Overview
Carbon markets are developing as a crucial economic lever in the challenge of reversing the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the Earth’s atmosphere, while CO2 remains a key factor in a range of industrial sectors.
National governments are embracing carbon markets, with a proliferation of carbon pricing policies worldwide. The private sector is channelling finance into projects that generate carbon emissions reductions and removals to mitigate their hard-to-abate emissions.
And the United Nations is making progress in building a global marketplace for carbon emissions reductions that will facilitate nations’ attempts to meet their obligations under the Paris Agreement.
Industrial sectors remain a key source of CO2 emissions and consumption, with innovation looking towards sustainable methods of production and utilisation.
Argus is setting the stage for an extended period of growth, evolution and interconnection of carbon market participants and initiatives.
Latest carbon markets news
Browse the latest market moving news on carbon markets.
Q&A: GravitHy expects policy clarity to shape economics
Q&A: GravitHy expects policy clarity to shape economics
London, 6 February (Argus) — Argus spoke with French direct-reduced iron (DRI) firm GravitHy's chief executive Jose Naldin to explore the company's strategy, cost position and partnership plans in a rapidly shifting competitive landscape. The company is progressing with its Fos-sur-Mer plant, scheduled to begin production in 2030. Edited highlights follow: Some other green steel companies will start with natural gas and gradually introduce H2, mostly because of the price of hydrogen. Does GravitHy plan to use green H2 from the start or have a similar strategy to others? We follow a different approach. While other projects adopt gradual strategies, we are fully committed to energy independence and decarbonisation, and we believe the technology for hydrogen production and its use in DRI is already mature. Our strategy is to start with hydrogen from day one. A key advantage of our site in France is access to baseload electricity, allowing us to produce and use hydrogen on site, which is more cost effective and technically sound. We will still use some natural gas to add carbon to the product, but only for carburisation, and hydrogen will be the reducing agent from the start. This is why we will install significant electrolyser capacity. GravitHy's competitiveness depends heavily on electricity and hydrogen prices in the EU. Which EU policy tools and trade measures support your cost position most? DRI/HBI production has two main costs: energy and cost of capital. Iron ore is a global commodity, so electricity becomes the differentiator. This is why choosing France, with its competitive and decarbonised nuclear-based mix, is essential. But competitiveness also requires a level playing field. Without strong policies ensuring others follow the same decarbonisation rules, European producers are at a disadvantage. Europe must remain committed to the Green Deal and Fit for 55 because decarbonisation is not only about climate, but also about industrial resilience, sovereignty and security. The fundamentals are set out in the Clean Industrial Deal and the Steel and Metals Action Plan. What matters now is implementation. We are waiting for the Industrial Accelerator Act to detail lead market mechanisms and define green steel in a way that incentivises resilient European value chains. North Africa, particularly Algeria, is rapidly scaling low-carbon DRI. Given this growing supply of low cost, hydrogen-ready DRI/HBI in nearby markets, how does GravitHy position itself competitively while producing in a higher cost environment? Competitiveness must be analysed globally and this is where policies matter. Imported material must face the same carbon costs, and safety and quality criteria. Projects outside Europe also face rising cost of capital and natural gas prices. When you add these factors together — plus CBAM payments, transport costs and a strengthened ETS — our projections show that early in the next decade, GravitHy can be competitive against natural gas-based HBI imports. There is confusion because people compare today's HBI prices with future costs for new projects. But the market will change: free allowances will phase out, CBAM becomes financially relevant and carbon prices will likely rise. Under these conditions, our modelling shows competitiveness around 2030. But this depends on EU policy implementation — especially the Industrial Accelerator Act and a strong ETS — to maintain clear decarbonisation incentives. Your current schedule targets commercial production in 2030, with testing beginning in 2029. Is this timeline still