Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Australian coal thrives despite China ban

  • : Coal
  • 20/12/09

Australian thermal coal prices have risen sharply in recent weeks despite an import ban from one of its traditional markets, China.

Increasingly severe domestic shortages have led to aggressive bidding by China for NAR 5,500 kcal/kg coal from non-Australian origins, including South Africa and Russia, displacing many usual buyers who were forced to chase Australian material instead.

"China may have scored an own goal by banning Australian coal. The market will always prevail," an international trader told Argus. His comment followed an extraordinary rally of nearly $10/t over the past fortnight lifting Australian NAR 5,500 kcal/kg coal to $46.89/t fob Newcastle on 4 December, according to the most recent Argus assessments.

Beijing imposed informal restrictions on Australian coal since April after Canberra called for an independent investigation into the origin of Covid-19, leaving Australian thermal coal prices in the doldrums in the second half of this year. The significantly lower prices, particularly of high-ash NAR 5,500 kcal/kg coal, drew interest from many non-traditional markets such as India, Turkey, Qatar and Myanmar (Burma), providing limited price support. Many Australian producers also scaled back output to halt further price slides.

But China's import restrictions are threatening to rebound on Beijing because of a severe northern hemisphere winter that has intensified restocking demand even as domestic production failed to compensate for steep import cuts since April. China's imports of all coal in November dropped sharply by 44pc on the year, lowering total January-November imports by 11pc compared with a year earlier. This has severely curtailed available stockpiles for winter. China's coal output is overstretched and unlikely to rise significantly in the near future, the China national coal association has said recently.

China's coal futures have been even more volatile, spiking to a record high on 8 December, with the actively traded January contract on the Zhengzhou commodity exchange closing at 702.80 yuan/t ($106.50/t). This was an unusually steep increase of Yn110/t or $16.85/t from nearly a month earlier. China's physical coal prices also surged in tandem with the futures. Argus last assessed Chinese NAR 5,500 kcal/kg coal at 671.25 yuan/t fob Qinhuangdao on 4 December, up by Yn42.25/t over the week. In dollar terms, the price gained $6.81/t to $102.47/t to reach a more than two-year high. This was much higher than the government-set upper limit of Yn600/t, underscoring the severity of domestic shortages.

Additional import quotas of nearly 20mn t were granted to some coastal provinces recently but they have done little to calm the market given the magnitude of China's demand. Some Chinese domestic thermal coal indexes had to stop publishing prices last week because they were much higher than the government-recommended levels, illustrating the sensitivity surrounding shortage-driven price hikes.

Struggle to raise output

A series of mining accidents involving fatalities in China have put pressure on the authorities to step up safety inspections nationwide, curtailing domestic output. The latest coal mining accident happened on 4 December in the southwestern city of Chongqing, killing 23 workers, according to state media Xinhua news. This follows an earlier accident in the same city in September that killed 16 workers.

Many Chinese producers are reluctant to exceed government-allocated production quotas for fear of incurring personal and corporate penalties. Inner Mongolia, the country's second-largest producing region, has faced an extensive central government-driven probe into overproduction and licensing this year. This has prompted coal producers there to resist calls to increase output.

A state-controlled mine in China's largest coal-producing province Shanxi was suspended last month for allegedly exceeding production quotas, which is considered a safety hazard.

Permission for coal producers in China to exceed production quotas is up to more than one government department and producers want a coordinated response before they can proceed legally with expansions. Such a coordinated response is unlikely after mining accidents that have put the spotlight on safety and because the Inner Mongolia mine probe by a central government commission is being conducted independently of other government departments.

Arbitrage opportunities

Increasing December production in China is too late to alleviate possible shortages in January, prompting aggressive bids by China-based buyers for increasingly scarce Russian, South African and Colombian NAR 5,500 kcal/kg coal. This is despite the presence of trace elements that could render coal from such origins unsuitable for typical Chinese buyers.

At least four Capesize cargoes of South African coal loading in December and January were sold to Chinese buyers recently. But the earliest that South African material loading this winter can reach Chinese ports would be January, with more time needed for customs clearance before it reaches utilities.

