Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

US tariffs create uncertain jet fuel outlook

  • : Oil products
  • 25/04/25

US airlines are signaling an uncertain outlook for jet fuel demand, with most withdrawing 2025 financial guidance because President Donald Trump's evolving tariff plans have made it difficult to predict travel demand.

Delta Air Lines, American Airlines, Southwest Airlines and Alaska Airlines all withdrew financial guidance for the full year when reporting first-quarter earnings this month. Global economic uncertainty prompted United Airlines to provide two outlooks, one based on a weaker but stable economy and a second scenario in which the US falls into a recession.

The uncertain demand outlook comes even as jet fuel costs are 11-15pc cheaper than a year earlier, with prices projected to fall to a 4-year low in 2025.

Much of the uncertainty stems from Trump's high and repeatedly changing tariff levels. He has imposed an across-the-board 10pc on imports from most trading partners, 25pc on some imports from Canada and Mexico and 145pc on most imports from China — and separately, a 25pc tariff on imported steel, aluminium, cars and auto parts. Beijing has responded with a 125pc tariff on imports from the US.

The growing trade war has prompted the IMF to significantly lower its outlook for global economic growth in 2025-26.

With no clear path on how to navigate the changing political and economic landscape, businesses and consumers have grown more cautious. Domestic and international air travel began to falter last month as Trump rolled out his trade policies. US airline passenger volumes declined by 15pc to 16.48mn passengers in the week ended 8 March, down from an eight-month high in the week prior.

Brewing anti-American sentiment and concern about US immigration policy also may be lowering global demand for air travel to the US. The number of European travelers to the US totalled 1.03mn in March, lower by 15pc from the same month last year. This was the first time that European arrivals in the US fell on the year since March 2021, during the Covid-19 pandemic.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/05/05

Sunoco to buy Canadian fuel distributor Parkland

Sunoco to buy Canadian fuel distributor Parkland

Houston, 5 May (Argus) — US firm Sunoco agreed to buy Canadian fuel distributor and retailer Parkland in a deal valued at $9.1bn, the companies said Monday. Sunoco, an energy infrastructure and fuel distribution company, will acquire all outstanding shares of Parkland in a cash and equity transaction. This deal "creates significant financial benefits for shareholders and would position the combined company as the largest independent fuel distributor in the Americas," said Michael Jennings, executive chairman of Parkland. The transaction will further diversify Sunoco's portfolio and geographic footprint and increase cash flow generation for reinvestment and distribution growth, the companies said. Parkland owns a 55,000 b/d refinery in Burnaby, British Columbia, which produces conventional oil products and has 4,000 b/d of co-processing capacity, meaning both petroleum and biogenic feedstocks are used. Sunoco said it is committed to continue investment in the refinery which supplies fuel to southwestern BC, including the Vancouver area. Parkland owns about 4,000 retail and commercial locations in Canada, the US and the Caribbean region. Under the deal, Sunoco will keep a Canadian headquarters in Calgary and "significant employment levels" in Canada, the companies said. The transaction is expected to close in the second half of the year. Parkland has planned a special meeting of its shareholders on 24 June, to approve the transaction. The annual general meeting of Parkland shareholders, which was originally scheduled for 6 May has been cancelled. Parkland in March said it was conducting a review of strategic alternatives including a possible sale of the company. The review was led by a special committee of the board of directors. Parkland last year sold its Canadian commercial propane business to Avenir Energy for C$115mn. By Eunice Bridges Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

