Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

US lawmakers counter Mexican regulatory bias

  • : Crude oil, Electricity, LPG, Natural gas, Oil products, Petrochemicals
  • 20/10/23

Preferential treatment for Mexico's state-owned companies threatens US energy investment and may violate the two countries' free trade agreement, Texas' two senators and 41 other lawmakers told the White House.

Mexico's president in September called on the country's energy regulatory agencies to prioritize the work of state-owned oil company Pemex and power company CFE, although the country's 2014 energy reform aimed to level the playing field for other companies after decades of government monopolies. Yet president Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has long opposed the energy reform passed by his predecessor, and his Morena party has proposed rolling back the constitutionally enshrined changes that allowed for private investment in the sector.

The bipartisan group of US lawmakers complained of Mexico "delaying or cancelling outright permits for US energy companies," in the letter yesterday addressed to US president Donald Trump. It cited anecdotal experiences and echoed complaints from market participants, as well as a letter the American Petroleum Institute sent in June.

Evidence that Mexico's government is providing preferential regulatory treatment to Pemex and CFE includes a leaked memo from Lopez Obrador directing regulators to "use all available resources within the regulatory framework" to protect the state companies, the lawmakers said.

"These efforts violate and contradict the spirit, if not the letter," of the US Mexico Canada (USMCA) free trade agreement, the lawmakers said. "Therefore, we are deeply concerned that these actions demonstrate a pattern of obstruction."

Mexico is the largest single export market for US refined products as well as natural gas exports.

Lawmakers who signed the letter include senators John Cornyn (R) and Ted Cruz (R), and Democratic representatives Henry Cuellar and Lizzie Fletcher, all of Texas — Mexico's main trading partner among the US states. Cruz especially had often sided on key issues with Trump, who faces an election against Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden on 3 November.

Lopez's Morena party faces mid-term elections next June, and is aiming to win the two-third majority of congress which would ease passage of constitutional changes such as reversing the energy reform. Constitutional changes also require a simple majority vote in Mexico's state legislatures.

The Mexican president began reversing some implementation of the energy reform immediately after taking office, including cancelling planned rounds of upstream exploration and production rights. The reform did not bring lower energy prices and investment has fallen short of promises, Lopez Obrador has said.

But investors — both foreign and domestic — complain that the regulatory uncertainty of the Lopez Obrador presidency has undermined their efforts.

"US companies have invested billions of dollars in midstream and retail infrastructure in Mexico to the benefit of both countries," said Chet Thompson, president of the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers trade group in response to the letter. "However, this good progress is now in jeopardy based on the Mexican government's preferential treatment of Pemex and their actions to delay or even cancel permits for US energy companies."

Mexico's courts have provided a counterweight recently against some of the government's proposals to favor state companies, particularly in the power sector. The supreme court suspended a policy that favored state-owned generation, although the state power utility has also redrawn grid dispatch rules that would favor state-owned hydroelectric generation in a separate effort.

By Carla Bass


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/04/24

Eni cuts capex on macro headwinds, tariff uncertainty

Eni cuts capex on macro headwinds, tariff uncertainty

London, 24 April (Argus) — Italy's Eni has cut its spending plans for this year in response to macroeconomic headwinds, uncertainty around trade tariffs and a lower oil price outlook. The company is planning a series of "mitigation measures" worth over €2bn [$2.28bn], a key element of which is a reduction in 2025 capex to below €8.5bn from previous guidance of €9bn. Eni now expects net capex — which takes into account acquisitions and asset sales — to come in below €6bn this year, compared with its initial plan of €6.5bn-7bn. Other savings will come from "mitigating actions" around its portfolio, operating costs and "other cash initiatives", the firm said. Eni's plan reflects a tariff-driven deterioration in the outlook for the global economy and, in turn, global oil demand and oil prices. The company has revised its Brent crude price assumption for 2025 down to $65/bl from $75/bl previously. It has also lowered its refining margin indicator assumption for the year to $3.5/bl from $4.7/bl. The lower oil price assumption has not changed the company's upstream production forecast — it still expects 2025 output to average 1.7mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d). But Eni's production in the first quarter was only 1.65mn boe/d, 5pc lower than the same period last year. The firm's gas production took the biggest hit, falling by 9pc on the year to 4.5bn ft³/d (861,000 boe/d) as a result of divestments and natural decline at mature fields. Liquids output fell by 1pc year on year to 786,000 boe/d. Eni reported a profit of €1.17bn for January-March, 3pc lower than the same period last year. Underlying profit— which strips out inventory valuation effects and other one off-items — fell by 11pc on the year to €1.41bn. Eni said the fall in profits was mainly due to lower oil prices. The company also had to contend with weaker refining margins and throughputs, as well as a continuing downturn in the European chemicals sector. By Aydin Calik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Taiwan’s CPC buys Vincent crude ahead of CDU turnaround


