ジェット燃料
概要
原油価格、精製能力による供給問題、継続的な規制変更などジェット燃料市場の変動は、お客様の収益にとって継続的なリスクです。
燃料価格の選択肢を持つことは、リスクを軽減し、市場の変化への柔軟な対応に不可欠です。アーガス は、各市場に適した方法で価格インデックスを構築しています。これにより、市場参加者は日々の業務を調整し、燃料コストの管理を改善し、純利益に直接影響を与えることができます。
ジェット燃料は航空会社の総運航費の40％以上を占めます。政府の義務付けや航空会社の自主規制により、持続可能な航空燃料（SAF）の重要性が高まっており、運航コストに大きな影響を及ぼしています。
アーガスは、従来のジェット燃料とSAFの価格アセスメントと取引情報、最新の市場動向ニュース、詳細分析、需要動向、価格予測により、ジェット燃料市場参加者の皆様の最善の意思決定、戦略最適化をサポートします。
Latest jet fuel news
Browse the latest market moving news on the global jet fuel industry.
Shell shuts oil unit at Singapore refinery
Shell shuts oil unit at Singapore refinery
Singapore, 27 December (Argus) — Shell has shut an oil unit at the 237,000 b/d Pulau Bukom refinery in Singapore to investigate a "suspected leak", said the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) and National Environment Agency (NEA) today. Shell informed the government agencies that they will have to shut one of its "oil processing units" at Pulau Bukom to facilitate investigations into a suspected leak. The exact oil processing unit cannot be confirmed, but it is a unit "used to produce refined oil products such as diesel". This means it is likely a crude distillation unit or a hydrocracking unit. Shell's initial estimates show that a few tonnes of oil products were leaked, together with cooling water discharge. Sea water is typically drawn to aid in the cooling process, according to the media release. This came after the 20 October leak at a pipeline at Pulau Bukom, when 30-40t of "slop" — or a mixture of oil and water — leaked into the sea, according to Shell. The gasoline market has shown little reaction so far with spreads being "stagnant" and "range bound", said a Singapore-based gasoline broker. But this could be because of a lack of market activity, with many traders away for holidays at the end of the year. The gasoil January-February spread last traded at $0.58/bl in backwardation at around 6:30pm Singapore time on 27 December, according to a Singapore-based gasoil broker. This marks a slight increase from an assessment of $0.55/bl in backwardation on 26 December, according to Argus pricing data. By Aldric Chew Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Viewpoint: US jet fuel demand to trail passenger growth
Viewpoint: US jet fuel demand to trail passenger growth
Houston, 26 December (Argus) — The upward trajectory of US jet fuel demand is likely to continue lagging the pace of rising passenger numbers because of recent capacity gains for multiple US airlines and the slow but steady improvement of aircraft fuel efficiency. More than 2.35mn travelers were screened weekly at US airports this year through the end of November, according to the US Transportation Security Administration (TSA) — a 6.2pc increase from the same 11-month period in 2019, before the Covid-19 pandemic curtailed domestic and international flights. Passenger screenings have exceeded 2019 levels consistently since the summer of 2023. Yet US jet fuel products supplied — a proxy for demand — remains stubbornly below pre-Covid-19 levels, despite the rise in traffic. Weekly jet fuel products supplied this year through 13 December was 1.66mn b/d, down by 6.5pc from daily demand in full-year 2019, according to US Energy Information Administration (EIA) data. This slower recovery in jet demand relative to rising passenger numbers may be driven by several factors, including airlines carrying more passengers than in the past, as well as steady improvements in aircraft fuel efficiency. More seats, more flyers Many US airlines have increased flying capacity, as measured by available seat miles (ASMs), since pre-pandemic levels, while load factor — the percentage of seats filled by passengers — has been stable to lower compared with 2019. United Airlines' 2024 third quarter ASMs were up by 14pc at 81.54bn compared with the same three months in 2019. United's load factor was down by 0.8 percentage points to 85.3pc in the same period. Rival US carriers American Airlines and Southwest Airlines similarly posted capacity increases of 14pc and 15pc, respectively, compared with the third quarter of 2019. American's load factor was unchanged at 86.6pc, while Southwest saw a decline of 2.3pc to 81.2pc. Airlines have also made fuel efficiency improvements in recent years. This is in part from the retirement of many older airplane models during the lean years of the pandemic, combined with delivery of newer, more efficient models in more recent years. Southwest Airlines' third quarter fuel efficiency improved by 1.5pc year-over-year, the company said in October. Southwest improved its fuel efficiency with the delivery of nine Boeing