Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Zhoushan takes bunker market share as China prices fall

  • : Oil products
  • 20/04/27

Low-sulphur bunker prices at China's main ports have moved to a discount to prices in Singapore, drawing some business away from the southeast Asian bunkering hub.

Rising exports, intensifying price competition and tax reforms are making Chinese prices increasingly competitive. Prices of 0.5pc sulphur bunker fuel oil in Zhoushan, China's emerging bunker hub in Zhejiang province, fell to a discount of $5.30/t to Singapore prices on 14 April, the first such discount since 6 January. The discount increased to $14.42/t on 22 April, the widest since $32/t on 27 December.

Low-sulphur 380cst bunker fuel oil prices were at $205.96/t in Zhoushan and $216.51/t in Singapore on 24 April, a $10.55/t discount, according to Argus data.

China's governing State Council earlier this year approved plans to refund taxes on fuel oil exports from 1 February, a move aimed at enhancing the competitiveness of Chinese bunker fuel supplies on the global market. Sales were previously subject to a 13pc value-added tax, which made it more costly to refuel at Zhoushan than Singapore. Exporters are only able to sell to the bonded bunker market, limiting exports to the barge market.

The fall in bunker prices has helped Zhoushan expand its market share, as traders and shipowners switch some business away from Singapore. Bunker sales at Zhoushan rose by 25pc from a month earlier to 348,500t in March, although this was still less than 10pc of Singapore's sales of 4.32mn t in the same month.

Spot low-sulphur bunker volumes in Zhoushan reported to Argus reached a record high of nearly 49,000t in March. Argus started to assess the Zhoushan Bunker Index (ZBI) from June 2019, using a volume-weighted average (VWA) of spot bunker deals captured each day.

Zhoushan is not the only Chinese port aggressively competing with Singapore. Prices in Hong Kong and Shanghai, where Argus also applies a VWA methodology, moved to a discount to Singapore on 14 April from a premium previously amid rising Chinese exports. Hong Kong and Shanghai prices were assessed $14.50/t and $8.50/t lower than Singapore respectively on 24 April. Spot volumes reported to Argus reached a record high of 27,500t in Shanghai and Hong Kong at 32,300t in March.

Chinese ports' price discount is expected to continue as refiners in the country look to export more fuel oil to relieve pressure on rising crude and light distillate inventories. One major state-controlled refiner is planning to raise fuel oil exports by at least 25pc to more than 500,000t in April from 400,000t in March.

Market participants are still waiting for details of potential export quotas for fuel oil, which had been expected as part of the tax reforms.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