valid, given delays at other European decarbonisation projects? For now, yes. As engineering and procurement advance, we will confirm the dates. The timeline depends on permitting and reaching an investment decision, but it remains ambitious and achievable. It will also depend on the progress of our engineering studies and procurement strategy. Europe faces tightness in DR-grade pellet supply. Has GravitHy secured long-term pellets, and how exposed are you to fluctuations? We have already signed a contract with Rio Tinto, one of our shareholders, for high grade pellets covering part of our needs. We are in discussions with other pellet suppliers to complete our strategy. Globally, there is existing pellet capacity and numerous new projects. If all materialise, there could be tightness, but this is a bottom-up situation. For the first wave of DRI projects, supply is sufficient. And if DRI capacity expands significantly, pellet producers will react as it is an attractive market. Mining companies are flexible and investment driven. So I am less concerned than many. Our aim is long-term partnerships across all inputs and we believe our project's value strengthens this position. GravitHy has recently signed an agreement with Marcegaglia, which aligns with Marcegaglia's plan to start electric arc furnace-based flat steel production in Fos around 2028. What does this co-operation entail? Potential supply agreement or infrastructure sharing? These projects are still in development, so the goal is to build strong value chains early. Collaboration is much easier at this stage than after plants are built. GravitHy, Marcegaglia and Nucor are in the same area and there are many potential synergies: logistics, infrastructure, circular economy streams, resource use and environmental co-ordination. If you collaborate too late in heavy industry, it becomes difficult or impossible because of cost and technical constraints. The MoU is not a commercial negotiation, it is about exploring how to make development faster, more efficient, safer and more cost effective through collaboration. Are you exploring partnerships with northern European electric arc furnace/mini-mill projects? No. We remain a small but growing team focused on maximising our project in Fos. We look at northern Europe mainly to understand how we can support their decarbonisation by supplying the iron units they need, rather than forming MoUs similar to the one with Marcegaglia and Nucor. There is only so much we can do with our current size; the focus is on maximising the project in Fos. By Elif Eyuboglu Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Asian, Finnish firms start Sony bioplastic supply chain
Asian, Finnish firms start Sony bioplastic supply chain
Tokyo, 6 February (Argus) — Asian and Finnish companies in chemicals, refining and trading have created a bioplastic supply chain for Japanese electronics maker Sony to cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in electronics production. In the supply chain, Finnish biofuels producer Neste will supply bionaphtha to four petrochemical companies, the companies said on 6 February. The supply chain of multiple companies works like this: Japanese refiner Eneos and South Korean chemicals firm SK Geo Centric will process the bionaphtha supplied by Neste at their crackers to produce bio-paraxylene (bio-PX); this bio-PX will be used by South Korea's Hanwha Impact to make renewable terephthalic acid; that is then converted to renewable polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) resin and films by Japanese firm Toray's South Korean subsidiary Toray Advanced Materials Korea. Eneos has already started supplying the bio-paraxylene produced at its Mizushima refinery in western Japan, the company said. Other companies involved in the supply chain are Japanese refiner Idemitsu which uses bionaphtha at its cracker to produce renewable styrene monomer, which Taiwan's Formosa Chemicals and Fibre (FCFC) converts to renewable polystyrene resin. Another Japanese chemicals firm, Mitsui Chemicals, also uses Neste's bionaphtha to produce bisphenol-A. Japan's Adeka also uses a bio-derived feedstock to make flame retardants, while Chinese firm Qingdao Haier New Material Development produces polycarbonate or acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) resin. Taiwan-based Chimei also supplies renewable polycarbonate resin. All these biochemical materials will be processed by plastics molding companies for Sony's new products. Using a mass balance approach, biomass-based attributes will be allocated to the products across the supply chain. Japanese trading house Mitsubishi will coordinate the entire chain and manage the delivery of environmental credits. The total volume of bio-naphtha