California refinery closures panic politicians


25/05/05
25/05/05

California refinery closures panic politicians

Houston, 5 May (Argus) — California could lose up to 17pc of its refining capacity within a year, triggering major concerns about its tightly supplied and frequently volatile products market. US independent Valero announced on 16 April that it will shut or repurpose its 145,000 b/d Benicia refinery near San Francisco by April 2026. The firm is also evaluating strategic alternatives for its 85,000 b/d Wilmington refinery in Los Angeles. And independent Phillips 66 said in October that it would shut its 139,000 b/d Los Angeles refinery in the fourth quarter of this year. Valero's Benicia announcement brought a quick reaction from state officials. Governor Gavin Newsom on 21 April urged regulators at the California Energy Commission (CEC) to work closely with refiners through "high-level, immediate engagement" to make sure Californians have access to transport fuels. He has ordered them to recommend by 1 July any changes to California's approach that are needed to ensure adequate fuel supply during its energy transition. The message appears to have hit home. The CEC delayed a vote on new refinery resupply rules to provide time for additional feedback and consultation with stakeholders after the Valero announcement. The CEC also plans to introduce a rule this year for minimum inventory requirements at refineries in the state as well as possible rules on setting a refiner margin cap. The new rules are part of an effort by Newsom to mitigate fuel price volatility in California, including the signing of two pieces of legislation known as AB X2-1 and SB X1-2. Refiners have been unhappy with the state's regulatory and enforcement environment for some time. It is "the most stringent and difficult" in North America owing to 20 years of policies pursuing a move away from fossil fuels, Valero chief executive Lane Riggs says. The long and short of it Refinery closures are fuelling long and short-term supply concerns in California. The most immediate is an anticipated supply crunch at the end of this summer. Phillips 66's plan to shut the Los Angeles refinery by October will deal a significant blow to the state's refining capacity and is likely to occur at a time when Californian gasoline prices are most prone to volatility. The US west coast is an isolated market, many weeks sailing time from alternative supply sources in east Asia or the US Gulf coast. California's strict product specifications further limit who can step in when refinery output falls. The state sometimes sees price spikes in late summer and early autumn because the switch from summer gasoline blends leaves local inventories low while in-state refineries adjust to producing winter grades. California gasoline prices spiked in September 2022 when stocks fell to a nine-year low on the west coast. Spot deliveries hit a record $2.45/USG premium to Nymex Rbob futures in the Los Angeles market at the time (see graph). Production problems at several refineries in southern California led to another spot price surge in September 2023. The California Air Resources Board (Carb) permitted an earlier switch to cheaper winter gasoline production in response to both events. Refinery closures will force California to rely on imports in the longer term, leaving the state exposed to stretched supply lines. State regulators' proposed solutions have raised eyebrows. The CEC's Transportation Fuels Assessment report in August last year included a policy option in which California would buy and own refineries, which the state is not pursuing. Another option involves state-owned products reserves to allow rapid deployment of fuel when needed. The CEC and Carb regulators will also release a draft transportation fuels transition plan later this year. By Eunice Bridges and Jasmine Davis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia’s election gives LNG, fuels sector certainty


25/05/05
25/05/05

Australia’s election gives LNG, fuels sector certainty

Sydney, 5 May (Argus) — Australia's governing Labor party's second majority term could mean that changes to the offshore permitting regime promised last year are signed into law, while east coast LNG businesses will avoid a planned reservation system proposed by the opposition. Labor's victory at the 3 May election combined with the election of fewer members from the Greens party and climate-focused independents, could mean it faces less pressure to cancel fossil fuel projects. But it will remain reliant on the Greens to pass laws through the nation's upper house — the senate — meaning Labor may need to negotiate the passage of bills with the leftist party if the Liberal-National-based coalition opposes its measures. The Greens ran on a promise to ban new coal, oil and gas projects but won fewer seats than in 2022 because of preference flows. A federal decision on the lifetime extension of the Woodside Energy-operated 14.4mn t/yr North West Shelf (NWS) LNG delayed by Labor, is now looking more positive for the firm. The firm sees approval as vital to progressing its Browse gas development offshore northwestern Australia. Voters' rejection of the opposition Coalition on the nation's east coast means its policy to reserve a further 50-100PJ (1.34bn-2.68bn m³/yr) from the Gladstone-based LNG exporters will not proceed. The result provides an opportunity for certainty and stability for the energy sector, upstream lobby Australian Energy Producers said. The group urged the government to focus on new supply as Australia's gas reserves for domestic use rapidly deplete. The government will need to specify exactly how it aims to secure supplies to ensure stable supply, once coal-fired generators retire at the end of the 2020s and into the 2030s. This is because the nation's integrated system plan is based on Labor's policy of reaching 82pc renewable energy in the power grid, backed up by about 15GW of gas-fired power. Industry will await further direction stemming from the Future Gas Strategy which canvassed solutions to Australia's declining gas supply including new pipelines, storage and seasonal LNG imports. Permitting concerns In the government's previous three-year term, a series of court-ordered requirements to consult with affected Aboriginal groups briefly disrupted multi-billion dollar LNG developments. Labor promised to specify through new laws exactly which groups must be consulted before approvals could be granted. But these were dropped from the agenda in early 2024 following opposition by the Greens. Labor's resources minister Madeleine King blamed the Greens for obstructionist manoeuvres on this legislation, but it remains unclear if and when Labor might introduce such laws. Conversely, the Coalition promised to end government support for anti-gas lobbies such as law group the Environmental Defenders Office — set to continue under Labor. In liquid fuels, Labor's victory should boost Australia's electric vehicle (EV) sales, with emissions standards laws set to remain enforced. The Coalition had said it would soften the laws because of concern over cost of living pressures. Plans to temporarily cut the fuel excise will also not progress. Australia's EV take-up has stalled, and industry has blamed this on poor investment in recharging infrastructure and other policy settings, including the removal of the fringe benefits tax exemption for plug-in hybrid car models. A re-elected Labor government is likely to further policy towards a mandate for sustainable aviation fuel or renewable diesel, given the growing share of Australia's emissions projected to come from the transport industry. It pledged A$250mn ($162mn) for low-carbon liquid fuels development in March , for low-carbon liquid fuels development in March, as part of its commitment to the nascent sector. Local market participants are optimistic that further biofuels support will be provided as urgency to meet net zero ambitions builds, including a 2030 target of 43pc lower emissions based on 2005 levels. About A$6bn/yr of feedstocks like canola, tallow and used cooking oil are exported from Australia, while existing ethanol and biodiesel producers are running underutilised plants, making about 175mn litres/yr at present, because of poorly-enforced blending mandates. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Chevron 'not surprised' Calif refineries shutting