B100 seen attractive shipping fuel option after MEPC 83


25/04/25
25/04/25

B100 seen attractive shipping fuel option after MEPC 83

Singapore, 25 April (Argus) — More buyers in the shipping sector will consider biofuel blends of up to B100 now a greenhouse gas (GHG) pricing mechanism has laid out by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), according to panellists at the Argus Biofuels & Feedstocks Asia Conference. Global biodiesel demand is likely to strengthen in the near-term following the emergence of clearer international pricing standards for GHG emissions, they said. "B100 seems to have great momentum based on the [83rd Marine Environment Protection Committee] MEPC meeting," said French certification society Bureau Veritas' VeriFuel global business development director Bill Stamatopoulos. MEPC 83 is "a clear indication that we have to work together and work fast" because there is a cost penalty for not switching away from conventional marine fuels, said Danish tanker owner Hafnia's general manager of project and fleet sustainability, Pankaj Porwal. Most maritime participants welcomed the two-tier GHG pricing framework approved by the IMO at MEPC 83 from 7-11 April, which is a key milestone as the maritime sector pushes for decarbonisation. Biofuels like B24, B30, and B100 will gain more interest because of cost-savings for buyers when switching to cleaner fuels, said Singapore bunker supplier Equatorial Marine Fuel's (EMF) chief operating officer Choong Sheen Mao. B24 is 24pc of used cooking oil methyl ester (Ucome) blended with 76pc of conventional fuel, such as very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO), while B100 is pure biodiesel not blended with fossil fuels. Panellists said bunkering B100 would provide significant advantages for ships with voyages in EU waters, where firms can "pool" multiple vessels within the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and FuelEU Maritime Regulation to balance compliance surpluses and deficits. But vessel shipowners would need to be "absolutely sure" of the amount of fuel required for the voyage, to avoid any unknown consequences if excess biofuels were mixed with other fuel types, said Hafnia's Porwal. The GHG pricing mechanism gives bunker buyers a "strong indication" of the cost of not switching to alternative marine fuels and this will drive biodiesel demand as buyers realise "they need to get involved in some way", said EMF's Choong, adding that suppliers can consider selling biodiesel if it is "commercially viable". There will be a minimum cost of compliance in adhering with IMO decarbonisation targets, but smaller shipowners should start running trials and "building quality control systems for your marine fuels so you're prepared to take on greener fuels", said International Bunker Industry Association (IBIA) Asia chair Rahul Choudhuri. "At the moment hedging is very much focused on VLSFO and gasoil… but as exposures change and regulations change, we'll see more instruments being used to counter [trading risks]," said shipbroker Braemar oil derivatives broker Rebecca Reed-Sperrin. As the decarbonisation mandates grow, "hopefully liquidity increases tremendously" for marine biofuels, she said. Challenges Panellists cited several barriers in the widespread uptake of biofuels in the shipping sector, such as availability of Ucome feedstock, controversies regarding feedstock origin, and limited biodiesel shelf life compared to conventional marine fuels. Fuel pricing and costs associated with bunkering biofuels surfaced as key concerns. International regulations are complex and buyers have to assess "what is [the] real price" taking into account IMO regulations, said Bureau Veritas' Stamatopoulos. Charterers and tanker operators face difficulties in securing a price without hidden costs involved, Italian ship owner Fratelli Cosulich biofuel trading advisor Sebastiaan Bruins. B100 is available but suppliers are not actively selling it as buying interest has been limited, Bruins said. China will be a "dominant force" for B100 supplies because of a larger Ucome volume, and market developments would depend on how China portions domestic and export volumes of Uco, said Choong. Long-term uptake agreements for biofuel with major shipowners would be important in scaling up biofuel bunker supplies, said Indonesian state-owned refiner PT Pertamina's marine fuels trading manager Justin Tan. Bunker buyers need to signal their interest regarding biofuels "so we know where to start too", he said. The maritime sector is still looking at a multifuel future since the supply of "Ucome alone cannot meet shipping's needs", said Danish tanker owner Maersk senior green fuel originator Felicia Ng. By Cassia Teo Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Southwest Airlines shortens outlook to 2Q only


25/04/24
25/04/24

Southwest Airlines shortens outlook to 2Q only

Houston, 24 April (Argus) — Southwest Airlines withdrew its full-year 2025 and 2026 financial forecasts due to economic uncertainty caused by US tariffs. The US-based passenger airline limited its outlook to just the second quarter 2025 during its first quarter earnings release on Thursday, saying a projected economic slow-down would pressure unit revenue to be flat and possibly fall by 4pc compared to the second quarter 2024. In the second quarter available seat miles (ASM) — a measure of capacity — are expected to rise by 1-2pc compared to the same quarter in 2024. First quarter ASMs were down by 1.9pc to 41.3bn from the same three-months in 2024, which was in-line with their expectations. Southwest's first quarter load factor, or the percentage of seats filled, dropped by 4.4pc from the prior year to 73.9pc. First quarter total operating expenses, including jet fuel, dropped by 2.2pc from the previous year to $6.65bn. Southwest paid $2.49¢/USG for jet fuel in the first quarter, a decrease of 16pc from 2024. Fuel efficiency improved in the first quaer due more fuel-efficient aircraft, with 500mn USG consumed, down by 4.6pc compared to the same quarter in 2024. Expected lower jet fuel prices should help ease operating cost in the upcoming months. Southwest expects to pay $2.20¢/USG to $2.3¢/USG for jet fuel in the next quarter. Southwest narrowed its first quarter 2025 net loss to $149mn from $231mn a year earlier. By Carrie Carter Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Water levels delay Tennessee River lock reopening