25/04/24
25/04/24

Taiwan’s CPC buys Vincent crude ahead of CDU turnaround

Singapore, 24 April (Argus) — Taiwanese state-controlled refiner CPC has purchased a rare cargo of Australian heavy sweet Vincent crude, ahead of a June crude distillation unit (CDU) turnaround that is expected to tighten blendstock component availability at its refinery. CPC recently bought the end-May loading Vincent from Japanese trading firm Mitsui at around a $5-5.50/bl premium to North Sea Dated, traders said. Vincent is usually sold in volumes of 550,000 bl. An upcoming CDU maintenance at a CPC refinery in June, expected to last 1-2 months, will limit production of other blendstock components needed for fuel oil production, market sources told Argus . It is unclear which refinery — the 200,000 b/d Taoyuan or 400,000 b/d Dalin — is having the maintenance. Production constraints, arising from the upcoming turnaround, may have prompted CPC to seek alternative blendstocks like Vincent to help meet its fuel oil supply obligations during this period. CPC is responsible for supplying the majority of Taiwan's bunker fuel at domestic ports. The Vincent deal marks CPC's first crude purchase from Australia since November 2023, when it received heavy sweet Van Gogh crude, data from oil analytics firm Vortexa show. Van Gogh is similar in quality to Vincent. The last time CPC took Vincent was in March 2023. CPC has mainly relied on US light sweet WTI in the past year, supplemented by medium sour Saudi Arab Light and Abu Dhabi Upper Zakum. Vincent and Van Gogh, as well as Australian heavy sweet Pyrenees, are valued as blendstocks for very low-sulphur fuel oil production in the Singapore strait region. These grades' heavier density relative to other sweet crude grades make them less economical for refining, and better suited for direct use in fuel oil blending. By Asill Bardh and Reena Nathan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US states including New York sue Trump over tariffs


25/04/23
25/04/23

US states including New York sue Trump over tariffs

New York, 23 April (Argus) — A coalition of 12 states including New York is suing the administration of President Donald Trump for imposing "illegal" tariffs that threaten to raise inflation and derail economic growth. The lawsuit, filed by attorneys general from the 12 states, argues that Congress has not granted the president the authority to impose the tariffs and the administration violated the law by imposing them through executive orders, social media posts, and agency orders. "President Trump's reckless tariffs have skyrocketed costs for consumers and unleashed economic chaos across the country," said New York governor Kathy Hochul (D). "New York is standing up to fight back against the largest federal tax hike in American history." The lawsuit alleges the tariffs will increase unemployment, threaten wages by slowing economic growth and push up the cost of key goods from electronics to building materials. The lawsuit, which was filed in the United States Court of International Trade, seeks a court order halting the tariffs. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Tariffs could cut FY profit $100mn-$200mn: Baker Hughes


25/04/23
25/04/23

Tariffs could cut FY profit $100mn-$200mn: Baker Hughes

New York, 23 April (Argus) — Oilfield services giant Baker Hughes expects a cut in its annual profit of as much as $200mn from tariffs, if current levels applied under President Donald Trump's 90-day pause stay in place for the rest of the year. That hit to profits does not include secondary effects, such as the impact of Trump's trade wars on slower global economic growth, as well as a renewed bout of weakness in oil prices. While the company is taking steps to mitigate tariff impacts, its "strong weighting" to international markets helps reduce its overall financial exposure, according to chief executive officer Lorenzo Simonelli. Increased oil price volatility due to tariffs , as well as the return of Opec+ barrels to the market, have resulted in a softening outlook for the market. As such, Baker Hughes now expects global upstream spending will be "down by high single digits" this year. The company forecasts a low-double digit decline in North America spending by its clients, and a mid-to-high single digit drop internationally. "A sustained move lower in oil prices or worsening tariffs would introduce further downside risk to this outlook," said Simonelli. "The prospects of an oversupplied oil market, rising tariffs, uncertainty in Mexico and activity weakness in Saudi Arabia are collectively constraining international upstream spending levels." The company has identified three areas of tariff exposure within its industrial and energy technology division, including volumes exported to China, critical equipment supplies from its facilities in Italy, and an expected modest impact from steel and aluminum tariffs as well as US-China trade activity. Mitigation efforts include exploring domestic procurement alternatives to reduce input costs and improving its global manufacturing footprint. In relation to its oilfield services and equipment segment, Baker Hughes has been working to boost domestic sourcing and is working with customers to recover some costs. Elsewhere, the repeal of an US LNG permitting moratorium under the Trump administration has resulted in higher orders. Baker Hughes has booked about $1.7bn in LNG orders in the US over the past two quarters, and several LNG customers in the Gulf Coast have signaled plans to expand capacity beyond 2030. Profit of $402mn in the first quarter was down from $455mn in the year-earlier period. Revenue held steady at about $6.4bn. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US generators weigh delaying coal plant retirements


