months since June 2022, means that Italy may have limited need to boost Algerian flows before the end of next month. But below-average temperatures later in the year and into the first quarter of 2024 could push flows at Mazara above levels seen a year earlier.

But even if Italian demand is low, Italian firms may have an incentive to keep Algerian flows firm and reduce their storage withdrawals, or even to increase export flows to northwest Europe. This looks limited for the time being, as forward PSV prices for this winter still command a premium to corresponding TTF contracts at present, albeit a small one.

Upstream production stays strong

In any event, Algerian exports this winter will depend on how the country's upstream production performs in the coming months. Mazara flows fell sharply to 43.7mn m³/d in January from 74.3mn m³/d in December, before rebounding to 56.9mn m³/d in February. The drop may have stemmed from low Italian demand during a mid-winter mild spell, but it also coincided with a dip in Algerian production, which fell to 8.4bn m³ in January from 9.4bn m³ in January 2022.

Algerian production increased year on year in all months from February-May, figures from the Joint Organisation Data Initiative show. The rise in March output was especially large, reaching 13.1bn m³ from 9.1bn m³ a year earlier, although Algerian domestic consumption also rose sharply in March, to 8bn m³ from 4.6bn m³ a year earlier. Several new upstream projects came on stream in Algeria in late 2022, including the 2bn m³/yr South Berkine, 1.8bn m³/yr Tinhert 1 and 1.6bn m³/yr Hassi Guettara fields, as well as the initial phase of the Hassi R'Mel LD2 reservoir, which was first announced by Sonatrach in June 2022. These projects have supported Algeria's output, which totalled 72.4bn m³ in October 2022-May 2023, up by 5bn m³ from a year earlier.

Winter 2023-24 may bring about a further increase in production. The Hassi Bahamou field, which had been slated to start in 2024, has recently come on line with capacity of up to 2.2bn m³/yr, although output is expected to average 1.64bn m³/yr, Sonatrach said earlier this month. And Hassi R'Mel LD2 is expected to reach production of 5.5bn m³/yr by the end of 2023, having started production at 1.4bn m³/yr. Three more fields — TFT Sud, Ahnet and In Amenas Periphery — were expected to add 7.1bn m³/yr over 2023. And more than 3bn m³/yr of additional production capacity from three other projects could come on line in 2024.

Italy gas infrastructure

Algerian gas production bn m³

Algerian flows to Italy mn m³/d

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

08/05/25

HSFO defies the green tide

HSFO defies the green tide

New York, 8 May (Argus) — High-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO), once seen as a fading relic, is proving remarkably resilient (see table) despite the maritime sector's push toward decarbonization. The fuel remains economically attractive thanks to persistent scrubber investments and regulatory frameworks that fail to fully penalize its use. Under the EU notation, HSFO and very low-sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) are assigned the same calorific and greenhouse gas emission values. This equivalence means that ships fitted with scrubbers — systems that strip out sulphur oxides — face no additional penalties for choosing HSFO over VLSFO. As a result, greenhouse gas fees under FuelEU Maritime and the EU emissions trading system (ETS) offer no disincentive for scrubber users to stick with cheaper HSFO. In March 2025, the VLSFO-HSFO spread in Singapore narrowed to just $44/t, the lowest since the IMO 2020 sulphur cap took effect. At that level, a scrubber on a capesize bulker pays for itself in under two years. When the spread averaged $122/t in 2024, the payback period was about eight months. Even in regulated markets like Europe, economics favor HSFO. Under the EU ETS, ships operating in, out of or between EU ports must pay for 70pc of their CO2 emissions in 2025. In Rotterdam, bunker prices including ETS surcharges still favor HSFO: $575/t for HSFO, $605/t for VLSFO, and $783/t for a B30 Used cooking oil methyl ester blend. While biofuels, methanol and LNG are inching forward in market share, they remain cost-prohibitive. In the meantime, HSFO, with scrubber backing, continues to punch above its environmental weight. By Stefka Wechsler Selected ports marine fuel demand t % Chg 1Q 25-1Q 24 1Q 2025 less 1Q 2024 1Q 2025 1Q 2024 Singapore HSFO 1.0% 33,160.0 4,898,372.0 4,865,212.0 VLSFO/ULSFO -13.0% -1,005,951.0 6,829,667.0 7,835,618.0 MGO/MDO -5.0% -49,012.0 907,874.0 956,886.0 biofuel blends 187.0% 237,552.0 364,418.0 126,866.0 LNG 34.0% 25,935.0 101,856.0 75,921.0 Rotterdam HSFO 1.0% 11,169.0 829,197.0 818,028.0 VLSFO/ULSFO 14.0% 118,670.0 976,249.0 857,579.0 MGO/MDO 3.0% 9,662.0 393,071.0 383,409.0 biofuel blends -60.0% -158,597.0 104,037.0 262,634.0 LNG 7.0% 7.0 104.0 97.0 Panama HSFO 22.0% 65,266.0 362,388.0 297,122.0 VLSFO/ULSFO 25.0% 177,296.0 878,776.0 701,480.0 MGO/MDO 22.0% 27,097.0 150,980.0 123,883.0 — Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore, Rotterdam Port Authority and Panama Canal Authority Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

