Bolivia political deal clears gas line, urea plant

: Fertilizers, Natural gas
19/11/25

A breakthrough in Bolivia's political crisis is clearing the way for repairs to a sabotaged natural gas pipeline and a urea plant.

Jeanine Anez, the conservative former senator who declared an interim administration after longtime president Evo Morales resigned on 10 November, struck a political compromise yesterday with Morales' Movement toward Socialism party (MAS) that will lead the country to new elections by around the end of April 2020.

Morales supporters agreed to lift roadblocks, while the Anez administration vowed to withdraw the military from the streets.

The military and police effectively abandoned Morales after he declared victory in his bid for a fourth presidential term in 20 October elections that the Washington-based Organization of American States (OAS) deemed to be tainted.

Unrest broke out shortly after the elections, and later focused around La Paz and Cochabamba where Morales supporters had demanded his return. Tensions peaked last week when protesters blocked the Senkata fuel terminal in El Alto outside of La Paz.

The lifting of the roadblocks has allowed technicians to access the Carrasco-Cochabamba gas pipeline that was sabotaged in early November, allegedly by Morales supporters shortly after he fled to Mexico where he was given political asylum. Around 200m of the domestic pipeline were damaged, according to Bolivia's state-owned oil and gas company YPFB.

Bolivia's defense ministry reported that farmers agreed to allow workers from YPFB to access the pipeline and undertake repairs.

The pipeline supplies the 700,000 t/yr Bulo Bulo urea and ammonia plant in Cochabamba's jungle region. YPFB said it was too early to determine how much time would be needed to fix the line.

The plant had been producing at a reduced capacity since late October because of the roadblocks that prevented urea supply from reaching neighboring Brazil.

YPFB signed a commercial deal on 15 October with Russia's Acron to provide natural gas for urea production at a plant that the Russian company operates in Brazil's Mato Grosso do Sul state. Under the contract, Acron will help distribute urea from the Bolivian plant.

The unrest in Bolivia did not impact the country's pipeline gas exports to Brazil and Argentina which account for the bulk of the government's revenue. YPFB had warned its counterparts in both countries on 11 November of possible interruptions, but these never materialized. The operations of foreign companies, including Spain's Repsol, France's Total, Shell and Russia's Gazprom, were largely unaffected.

Evo's friends

Under ground-breaking legislation approved by the MAS-controlled congress yesterday, a new electoral board will be installed within 20 days. The board is tasked with calling elections within 120 days.

The legislation prohibits Morales and his former vice president Alvaro Garcia from running in the new elections. Garcia fled to Mexico along with Morales, a steadfast ally of Venezuela's president Nicolas Maduro, whose government is the target of US sanctions.

The indigenous Morales was first elected in 2005 on a resource nationalist platform and served nearly 14 years before resigning. Despite his rhetoric, the Morales administration provided a stable operating climate for oil and gas companies.

Morales and his supporters inside and outside Bolivia say he was the victim of a coup. Among his regional backers are Mexico, Cuba, Venezuela and Uruguay. Montevideo's stance could now swing into the anti-Morales camp if the initial results of a 24 November run-off election favoring center-right Luis Lacalle Pou are confirmed. But Argentina is shifting leftward with incoming president Alberto Fernandez, who replaces pro-business Mauricio Macri early next month.