25/04/23
25/04/23

US generators weigh delaying coal plant retirements

New York, 23 April (Argus) — US utilities are considering additional extensions to coal plant retirements in response to recent policy changes, even though the benefit for the coal industry may be short-lived. US utilities are still mostly reviewing US president Donald Trump's executive orders issued earlier this month plus other actions initiated by his administration. One of the more concrete recent actions were the two-year exemptions from complying with updated Mercury and Air Toxics Standards granted to dozens of power plants on 15 April. But even though utilities had applied for these exemptions, the majority of those that spoke to Argus indicated they are still evaluating their options. "Granting a two-year compliance extension at Labadie and Sioux will enable Ameren Missouri to further refine its compliance strategy and optimize planned monitoring mechanisms to ensure accuracy," said Ameren Missouri director of environmental services Craig Giesmann. "We are committed to selecting cost-effective solutions that minimize the impact on customer rates." Ameren's 1,099MW Sioux plant is scheduled to be closed by 2028 and the 2,389MW Labadie plant has no concrete retirement date. Tennessee Valley Authority said it is "carefully reviewing" the mercury and air toxics exemptions "for how it might apply and benefit our efforts to support load growth across our seven-state region." The federal utility was granted exemptions for all of its coal facilities, including units of the Cumberland and Kingston plants that had been scheduled to close by the 1 July 2027 compliance deadline for the new mercury and air toxics standards. NRG Energy and Xcel Energy also said they are still considering how to proceed. "It will take our regulatory and environmental teams some time to evaluate and access the new guidelines, so we do not have any update to share at this time," NRG said. The utility was granted exemptions for four coal plants with a combined 7,092MW of capacity. None of these units currently has concrete retirement dates scheduled. Companies need to take into account other factors before committing to extending a coal unit's life, including natural gas price expectations and whether government regulations will stay in place. In addition, the planning process for retiring and adding generating assets takes time. These factors also are being taken into account by utilities that do not have coal units on the list of mercury rule exemptions but could be affected by other efforts the Trump administration is making to try to preserve coal generation. "Whatever impacts may arise from policy changes this year will be assessed in a future [Integrated Resource Plan], with the best analysis of information available at that time," utility PacifiCorp said. The utility just filed its latest integrated resource plan with state regulators on 31 March and does not expect to file another one until early 2027. Another utility that did not have coal units on the list of mercury rule exemptions but would be affected by other regulatory actions said it is considering extending coal unit operations by a few years. A US coal producer reported receiving increased inquiries from utilities about the feasibility of continuing to get coal supply beyond power plant units' planned retirement dates. Both buyers and sellers that talked to Argus agree that contract flexibility is gaining importance. But "even if you roll back some regulations and push deadlines on various retirements and certain requirements out into the future, you still can not justify taking more coal unless it is going to be competitive" with natural gas, one market participant said. While profit margins for dispatching coal in US electric grids were above natural gas spark spreads for a number of days this past winter, that was an anomaly when compared with recent years. Coal may bridge generating gap But recent policy changes could help utilities use coal generation to bridge any gaps in generating capacity caused by delays in bringing other energy sources online. These include possible delays in adding solar generation following increased tariffs the Trump administration has imposed on imports from China as well as legislation moving through some state governing bodies aimed at inhibiting renewable projects. On 15 April, the Texas Senate passed a bill that would impose restrictions on solar and wind projects, including new permits, fees, regulatory requirements, and taxes. Separately, North Carolina legislators are reviewing a bill that proposes reducing solar tax breaks from 80pc to 40pc and limiting locations for utility-scale projects. Other states are moving forward with efforts to encourage less carbon-intensive generation. Colorado governor Jared Polis (D) on 31 March signed legislation classifying nuclear energy as a "clean" power source. Increased renewable energy generating capacity still is expected to be the "main contributor" to growth in US electricity generation, according to the US Energy Information Administration's (EIA) Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO). But EIA's latest outlook did not take into account the coal-related executive orders Trump signed on 8 April. "We are currently evaluating these developments, and they will be reflected in the May STEO," EIA chief economist Jonathan Church said. Most market participants do not expect substantial long-term changes to come from recent coal-supporting efforts because of various other factors including the fundamental economics of coal-fired power plants. By Elena Vasilyeva Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more