Brazil launches coal power program with 2050 end date

: Electricity, Emissions
21/08/09

The Brazilian government launched a program to encourage the continued use of coal-fired power in the face of a drought-induced power shortage.

The ordinance launched today, which runs counter to most global efforts to penalize coal fired power and other higher carbon fuels, has three objectives: preserving the existing coal power industry — which is concentrated in Brazil's southern region and provides a capacity of 1,572MW; lessening the coal industry's environmental impact; and encouraging contracting of installed coal power capacity.

Coal has became less competitive than other fuels in recent years from an efficiency perspective — with only 32pc efficiency against natural gas' 60pc, for example — while its higher emissions made it less attractive. This led to it losing governmental financing and space in Brazil's power auctions.

The Brazilian coal mining industry has tried to keep the sector alive, as a subsidy being paid by all regulated power consumers is set to expire in 2027.

The proposal calls for unspecified financial incentives for Brazil's coal-fired thermal plants to be put under contract through auctions for the regulated power market. Currently, most of the country's energy is already contracted in this kind of auction, in which the government follows its energy policy to determine which kinds of plants should be considered. The last time a coal-powered thermal plant was hired in an auction was in 2014.

The program also proposes that the government should invest in the modernization of Brazil's coal-fired plants, making them more sustainable, while also making them more attractive during auctions. It also proposes government help in searching for new powerplant financing or retrofitting of existing ones, including using public funding.

The proposal also suggests auction contracts with due dates that extend until 2050, Brazil's current deadline for the decarbonization of its energy grid. The ordinance argues that this is a cheaper alternative to Brazil's risk of an electrical blackout, as coal is an "indigenousfuel, not dollar-denominated."

By Rebecca Gompertz

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/04/03

EU Parliament approves delay to climate policies

London, 3 April (Argus) — The European Parliament today voted to postpone the application of the corporate sustainability due diligence directive (CSDDD) and the corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD), with final approval now required from the European Council. The European Parliament has backed some of the key proposals from the European Commission's omnibus package submitted in February , which aims to delay the start of due diligence and sustainability reporting requirements by one and two years, respectively. The CSDDD would require large firms to adopt plans to mitigate their climate impact, keeping global temperatures within 1.5°C of pre-industrial levels, as per the Paris climate agreement. Under the new proposals, member states have until July 2027 to transpose the rules into national legislation, with the first wave of affected business required to be compliant from 2028. The CSRD came into force at the beginning of 2024, introducing mandatory climate and energy disclosures for some businesses. The use of certificates such as guarantees of origin and renewable power purchase agreements are the only ways recognised in the original text to document use of renewable energy. February's omnibus package sought to delay the start of reporting for companies with more than 250 employees as well as small and medium-sized enterprises by two years to 2028 and 2029, respectively. The next step in the legislative process requires formal approval from the European Council, which already indicated an agreement in an initial position adopted on 26 March. In addition to delaying the application dates, the commission is also seeking to amend the content and scope of both directives. Notably, for sustainability reporting, the changes would see 80pc of companies falling outside the initial scope . By Giulio Bajona Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Article 6 credits 'could provide CBAM cost flexibility'

25/04/02

Article 6 credits 'could provide CBAM cost flexibility'