Strong Chinese demand also pushed up Russian NAR 5,500 kcal/kg prices, which rose by $2.95/t on the week to $61.75/t fob Vostochny on 4 December. But there is limited availability of NAR 5,500 kcal/kg coal from Russia, South Africa, Colombia and Indonesia, prompting some sellers to hold back as they expect bids to rise further.

The lifting of the overall seaborne price complex on the back of Chinese bidding has benefited Australian coal by sustaining its arbitrage into non-China markets. One trader estimated the arbitrage for Australian NAR 5,500 kcal/kg coal into India at around $9/t on 4 December, based on current spot prices and freight compared with NAR 5,500 kcal/kg South African coal. The arbitrage spread suggests there is still room for Australian NAR 5,500 kcal/kg prices to rise further, so long as China bids continue to pay higher prices for similar coal from other origins.

China is still importing large quantities of Australian iron ore to sustain its booming steel industry given a lack of alternative sources. It remains to be seen if the impact of the thermal coal shortages, which disproportionately affect China's heavily populated industrial coastal regions, will be sufficient to nudge Beijing into giving Australian coal the same treatment as iron ore imports.

Chinese coal imports (all) mn t

Chinese coal production mn t

Year-on-year change in supply mn t

NAR 5,500 kcal/kg coal prices $/t

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/04/17

IMF anticipates lower growth from US tariffs

IMF anticipates lower growth from US tariffs

Washington, 17 April (Argus) — Economic growth projections set for release next week will include "notable markdowns" caused by higher US tariffs that have been disrupting trade and stressing financial markets, IMF managing director Kristalina Georgieva said today. The IMF earlier this month warned that the tariffs that President Donald Trump was placing on trading partners could pose a "significant risk" to the global economy. Those higher trade barriers are on track to reduce growth, raise prices for consumers and create incremental costs related to uncertainty, the IMF plans to say in its World Economic Outlook on 22 April. "Our new growth projections will include notable markdowns, but not recession," Georgieva said Thursday in a speech previewing the outlook. "We will also see markups to the inflation forecasts for some countries." Trump has already placed an across-the-board 10pc tariff on most trading partners, with higher tariffs on some goods from Canada and Mexico, a 145pc tariff on China, and an exception for most energy imports. Those tariffs — combined with Trump's on-again, off-again threats to impose far higher tariffs — have been fueling uncertainty for businesses and trading partners. The recent tariff "increases, pauses, escalations and exemption" will likely have significant consequences for the global economy, Georgieva said, resulting in a postponement of investment decisions, ships at sea not knowing where to sail, precautionary savings and more volatile financial markets. Higher tariffs will cause an upfront hit to economic growth, she said, and could cause a shift in trade under which some sectors could be "flooded by cheap imports" while other sectors face shortages. The IMF has yet to release its latest growth projections. But in January, IMF expected global growth would hold steady at 3.3pc this year with lower inflation. The IMF at the time had forecast the US economy would grow by 2.7pc, with 1pc growth in Europe and 4.5pc growth in China. The upcoming markdown in growth projections from the IMF aligns with analyses from many banks and economists. US Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell on 16 April said the recent increase in tariffs were likely to contribute to "higher inflation and slower growth". Those comments appear to have infuriated Trump, who has wanted Powell to cut interest rates in hopes of stimulating growth in the US. "Powell's termination cannot come fast enough!" Trump wrote today on social media. Powell's term as chair does not end until May 2026. Under a longstanding US Supreme Court case called Humphrey's Executor , Trump does not have the authority to unilaterally fire commissioners at independent agencies such as the Federal Reserve. Trump has already done so at other agencies such as the US Federal Trade Commission, creating a potential avenue to overturn the decision. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Dozens of US coal plants eligible for MATS extension


