Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Q&A: Marine CO2 goals need culture shift: TotalEnergies

  • Spanish Market: Biofuels, Hydrogen, Oil products
  • 20/05/24

A cultural change in buying behaviour and supply patterns is necessary for the shipping sector to meet its decarbonisation targets and may be the biggest hurdle to overcome, strategy and projects director for TotalEnergies' marine fuels division Frederic Meyer told Argus. Edited highlights follow:

What is the biggest challenge standing in the way of the maritime industry in meeting decarbonisation targets and the fuel transition ?

A cultural change is required — for decades the maritime sector has relied on by-products with high energy density from the crude refining process such as fuel oil. The industry will now have to pivot its attention towards fuels developed for the purpose of consumption within the maritime industry. This will also require time as the sector looks to level up, and it remains to be seen whether there will be enough time to meet the International Maritime Organisation (IMO)'s net-zero by or around 2050 targets. But we have seen some good progress from cargo owners who are seeking scope 3 emissions related documents.

How does TotalEnergies see marine biodiesel demand moving in the short term?

In the short term, there is little incentive for the majority of buyers in the market. This is due to a lack of any regulatory mandates, as well as limited impact from existing regulations such as the IMO's carbon intensity indicator (CII) and the EU's Emissions Trading System (ETS).

Despite providing a zero emission factor incentive for biofuels meeting the sustainability criteria under the EU's Renewable Energy Directive (RED), EU ETS is still on a staggered implementation basis beginning with only 40pc this year, rising to 70pc next year and 100pc in 2026. Further, EU ETS prices have been quite low, which also weighed on financial incentives for marine biodiesel. Therefore, many buyers are currently waiting for further incentives and signals from the regulators before purchasing marine biodiesel blends.

Another point impacting demand is the current edition of ISO 8217, which does not provide much flexibility when it comes to marine biodiesel blend percentages and specifications. The new 2024 edition will likely provide greater flexibility for blending percentages, as well as a provision for biodiesel that does not meet EN14214 specifications. This will provide greater flexibility from a supply point of view.

However, there remains stable demand from buyers who can pass on the extra costs to their customers.

And how do you see this demand fluctuating in the medium to long term?

If the other alternative marine fuels, such as ammonia and methanol, that are currently being discussed do not develop at the speed necessary to meet the decarbonisation targets, then marine biodiesel demand will likely be firm.

Many in the market have voiced concerns regarding biofuel feedstock competition between marine and aviation, ahead of the implementation of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) mandates in Europe starting next year. With Argus assessments for SAF at much higher levels than marine biodiesel blends, do you think common feedstocks such as used cooking oil (UCO) will get pulled away from maritime and into aviation?

With regards to competition among different industries for the same biofuel feedstock, suppliers may channel their feedstock towards aviation fuels due to the higher non-compliance penalties associated with SAF regulations as opposed to those in marine, which would incentivise greater demand for SAF. An area that can be explored for marine is the by-product when producing SAF, which can amount to up to 30pc of the fuel output. This could potentially feed into a marine biodiesel supply pool. So it's not necessarily the case that the two sectors will battle over the same feedstock if process synergies can be found.

Regarding fuel specifications, market participants have told Argus that the lack of a marine-specific fuel standard for alternatives such as marine biodiesel is feeding into uncertainty for buyers who may not be as familiar with biofuels. What impact could this have on demand for marine biodiesel blends from your point of view?

Currently, mainstream biodiesel specifications in marine biodiesel blends are derived from other markets such as the EN14214 specification from road diesel engines. But given the large flexibility of a marine engine, there is room to test and try different things. For "unconventional" biofuels that do not meet those road specifications, there needs to be a testing process accompanied by proof of results that showcase its safety for combustion within a marine engine.

Some companies may not have the means or capacity to test their biodiesel before taking it into the market. But TotalEnergies always ensures that there are no engine-related issues from fuel combustion. Suppliers need to enact the necessary testing and take on the burden, as cutting out this process may create a negative perception for the product more generally.

