California governor eyes carbon market extension

Spanish Market: Biofuels, Electricity, Emissions
10/01/25

California governor Gavin Newsom (D) is planning to start discussions with lawmakers to enact a formal extension of the state's cap-and-trade program.

Newsom included the idea in the 2025-26 budget proposal he released on Friday.

"The administration, in partnership with the legislature, will need to consider extending the cap-and-trade program beyond 2030 to achieve carbon neutrality," the governor's budget overview says.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) believes it has the authority to operate the program beyond 2030, but a legislative extension would put it on much firmer footing.

The cap-and-trade program, which covers major sources of the state's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including power plants and transportation fuels, requires a 40pc cut from 1990 levels by 2030. CARB is eyeing tightening that target to 48pc as part of a rulemaking that could take effect next year to help keep the state on a path to carbon neutrality by 2045.

Newsom's budget proposal highlighted the need to weigh the revenue received from the program carbon allowance auctions. That money goes to the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF), which supports the state's clean economy transition through programs targeting GHG emissions reductions, such as subsidizing purchases for zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs).

The budget plan added few new climate commitments, instead prioritizing funding agreed to last year.

The governor's $322.3bn 2025-26 budget proposal would continue cost-saving measures the state enacted in its 2024-25 budget to deal with a multi-billion-dollar deficit. These included shifting portions of expenditures from the state general fund to the GGRF over multiple budget years, such as $900mn for the state's Clean Energy Reliability Investment Plan.

The state's $10bn Climate Bond, passed by voters in November 2024, would cover the majority of new climate-related spending, including taking on $32mn of the reliability plan spending. The change in funding source would allow the state Department of Motor Vehicles to utilize $81mn in GGRF funds to cover expenditures from CARB's Mobile Source Emissions Research Program.

The governor's budget would also advance his proposal from October for CARB to evaluate allowing fuel blends with 15pc ethanol (E15) in the state, as a measure to lower gas prices. CARB would receive $2.3mn from Newsom's proposal to finish the multi-tier study it began in 2018 and implement the necessary regulatory changes to allow E15 at the pump.

Currently, California allows only fuel blends with up to E10 because of environmental concerns, such as the potential for increased emissions of NOx, which contributes to smog, by allowing more ethanol.

With the administration predicting a modest surplus of $363mn from higher state revenues, it is unlikely that California will return to the belt tightening of the past two state budgets. But the state cautions that tension with the incoming president-elect Donald Trump, potential import tariffs and ongoing state revenue volatility should leave California on guard for any potential future fiscal pitfalls.

The state's legislature's non-partisan adviser cautioned in November that government spending continues to outpace revenues, with future deficits likely.

The administration is keeping an eye on the issue, which could result in changes through the governor's May budget revision, state director of finance Joe Stephenshaw said.