25/04/15
25/04/15

Dozens of US coal plants eligible for MATS extension

Cheyenne, 15 April (Argus) — The White House has identified more than 60 fossil fuel-fired power plants that will have two extra years to comply with the more stringent mercury and air toxics standards (MATS) finalized in 2024. Under a proclamation signed by US president Donald Trump last week, the plants on the list will be able to operate under whatever existing mercury and air toxics standards they currently are subject to until 8 July 2029. That is two years after the compliance deadline put in place in May 2024. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules finalized last year tightened mercury and air toxics standards for coal- and oil-fired units by 67pc, included new emissions-monitoring requirements and added standards for lignite-fired coal plants that put them in line with those for other coal plants. EPA in March said it was reviewing the new standards and said companies could seek exemptions to the mercury rule and other emissions rules. Trump followed that up last week with a proclamation that certain generating facilities would be given a two-year exemption in complying with the 2024 rule. The White House released the list of exempt power plants late on 14 April. Most of the plants on the list are coal-fired generators, some of which were scheduled for retirement by the end of 2027. These include Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston plant and one unit of its Cumberland plant, as well as Vistra Energy's Kincaid, Baldwin and Newton plants and two coal units of Vistra's Miami Fort plant. The two coal units at Southern Company's Victor J Daniel plant in Mississippi also have been exempted from the new mercury and air toxics rules for two years. Southern had planned on retiring those units by the end of 2027, but in February, the Mississippi Public Service Commission approved two special contracts that were expected to need unit 2 of the Daniel plant and possibly a unit of a natural gas plant to run into the 2030s. Some other coal plant units owned by Southern, TVA and Vistra also are now exempt from the July 2027 mercury and air toxics compliance deadline. So are some plant units owned by East Kentucky Power Cooperative (EKPC), NRG, Ameren and Entergy. At least two natural gas plant units — unit 5 of Southern's Plant Barry and City Utilities of Springfield's John Twitty Energy Center, which has coal and natural gas generation — are exempt from the July 2027 deadline. So is unit 5 of Entergy's RS Nelson plant, which runs on petroleum coke. Essentially all of the other units in the White House's list are coal units, including Otter Tail Power's Big Stone and Coyote Station plants in North Dakota. Otter Tail said it had requested the exemptions "to avoid making unnecessary expenditures" if EPA decides to roll back the 2024 rule. EKPC said it was "grateful" its request to exempt the Spurlock and Cooper coal-fired power plants in Kentucky was granted and that the company "will continue to operate the plants in accordance with all market and environmental rules." NRG said it was still reviewing the order, but did not expect it to have any effect on its plans. TVA, Southern, Vistra and owners of other power plants given compliance extensions did not respond to requests for comment. By Courtney Schlisserman Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australian coal methane emissions under-reported: Ember


25/04/15
25/04/15

Australian coal methane emissions under-reported: Ember

London, 15 April (Argus) — Australian coal miners emitted 40pc more methane in 2020 than they reported, energy think-tank Ember said in a review of satellite data released today. The organisation, along with energy intelligence company Kayrros, analysed methane emissions from four mining "clusters" in Queensland in 2020, which account for roughly three fourths of the state's thermal coal and almost all of its coking coal production. The investigators found "a total of 1.42 ± 0.19 million tonnes of methane released from coal mines" in that year. Miners in the state reported 1.01mnt of methane emissions during the same period. The difference between reported and actual emissions was much larger in New South Wales, Ember said. "While the state reported 379,000t of methane in 2020, our satellite study identified 721,000t of methane that year, while only accounting for approximately 61pc of the state's coal production," the organisation said. If all coal mines in New South Wales followed the same trend, this would suggest total methane emissions of 1.2mn t, more than three times the figure producers reported to the government. Ember are not the only organisation criticising Australia's official numbers. Climate Trace and Open Methane, two organisations monitoring greenhouse gas emissions by satellite, suggest that Australian coal miners are only reporting half of their methane emissions. Academics supported by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), writing in the American Chemical Society, published an article this year saying that trading company Glencore's Hail Creek mine was emitting four to five times more methane than it reported. Glencore sharply criticised the Hail Creek report, saying the study's aerial surveys lacked credibility because they were based on very limited samples and did not consider "inherent mining variability." The firm said that the report "failed to detect methane emissions" that it had reported itself. The producer, one of the country's largest, has repeatedly criticised satellite measures of methane emissions. The method, the firm said in a 2022 statement, is vulnerable to "atmospheric contaminants such as dust, water vapour or smoke" and cannot reliably detect the amount of greenhouse gases coming from mines. The Australian government launched a review of their methane reporting last year in light of the new satellite techniques used by researchers. The UK and EU are both planning a carbon tax on imported goods called the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) in the next two years. If either government were to accept Ember's figures, they could theoretically raise taxes on imported steel made with Australian coking coal. Neither government plans on taxing coal imports directly under CBAM. By Austin Barnes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Indonesian coal producer Bukit Asam to raise 2025 capex


