Viewpoint: US ethanol production threatens recovery
Rising US ethanol production coupled with limited domestic demand growth and new export barriers could threaten the industry's recovery in 2020.
US ethanol crush margins, which measure the profitability of producing ethanol from corn, climbed to an average 28¢/bushel in November, from 16¢/bushel in September, thanks to falling output and lower corn prices.
But the upward trend waned moving into 2020, on lax production discipline, limited domestic demand growth and lower exports. Margins averaged just 10¢/bushel in December.
An up and down year
In the first eight months of 2019, ethanol production rates were above the five-year average, setting new seasonal records in June and July. But the growing production exceeded demand from domestic gasoline blending and fuel ethanol exports, which led to oversupply and lower prices.
Prompt in-tank transfers of ethanol at Kinder Morgan's Argo terminal near Chicago oscillated between 126.5¢/USG and 154.5¢/USG between January-August, compared with five-year averages that moved between 151¢/USG and 177¢/USG.
In September-October, the ethanol industry showed signs of production discipline as plants closed. The closures balanced out the market by reeling in production to levels that allowed for inventories to drop. Some ethanol companies said in their 2019 third quarter results that fewer plants had created a more balanced market, allowing them to incrementally increase production to keep up with demand.
In September-October prices for prompt in-tank transfers of ethanol at Kinder Morgan's Argo terminal near Chicago strengthened with the plant closures, with prices between 139¢/USG and 157¢/USG compared with five-year averages ranging from 151¢/USG to 161¢/USG.
Lower corn prices also supported margins during September-December. Flooding in the Midwest drove up corn prices in June to an average $4.35/bushel. But prices came down after the US Department of Agriculture' s World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates started showing higher than expected post-flooding estimates for planted corn acreage. December prices averaged around $3.78/bushel.
Growing production a threat
Increased production in November and December, however, threaten the production discipline seen in September and October, with output quickly approaching the upper echelons of the five-year range. This suggests inventories could creep up in 2020, which would erode margins again.
The demand outlook has limited growth prospects. US refiners have blended above their required obligation for ethanol D6 RINs for the past six years, and some exports have been met with trade barriers, despite being marketed and sold to over 60 different countries in Asia, Latin America, Europe and the Mideast. India now requires licenses to import ethanol, while Brazil has implemented a tariff rate quota — requirements that have cut the volume of duty-free ethanol imports to both countries.
Adding to stifled foreign demand is the US-China trade dispute. An interim trade deal between Beijing and Washington does not remove tariffs that have cut flows of US ethanol and other energy commodities to China. China will struggle to meet its E10 biofuel blending targets without access to US ethanol, but Beijing says its energy purchases will be "as needed" and based on market fundamentals moving into 2020.
By Thom Dwyer and Jacqueline Reigle
Related news posts
British Columbia raises biofuels output goal
British Columbia raises biofuels output goal
New York, 28 June (Argus) — British Columbia has increased by 15pc its 2030 goal for renewable fuels production in the province, driven by the success of its low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS). The province aims to produce 1.5bn liters/yr (26,000 b/d) of renewable fuels by 2030, up from its prior goal 1.3bn l/yr, the government said Thursday in a report on its clean energy strategy. British Columbia's LCFS has driven investment in petroleum alternatives and enabled more ambitious biofuel targets, with the province on track to produce 840mn l/yr of renewable fuels by 2026, according to the report. The new goal specifically covers renewable liquid fuels like renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel. The province also aims to scale up renewable natural gas and hydrogen, the report said. British Columbia's LCFS targets a 30pc reduction in the carbon intensity of the diesel and gasoline fuel pools by 2030 as well as a 10pc reduction in the carbon intensity of aviation fuels. The provincial program, which operates alongside new federal requirements, has the toughest reduction targets of any North American LCFS. LCFS programs require yearly reductions in transportation fuel carbon intensity. Conventional, higher-carbon fuels that exceed annual limits incur deficits that suppliers must offset with credits generated from the distribution of approved, lower-carbon alternatives. British Columbia justified its renewable fuels goals in the report, arguing that "liquid and gas fuels will remain essential for the foreseeable future" for long-haul transportation, industry, and remote communities with less access to electricity. A more ambitious domestic production target is also designed to reduce the province's dependence on fuel imports. The only provincial fuel producers are Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure's 12,000 b/d refinery and Tidewater Renewables' 3,000 b/d renewable diesel refinery in Prince George as well as Parkland's 55,000 b/d refinery in Burnaby that co-processes renewable feedstocks with conventional petroleum feedstocks. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Canaries' bio-marine fuel demand hit by ETS exemptions
Canaries' bio-marine fuel demand hit by ETS exemptions
London, 28 June (Argus) — Spanish energy firm Cepsa has delayed plans to supply marine biodiesel blends in the Canary Islands as increased demand for conventional bunker fuels and EU regulatory exemptions weigh on market fundamentals for the blended products. Cepsa's international marine fuels sales manager, Francisco Diaz Castro, told attendees at the Maritime Week Las Palmas conference last week that the firm remains committed to supplying marine biodiesel in the Canary Islands but is delaying it in response to a sharp rise in conventional bunker fuel demand in recent months, underpinned by vessels re-routing around the southern tip of Africa to avoid the risk of Houthi attacks in in the Red Sea. Vessels have been stocking up on bunker fuels before and after sailing around Africa's Cape of Good Hope to avoid stopping along the way. Latest data from the Spanish transport ministry show sales of conventional bunker fuel out of the Canary Islands last month increased by 3pc compared with April and by 41pc on the may last year (see table) . This demand growth has pushed suppliers to retain barge availability for conventional bunker fuels, reducing capacity to supply marine biodiesel