needed for the chain was not disclosed. Using Neste's bionaphtha typically reduces GHG emissions by around 85pc compared with using only conventional fossil-derived naphtha, Mitsubishi said. Sony plans to roll out new audio-visual products made with these renewable plastics globally as it aims to achieve net-zero GHG emissions by 2040. Argus last assessed bionaphtha delivered to northeast Asia at $1,875/t cfr on 6 February, $1,270/t over Japanese fossil naphtha. The range of downstream bio-based products in development continues to expand, but high prices for bionaphtha and downstream biochemicals continue to inhibit wider adoption and commercialisation, according to chemical producers in the region. By Kohei Yamamoto and Lauren Moffitt Supply chain partners Company Role Neste Production of bionaphtha Idemitsu Kosan Production of renewable styrene monomer Formosa Chemicals and Fibre Production of renewable polystyrene resin SK Geo Centric Production of renewable para-xylene Eneos Production of renewable para-xylene Hanwha Impact Production of renewable terephthalic acid Toray Advanced Materials Korea Production of renewable PET resin Mitsui Chemicals Production of renewable bisphenol-A CHIMEI Production of renewable polycarbonate (PC) resin ADEKA Production of renewable flame retardants Qingdao Haier New Material Development Production of renewable PC/ABS resin Sony Design and manufacturing of finished products Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
E15 'council' convenes without Dem. lawmakers
E15 'council' convenes without Dem. lawmakers
New York, 5 February (Argus) — A council of Republican lawmakers tasked with negotiating major changes to US fuel policy held its first meeting Tuesday evening, leaving out Democrats that had pushed for a seat at the table. The US House of Representatives last month punted on a proposal that would have allowed year-round sales of gasoline with up to 15pc ethanol (E15) and restricted how many refiners can win hardship exemptions from annual biofuel mandates. Instead, lawmakers tasked a new "rural domestic energy council" with developing policy recommendations by 15 February in the hopes that Congress will weigh legislation by 25 February. The full council met for the first time Tuesday evening, four people familiar with the matter said. The task force includes more than 20 House Republicans with a range of views on biofuel policy, but no Democrats, two of the people said. The office of House speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana), who was in charge of appointing council members, did not respond to Argus' requests for comment. "My Democratic colleagues and I have been clear about the need for Democratic voices on this council — a concern leadership has so far failed to address," representative Nikki Budzinski (D-Illinois) said. "I will continue to press for real, bipartisan action that our growers deserve." Proposals to expand E15 have historically drawn bipartisan support, particularly from Midwestern lawmakers keen to help the region's farmers. Democrats could still support legislation that includes an E15 deal even if left out of negotiations this month. But some lobbyists close to the debate privately doubt that the council will reach any substantial compromise, especially after the earlier E15 proposal drew strong opposition from mid-sized oil refiners that want to maintain their ability to avoid the costly biofuel quotas. The council includes members from states with those refineries, including Gabe Evans' district (R-Colorado), where a Suncor refining complex is located, while CVR Energy and HF Sinclair have units in council co-chair Stephanie Bice's state (R-Oklahoma). Some Republican US senators that have long wanted deeper reforms to the biofuel mandate program are also skeptical of the earlier proposal, complicating any deal's chance of passage. "The federal government should not force Americans to put ethanol in their gas tanks," senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) said. "It is not good for the economy, the environment or car engines. We should not subsidize the corn industry at the expense of hardworking American families." The latest E15 proposal was developed partly by the American Petroleum Institute — an influential lobby within the Republican Party — and has won the support of larger oil refiners like Valero. Farmers' and fuel groups that support the earlier bill have urged the council to focus narrowly on improving it, rather than considering more divisive fuel market issues too. President Donald Trump, who has backed the biofuel industry with a proposal last year for record-high blend mandates, has made clear that he would sign legislation expanding E15 access. He said in an Iowa speech last month that he was optimistic Congress could strike a deal. It is unclear when the council, which includes a number of farm-state biofuel supporters too, plans to meet again. The large majority of gasoline in the US is sold as a 10pc ethanol blend. Farm advocates have pushed for over a decade to loosen summertime smog rules that forbid sales of higher blends in much of the country without emergency waivers . By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
