Compensation adds to Singapore bunker contamination row

: Oil products
22/04/27

Shipowners that have suffered losses from taking contaminated high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) in Singapore are uncertain how they will be compensated, as a market tightness sees delivered premiums for the marine fuel spike.

Singapore's Maritime and Port Authority (MPA) on 13 April named trading firm Glencore as the initial supplier of the contaminated HSFO in Singapore, the world's largest bunkering hub. The contaminated fuel was then supplied to Chinese bunker supplier PetroChina, which in turn supplied about 200 vessels in Singapore, with about 80 suffering fuel pump and engine damage because of the presence of chlorinated compounds.

Market participants said that shipowners will possibly see debunkering and replacement of cargo costs met by the supplier of the contaminated fuel, but not the demurrage or potential mechanical repair costs incurred by the vessel.

Oslo-based marine insurance provider Skuld said on 1 April that it had seen an "increased number of protection and indemnity and hull claims related to high-sulphur fuel oil at Singapore and which were found to be contaminated with chlorinated compounds." But when contacted by Argus regarding a potential spread of the contamination beyond Singapore, it declined to offer further comment beyond that already published on its website.

Market participants are varied in their views of how long the situation will take to be resolved, with some saying it will possibly last until the end of May. Others said it could take many months to be finalised. There is no blanket fix, with any compensation to parties involved having to be handled on a case-by-case basis, they added.

Most shipowners are already paying a premium for Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GCMS) pre-testing, an advanced and more expensive fuel quality test compared with conventional ISO 8217 tests. The results of these tests are usually available in a day. But this has increased to 2-3 days as a result of increased demand following the contamination crisis, further increasing demurrage costs.

Vessels that have taken on contaminated fuel can still sail and usually can make their way to the nearest port for debunkering. It is uncertain what then happens to the contaminated fuel once offloaded. Suppliers might blend down the contaminants in the reclaimed contaminated fuel, although it will be a complicated process requiring large volumes, said market participants.

Glencore placed daily bids for HSFO cargoes in online trading in the first two weeks of April, although it could not be confirmed if this was related to the contamination.

"Contaminated fuel oil retains some of its value, and it might get sold in the market at the cargo price minus $100-150/t or so", said a local buyer whose vessels had also been affected.

Tightness spurs firmer prices

Singapore 180cst HSFO margins against Dubai crude values entered positive territory for the first time since November 2020 at $0.83/bl on 1 April, which was around when the contamination was discovered, on expectations of a tightening of supplies. They then widened to a record $4.38/bl on 12 April, the highest since Argus started assessments in July 2006. They fell to -$0.57/bl on 25 April, probably because of rare regional exports. But this is still higher than average -$6.06/bl margins in the second half of 2021.

The delivered premium, or the additional price of delivered bunker fuel over the cargo price, has averaged $65/t so far this month compared with a more typical $10-15/t. HSFO delivered premiums last reached such levels in September 2019-January 2020 when the marine fuel market was anticipating and navigating the International Maritime Organisation's 2020 global sulphur cap.

Bunker fuels have always been an important component for freight, as it affect shipowners' earnings and at times comprises a sizable portion of the freight cost. The higher fuel costs and uncertainty surrounding the contamination issue have led to shipowners increasing their offer levels, freight participants said. The long downtime taken by vessels as they repair or replace their failed fuel pumps and engines will have reduced the amount of available tonnages, adding further pressure to already tight supply woes in Asia-Pacific.

More stringent regulations by Singapore's MPA are expected to prevent future fuel contamination crises. One such measure could be making GCMS testing mandatory, which a majority of bunker buyers support based on a survey by UK-based bunker broker NSI.

