Trading firm Trafigura makes green hydrogen investment

: Hydrogen, Oil products
20/12/02

Trading firm Trafigura will invest $62mn in Switzerland-based green hydrogen company H2 Energy Holding to help it with its plans to roll out a supply-chain network.

This marks a small step into the energy transition for one of the world's largest physical commodities trading groups, which will put its money into developing a business that could cut into one of its traditional markets. Trafigura will invest $20mn to support H2 Energy's development, and the rest will "seed and fund" a 50:50 joint venture, based in Zurich, that will roll out the model across Europe, excluding Switzerland.

Green hydrogen is produced from renewable energy, through electrolysis. H2 Energy is working with others to develop a hydrogen production facility, a hydrogen filling station, a hydrogen-powered truck and several hydrogen-powered cars. Trafigura trades close to 6mn b/d of oil of crude and oil products, along with metals and minerals. It has recently made investments that appear to shore up its position in the oil markets, including the acquisition of a 3pc stake in Italian refiner Saras, which owns the 300,000 b/d Sarroch refinery in Sardinia, and the purchase of a 10pc stake in Russian state-controlled Rosneft's ambitious Vostok Oil project in Russia's arctic.

Trafigura's other assets include a majority stake in global zinc and lead producer Nyrstar, a stake in global oil products storage and distribution company Puma Energy, and a stake in terminals, warehousing and logistics operator Impala Terminals.

"Our investment [in H2 Energy] has enormous potential at a time when the economics for green hydrogen use by heavy duty transport is becoming competitive with traditional fuels," Trafigura chief executive Jeremy Weir said. "We are looking forward to… bringing Trafigura's ability to evolve traditional supply chains to develop new markets."

H2 Energy chairman Rolf Huber said the joint venture with Trafigura "will enable the partners to execute on planned projects on a Europe-wide scale."

By Konstantin Rozhnov

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/01/07

Trump wants policy of 'no windmills' being built

Washington, 7 January (Argus) — President-elect Donald Trump wants to pursue a policy to stop the construction of wind turbines, a move that could limit the growth of a resource projected to soon overtake coal and nuclear as the largest source of power in the the US. Trump has spent years attacking the development of wind, which accounted for 10pc of electricity production in the US in 2023, often by citing misleading complaints about its cost, harm to wildlife and health threats. In a press conference today, Trump reiterated some of those concerns and said he wants the government to halt new development. "It's the most expensive energy there is. It's many, many times more expensive than clean natural gas," Trump said. "So we're going to try and have a policy where no windmills are being built." The US is on track to add more than 90GW of wind capacity by 2028, a nearly 60pc increase compared to 2024, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) said in latest Annual Energy Outlook report. If that growth materializes, wind will become the second largest source of electricity in the US at the end of of Trump's term, overtaking coal and nuclear in 2027 and 2028, respectively, according to the EIA forecast. Trump did not offer specifics on the policy, which he did not run on during his campaign. But the vast majority of wind capacity in the US is built on private land such as farms — largely in rural districts represented by Republicans — limiting the federal government's role. Trump could still threaten wind development by blocking projects on federal land, such as offshore wind projects, and working to repeal federal tax credits that subsidize wind. Democratic lawmakers said blocking wind development will raise costs for consumers and reduce energy production. "Trump is against wind energy because he doesn't understand our country's energy needs and dislikes the sight of turbines near his private country clubs," said US Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), who helped expand federal tax credits for wind through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Wind energy industry officials also raised concerns with the policy, which they said conflicted with an all-of-the-above energy strategy. "American presidents shouldn't be taking American resources away from the American people," American Clean Power chief executive Jason Grumet said. 'Gulf of America' Trump today separately reiterated his vow to "immediately" reverse Biden's withdrawal of more than 625mn acres of waters for offshore drilling, and also said he would rename the Gulf of Mexico as the "Gulf of America", which he said was a "beautiful name". In addition to expanding oil and gas production offshore, Trump said he will seek to drill in "a lot of other locations" as a way to lower prices. "The energy costs are going to come way down," Trump said. "They'll be brought down to a very low level, and that's going to bring everything else down." US consumers paid an average of $3.02/USG for regular grade gasoline in December, the lowest monthly price in more than three years. Henry Hub spot natural gas prices dropped to $2.19/mmBtu in 2024, the lowest price in four years. During his campaign, Trump said he would cut the price of energy in half within 12 months of taking office. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US 45V rules draw guarded industry, greens nods