Lisbon, 2 April (Argus) — Allowing the use of credits issued under Article 6 of the Paris climate agreement for compliance with the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) could provide flexibility for developing countries that lack the capacity to set up their own carbon pricing systems in response to the measure, delegates at a conference in Lisbon, Portugal, heard today. The CBAM regulation provides for a carbon price already paid on a product in its country of origin to be deducted from CBAM costs, providing an incentive for countries importing products covered by the measure to the EU to introduce equivalent carbon pricing systems. But developing countries often lack the capacity to enact such policies, the chief sustainability and innovation officer at ACT Group, Federico di Credico, told delegates, and allowing the use of Article 6 credits for compliance could provide an alternative. This could in one form take place implicitly, di Credico said, if CBAM liabilities are adjusted down in relation to pricing systems that themselves allow some compliance using Article 6 credits. An example of this is Singapore, where 5pc of the country's carbon tax can be offset through the purchase of Article 6 internationally traded mitigation outcomes (Itmos). A more direct inclusion of Article 6 credits for compliance could entail a calculation on a euro-for-euro basis, di Credico suggested, for example reducing a CBAM liability of €100 to €50 if the importer has purchased €50-worth of Article 6 credits. Using a tonne-for-tonne basis would not work because the CBAM is not volume based, he said. But the uncertainty surrounding Article 6 credits means that their inclusion would bring an added layer of complexity to the CBAM, Cedric de Meeus of cement producer Holcim said. Article 6 credits are not usable in the EU emissions trading system (ETS), which forms the reference price for the CBAM, he pointed out, while not all activities producing Article 6 credits would be equivalent to the deep decarbonisation being carried out by European industry. It remains unclear how the EU will take into account carbon prices in other jurisdictions for the purposes of the CBAM. The CBAM regulation includes the ability to credit a "carbon price… effectively paid in the country of origin" but does not define what falls within this term, and the implementing regulation that will provide further detail on the matter has not yet been tabled. Article 6 of the Paris deal provides for two carbon pricing mechanisms allowing countries to collaborate voluntarily to reduce their emissions. Article 6.2, which is already fully operational, produces Itmos through bilateral agreements on emissions reduction or removal projects, while Article 6.4 establishes the soon-to-be-implemented Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (Pacm), a UN-regulated global carbon crediting system. By Victoria Hatherick Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Transition technology draws energy R&D spend: IEA

25/04/02

Transition technology draws energy R&D spend: IEA

London, 2 April (Argus) — Public and corporate spending on energy research and development (R&D) is "trending upwards", with a focus on "low-emissions" technology, but venture capital investment in energy start-ups dropped last year, energy watchdog the IEA found. Government and corporate energy R&D spending increased to $50bn and over $160bn, respectively, in 2023 — the latest year for which full data are available, the IEA said. There are "early indications of continued growth in 2024", although the pace of growth has "slowed slightly" since 2022, it added. But "the momentum of investing in low-emissions energy technologies has been maintained", partly on the back of climate policy goals, the IEA noted. The share of "low-emissions" energy R&D spending has held at "roughly four-fifths of the global total" in recent years, the IEA said. It defines low-emissions energy as renewable power, grids and storage, energy efficiency, nuclear and "low-emissions fuels". Venture capital investments in energy start-ups totalled around $27bn in 2024, 23pc lower on the year, the IEA found. This reflects the "cyclical nature" of venture capital, as well as a drop in funding owed to inflation, but the trend "could have long-term negative impacts as innovators struggle to scale up high-potential technologies without access to affordable capital", the watchdog noted. The IEA also suggested that "the situation is compounded by uncertainties about political commitments to the climate policies that many start-ups depend on to drive demand". But venture capital financing rose in 2024 for start-ups focused on nuclear, synthetic fuels and carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS), it found. CCUS and "novel CDR" — carbon removal — technologies have drawn more venture capital funding in recent years, and sector R&D "is being spurred on by private capital mobilised by carbon credits", the IEA said. There are multiple ways to capture and store CO2, but many are at very early stages, while most funding goes towards just two approaches — direct air capture and bioenergy with CCS, its report found. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia’s gas leaders hit out at market intervention