STJ endossa Cbios, mas estoques limitam preços
STJ endossa Cbios, mas estoques limitam preços
Sao Paulo, 5 February (Argus) — A decisão do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) de suspender liminares que blindavam distribuidoras inadimplentes em créditos de descarbonização (Cbios) de sanções previstas na legislação pode ampliar a demanda esperada por títulos no ciclo de 2026, mas com efeitos limitados sobre os preços. O movimento foi visto por participantes do mercado como um endosso institucional relevante para a Política Nacional de Biocombustíveis (Renovabio) em um momento ainda desafiador para autoridades públicas no enforcement da nova lei dos Cbios (Lei nº 15.082/2024) e diante de persistente judicialização. A avaliação é de que o instrumento confere maior autoridade à Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis (ANP) na aplicação de retaliações contra empresas em desconformidade com a política pública e pode frear novas decisões contrárias ao Renovabio em instâncias inferiores do Poder Judiciário. Ao menos 43 processos questionando o Renovabio tramitam em diversas esferas do Poder Judiciário, sendo que seis haviam resultado em liminares favoráveis a distribuidores, segundo levantamento feito pelo governo federal. Na prática, a suspensão das liminares tende a aumentar a percepção de risco de distribuidoras inadimplentes, gerando um impulso na demanda por Cbios, mas com capacidade limitada de pressionar a abundância de créditos em estoque e um ritmo acelerado de emissões esperadas para o ciclo atual. Perfil da inadimplência Das 160 distribuidoras registradas no Renovabio, 61 iniciaram o ano de 2025 com algum saldo de Cbios devidos de ciclos anteriores, segundo a ANP. O grupo de empresas enquadradas como inadimplentes do programa encerrou o ano com 29 nomes. A redução na taxa de inadimplência ao Renovabio contribuiu para elevar o percentual de cumprimento da meta em 2025 para 82pc, ante 77pc registrados no ano anterior. O resultado foi comemorado por defensores do programa, mas ainda é avaliado como tímido, considerando alterações legislativas recentes que endureceram a punição a empresas em desconformidade. Os dados da ANP mostram que 17 distribuidoras mantinham algum processo judicial relacionado ao Renovabio ao final do ano passado, sendo que apenas 7 apareciam com volumes de títulos aposentados abaixo do mínimo de 85pc estabelecido pela Lei dos Cbios (Lei nº 13.576/2017). Deste grupo, só 3 não aposentaram nenhum Cbio em 2025, de acordo com os registros oficiais. Oferta forte limita avanço de preço Na avaliação de participantes do mercado, as próximas semanas darão pistas relevantes quanto aos impactos concretos da decisão do STJ sobre a demanda por Cbios, mas os preços podem ter avanços limitados no período. O elevado nível de estoques herdado dos ciclos anteriores e as expectativas por produção recorde de etanol na próxima safra devem pressionar o preço para baixo. O ano de 2026 começou com 19,611 milhões de Cbios nas mãos dos mais diversos atores do mercado, sendo 71pc com a chamada "parte não-obrigada" (produtores de biocombustíveis registrados no Renovabio) e o restante concentrado em distribuidores. Além disso, parte dos distribuidores inadimplentes se antecipou à compra de papéis, mesmo ainda questionando o Renovabio em diferentes instâncias do Poder Judiciário, buscando aproveitar os níveis de preço mais baixos praticados neste momento no mercado. O preço médio do Cbio atingiu R$29,60 em 3 de fevereiro, cerca de 61pc abaixo do patamar observado um ano antes. Apesar de insatisfeitos com os níveis atuais, muitos produtores de biocombustíveis intensificaram movimentações na última quarta-feira, acelerando vendas na faixa de R$30 em busca de reforço de caixa. Tal postura reforçou entre agentes do mercado a percepção de que podem ser necessários outros vetores para sustentar altas mais expressivas nos preços, como não só diminuição expressiva na inadimplência, mas também metas mais agressivas de aposentadorias de Cbios nos próximos ciclos. Por Marcos Mortari Envie comentários e solicite mais informações em feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . Todos os direitos reservados.
Spotlight carbon content
Browse the latest carbon insight produced by our global team of carbon experts