By Denise Cathey

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

09/04/25

Trump coal plant bailout renews first term fight

Washington, 9 April (Argus) — President Donald Trump's effort to stop the retirement of coal-fired power plants is reminiscent of a 2017 attempt that faltered in the face of widespread industry opposition. Trump, in an executive order signed on Tuesday, directed the US Department of Energy (DOE) to tap into emergency powers to stop the retirement of coal-fired plants and other large plants it believes are critical to grid reliability. The order sets a 30-day deadline for DOE to decide which plants are critical based on a new methodology that will analyze if reserve margins, or the percent of unused capacity at peak demand, are at an "acceptable" level. The initiative shares similarities to Trump's unsuccessful effort in his first term to bail out coal and nuclear plants. In the 2017 effort, Trump backed a "grid resiliency" proposal to compensate power plants with 90 days of on-site fuel. But an unusual coalition of natural gas industry groups, manufacturers, renewable producers and environmentalists united against the idea, warning it would upend power markets and cost consumers billions of dollars each year. The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission voted 5-0 to reject the proposal. It remains unclear if a similarly sized coalition will emerge to fight Trump's latest proposal, under which DOE would use emergency powers in section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act to keep some coal plants and other large power plants operating. Industry groups have largely been avoiding taking positions that could be seen as critical of Trump. Environmentalists say they strongly oppose keeping coal plants operating using emergency powers. Doing so would mean more air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, they say, and higher costs for consumers. Environmental groups say they are hoping other industries affected by the potential bailout will eventually speak out against the initiative. "The silence from those who know better is deafening," Center for Biological Diversity climate law institute legal director Jason Rylander said. "I hope that we will start to see more resistance to these dangerous policies before significant damage is done." DOE said it was "already hard at work" to implement Trump's executive order, which was paired with other orders that were meant to support coal mining and coal production. US energy secretary Chris Wright said today that reviving coal will increase the reliability of the electrical grid and bring down electricity costs, but he has not shared further details on the 202(c) initiative. Trying to litigate the program could be "tricky", and section 202(c) orders have never successfully been challenged in court, in part because they are usually short-term orders, Harvard Law School Electricity Law Initiative director Ari Peskoe said. But opponents could challenge them by focusing on "numerous legal problems", he said, such as not allowing public comment or running afoul of a US Supreme Court precedent that prohibits agencies from attempting to decide "major questions" without clear congressional authorization. "Here DOE would use a little-used statute explicitly written for short-term emergencies in order to PREVENT a change in the US energy mix," Peskoe said. A projected 8.1GW of coal-fired generation is set to retire this year, equivalent to nearly 5pc of the coal fleet, the US Energy Information Administration said last month. Electric utilities often decide which plants to retire years in advance, allowing them to defer maintenance and to forgo capital investments in aging facilities. Keeping coal plants running could require exemptions from environmental rules or pricey capital investments, the costs of which would likely be distributed among other ratepayers. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

German coalition eyes 'limited' foreign carbon credits

09/04/25

German coalition eyes 'limited' foreign carbon credits

Berlin, 9 April (Argus) — The parties likely to form Germany's next government today presented their coalition treaty, which pledges to allow the use of foreign carbon credits to reach the country's 2040 climate target. The treaty, presented in Berlin by the four party leaders Friedrich Merz of the CDU — the likely next federal chancellor — Lars Klingbeil and Saskia Esken of the SPD, and Markus Soeder of the CDU's Bavarian sister party CSU, stresses the parties' commitment to German and European climate targets, the Paris climate agreement, and reaching climate neutrality in Germany by 2045 "by combining climate action, economic competitiveness and social balance, and by focusing on innovation". "We want to remain an industrialised country and become climate neutral," the treaty reads. The parties' support for the EU's suggested interim target to reduce its emissions 90pc by 2040 compared with 1990 levels is conditional on two points. Germany must not be expected to go beyond its 88pc reduction target for 2040 enshrined in the country's climate action law. And its companies must be allowed, with a view to reducing their residual emissions in an "economically viable" way, to resort to "permanent and sustainable negative emissions", and to "credible CO2 reduction through highly qualified, certified and permanent projects" in "non-European partner countries". Making use of the latter activities should be permissible for up to three percentage points of the 2040 reduction target, although the "priority" for companies will be to reduce carbon emissions. And allowing these options must be reflected in the European Climate Law and the EU emissions trading system (ETS), the parties stipulate. The treaty also underlines the importance of "effective" carbon leakage protection to preserve Germany's "industrial value creation". The treaty calls for the European Green Deal and Clean Industrial Act to be further developed to "bring competitiveness and climate action together", and stresses the importance of carbon pricing instruments, which more countries should be persuaded to introduce. The parties also flag the importance of social acceptance, advocating an "economically viable price development" and pledging to ensure the smooth transition of Germany's domestic carbon price for the heating and transport sectors into the EU ETS 2 on the latter's launch in 2027. The parties pledge "immediately" to adopt a legislative package that enables carbon capture, transport, use and storage (CCU/CCS), particularly for industrial emissions that are difficult to avoid, and also for gas-fired power plants — a disputed issue within the SPD, and the reason why CCS legislation did not pass under the outgoing SPD-Green-led federal government. The new government said it will legally enshrine the "overriding public interest" of the construction of CCS infrastructure, as well as pledging to give the "highest priority" to ratifying the [amendment to the] London Protocol, allowing cross-border CO2 transportation, and to enter bilateral agreements with neighbouring countries on storing carbon. The new government will enable CO2 storage offshore in Germany's exclusive economic zone and the North Sea, as well as onshore where geologically suitable and accepted. The parties see direct air capture as a "possible" future technology to "leverage negative emissions". By Chloe Jardine Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Trump issues executive orders to boost coal