25/04/02

Australia’s gas leaders hit out at market intervention

Sydney, 2 April (Argus) — Senior figures in Australia's upstream gas sector have hit out at plans for intervention in the heavily regulated industry, as debate continues on how to best address domestic supply shortfalls later this decade. The federal Coalition in March announced National Gas Plan including a 50-100 PJ/yr (1.34bn-2.68bn m³/yr) domestic reservation system aimed at forcing the three LNG exporters based in Queensland's Gladstone to direct more supply to the eastern states' market. But oversupplying the market to drive down prices would destroy the viability of smaller gas projects, Australian independent Beach Energy's chief executive Brett Woods said at a conference in Sydney on 1 April. The domestic-focused firm, which will export some LNG volumes via its Waitsia project in 2025, warns that such a move by the Peter Dutton-led opposition would reduce export incomes while harming Australia's international reputation. The volumes impacted by the policy could reach around 900,000-1.8mn t/yr. Expropriation of developed reserves is equivalent to breaking contracts with LNG buyers and with the foreign and local investors that the country needs for ongoing economic security, Woods said on 1 April. Domestic gas reservation systems put in place by the state governments of Western Australia (WA) and Queensland, designed to keep local markets well supplied, were "clearly supportable", Woods said, but only future supply should be subject to the regulations. LNG terminals, which represent about 70pc of eastern Australia's total gas consumption and shipped 24mn t in 2024 , should not be blamed for the failure of governments to expedite new supply and plan for Australia's gas future, head of Shell Australia Cecile Wake said in response to the Coalition's proposal. Shell's QGC business supplied 15pc of its volumes to the local grid, with the remainder shipped from its 8.5mn t/yr Queensland Curtis LNG project, Wake added. Canberra has moved to promote gas use as a transition fuel to firm renewable energy in line with its 2030 emissions reduction targets, but progress has been slow as reforming laws appear to be hampering development . The state governments, particularly in gas-poor Victoria and New South Wales (NSW), must recognise the need for locally-produced supply and streamline the approvals processes, especially environmental permits, executives said. But despite pleas for an end to years of interventionist policy — including the governing Labor party's measures to cap the price of domestic gas at A$12/GJ , Australia's fractured political environment and rising cost of living has sparked largely populist responses from its leaders. A so-called "hung" parliament is likely to result from the 3 May poll , with a variety of mainly left-leaning independents representing an anti-fossil fuel agenda expected to control the balance of power in Australia's parliament. LNG debate sharpens Debate on the causes of southern Australia's gas deficit has persisted, and the ironic outcome of underinvestment in gas supply could be LNG re-imports from Gladstone to NSW, Victoria and South Australia, making fracked coal-bed methane — liquefied in Queensland and regasified — a likely higher-emissions alternative to pipeline supply. Several developers are readying for this possibility , which is considered inevitable without action to increase supply in Victoria or NSW, increase winter storages or raise north-south pipeline capacity. Australian pipeline operator APA appears to have the most to lose out of the active firms in the gas sector. APA chief executive Adam Watson this week criticised plans for imports, because relying on LNG will set the price of domestic gas at a detrimental level, raise emissions and decrease reliability of supply, Watson said. The firm is planning to increase its eastern pipeline capacity by 25pc to bring new supplies from the Bass, Surat and Beetaloo basins to market. But investment certainty is needed or Australia will risk needing to subsidise coal-fired power for longer if sufficient gas is unavailable to back up wind and solar generators with peaking power, Watson said. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

LNG stocks at Japan’s power utilities rise

25/04/02

LNG stocks at Japan’s power utilities rise

Osaka, 2 April (Argus) — LNG inventories at Japan's main power utilities increased during the week to 30 March, as warmer weather reduced electricity demand for heating purposes and limited gas-fired generation. The utilities held 2.24mn t of LNG on 30 March, up by 22pc from a week earlier, according to a weekly survey by the trade and industry ministry Meti. This was higher by 51pc compared with 1.48mn t at the end of March 2024 and up by 10pc against 2.03mn t — the average end-March stocks over 2020-24. A seasonal rise in temperatures weighed on power demand, which fell by 12pc on the week to 87GW across 24-30 March, according to the Organisation for Cross-regional Co-ordination of Transmission Operators (Occto). This resulted in a 24pc fall in gas-fired output to an average of 24GW during the period, the Occto data showed. Coal- and oil-fed generation also fell by 14pc to 23GW and by 21pc to 409MW respectively in the same period. The lower demand has created extra supplies to be sold on the wholesale market. This has weighed on day-ahead prices on the Japan Electric Power Exchange (Jepx) and worsened generation economics for the country's thermal power plants. Margins at a 58pc-efficient gas-fired unit running on oil-priced LNG supplies fell into negative territory, with the spark spread averaging at a loss of -¥2.28/kWh ($15.22/MWh) across 24-30 March, compared with the previous week's profit of ¥0.84/kWh. The 58pc spark spread using spot LNG widened the deficit, with the margin averaging at a loss of -¥3.79/kWh against the previous week's -¥0.80/kWh, based on the ANEA — the Argus assessment for spot LNG deliveries to northeast Asia. Coal remained competitive in Japan's merit order. But the dark spread of a 40pc-efficient coal-fired unit also fell by 64pc on the week to an average of ¥1.63/kWh over 24-30 March, based on Argus' spot coal and freight assessments. By Motoko Hasegawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more