FinBalt gas demand down on the year in April


08/05/25
08/05/25

FinBalt gas demand down on the year in April

London, 8 May (Argus) — Combined gas demand across the Finnish and Baltic region fell by 4pc on the year in April despite gas-fired power generation rising by nearly 50pc. Aggregate consumption in Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in April fell to 3.42TWh, down from 3.56TWh the previous year and the three-year average of 5.12TWh in 2019-21. That said, it was still higher than in both 2022 and 2023 ( see consumption graph ). Lithuania remained the region's largest consumer, as it has been for every month since June, again driven by an increase in gas-fired power generation. Average gas-fired output soared by nearly 400pc on the year in April to 254MW according to data from Fraunhofer ISE, more than making up for a 43pc drop in Finnish production ( see power table ). Following the de-synchronisation of the Baltic states from the post-Soviet Brell system, gas-fired power plants have become particularly important in the region, not just for producing electricity but also for providing ancillary services such as frequency reserves. Lithuania has the largest gas-fired fleet in the region, and its output jumped despite domestic power consumption falling by more than 5pc on the year and renewable output increasing, which allowed the country to cut its power imports last month to 104MW, from 546MW in the previous year. With power sector gas demand increasing in April but overall gas consumption in the region dropping, demand from households and industries must have been lower on the year. Weather patterns were split across the region, with lower average minimum temperatures than the previous year in Vilnius and Riga, but higher in Tallinn and Helsinki. That said, overnight lows in all four capitals were still above the 2015-24 average last month, limiting strong heating demand in the shoulder month ( see temperature table ). Traded volumes on the region's gas exchange GET Baltic rose to 1.1TWh last month, an "unusually high result for this time of year" according to the exchange's senior account manager Karolis Bagdonas. Of the overall volume, 56pc traded in Lithuania, 28pc in the joint Estonia-Latvia market area, and the remaining 16pc in Finland. The average price on GET Baltic was €39.40/MWh last month, down by around 8pc from March. GET Baltic announced in April that its full integration into the European Energy Exchange (EEX) had been delayed again until 9 September , having previously been planned for 27 May . Across all of January-April FinBalt consumption totalled 18.43TWh, down from 20.04TWh in the same period of 2024. Stocks at the region's only storage facility in Latvia ended the storage year on 1 May at 8.4TWh, below 11.3TWh on the same day last year and 9TWh in 2023, but still above all other years since 2018 ( see data and download ). The entire 100pc of capacity, amounting to just over 23TWh, had been booked for the 2024-25 storage year, but for the new 2025-26 cycle a lower 17TWh has been allocated, representing around 68pc of the cycle's total technical capacity of 24.9TWh. Consistently positive summer-winter spreads over the winter period, which gave no financial incentive to book storage, may have driven lower interest in 2025-26 capacity, although they had normalised by April. Lower overall booked volumes is despite operator Conexus managing to sell all 9TWh of the new five-year capacity product it offered in February and March . Slow start to injection season Injections into Incukalns have been weak so far this year, with not a single day of net injections until 24 April. In the previous year, there had been some brief net injections on 1-4 April at an average of 54 GWh/d, and across all of April they averaged just over 7 GWh/d. In contrast, this year's April averaged net withdrawals of 32 GWh/d across the month, with injections only on 24-30 April. This slow stockbuild has continued in the first week of May, with 35GWh of net injections on 1 May but then a flip back to very minor net withdrawals of 0.2 GWh/d on every day of 2-6 May, the latest data from GIE show. Last year, there were average net injections of 47 GWh/d on 1-6 May, and 39 GWh/d in 2021-23. Despite weak injections, overall LNG sendout across the region's three terminals of Klaipeda, Inkoo and Hamina has increased significantly from April, nearly doubling to 150 GWh/d on 1-7 May from 80 GWh/d in April. Sendout from these terminals averaged 84 GWh/d on 1-7 May last year. Rather than injecting all of the regasified LNG, some of it is being sent southward to Poland at Santaka, with exit flows at the point averaging 22 GWh/d on 1-7 May, switched from net inflows of 2 GWh/d in April. This is likely to be linked to Polish incumbent Orlen's deals to supply LNG to Ukraine's Naftogaz, of which one of the contracts specified that it would be delivered to Klaipeda and transited to the Ukrainian border . By Brendan A'Hearn FinBalt gas-fired power production MW Apr-25 Apr-24 year-on-year % change Finland 118 206 -43 Estonia 6 5 20 Latvia 85 53 60 Lithuania 254 52 388 Total 463 316 47 — Fraunhofer ISE FinBalt average minimum temps °C Apr-25 Apr-24 2015-24 avg Helsinki 0.7 0.1 0.1 Talinn 2.2 2.0 1.0 Riga 4.8 5.0 4.0 Vilnius 3.8 5.2 2.8 — Speedwell FinBalt gas demand by country GWh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