08/04/25

Trump issues executive orders to boost coal

Cheyenne, 8 April (Argus) — US president Donald Trump signed four executive orders today aimed at increasing the country's coal production and use, including directing agencies to possibly expand access to federal land and use emergency authority to keep coal-fired power plants open. The orders follow up on a pledge Trump made on 17 March to authorize his administration "to immediately begin producing Energy with BEAUTIFUL, CLEAN COAL." At the time of Trump's social media post, the White House did not elaborate on his plans. The executive orders signed today are primarily focused on US coal use and production. These include directing the chair of the National Energy Dominance Council to designate coal as a "mineral" covered under a previous executive order signed in March that uses emergency power granted under the Federal Power Act to fast track permit reviews for critical mineral projects. Today's orders also direct agencies to revoke policies that aim to move the US away from coal production or favor other generation resources over coal. This includes authorizing the Department of Justice to investigate state policies considered to be prejudicial against coal. The orders also direct agencies to identify coal resources on federal land and prioritize coal leasing on those lands, and orders the Secretary of the Interior to make it clear that a moratorium on federal coal leasing that was initially in effect from 2016-17 and reinstated from 2022-24 is no longer active. Trump also signed a proclamation allowing some coal plants to comply with a less stringent version of the EPA's mercury and air toxics standards for two years. Another order signed today directs the Secretary of Energy to "streamline, systemize, and expedite processes for issuing emergency orders under the Federal Power Act during forecasted grid interruptions." "We're slashing unnecessary regulations that targeted beautiful, clean coal" and "will end the government bias against coal", Trump said today before signing the orders at an event featuring coal miners and lawmakers from coal-producing states. The US is "going to produce energy the likes nobody has seen before." He said his administration is going to devise a "guarantee" that will ensure the industry and investment in coal projects will be protected from "the ups and downs" of politics, but did not elaborate on what that would be. Other parts of the orders have the Council of Environmental Quality assisting agencies in making some exclusions for coal under the National Environmental Policy Act, encourage coal-fired generation for artificial intelligence and call for the Secretary of Energy to consider whether coal used for steel production can be defined as a critical mineral. The orders also aim to promote coal and coal technology exports, including by possibly facilitating international offtake agreements for US coal. US coal exports rose in 2023 and 2024 but trading activity has faltered lately amid restrained steel production, limited coal-fired generation in some countries and uncertainty over recent tariffs and the US Trade Representatives proposal to charge Chinese-built and operated ships that do business in the US. The National Mining Association praised Trump's actions. "It's a stark shift from the prior administration's punitive regulatory agenda, hostile energy policies and unlawful land grabs," NMA chief executive officer Rich Nolan said before Trump signed the order. But environmental group Sierra Club warned the order will be costly. "Forcing coal plants to stay on line will cost Americans more, get more people sick with respiratory and heart conditions, and lead to more premature deaths," Sierra Club executive director Ben Jealous said. By Courtney Schlisserman Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US faults EU carbon fee during tariff fight