MAX 8 aircraft in the third quarter while retiring 15 older planes. The MAX 8's and MAX 9s have average fuel efficiencies of 96 and 101 seat miles per USG (sm/USG), respectively. That would make them 23pc and 30pc more efficient than older planes they may have replaced, such as the Boeing 737-800, with a 78 sm/USG. Other airlines are also refreshing their fleets with newer, more fuel-efficient planes. American Airline's mainline fleet at the end of the third quarter grew by 2.2pc from a year earlier to 971 aircraft. It took in 600 new aircraft from 2013 to 2023, including 31 new planes in 2023. United Airline's third-quarter fleet was similarly 3.4pc larger than a year earlier. But there are limits to this growing efficiency. Globally the average age of airline fleets has risen to 14.8 years, according data from the International Air Transport Association (Iata) — up from 13.6 years in 1990-2024. This is due largely to the steep dropoff in new plane deliveries as aircraft manufacturers struggled with supply chain issues and high costs from the pandemic. Boeing, a chief provider of planes for many US airlines, had a spate of production disruptions in 2024, including a multi-week strike this past fall, that slowed the delivery of newer aircraft. But even a trickle of newer models would gradually affect fuel efficiency, potentially continuing to hold gains in fuel consumption below the rate of passenger growth. By Jared Ainsworth Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Trump-Panama tiff highlights rising transit cost
Trump-Panama tiff highlights rising transit cost
New York, 23 December (Argus) — US president-elect Donald Trump's threat on Saturday to reclaim the Panama Canal for the US put a spotlight on rising costs this year and additional fees planned by the Panama Canal Authority (ACP) for 2025 in the ongoing fallout of a 2023 drought in Central America. Trump claimed that the US is the "number one user" of the Panama Canal, with "over 70pc of all transits heading to, or from, US ports" on 21 December. ACP data for ships destined for or departing from the US puts this percentage at 73pc in 2023 and 75.5pc in 2024 based on total tonnage of commodities moved through the canal. "This complete ‘rip-off' of our Country will immediately stop…" Trump said. The base transit tolls at the Panama Canal have been on the rise and are largely in line with those at the Suez Canal, but Panama Canal costs can be much higher for vessel operators that compete in auctions to enter the Central American passageway. The operator of a medium range (MR) tanker traveling laden through the Panama Canal would pay $279,564.87 in transit fees, while the operator of a laden very large gas carrier (VLGC) would pay $505,268.24 without accounting for reservation costs, ACP estimates. Suez Canal fees have also been on the rise , with MR tanker at $274,001 throughout 2024, while a VLGC operator would pay $487,562. But after last year's drought caused the ACP to temporarily limit transits, ACP required shippers to book transit reservations. Shippers unable to secure reservations via pre-booking often resort to the transit slot auction, where winning bids vary wildly. Pre-booked transit slots often quickly sell out to the containership and LPG vessel owners that dominate the top spots on the ACP's client list. Auction prices for the Neopanamax locks, which have a starting bid of $100,000 and handle large vessels like VLGCs, are at about $220,000, per Argus assessments. Auction prices for the Panamax locks, which have a starting bid of $55,000 and handle vessels like MR tankers, are around $75,000. The highest Neopanamax auction price was nearly $4mn, with the highest Panamax auction price at about half that level. In December 2023, 30pc of Panamax lock tanker transits were reserved via the auction system , according to ACP. The president-elect's criticism of the ACP's handling of Panama Canal fees comes as the administrators of the waterway bounce back from a severe drought throughout 2023. Freshwater levels in the manmade Gatun Lake that helps to feed the canal have recovered because of the return of the rainy season this year, but ACP has maintained its requirement that shippers wishing to transit have reserved transit slots. Prior to the drought, ACP maintained a first-come, first-serve basis for vessels without reservations. ACP ups reservation costs, adds fees for 2025 Starting in 2025, ACP is maintaining the auction system while also increasing pre-booking costs and adding other fees. ACP will raise transit reservation fees from $41,000 to $50,000 for Panamax lock transits for "Super" category