25/04/24
25/04/24

Water levels delay Tennessee River lock reopening

Houston, 24 April (Argus) — The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) will delay the reopening of the Tennessee River's Wilson Lock by three weeks after high floodwater disrupted repair plans. The Wilson Lock is now planned to reopen in mid-June or July, the Corps said this week. The lock's main chamber has been closed since September after severe cracks were found in the structure. The Corps initiated evacuation procedures so personnel and equipment could be removed before any water entered the dewatered lock and ruined repairs after high water appeared too close to the lock's edge. The water did not crest above the temporary barrier the Corps installed to keep water out. Delays at the lock averaged around 10 days as of 24 April, according to the Corps. Barge carriers fees have been in place for each barge that must pass through the auxiliary chamber of the lock since 25 September, when the lock first closed. Restricted barge movement placed upward pressure on fertilizer prices in surrounding areas as well. The lock still requires structural repairs to the main chamber gates, including the replacement of the pintle components, the Corps said. This is the fourth opening delay the Corps have issued for the Wilson Lock, with the prior opening dates being in November , then April and then in June . The Wilson Lock will enter its eighth month of repairs next month. By Meghan Yoyotte and Sneha Kumar Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Valero's Mexico fuel import permit reinstated: Update


25/04/24
25/04/24

Valero's Mexico fuel import permit reinstated: Update

Include market comments, details of Valero operations in Mexico. Houston, 24 April (Argus) — Independent US refiner Valero said its permit to import fuel into Mexico has been reinstated after being suspended earlier this month. The temporary suspension was imposed by Mexico's tax authority SAT on 9 April as part of the country's efforts to fight fuel smuggling, Valero said. The suspension was lifted after the company reached out to stakeholders and customs officials in Mexico and was "quickly exonerated of any wrongdoing," Valero said Thursday morning during its first quarter earnings call. Valero on 23 April sent a notice to customers in Mexico saying its import operations had resumed, but the two-week stop disrupted supply in several regions. Some cities, like Irapuato in Guanajuato state northwest of Mexico City, remain without product, according to market sources. "Although this is all unfortunate and created significant supply disruption for our customers, it is part of an effort in Mexico to limit the import of illegal fuel," Valero chief financial officer Gary Simmons said in the earnings call. Fuel smuggling is rampant in Mexico, with illicit fuel sales accounting for up to 30pc of Mexico's 1.2mn b/d of gasoline and diesel demand, according to finance ministry estimates. Most of the illicit supply enters Mexico through mislabeling oil products at the US-Mexico border as petrochemicals, additives or biofuels, which are not subject to excise taxes on diesel and regular gasoline. Earlier this month Mexico stopped the movement of all fuel trucks as part of fight against fuel smuggling. Valero top importer to Mexico Valero is the largest private fuel importer in Mexico, operating an extensive distribution network supported by its refineries in the US Gulf coast and a system of terminals, pipelines, rail routes, truck routes and waterborne logistics. Its fuel sales accounted for 10pc of Mexico's gasoline and diesel demand on 9 April, according to the company. The company imports road fuels by pipeline from its Corpus Christi and Three Rivers refineries in Texas to the 195,000 bl NuStar storage terminal in Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas. Valero's waterborne fuel deliveries arrive at the 2.1mn bl Sempra terminal in Veracruz, from which it supplies other terminals near Puebla, Mexico City and Guadalajara. Valero stores fuel at four private-sector terminals in Mexico, with over 4mn bl of capacity. The company is also expected to start storing fuel at the new 1.1mn bl OTM maritine terminal in Altamira, Tamaulipas, in the near future. The company operates a network of over 290 retail fuel stations in Mexico and also supplies fuel to other retailers and fuel marketers. In Mexico Valero holds gasoline, diesel and jet fuel import permits valid through 2038. Valero is one of only a handful of private-sector companies with such permits, as Shell, Marathon and ExxonMobil hold permits to import only gasoline and diesel. Private-sector companies started importing fuel into Mexico in 2016 after the market opened to more competition, but under former president Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador's administration, the energy ministry (Sener) cancelled dozens of fuel import permits. By Eunice Bridges and Antonio Gozain Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more