25/01/06

US 45V rules draw guarded industry, greens nods

Houston, 6 January (Argus) — Revised federal guidelines released last week for what will be billions of dollars worth of hydrogen production tax credits drew guarded approval from both industry and environmental groups. Energy companies and associated lobbying groups hailed greater flexibility for nuclear and natural gas producers to access subsidies of as much as $3/kg of hydrogen, while climate groups cautiously cheered the administration for upholding a so-called "three-pillars" model of regulations intended to ensure hydrogen production does not increase emissions. "This framework offers an opportunity for natural gas, when paired with carbon capture and storage, to compete more fairly in new markets," said the American Petroleum Institute. Katie Ellet, chief executive of ETCH, a decarbonization technology company which aims to produce hydrogen from natural gas, called the updated guidelines "a significant step forward" and hailed new standards that adopt life-cycle emission assessments for projects using natural gas. The updated guidelines also open more pathways for renewable natural gas (RNG) developers to access tax credits, which one lobbying group said could unlock thousands of potential projects. "The final rules address key issues...including removing the first productive use penalty, which effectively treated existing sources of RNG like conventional natural gas," said the American Biogas Council. There are currently 2,400 biogas projects in operation in the US compared to a potential 24,000, said the council. "These new rules will support increased production.". Electrolytic producers, which use nuclear or renewable power to split water into hydrogen, also responded positively to the changes. "We are pleased that the US Treasure Department changed course and that the final rule allows a significant portion of the existing merchant nuclear fleet to earn credits for hydrogen production," said power utility Constellation Energy chief executive Joe Dominguez in a statement. Constellation previously warned that it would be forced to cancel a proposed $900mn hydrogen plant in Illinois if the administration did not amend rules intended to prohibit new hydrogen projects from displacing other consumers of renewable power. A prior rule stipulating projects to draw power from energy assets built no more than 36 months in advance of the hydrogen start up effectively shut out nuclear producers from accessing the subsidies. Constellation says it is still reviewing how the new rules will impact its project at the LaSalle Clean Energy Center, which is a partner at the federally funded Midwest Alliance for Clean Hydrogen (MachH2) hub. Solid pillars Environmental groups gave subdued praise to the Biden administration's decision to largely leave in place restrictions pertaining to the additionality, temporality and regionality of new renewable-power based projects. "While the final rule includes several potentially concerning exemptions, it still broadly relies on the three pillars," said Sierra Club director of climate policy Patrick Drupp in a statement. Similarly, Earthjustice nodded towards the survival of the three pillars framework but noted the tweaks still included "several significant loopholes for dirty hydrogen producers to enjoy the benefits of this important climate program." The Union of Concerned Scientists noted that final 45V rules "firmly reject the most egregious" of the loopholes sought by industry players, but still leave room for some what they call heavily polluting hydrogen projects through ongoing questions of carbon accounting. By Jasmina Kelemen Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

German fuel prices rise with new GHG quota, CO2 levy

25/01/06

German fuel prices rise with new GHG quota, CO2 levy

Hamburg, 6 January (Argus) — Prices for road fuels and heating oil in Germany rose at the start of the year as a result of an increased greenhouse gas (GHG) quota and CO2 levy, as well as higher Ice gasoil futures. Many filling stations are replenishing stocks, and low temperatures have led to more heating oil orders. German wholesale prices for heating oil, diesel, and gasoline increased because of a 1.25 percentage point increase in the GHG quota and a €10/t CO2 increase in the CO2 levy, which came in on 1 January. The increase in heating oil was €4.94/100l, in diesel €6.79/100l, and in gasoline €5.36/100l. Heating oil is excluded from Germany's GHG mandate. This price rise roughly matches Argus ' estimates from December. But higher Ice gasoil futures since the turn of the year led to a bigger price increase than originally expected. Lower gasoil imports from east of Suez into the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) hub in December are lending support to futures. Heating oil consumer stocks are on average 57pc full nationwide, but more was ordered in the first week of the new year than many traders had expected. Traders reported deal volumes of nearly 13,000m³ on January 2, the highest for a day since 15 December. One reason for this is the cold weather that has hit many regions in Germany, another is the price increase at the beginning of the year, which has boosted buying interest. Many market sources said diesel demand will only begin to pick up from the second half of January. Many wholesalers had sufficiently stocked up in December in expectation of the increased GHG quota and CO2 levy. Diesel stocks of commercial consumers were at a 12-month high of just under 59pc on 1 January, according to Argus MDX data. But stockbuilding towards the end of 2024 does not seem to have had a dampening effect on demand from filling stations. These are being resupplied since 2 January, and daily diesel amounts reported to Argus on that day were the highest since 19 December. Ship owners on the Rhine river said business will not fully resume until the second week of the year, and they expect January to remain quiet because of wholesalers' high diesel stocks. Importers' anticipated restocking with biodiesel will also not initially lead to price pressure, as the Rhine is deep enough for transit. By Johannes Guhlke Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Carbon management a must for EU clean industry: ZEP