08/04/25

US faults EU carbon fee during tariff fight

Washington, 8 April (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration is citing the EU's upcoming tariff on carbon-intensive imports as one of the "unfair trade practices" that justified a tariff response. Trump has said a 20pc tariff on most EU goods and a higher tariff on many other key trading partners — set to take effect after midnight — are "reciprocal" to other countries' tariffs and non-tariff barriers, even though those tariffs are calculated based on each country's trade deficits and imports with the US. Trump has yet to even identify which trade policies he wants other countries to change before he would withdraw tariffs his administration expects will raise $600bn/yr in new revenue. But the US Trade Representative's office, in a social media post on Monday made in "honor" of Trump's tariffs, identified the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) — which will collect a carbon-based levy on imports such as steel, cement and fertilizer — as one of the examples of what it sees as an unfair trading practice. The Trump administration estimates $4.7bn/yr of US exports would be affected by the CBAM, which is set to take effect in 2026. "These EU regulations undermine fair competition, penalizing US companies while providing advantages to EU-based competitors," the US Trade Representative's office wrote in a series of posts on Tuesday that also criticized India and Thailand for imposing import restrictions on ethanol produced in the US. White House officials say more than 70 countries have approached the administration seeking deals on the tariffs since they were announced nearly a week ago. But with just hours before the tariffs take effect, Trump has yet to announce any definitive agreements to withdraw the tariffs. Instead, he has rejected offers from countries to zero out some of their tariffs. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen on Monday said the EU was "ready to negotiate" on tariffs, and would zero out its tariffs on industrial imports if the US agreed to do the same. But Trump on Monday said that offer was not enough. "We have a deficit with the European Union of $350bn, and it's gonna disappear fast," Trump said. "One of the ways that that can disappear easily and quickly is they're gonna have to buy our energy from us." Today, Trump said he had a "great call" with South Korea's acting president Han Duck-soo that created the "probability of a great DEAL for both countries." Trump cited a potential agreement that might include large-scale purchases of US LNG and investments tied to the 20mn t/yr Alaska LNG export project. Trump and his cabinet believe the tariffs will align with a goal to achieve "energy dominance" and increase the amount of US energy exported abroad. "At the end of the day, we're going to have growing American exports and reindustrialize the country," US energy secretary Chris Wright said today during an interview on CNBC. Trump's tariffs have already caused a selloff in equities and, according to many analysts on Wall Street, a higher likelihood of a recession. Oil prices have dropped because of a "sudden change in the economic outlook, whereas everyone just honestly 10 days ago was expecting modest but steady positive growth in the US", non-profit group Center for Strategic and International Studies' senior fellow Clayton Seigle said today. Republicans have largely backed Trump in his imposition of tariffs, with the hope the tariffs will be lifted as part of trade negotiations. But some Republicans have started criticizing the rationale for the tariff policy. "Whose throat do I get to choke if this proves to be wrong?" US senator Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina) said in a hearing today with the US trade representative Jamieson Greer. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Bunker Industry seeks universal alternative fuels rules

08/04/25

Bunker Industry seeks universal alternative fuels rules

Fujairah, 8 April (Argus) — Bunker market participants urged the adoption of universal standards for alternative bunker fuels, warning that fragmented regulations are hampering the maritime sector's shift to lower-carbon options. Speaking at the S&P Global Commodity Insights FUJCON 2025, held in Fujairah, UAE, stakeholders highlighted inconsistencies and divergent regional policies, governing biofuels, methanol, ammonia and hydrogen as a key obstacle to scaling up adoption. The lack of harmonised standards on fuel certification, safety protocols and emissions accounting is creating uncertainty for operators and suppliers navigating a complex global market. "Shipping companies like us face an unfair situation, falling behind the policies, that are changing every day," Jens Maul Jorgensen, director of bunkering at Oldendorff Carriers said. The EU's emissions trading system (ETS) was extended to cover the maritime sector last year, and this year FuelEU Maritime came into effect, while the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) is lagging with global regulations, Jorgensen said. FuelEU Maritime, which came into effect this year, sets greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets for vessels travelling in or out of Europe. Panel participants at FUJCON called for the replacement of "too many regulations" with universal, clear and policed rules. "If we do not ensure the proper policing of these rules, people will keep finding loopholes, and we do not need loopholes," according to chair of the International Bunker Industry Association Constantinos Capetanakis. The bunker market is under pressure to decarbonise as the IMO targets a 50pc cut in shipping emissions by 2050 from 2008 levels. Alternative fuels are central to this goal, but regulatory disparities complicate investment decisions, industry players said. Market participants warned that prolonged regulatory fragmentation could delay infrastructure investments and inflate costs for end-users. By Elshan Aliyev Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more