Traders should also take on some of the burden and test their fuels to ensure they are fully compatible with the engine.

With many regulations being discussed, how do you see the risk of regulatory clashes impacting the industry?

The simple solution would be an electronic register to trace the chain of custody. In the French markets, often times the proof of sustainability (PoS) papers are stored onto an electronic database once they are retired to the relevant authority. This database is then accessible and viewable by the buyer, and the supplier could also further deliver a "sustainability information letter" which mirrors the details found in the PoS. It is important for the maritime sector to adopt an electronically traceable system.

What role could other types of fuels such as pyrolysis oil potentially play in the maritime sector's decarbonisation targets?

We have teams in research and development at TotalEnergies which are studying the potential use of other molecules, including but not limited to pyrolysis oil, for usage in the maritime sector. It may become an alternative option to avoid industry clashes, as pyrolysis oil would not be an attractive option to the aviation sector.

We are currently exploring tyre-based pyrolysis oil, but have only started doing so recently so it remains an untapped resource. We need to figure out the correct purification and distillation process to ensure compatibility with marine engines. For the time being we are specifically looking at tyre-based pyrolysis oil and not plastic-based, but we may look at the latter in a later stage.

The fuel would also have to meet the RED criteria of a 65-70pc greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction compared with conventional fossil fuels, so we are still exploring whether this can be achieved.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

02/02/25

Trump tariffs to hit North American energy trade

Trump tariffs to hit North American energy trade

Washington, 2 February (Argus) — US president Donald Trump is set to disrupt the integrated North American energy market with tariffs of 10pc on Canadian energy imports and 25pc on Mexico-sourced energy commodities, effective on 4 February. Trump on Saturday issued executive orders that would impose taxes of 25pc on all imports from Mexico and 25pc on all non-energy imports from Canada, effective on 4 February. Most energy commodities imported from Canada would be subject to a lower, 10pc tariff. Imported goods in transit before 12:01am ET on 1 February would not be subject to those levies. The Canada energy exemption applies to "crude oil, natural gas, lease condensates, natural gas liquids, refined petroleum products, uranium, coal, biofuels, geothermal heat, the kinetic movement of flowing water and critical minerals". Trump and the White House did not explain why he made a slight concession on the Canadian energy commodities. The US-Canada energy trade is particularly vulnerable to tariffs, for both sides. More than 4mn b/d of Canada's exports are wholly dependent on pipeline routes to and through the US. Conversely, many refineries in the US midcontinent have no practical alternative to the Canadian crude. Industry group the American Petroleum Institute said on Saturday that it would "continue to work with the Trump administration on full exclusions that protect energy affordability for consumers, expand the nation's energy advantage and support American jobs". Trump imposed tariffs on Canada and Mexico, as well as on China, by declaring a "national emergency" related to alleged inability of those countries to stem the flow of migrants and illegal drug fentanyl to the US. The White House in previous decades has used emergency declarations to impose sanctions against foreign countries, and US courts have stayed away from challenging the executive branch on such declarations and their economic applications. The choice of an emergency declaration also is meant to prevent the US Congress, which retains primary authority over US international trade, from intervening legislatively to remove tariffs. Congressional Republicans, at any rate, quickly hailed Trump's decision. By contrast, Democratic lawmakers and state officials denounced the tariffs and cited inflationary effects of the import taxes. Tit for tat Canada's prime minister Justin Trudeau said on Saturday that his country's energy exports to the US would factor in with other retaliatory measures, possibly in the form of export taxes. "There are a number of different industries and regions of the country that can have greater leverage over the US," Trudeau said. "One thinks of the oil industry for example." Alberta premier Danielle Smith said on Saturday that she would oppose efforts to ban or to tax exports to the US. Trudeau said he would hold consultations with regional and business leaders before taking any counter-measures. But he added, "no one part of the country should be carrying a heavier burden than another." Trudeau said that Canada would apply a 25pc import tax on C$30bn ($21bn) worth of imports from the US on 4 February, followed by a 25pc tariff on an additional C$125bn worth of imports on 25 February. Denouncing Trump's punitive tariffs and his frequent derogatory comments about the US' northern neighbor, Trudeau, in comments directed at a US audience, said: "From the beaches of Normandy to the mountains of the Korean Peninsula, from the fields of Flanders to the streets of Kandahar, we have fought and died alongside you." Mexico's president Claudia Sheinbaum likewise criticized Trump's action, characterizing as "slander" the text of his executive orders, which alleged that Mexico's government was an instrument of the country's drug cartels. But Mexico did not unveil specific countermeasures against Trump's tariffs. "I instruct the secretary of economy to implement Plan B, which we have been working on, including tariff and non-tariff measures in defense of Mexico's interests," Sheinbaum said on Saturday. Trump's executive orders call for raising US tariffs if Canada and Mexico retaliate. Effects to be felt across the economy The North American energy industry is an obvious casualty of Trump's trade war. But its effects will be felt in automobile manufacturing, agriculture, steel, aluminum, potash and every other sector of the economy in all three countries. Nearly all of Mexico's roughly 500,000 b/d of crude shipments to the US in January-November 2024 were waterborne cargoes sent to US Gulf coast refiners. Those shipments in the future could be diverted to Asia or Europe. Tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico would most likely have the greatest impact on US Atlantic coast motor fuel markets. The tariffs may affect regional natural gas price spreads and increase costs for downstream consumers, but there is limited scope for a reduction in gas flows between the two countries — at least in the short term. Tariffs on Canadian and Mexican imports also will disrupt years of free-flowing polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) trade between the three countries, market sources said. North American steel trading costs could rise by as much at $5.3bn across the three nations, since Mexico and Canada are expected to issue reciprocal tariffs against the US, as it did when Trump issued tariffs in his first term. The tariffs could also disrupt US corn and soybean sales, since China and Mexico account for 48pc of US corn exports and 61pc of US soybean exports since 2019, according to US Department of Agriculture data. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Trump tariffs on Canada, Mexico to include oil: Update