25/01/06

Carbon management a must for EU clean industry: ZEP

Brussels, 6 January (Argus) — The European Commission must move beyond just renewables and electrification to a more holistic approach to decarbonisation, Zero Emissions Platform (ZEP) secretary-general Eadbhard Pernot told Argus ahead of the commission's expected Clean Industrial Deal proposal on 26 February. How important is this Clean Industrial Deal? The industrial sector is directly responsible for some 20-25pc of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally. If you factor in all energy emissions linked to the industrial sector — whether in power or other sectors — then you're looking at 40-45pc of GHG emissions. Under existing tools like the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), globally traded industrial products such as steel or aluminium will still be imported at lower cost from other regions, such as China, with massive oversupply. In many cases, exporters will shift existing clean production to Europe and send other carbon-intensive products elsewhere. Or they will simply import finished products like cars here without accounting for those emissions. It's a lose-lose. What other specific concrete adjustments can the EU or Clean Industrial Deal bring? Creating a market for decarbonised cement, fertilisers, steel and aluminium, for example, should be on the list of things in the Clean Industrial Deal. In many cases, governments themselves are the ones procuring products — think of bridges and other major infrastructure. That entails reform of EU procurement rules and having long-term offtake agreements. We've got a lot of industrial sites that are going to start producing decarbonised products within the next year or so. If we look at Norway's Longship Project — with multiple emitters, including the Norcem cement plant in Brevik, fertiliser producer Yara, and Haflsund's waste to energy facility — multiple industrial producers are going to be producing decarbonised products and services in the next years, built around common infrastructure projects. We have to ensure a market exists for them. How do you see the wider industrial carbon management strategy unfolding? With the EU elections in June and the start of a new commission, 2024 wasn't an ordinary year. But things are moving in the background. So far, there's been a particular focus on where the best areas are in Europe to develop commercial carbon capture and storage (CCS) sites, like the North Sea, but now it's clear that CCS is essential for the whole of Europe. Central, eastern and southern European countries are taking action. What other legislative solutions do you want to see? Currently, there are no clear EU-wide rules on how the CCS market functions — unlike for gas, power and hydrogen. So we need to secure a regulatory framework for CO2 transport, tackling competitive issues, pricing, ownership of infrastructure and third-party access. We need rules of the game for emitters, storage sites, pipelines and shippers. We hope to see that EU framework within the next 18 months. This is really important for investors and lenders too. At the moment, we only have a patchwork with the 2009 CCS Directive. And the only country with a detailed comprehensive framework is outside the EU — the UK. Do you think the EU really has the political will to push for CCS? Given the role that CCS and carbon capture and use (CCU) will have to play in emissions reductions as well as removals, industrial carbon management is essential to meet the EU's net 90pc GHG CO2 reduction target for 2040. It's non-negotiable, and politicians recognise this now across the political spectrum. Can hydrogen help decarbonise industry? Clean hydrogen certainly has the potential to decarbonise some hard-to-abate industrial processes in the long term. The hydrogen industry is also currently responsible for a significant chunk of European emissions, and that isn't discussed enough. When making grey hydrogen, we need to stop venting CO2 into the atmosphere that could otherwise just be permanently geologically stored. Our focus in the recent EU delegated act on low-carbon hydrogen was to ensure the criteria for carbon stored outside Europe meet the same standard as ours in the EU. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Indonesia’s Pertamina launches B40 bunker prices

25/01/06

Indonesia’s Pertamina launches B40 bunker prices

Singapore, 6 January (Argus) — Indonesia's state-owned refiner Pertamina issued posted bunker prices for 40pc biodiesel blend (B40) for the first time on 6 January, in line with the country's mandate . Pertamina issued B40 prices today for five locations — Jakarta, Benoa, Surabaya, Balikpapan and Batam. They are effective for the first two weeks of January. The prices issued by Pertamina are for a blend of 500ppm (0.05pc) sulphur marine gasoil (MGO) and palm oil-based biodiesel . Prices were posted at $1,103/t for the port of Jakarta, $1,085/t for Benoa, $1,049/t for Surabaya, $1,087/t for Balikpapan and $910/t for Batam. Indonesia's biodiesel sector has been preparing for the transition from B35 to B40 on 1 January . Biodiesel producers have been given until the end of February to make the transition to B40 blends for all sectors. Pertamina produces three kinds of MGO at its refineries, two grades with 500ppm sulphur content and a third grade with 50ppm. By Mahua Chakravarty Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more