blends. Market participants told Argus that another reason marine biodiesel demand in the Canary Islands has not picked up is EU regulatory exemptions for vessels sailing between the islands and mainland Spain. According to article 12 (3b) of the EU's Emissions Trading System (ETS) directive, "an obligation to surrender allowances shall not arise in respect of emissions released until 31 December 2030 from voyages between a port located in an outermost region of a member state and a port located in the same member state, including voyages between ports within an outermost region and voyages between ports in the outermost regions of the same member state, and from the activities, within a port, of such ships in relation to such voyages." Argus understands that this exemption applies to all vessels covered under the scope of the EU ETS, but would not apply if the vessel is sailing from an outermost region, such as the Canary Islands, to a different EU member nation, for example the Netherlands. A similar exemption for FuelEU Maritime regulations may be applicable as well, subject to member states asking for the exemption of the specific ports and routes for the vessels. Such an exemption could apply until 2029. Argus understands that requests from member states for this exemption will be published in the coming months. An exemption from FuelEU Maritime regulations could also be applied to routes connecting islands with a population under 200,000 people. This specific exemption would therefore not apply to Tenerife and Gran Canaria but may apply to other parts of the Canary Islands with smaller populations. By Hussein Al-Khalisy and Dafydd ab Iago Canary Islands liquid bunker sales t Month Las Palmas Tenerife Total Sales % m-o-m % y-o-y May-24 282,447 49,749 332,196 3 41 Apr-24 255,262 68,782 324,044 27 38 Mar-24 189,868 64,654 254,522 0 3 Feb-24 207,564 47,344 254,908 -6 0 Jan-24 219,962 51,894 271,856 16 27 Dec-23 187,889 47,306 235,195 4 1 Nov-23 181,218 45,940 227,158 5 -2 Spanish Transport Ministry Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US House panel advances waterways’ projects bill
US House panel advances waterways’ projects bill
Houston, 27 June (Argus) — A Congressional committee on Wednesday advanced a bill to authorize a bundle of US port and river infrastructure projects for the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) biennially authorizes projects handled by the Corps' civil works program aimed at improving shipping operations at the nation's ports and harbors, and along the inland waterway system. The traditionally bipartisan legislation also approves flood and storm programs, and work on other aspects of water resources infrastructure. The House of Representatives' Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on Wednesday passed the bill by a 61-2 vote. The Senate Committee on Environmental and Public Works passed its own version of the bill on 22 May by a 19-0 vote. Neither the full Senate nor House have yet voted on the bills, which will need a conference committee to sort out different versions. A key difference is that the House bill did not include an adjustment to the cost-sharing structure for lock and dam construction and major rehabilitation projects. The Senate measure adjusted the funding mechanism so that 75pc of costs would be paid for by the US Treasury Department's general fund, with the rest coming from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. The 2022 version of the bill made permanent an increase to 65pc from the general fund and 35pc from the trust fund, which is funded by a barge diesel fuel tax. The House committee's decision not to include the funding change drew disappointment from shipping interests. The Waterways Council was "disappointed that the House did not include a provision to modernize the inland waterways system", but was hopeful that conference negotiations would result in its inclusion, Tracy Zea, chief executive of the group, said. The latest House version of the bill authorizes 12 projects and 160 new feasibility studies. Among the projects receiving approval were modifications to the Seagirt Loop Channel near the Baltimore Harbor in Maryland. The federal government would pay $47.9mn towards an estimate $63.9mn project to widen the channel, which would help meet future demand for capacity within the Port of Baltimore. That would include increased container volume at the Seagirt Marine Terminal. The project was in the works before the 26 March collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge temporarily diverted freight from Seagirt and many other port terminals. The committee also authorized $314.25mn towards a resiliency study of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The study would consider hurricane and storm damage and identify ways to improve navigation, reduce the maintenance requirements, and provide resiliency. The waterway connects ports along the Gulf of Mexico from St Marks, Florida, to Brownsville, Texas. The House version of the bill also includes provisions to strengthen flood control, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure. "Critically, WRDA 2024 will help communities increase resiliency in the face of climate change," representative Rick Larsen (D-WA) said. By Abby Caplan and Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Japan aims to tighten SAF supply regulations
Japan aims to tighten SAF supply regulations
Tokyo, 27 June (Argus) — Japan is proposing stricter rules for domestic producers of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) to help cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, aiming to finalise the discussions later this year. The new proposal was announced on 27 June by the country's joint commission of the government and private sector for promoting SAF. The proposed regulations will require SAF producers to cut GHG emissions from jet fuel use by more than 5pc during the April 2030-March 2035 fiscal year against 2019-20 levels. With Japan's domestic jet fuel supplies at 12.5mn kilolitres (210,000 b/d) in 2019-20, the 5pc reduction equates to 1.58mn t of carbon dioxide. Additional targets beyond 2035 will be further discussed, according to the country's ministry of trade and industry (Meti). The Japanese government decided in 2022 to mandate SAF to account for at least 10pc of domestic airlines' jet fuel consumption by 2030. The new proposals also aim to develop new technology for producing SAF, including alcohol-to-jet fuel technology, according to a Meti official that spoke to Argus. There is also scope to promote synthetic fuel-based SAF, or e-SAF, as it could reduce 80-90pc more GHG emissions compared with biofuel-based SAF, he added. Japan's proposals would exceed SAF regulations globally, given that even the EU's ReFuel EU aviation legislation adopted in 2023 does not mandate the "quality of SAF", the Meti official added. By Yusuke Maekawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more