IMO GHG pricing falls short on green methanol, ammonia


07/05/25
07/05/25

IMO GHG pricing falls short on green methanol, ammonia

New York, 7 May (Argus) — The International Maritime Organization's (IMO) proposed global greenhouse gas (GHG) pricing mechanism might not drive significant uptake of green methanol and green ammonia by 2035, given current market prices. Despite introducing penalties on high-emission fuels use and tradable surplus credits for low-emission fuels, the mechanism does not sufficiently close the cost gap for green alternatives. Under the system, starting in 2028 ship operators will face a two-tier penalty: $100/t CO₂e for emissions between the base and direct GHG intensity limit, and $380/t CO₂e for those exceeding the looser base limit. These thresholds will tighten annually through 2035. Ship operators can earn tradable credits for overcompliance when their GHG emissions fall below the direct limit. Assuming a surplus CO₂e credit value of $72/t — mirroring April 2025's average EU emissions trading system price — green ammonia would earn about $215/t in surplus credits in 2028 (see chart) . This barely offsets its April spot price of $2,830/t VLSFO equivalent in northwest Europe. Bio-methanol would receive about $175/t in credits, offering minimal relief on its $2,318/t April spot price. Currently, unsubsidized northwest Europe bio-LNG sits mid-range among bunker fuel options under IMO's emissions framework. While more expensive than HSFO, grey LNG, and B30 bioblends, the bio-LNG is cheaper than B100 (pure used cooking oil methyl ester), green ammonia, and bio-methanol. To become cost-competitive with unsubsidized bio-LNG — priced at $1,185/t in April 2025 — green ammonia and bio-methanol prices would need to fall by 57pc and 49pc, respectively, to around $1,220/t VLSFOe and $1,180/t VLSFOe by 2028. Unless green fuel prices drop significantly or fossil fuel prices rise, the IMO's structure alone provides insufficient economic incentive to accelerate green ammonia and bio-methanol adoption at scale. By Stefka Wechsler NW Europe, fuel prices plus IMO penalties and credits Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Trump to end military campaign in Yemen: Update