By Lucien Chauvin and Patricia Garip

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/04/15

VG begins contracted LNG deliveries at Calcasieu Pass

Houston, 15 April (Argus) — US LNG exporter Venture Global began deliveries of long-term contractual cargoes at its 12.4mn t/yr Calcasieu Pass terminal in Louisiana today after the facility started commercial operations, more than three years after producing its first LNG. "We are excited to reach this milestone and are grateful for our regulators and supply chain partners who have worked with our team to reach commercial operations as efficiently and safely as possible," said Venture Global chief executive Mike Sabel. But the long-delayed and highly contested start comes amid ongoing arbitration proceedings against Venture Global, which some customers including Shell, BP, Italian utility Edison and Spanish company Repsol argue was unjustified in deferring the contracted supplies (see offtakers table) . The LNG exporter originally sought to begin commercial operations in 2022 but cited impacts from Covid-19, two hurricanes and "major unforeseen manufacturing issues" related to one of the plant's heat recovery steam generators, equipment that helps power the facility. Because several of the plant's facilities, including the power island, were not officially placed in service with federal authorization, Venture Global maintained that the plant was not commercially operating — despite producing 444 cargoes totaling 28.2mn t of LNG (about 1.28 trillion cubic feet of natural gas) since its first in March 2022, according to Vortexa data. The start-up Tuesday comes on the final day before Venture Global could have lost control of the project. The company said in a December filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that the agreement under which it had financed debt requires commercial operations to be completed by 1 June 2025. Should commercial operations have not begun 45 days prior to this date — which is Tuesday — then the agreement defaults, allowing "certain investors" to exercise control over the project. Before Tuesday, the company instead sold cargoes on the spot market for prices much higher than the terms of its offtake agreements. Calcasieu Pass produced its first LNG in January 2022 and exported its first cargo on 1 March 2022 — less than a week after Russia, then a key supplier of gas to Europe, invaded Ukraine. The facility produced its first LNG just 29 months after reaching a final investment decision (FID) on the project, compared with the industry average of four to five years. The timing of the project's start dovetailed with the war-driven volatility in the European gas market, helping Venture Global realize much larger profits than it would have under contracted volumes. The firm's liquefaction fees in 2023 and 2024 averaged $12.23/mn Btu and $7.28/mn Btu, respectively, compared with the average $1.97/mn Btu in its long-term deals, according to a company presentation in March. The lengthy commissioning process generated $19.6bn in revenue by the end of September 2024, Venture Global said in the December SEC filing. Shell estimated that Venture Global sold cargoes in 2023 at an average of $48.8mn per shipment, "raking in billions of dollars while shirking its contractual obligations", according to a filing with US energy regulator FERC in March 2024. Venture Global said in March that the customer arbitration cases are not likely to be resolved until after 2025. LNG facilities usually produce commissioning cargoes for a few months before beginning long-term contracts. But Venture Global has said its unique plant design, which uses a higher number of smaller, modular liquefaction trains compared with traditional trains, requires a longer start-up process. Calcasieu Pass LNG consists of 18 trains paired in nine blocks, and a similarly long commissioning period is expected at the first two phases of Venture Global's 27.2mn t/yr Plaquemines facility consisting of 36 trains. The company also has plans for an 18.1mn t/yr expansion at Plaquemines. An FID is expected in mid-2027, with first LNG production 18-24 months later. Venture Global estimated that its third LNG facility, the 28mn t/yr CP2 facility adjacent to Calcasieu Pass, could export up to 550 commissioning cargoes . The company expects to make an investment decision on the first phase of CP2 this year. By Tray Swanson Calcasieu Pass offtake deals Offtaker Volume, mn t/yr Contract length, yrs Shell 2.0 20 Galp 1.0 20 Sinopec 1.0 3 CNOOC 0.5 5 Edison 1.0 20 Repsol 1.0 20 PGNiG 1.5 20 BP 2.0 20 — US DOE Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Funding cuts could delay US river lock work: Correction

25/04/14

Funding cuts could delay US river lock work: Correction

Corrects lock locations in paragraph 5. Houston, 14 April (Argus) — The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) will have to choose between various lock reconstruction and waterway projects for its annual construction plan after its funding was cut earlier this year. Last year Congress allowed the Corps to use $800mn from unspent infrastructure funds for other waterways projects. But when Congress passed a continuing resolutions for this year's budget they effectively removed that $800mn from what was a $2.6bn annual budget for lock reconstruction and waterways projects. This means a construction plan that must be sent to Congress by 14 May can only include $1.8bn in spending. No specific projects were allocated funding by Congress, allowing the Corps the final say on what projects it pursues under the new budget. River industry trade group Waterways Council said its top priority is for the Corps to provide a combined $205mn for work at the Montgomery lock in Pennsylvania on the Ohio River and Chickamauga lock in Tennessee on the Tennessee River since they are the nearest to completion and could become more expensive if further delayed. There are seven active navigation construction projects expected to take precedent, including the following: the Chickamauga and Kentucky Locks on the Tennessee River; Locks 2-4 on the Monongahela River; the Three Rivers project on the Arkansas River; the LaGrange Lock on the Illinois River; Lock 25 on the Mississippi River; and the Montgomery Lock on the Ohio River. There are three other locks in Texas, Pennsylvania and Illinois that are in the active design phase (see map) . By Meghan Yoyotte Corps active construction projects 2025 Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