31/01/25
31/01/25

Trump tariffs on Canada, Mexico to include oil: Update

Updates with comments from Trump, plan for 10pc crude tariff. Washington, 31 January (Argus) — President Donald Trump said late Friday he will proceed with plans to impose 25pc tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico on 1 February, with crude imports likely to be taxed at a lower 10pc rate. Trump separately plans to impose tariffs on imports from China on 1 February. Asked if his Canada tariffs would include crude imports, Trump said, "I'm probably going to reduce the tariff a little bit on that," he told reporters at the White House. "We think we're going to bring it down to 10pc." Trump, who previously tied tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico and China to their alleged inability to stem the flow of drugs and migrants into the US, today insisted that the tariffs he plans to impose on Saturday in fact have a strictly economic rationale and are non-negotiable. The tariffs expected on Saturday "are not a negotiating tool", Trump said. "No, it's pure economic … we have big deficits with all three of them." Trump, in a wide ranging gaggle with reporters, separately mentioned that he would impose tariffs on imported chips and oil and natural gas. "That'll happen fairly soon, I think around 18 February," he said. It was not clear from his remarks if he meant that all oil and gas imports into the US would be taxed, or if he referred to supply only from Canada and Mexico. Trump said he would also raise tariffs on imported steel, aluminium and eventually copper as well. Trump brushed away criticism of potential negative impacts from his tariffs. "You will see the power of the tariff," Trump said. "The tariff is good, and nobody can compete with us, because we have by far the biggest piggy bank." The looming face-off on tariffs has unnerved US oil producers and refiners, which are warning of severe impacts to the integrated North American energy markets if taxes are imposed on flows from Canada and Mexico. Industry trade group the American Petroleum Institute has lobbied the administration to exclude crude from the planned tariffs. Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau reiterated today that Ottawa would retaliate against US tariffs. Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum also said her country has prepared responses to US tariffs . Nearly all of Mexico's roughly 500,000 b/d of crude shipments to the US in January-November 2024 were waterborne cargoes sent to US Gulf coast refiners. Those shipments in the future could be diverted to Asia or Europe. Canadian producers have much less flexibility, as more than 4mn b/d of Canada's exports are wholly dependent on pipeline routes to and through the US. Canadian crude that flows through the US for export from Gulf coast ports would be exempt from tariffs under current trade rules, providing another potential outlet for Alberta producers — unless Trump's potential executive action on Canada tariffs eliminates that loophole. Tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico would most likely have the greatest impact on US Atlantic coast motor fuel markets. New York Harbor spot market gasoline prices are around $2/USG, meaning a 25pc tariff on Canadian imports could up that price by as much as 50¢/USG. This could prompt buyers in New England or other US east coast markets to look to other supply options. Canadian refiners could also start sending their product to west Africa or Latin America. US refiner Valero said that the tariffs could cause a 10pc cut in refinery runs depending on how the tariffs are implemented and how long they last. Gas, petchems, steel and ags threatened The tariffs may affect regional natural gas price spreads and increase costs for downstream consumers, but there is limited scope for a reduction in gas flows between the two countries — at least in the short term. The US is