25/05/02
25/05/02

Chevron 'not surprised' Calif refineries shutting

Houston, 2 May (Argus) — Chevron's chief executive said today he is not surprised that refineries in California are shutting down, because the state has made it "nearly impossible" to invest going forward. Independent refiner Valero on 16 April said it is planning to shut or re-purpose its 145,000 b/d refinery in Benicia, California, by April 2026. This comes as Phillips 66 is planning to shut its 139,000 b/d Los Angeles refinery later this year. "I'm not surprised to see the announcements that have come out," chief executive Mike Wirth said Friday on Chevron's first-quarter earnings call. Policies coming out of the state "make it nearly impossible to invest in California going forward", he said. The state inserting itself into operational matters like planning turnarounds is "an unwise move", Wirth said. Chevron operates two large refineries in the state — the 269,000 b/d El Segundo, refinery and the 245,000 b/d Richmond refinery. "We do not have any announcements on our refineries at this time," Wirth said. California governor Gavin Newsom last year signed into law AB X2-1, legislation authorizing the state's energy regulator to require refiners to maintain minimum gasoline inventories. The bill is part of a multi-year effort by Newsom to mitigate price spikes at the pump, authorizing the California Energy Commission (CEC) to regulate, develop and impose requirements for in-state refiners to maintain minimum stocks of gasoline and gasoline blending components. The agency is in the rule-making process for some of the regulations, but a vote on a refinery resupply rule was postponed last month to allow for more engagement with stakeholders. The closures of Valero's Benicia refinery and Phillips 66's Los Angeles refinery will eliminate 17pc of the state's crude refining capacity. PBF Energy, which also operates refineries in California, said Thursday that the shutdowns will cause a 250,000 b/d shortfall in gasoline in the state and lead to growing reliance on more expensive imports. Valero chief executive Lane Riggs said last week that California's regulatory and enforcement environment is "the most stringent and difficult" in North America due to 20 years of policies pursuing a move away from fossil fuels. California will require 100pc of in-state sales of new cars and trucks to be electric, plug-in hybrid or hydrogen models by 2035. Five days after Valero's announcement to shut Benicia, Newsom urged state regulators to work closely with refiners on short-term and long-term planning, including through "high-level, immediate engagement" to make sure Californians have access to transportation fuels, according to a letter sent to CEC vice chair Siva Gunda. Newsom ordered the CEC to work with a cross-agency task force to recommend by 1 July any changes in the state's approach that are needed to ensure adequate fuel supply during the state's energy transition. By Eunice Bridges Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Shell’s 1Q European gas production up


25/05/02
25/05/02

Shell’s 1Q European gas production up

London, 2 May (Argus) — Shell's European gas production for sale in January-March slightly stepped up on the year, but the company expects works to limit global oil and gas production this quarter. Shell produced 24.9mn m³/d in the first quarter, up from 24.8mn m³/d a year earlier but below the 25.2mn m³/d in fourth-quarter 2024. Shell has stakes in UK and Dutch fields, as well as a 17.8pc share in Norway's Ormen Lange field and an 8.1pc stake in the giant Troll field. Output from the two Norwegian fields was down on the year in January-February, the latest months for which data are available. Ormen Lange produced 19.8mn m³/d in January-February, down from 22.6mn m³/d a year earlier. Troll production averaged 123.6mn m³/d over those two months, also down from 126.2mn m³/d a year earlier. Shell's integrated gas business was the company's top performing segment with profits of $2.8bn, slightly higher on the year. Lighter maintenance at the Pearl gas-to-liquids plant in Qatar supported production, but unplanned works and weather constraints in Australia left the company's LNG volumes at 6.6mn t in January-March from 7.6mn t a year earlier, Shell said. Meanwhile, Shell's upstream division posted $2.1bn in profit, down 8.5pc on the year earlier but double compared with the fourth quarter 2024. The segment was hit with a $509mn tax bill related to the UK's Energy Profits Levy in the first quarter, partially offset by gains from asset sales. Across the entire company, Shell reported first-quarter profits adjusted for inventory valuation effects and one-off items of $5.6bn, surpassing analysts' expectations of $5.3bn . Shell's first-quarter worldwide oil, liquids and gas production was 2.84mn boe/d, down from 2.91mn boe/d a year earlier but up from 2.82mn boe/d in the previous quarter. The company expects lower oil and gas production this quarter in a 2.45mn-2.71mn boe/d range because of maintenance across its integrated gas portfolio and an absence of volumes from its SPDC business in Nigeria, which Shell sold off in March. By Aleksandra Godlewska and Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more