IMO GHG pricing not yet Paris deal-aligned: EU

25/04/14

IMO GHG pricing not yet Paris deal-aligned: EU

Brussels, 14 April (Argus) — The International Maritime Organisation's (IMO) global greenhouse gas (GHG) pricing mechanism "does not yet ensure the sector's full contribution to achieving the Paris Agreement goals", the European Commission has said. "Does it have everything for everybody? For sure, it doesn't," said Anna-Kaisa Itkonen, the commission's climate and energy spokesperson said. "This is often the case as an outcome from international negotiations, that not everybody gets the most optimal outcome." The IMO agreement reached last week will need to be confirmed by the organisation in October, the EU noted, even if it is a "strong foundation" and "meaningful step" towards net zero GHG emissions in global shipping by 2050. The commission will have 18 months following the IMO mechanism's formal approval to review the directive governing the bloc's emissions trading system (ETS), which currently includes maritime emissions for intra-EU voyages and those entering or leaving the bloc. By EU law, the commission will also have to report on possible "articulation or alignment" of the bloc's FuelEU Maritime regulation with the IMO, including the need to "avoid duplicating regulation of GHG emissions from maritime transport" at EU and international levels. That report should be presented, "without delay", following formal adoption of an IMO global GHG fuel standard or global GHG intensity limit. Finland's head representative at the IMO delegation talks, Anita Irmeli, told Argus that the EU's consideration of whether the approved Marpol amendments are ambitious enough won't be until "well after October". Commenting on the IMO agreement, the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) pointed to the "neutral" approach to feedstocks, including first generation biofuels. "The EBB welcomes this agreement, where all feedstocks and pathways have a role to play," EBB secretary general Xavier Noyon said. Faig Abbasov, shipping director at non-governmental organisation Transport and Environment, called for better incentives for green hydrogen. "The IMO deal creates a momentum for alternative marine fuels. But unfortunately it is the forest-destroying first generation biofuels that will get the biggest push for the next decade," he said. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Bio-LNG could boom by early 2030s under IMO deal

25/04/14

Bio-LNG could boom by early 2030s under IMO deal

London, 14 April (Argus) — Compliance with the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) newly agreed global greenhouse gas (GHG) two-tier pricing mechanism will require LNG-powered ships to transition to bio-LNG by 2029 under the encouraged 'direct compliance' tier, or by 2033 for the minimum 'base target' tier, or else potentially incur heavy costs. The pricing mechanism was approved by IMO delegates on 11 April in London. Formal adoption will be decided in October, at the next Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) meeting, when a two-thirds majority vote will be required. The text says ships must reduce their fuel intensity by a "base target" of 4pc in 2028 (see table) against 93.3g CO2e/MJ, the latter representing the average GHG fuel intensity value of international shipping in 2008. This gradually tightens to 30pc by 2035. The text defines a "direct compliance target", that starts at 17pc for 2028 and grows to 43pc by 2035. Well-to-wake emissions for LNG diesel-type engines at dual fuel slow speed are equal to 76.08g CO2e/MJ, an 18.4pc emission reduction from the IMO's 2008 benchmark. In theory, this means the average LNG-vessel is compliant with the IMO's scheme until 2029 under both maximum and minimum tiers, or until 2033 under the base target. Waste-based bio-LNG carries a GHG intensity of between 30 and -100g CO2e/MJ depending on feedstock and production, which translates to between 68.09-206.4pc GHG emissions savings, making it compliant across all tiers. However, the uptake of bio-LNG may be capped. Many LNG-capable vessels run on dual-fuel engines, meaning ship-owners may be more inclined to adopt biodiesel, ammonia or other diesel-engine applicable fuels, depending on price levels and other real-world drawbacks. The pricing mechanism establishes a levy for excessive emissions at $380 per tonne of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) for ships compliant with the 'base' target, called Tier 2. For ships in Tier 1 — those compliant with the base target but that still have emission levels higher than the direct compliance target — the price was set at $100/tCO2e. Instead of physically transitioning to a greener fuel, ships could meet targets using 'surplus units', which will be allocated to over-compliant vessels equal to their positive compliance balance, expressed in tCO2e, and valid for two years after emission. Ships then will be able to use the surplus units in the following reporting periods, transfer to other vessels as a credit, or voluntarily cancel as a mitigation contribution. This could give rise to an entirely new ticket market or emissions trading scheme (ETS) common in many European markets for other transport fuel sectors. LNG vessels accounted for more than 2pc of the active global shipping fleet as of October last year, according to energy industry coalition SEA-LNG, but make up the majority of new-build alternative marine vessel orders over the next 10 years. By Madeleine Jenkins IMO GHG reduction targets Year Base Target Direct Compliance Target 2028 4% 17% 2029 6% 19% 2030 8% 21% 2031 12% 25% 2032 17% 30% 2033 21% 34% 2034 26% 39% 2035 30% 43% Source: IMO Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Shale patch on edge after tariff drama