vessels, including MR tankers. Neopanamax lock transit reservation fees will climb from $80,000 to $100,000 on 1 January. ACP announced a third transit option in late 2024 for vessel operators in the form of the "Last Minute Transit Reservation" (LMTR) fee to start 1 January 2025 alongside other new fees and higher existing reservation fees. ACP set the cost of the LMTR fee at about twice the starting bid of an auction , or $100,000 for Supers and $200,000 for Neopanamax, and will likely offer the LMTR fee to vessels that fail to secure a transit slot at auction. Furthermore, vessel operators that cancel within two days of their transit will be charged a fee at 2.5 times the transit reservation fee, described by the ACP as a surcharge to the existing cancellation fee, which ranges up to 100pc of the transit reservation fee depending on how close to the transit date that an operator cancels. This means that a Super vessel that cancels within two days of its transit date will receive the 2.5 times surcharge on top of the 100pc transit reservation cancellation fee and pay a total of $175,000. A Neopanamax vessel will pay a total of $350,000. "Vessels of war" should also vie for slots: ACP Trump also suggested that the ACP was charging the US Navy, alongside US corporations, "exorbitant prices and rates of passage" and that these fees were "unfair and injudicious". In March 2024, the ACP published an update on transit slot assignments for vessels of war, auxiliary vessels and other "government-owned" vessels encouraging their operators to participate in the transit system rather than waiting for the ACP to assign them a slot. "Vessels of war, auxiliary vessels, and other government-owned vessels are encouraged to obtain a booking slot through the available booking mechanisms in order to have their transit date guaranteed and minimize the possibility of delays," the ACP said. The ACP points out that these vessels of war are entitled to "expeditious transits" based on the Treaty Concerning Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Canal and are technically not required to obtain a reservation to be considered for transit. Panama president Jose Raul Mulino on Sunday rejected Trump's threat to retake the canal , which has been under full control of the Central American country since 1999. The canal's rates are established in a public and transparent manner, taking into account market conditions, Mulino said. "Every square meter of the Panama Canal and its adjacent area is Panama's and will continue to be," Mulino said. "The sovereignty and independence of our country are non-negotiable." By Ross Griffith Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Australia to invest $9mn in biofuel production projects
Australia to invest $9mn in biofuel production projects
Sydney, 17 December (Argus) — The federal Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Arena) has allocated A$14.1mn ($9mn) toward two studies for separate biofuel production projects. Australian refiner and marketer Ampol's proposed Brisbane Renewable Fuels project will receive A$8mn toward its A$30.2mn pre-engineering study, Arena said on 17 December, while A$6.1mn will go to grains aggregator GrainCorp's sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) Oilseed Crushing Facility pre-deployment study. Ampol's study will focus on developing more than 450mn litres/yr production capacity for SAF and renewable diesel at the company's 109,000 b/d Lytton refinery near the city of Brisbane. GrainCorp's plans for an oilseed crushing facility will produce 330,000 t/yr of canola seed oil, or about 12pc of the nation's 6.13mn t canola exports in the 12 months to 30 September, for use as SAF feedstock, Arena said. Both Ampol and GrainCorp recently entered an initial agreement with London-based fund manager IFM Investors to explore options for building a renewable fuels business. While Australia is a major exporter of feedstocks for biofuels such as canola and tallow, it imports most of its liquid fuels, with diesel and jet fuel imports averaging 520,000 b/d and 129,000 b/d respectively in the first nine months of 2024. Fellow SAF aspirant Jet Zero received A$9mn from Arena in September, bringing the total outlay from the agency's A$30mn SAF funding initiative to just over A$23mn. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Spotlight content
Browse the latest thought leadership produced by our global team of experts.
Key price assessments
Argus prices are recognised by the market as trusted and reliable indicators of the real market value. Explore some of our most widely used and relevant price assessments.