a net gas importer from Canada, with gross imports of 8.36 Bcf/d (86.35bn m³/yr) in January-October, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). The US' Canadian imports far exceeded the 2.63 Bcf/d it delivered across its northern border over the same period, EIA data show. Tariffs on Canadian and Mexican imports also will disrupt years of free flowing polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) trade between the three countries, market sources said. North American steel trading costs could rise by as much at $5.3bn across the three nations, since Mexico and Canada are expected to issue reciprocal tariffs against the US, as it did when Trump issued tariffs in his first term. The tariffs could also disrupt US corn and soybean sales , since China and Mexico account for 48pc of US corn exports and 61pc of US soybean exports since 2019, according to US Department of Agriculture (USDA) data. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Canadian crude will be priced for tariffs: Phillips 66


31/01/25
31/01/25

Canadian crude will be priced for tariffs: Phillips 66

Houston, 31 January (Argus) — Western Canadian crude will continue to flow to US refiners, but at a greater discount if President Donald Trump enacts tariffs on imports from that country, Phillips 66 said today. In the event of tariffs, the Western Canadian Select (WCS) discount to US light sweet crude WTI will eventually widen to incentivize crude to move into the US, Phillips 66 executive vice president of commercial Brian Mandell said during an earnings call. WCS' discount to WTI was around $15.25/bl on Friday afternoon. In the Rocky Mountain and midcontinent regions, where refiners have fewer alternative supplies, the "crack margins will also have to do some work," he said. Mandell said that the first effect of Canadian tariffs would be the filling of the 590,000 b/d Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) pipeline, which sends crude to Canada's west coast, followed by a replenishing of storage in western Canada. TMX has run well below its full capacity since startup in May 2024 but it is not clear how much spare capacity is left. About 374,300 b/d of crude from the combined Trans Mountain was exported via tanker in January, according to data from Vortexa. About 80pc of Canada's 5mn b/d of crude production flows downstream to US refiners, with US imports of Canadian crude reaching a record high of 4.42mn b/d in the week ending 3 January, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). The single largest conduit is Enbridge's 3mn b/d Mainline system, which reaches into Chicago to serve midcontinent refiners and hands off crude to other lines that go to the US Gulf coast for refining or export. The White House said today that president Donald Trump will proceed with plans to impose 25pc tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico and 10pc on imports from China on 1 February. The White House pushed back on reports that the tariffs would be delayed and declined to say whether Trump made a decision on whether to exclude Canadian and Mexican crude from the tariffs. Mexico sends far less crude to the US. Mexican crude imports to the US averaged 450,000 b/d in November 2024, according to the most recent EIA monthly data. Mexican imports of crude into the US would likely be displaced if the tariffs are enacted, Mandell said. Mexican crude will move to Europe and maybe Asia and other crudes will come in, he said. Heavy crude prices would rise a bit on the inefficiency of logistics but those differentials should dissipate as OPEC puts more oil onto the market as the year goes on, Mandell said. US refiner Valero said yesterday that the tariffs could cause a 10pc cut in refinery runs depending on how long the tariffs go and how fast they are implemented. By Eunice Bridges Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Mexican GDP growth in 4Q lowest since 2021