25/04/14

Shale patch on edge after tariff drama

New York, 14 April (Argus) — US president Donald Trump's back and forth over tariffs that sent oil prices tumbling to a four-year low last week has sparked jitters across the shale patch, although most producers are likely to take their time to respond. The oil and gas industry, one of Trump's biggest cheerleaders and donors during his election campaign, has been taken aback by the speed and scale of the president's escalating trade wars and executives are signalling growing impatience. Meanwhile, Trump's "Drill, baby, drill" mantra is even less likely to become a reality now, after oil slid below the $65/bl level that executives surveyed by the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank last month warned was needed to profitably sink a new well. Trump's imposition of punitive tariffs on nearly every major US trading partner led to a sell-off in stock, bonds and commodity markets until he announced a 90-day pause for most nations — except China — on 9 April. While it may be too early for talk about dropping rigs and curtailing production, companies will face tough questions from analysts about their contingency plans when first-quarter results start coming through later this month. One key difference from previous downturns in 2014 and 2020 is that exploration and production (E&P) firms are in a better position this time, with less debt on their balance sheets and more modest growth plans, which may help limit the initial fallout. But higher costs owing to tariffs on steel imports could offset the efficiency savings that have kept production going in an era of restrained spending. "E&Ps are likely to mostly take a wait-and-see approach — with a high level of uncertainty about future policy — and not prematurely lay down rigs," consultancy Enverus principal analyst Andrew Dittmar says. "If prices are weak headed into 2026, that is where you are likely to see a more material reduction in drilling budgets. Feeling dominated The shale industry has welcomed Trump's "energy dominance" agenda and his promise of a permitting overhaul. But cracks are appearing in that relationship because of his stop-start policy on tariffs. "This administration better have a plan," Diamondback Energy president Kaes Van't Hof said in a social media post, in a direct appeal to energy secretary Chris Wright. Shale is the "only industry that actually built itself in the US, manufactures in the US, grew jobs in the US and improved the trade deficit — and by proxy GDP — in the US over the past decade", Van't Hof, who is due to become Diamondback chief executive later this year, said. His company became the largest pure-play producer in the prolific Permian basin of west Texas and southeast New Mexico following its $26bn takeover of Endeavor Energy Resources last year. While few public producers were planning any kind of meaningful growth this year as higher dividends and buy-backs continue to be the priority, even that could eventually find itself on the chopping block. "The corporate reality for public players means that already modest growth could be at risk if prices remain near $60/bl," Rystad Energy vice-president for North American oil and gas Matthew Bernstein says. Little in the way of growth was forecast outside the core Permian this year even before Trump rolled out his tariffs. A prolonged period of lower prices could spur a downturn in the top-performing US basin. A combination of short-term activity levels, investor distributions and production could be sacrificed in order to defend margins, according to Rystad. And producers in the Delaware sub-basin could be especially vulnerable, given the region's steep initial decline rates, high well costs and large capital return requirements, the consultancy says. By Stephen Cunningham WTI breakeven price Nymex WTI futures month 1 Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more