06/05/25
06/05/25

Trump to end military campaign in Yemen: Update

Updates with details throughout, including Houthi response. Washington, 6 May (Argus) — President Donald Trump said today he will end the US military campaign against Yemen's Houthis, claiming that the militant group pledged to stop attacks on commercial ships passing through the Red Sea. The Houthis reached out with a request to stop the US bombing campaign, and the US will do so immediately, Trump told reporters at the beginning of his meeting with Canada's prime minister Mark Carney on Tuesday. "They don't want to fight anymore," Trump said. "They have capitulated ... And I will accept their word, and we are going to stop the bombing of the Houthis effective immediately." US secretary of state Marco Rubio, who also attended the meeting with Carney, added that if the Houthi attacks "are going to stop, then we can stop." Oman mediated a ceasefire agreement between the US and the Houthis, Oman's foreign minister Badr Albusaidi said in a social media post following Trump's remarks. "In the future, neither side will target the other, including American vessels, in the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab Strait, ensuring freedom of navigation and the smooth flow of international commercial shipping." It was not clear from Albusaidi's statement whether the Houthis committed to stop their attacks on all vessels passing near Yemen's coastline. The Houthis claimed in late 2023 that, out of solidarity with Gaza's Palestinian population, they would attack any ship that was owned by an Israeli company or made calls at an Israeli port. But the Houthi attacks were indiscriminate, effectively crippling the regular passage of oil, LNG and other commercial vessel traffic through Red Sea waterways. The militant group paused its attacks on commercial shipping following the ceasefire in Gaza in January, but resumed them in March, after Israel stopped allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza. The Houthis also launched attacks against Israel, drawing retaliatory strikes by the Israeli Air Force, and on US naval vessels in the Red Sea. There was no explicit confirmation of a ceasefire from Houthi-controlled information outlets. A Houthi spokesman reposted a social media post suggesting that "America stopped its aggression in Yemen" and that "the one who retreated is America." Another media channel used by the group said that "the Israeli and American aggression will not pass without a response and will not deter Yemen from continuing its position in support of Gaza". US president Donald Trump's administration listed its military campaign against Yemen-based Houthis, which began on 15 March, as a key foreign policy accomplishment in his first 100 days in office even though the militant group continued to launch missile and drone attacks — most recently on 4 May against Israel's main airport. Israel responded to the 4 May attack with air strikes on Yemen's port of Hodeidah and, today, on the main airport in Yemen's capital Sanaa. Israel also vowed to retaliate against Tehran, which is the main provider of weapons to the Houthis. The US separately warned Iran to discontinue its military support for the Yemeni militant group. The Trump administration is engaged in talks with Iran to address Tehran's nuclear program, with Iranian officials hoping to use the diplomatic negotiations to press for relief of oil and other sanctions against Iran. Trump said he will visit Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar next week and is widely expected to also visit Israel on the same trip. "Before then, we're going to have a very, very big announcement to make, like, as big as it gets, and I won't tell you on what," Trump said. "But it will be one of the most important announcements that have been made in many years about a certain subject, very important subject." By Haik Gugarats, Nader Itayim and Bachar Halabi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US onshore crude output likely peaked: Diamondback


06/05/25
06/05/25

US onshore crude output likely peaked: Diamondback

New York, 6 May (Argus) — US onshore crude production has likely peaked as activity slows in response to the recent decline in oil prices, according to Diamondback Energy. The leading US independent estimates that the US hydraulic fracturing crew count is already down 15pc this year, while the frack crew count in the Permian basin has fallen by about 20pc from its January peak. Moreover, the US oil rig count is expected to be almost 10pc lower by the end of the second quarter with further declines seen. "As a result of these activity cuts, it is likely that U.S. onshore oil production has peaked and will begin to decline this quarter," Diamondback's chief executive officer Travis Stice said in a letter to shareholders. Given the shale sector has matured from the rapid growth seen in the early days of the shale boom, "this is not one of the types of declines that can be offset by improved efficiencies," Stice later told analysts on a conference call. Diamondback Energy also set out plans to cut spending and drill and complete fewer wells in the aftermath of the price slump, which has been driven by the economic fall-out over President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff policy, as well as the Opec+ group's plan to accelerate the return of barrels to the market. Capital spending is now seen at $3.4bn-$3.8bn this year, a decline of 10pc from the midpoint of previous expectations. The company will drop three rigs and one full-time completion crew in the second quarter, and expects to hold steady at those levels through most of the third quarter. If oil prices remain weak or fall further, Diamondback could reduce activity further. Or if prices rebound above $65, it could ramp activity back to previous levels. Under normal circumstances, it would use a period of lower service costs to build more drilled but uncompleted wells. But well casing, its biggest drilling input cost, has increased by 10pc in the last quarter due to steel tariffs. "To use a driving analogy, we are taking our foot off the accelerator as we approach a red light," said Stice. "If the light turns green before we get to the stoplight, we will hit the gas again, but we are also prepared to brake if needed." The impact on oil output is expected to be minimal given volumes have outperformed year to date. The company now sees annual oil production in a range of 480,000-495,000 b/d, down just 1pc from the midpoint of prior guidance. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more