25/04/15
25/04/15

Indonesian coal producer Bukit Asam to raise 2025 capex

Manila, 15 April (Argus) — Indonesian state-owned coal producer Bukit Asam has increased its 2025 capital expenditure (capex) plan from a year earlier, as it focuses on completing key projects to support its expansion plans. The company said it has earmarked 7.2 trillion Indonesian rupiah ($428mn) as the capital expenditure (capex) plan for this year, a more than three-fold increase from last year's Rp2.35 trillion. Bukit Asam will fund around 80pc of the capex via loans while the remainder will be from the company's own coffers. The company said that it is able to be more aggressive with loans since it has a healthy debt-to-equity ratio of 0.6. The bulk of the capex will be used for the completion of the Tanjung Enim-Kramasan coal railway system, a key infrastructure project to allow the company to increase its coal production. The commercial operation of the railway project will boost the company's transportation capacity by another 20mn t/yr of coal. Construction of the railway project started in 2023 with a target to operationalise the line in 2025, but the project ran into delays. Bukit Asam is now targeting to open the line by the third quarter of 2026. This will be in line with the company's long-term plan of boosting output to 100mn t/yr by 2030. Bukit Asam is also increasing investments in its downstream project, in line with the government's push to develop the downstream coal industry. It has already partnered with Indonesia's National Research and Innovation Agency to develop artificial graphite sheets using Bukit Asam's coal. The pilot project has seen moderate success, but improvements are still needed to reach economic feasibility. Additional funds would help to improve conductivity and density to reach international standards, with the goal of commercial operations by 2028. The project is important for Bukit Asam, as it sees an increase in usage for artificial graphite sheets, ahead with the rising popularity of electric vehicles that would make Li-ion battery parts manufacturing an attractive coal downstream avenue. By Antonio delos Reyes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Funding cuts could delay US river lock work: Correction


25/04/14
25/04/14

Funding cuts could delay US river lock work: Correction

Corrects lock locations in paragraph 5. Houston, 14 April (Argus) — The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) will have to choose between various lock reconstruction and waterway projects for its annual construction plan after its funding was cut earlier this year. Last year Congress allowed the Corps to use $800mn from unspent infrastructure funds for other waterways projects. But when Congress passed a continuing resolutions for this year's budget they effectively removed that $800mn from what was a $2.6bn annual budget for lock reconstruction and waterways projects. This means a construction plan that must be sent to Congress by 14 May can only include $1.8bn in spending. No specific projects were allocated funding by Congress, allowing the Corps the final say on what projects it pursues under the new budget. River industry trade group Waterways Council said its top priority is for the Corps to provide a combined $205mn for work at the Montgomery lock in Pennsylvania on the Ohio River and Chickamauga lock in Tennessee on the Tennessee River since they are the nearest to completion and could become more expensive if further delayed. There are seven active navigation construction projects expected to take precedent, including the following: the Chickamauga and Kentucky Locks on the Tennessee River; Locks 2-4 on the Monongahela River; the Three Rivers project on the Arkansas River; the LaGrange Lock on the Illinois River; Lock 25 on the Mississippi River; and the Montgomery Lock on the Ohio River. There are three other locks in Texas, Pennsylvania and Illinois that are in the active design phase (see map) . By Meghan Yoyotte Corps active construction projects 2025 Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more