31/01/25
31/01/25

Mexican GDP growth in 4Q lowest since 2021

Mexico City, 31 January (Argus) — Mexico's economy slowed in the fourth quarter to its lowest pace since early 2021, as the agriculture and industrial sectors dragged on growth. Mexico's gross domestic product (GDP) growth slowed to annualized rate of 0.6pc, statistics agency Inegi reported. This is down from an annual 1.6pc in the third quarter and 2.1pc growth in the second quarter, which was the strongest quarter last year. The result marks the slowest growth in 15 quarters for Mexico, coming in below estimates. This was largely due to annualized 4.6pc decline in the agriculture sector, swinging from 4.1pc growth in the third quarter as drought conditions return. Inegi reported the industrial component of GDP also contracted, down 1.7pc in the fourth quarter, compared with a 0.5pc expansion in the previous quarter, on slowing construction and persistent declines in the oil component. Services, meanwhile, expanded an annualized 2.1pc in the fourth quarter, compared with a 2.2pc expansion in the previous quarter. Inegi reported full-year GDP growth at 1.5pc in 2024, slowing from 3.3pc in 2023 and the lowest level since the pandemic-stricken downturn in 2020. By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

ExxonMobil sees 45V as 'critical' for H2 market: Update


31/01/25
31/01/25

ExxonMobil sees 45V as 'critical' for H2 market: Update

Adds details from the earnings call Houston, 31 January (Argus) — ExxonMobil chief executive officer Darren Woods said hydrogen production tax credit 45V, a key component of former President Joe Biden's efforts to curb emissions, is critical to establishing a market for the zero-emissions fuel that can stand on its own. Pointing to the company's Baytown Low-Carbon Hydrogen project in Texas as an example, Woods noted the project depends on 45V to be economically viable. "We believe these incentives are critical to establishing a fully market-based future where hydrogen competes head-to-head with traditional fuels," Woods said in a call following the company's release of fourth-quarter earnings. "The end goal is clear: a system where no energy source remains dependent on government subsidies." Woods' comments come as President Donald Trump has ordered a review of the previous administration's clean energy polices, reversing a moratorium on new LNG export facilities and pausing funding related to Biden's signature climate bill, 2022's Inflation Reduction Act, which established 45V as an incentive to kickstart US hydrogen production. Woods noted that roughly 10pc of the company's capital expenditure is earmarked for "nascent, lower-emissions markets, where market forces have yet to fully take hold." ExxonMobil expects its low-carbon business, which includes hydrogen, lithium and carbon capture and storage, to provide $2bn in earnings growth between now and 2030, chief financial officer Kathryn Mikells said on the earnings call. ExxonMobil is developing what it describes as the largest low-carbon hydrogen plant in the world in Baytown, designed to produce 1bn cf/d of hydrogen from natural gas with carbon capture. If completed as designed, the project would represent nearly 10pc of the Biden administration's goal as laid out in the US National Clean Hydrogen Strategy and Roadmap, the company says on its website. Most of the plant's production would be used to decarbonize its refinery operations at Baytown but the company recently signed an agreement to sell ammonia from the plant to European trading firm Trammo. Japanese power producer Jera has said it is considering 500,000 t/yr of ammonia offtake from the plant as part of its plans to take an equity stake in the project. Earlier in January, ExxonMobil announced a technical breakthrough that would enable it to crack hydrocarbon molecules into olefins for plastics using furnaces that operate entirely on hydrogen fuel. The company said it is the first company to demonstrate this technology at industrial scale and is a part of "getting hydrogen-ready." The company is expected to make a final investment decision on the hydrogen plant later this year. By Jasmina Kelemen Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more