Sammy Six, Sarah Giam and Sean Zhuang

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/11/22

Cop 29 goes into overtime on finance deadlock

Developing countries' discontent over the climate finance offer is meeting a muted response, writes Caroline Varin Baku, 22 November (Argus) — As the UN Cop 29 climate conference went into overtime, early reactions of consternation towards a new climate finance draft quickly gave way to studious silence, and some new numbers floated by developing nations. Parties are negotiating a new collective quantified goal — or climate finance target — building on the $100bn/yr that developed countries agreed to deliver to developing countries over 2020-25. The updated draft of the new finance goal text — the centrepiece of this Cop — proposes a figure of $250bn/yr by 2035, "from a wide variety of sources, public and private, bilateral and multilateral, including alternative sources". This is the developed country parties' submission, the Cop 29 presidency acknowledged. Developing nations have been waiting for this number for months, and calling on developed economies to come up with one throughout this summit. They rejected the offer instantly. "The [$250bn/yr] offered by developed countries is a spit in the face of vulnerable nations like mine," Panama's lead climate negotiator, Juan Carlos Monterrey Gomez, said. Negotiating group the Alliance of Small Island States called it "a cap that will severely stagnate climate action efforts". The African Group of Negotiators and Colombia called it "unacceptable". This is far off the mark for developing economies, which earlier this week floated numbers of $440bn-600bn/yr for a public finance layer. They also called for $1.3 trillion/yr in total climate finance from developed countries, a sum which the new text instead calls for "all actors" to work toward. China reiterated on 21 November that "the voluntary support" of the global south was not to be counted towards the goal. A UN-mandated expert group indicated that the figure put forward by developed countries "is too low" and not consistent with the Paris Agreement goals. The new finance goal for developing countries, based on components that it covers, should commit developed countries to provide at least $300bn/yr by 2030 and $390bn/yr by 2035, it said. Brazil indicated that it is now pushing for these targets. The final amount for the new finance goal could potentially be around $300bn-350bn/yr, a Somalian delegate told Argus . A goal of $300bn/yr by 2035 is achievable with projected finance, further reforms and shareholder support at multilateral development banks (MDBs), and some growth in bilateral funding, climate think-tank WRI's finance programme director, Melanie Robinson, said. "Going beyond [$300bn/yr] would even be possible if a high proportion of developing countries' share of MDB finance is included," she added. All eyes turn to the EU Unsurprisingly, developed nations offered more muted responses. "It has been a significant lift over the past decade to meet the prior goal [of $100bn/yr]," a senior US official said, and the new goal will require even more ambition and "extraordinary reach". The US has just achieved its target to provide $11bn/yr in climate finance under the Paris climate agreement by 2024. But US climate funding is likely to dry up once president-elect Donald Trump, a climate sceptic who withdrew the US from the Paris accord during his first term, takes office. Norway simply told Argus that the delegation was "happier" with the text. The EU has stayed silent, with all eyes on the bloc as the US' influence wanes. The EU contributed €28.6bn ($29.8bn) in climate finance from public budgets in 2023. Developed nations expressed frustration towards the lack of progress on mitigation — actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Mentions of fossil fuels have been removed from new draft texts, including "transitioning away" from fossil fuels. This could still represent a potential red line for them. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Cop: Brazil eyes $300bn/yr for climate finance goal

24/11/22

Cop: Brazil eyes $300bn/yr for climate finance goal

Baku, 22 November (Argus) — Brazil has set out a suggestion of "at least" $300bn/yr in climate finance to be provided by developed countries to developing nations. Brazilian representatives set out their proposal today, in response to a draft text on a new climate finance goal. Brazil's proposal of $300bn/yr in climate finance by 2030 and $390bn/yr by 2035 are in line with the recommendations of a UN-mandated expert group. Negotiations at Cop are continuing late into the evening of the official last day of the conference, with no final texts in sight. Discussions centre around the new collective quantified goal (NCQG) — the climate financing that will be made available to developing countries in the coming years to help them reduce emissions and adapt to the effects of climate change. The presidency draft text released this morning put the figure at $250bn/yr by 2035, with a call for "all actors" to work towards a stretch goal of $1.3tn/yr. Representatives of developing countries have reacted angrily to the figure put forward in the text, saying it is far too low. Brazil's proposal appears to call for all of the $300bn-$390bn to be made up of direct public financing, which could then mobilise further funding to reach the $1.3tn/yr. It was inspired by the findings of a UN report, Brazil said. The UN-backed independent high-level group on climate finance today said that the $250bn/yr figure was "too low," and recommended the higher $300bn-390bn/yr goal. Brazil's ask would be a significant step up in the required public financing. The $250bn/yr target includes direct public financing and mobilised private financing, and potentially includes contributions from both developed and developing countries. Wealthier developing countries have been hesitant to see their climate financing fall in this category, which they say should be made up exclusively of developed country money, in line with the Paris Agreement. But $300bn/yr would represent an increase in ambition, Brazil said, while the $250bn/yr called for in the draft text would be very similar to the $100bn/yr goal set in 2009, after taking into account inflation. Delegates at Cop look set to continue discussions into the night. A plenary session planned for late in the evening, which would have allowed parties to express their positions in public, has been cancelled, suggesting groups still have differences to hammer out. By Rhys Talbot Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Cop: Drafts point to trade-off on finance, fossil fuels

24/11/22

Cop: Drafts point to trade-off on finance, fossil fuels

Baku, 22 November (Argus) — The new draft on the climate finance goal from the UN Cop 29 climate summit presidency has developed nations contributing $250bn/yr by 2035, while language on fossil fuels has been dropped, indicating work towards a compromise on these two central issues. There is no mention of fossil fuels in either the new draft text on the global stocktake — which follows up the outcome of Cop 28 last year, including "transitioning away" from fossil fuels — or in the new draft for the climate finance goal. Developed countries wanted a reference to moving away from fossil fuels included, indicating that not having one would be a red line. The new draft text on the climate finance goal would mark a substantial compromise for developing countries, with non-profit WRI noting that this is "the bridging text". Parties are negotiating the next iteration of the $100bn/yr that developed countries agreed to deliver to developing nations over 2020-25 — known as the new collective quantified goal (NCQG). The new draft sets out a figure of $250bn/yr by 2035, "from a wide variety of sources, public and private, bilateral and multilateral, including alternative sources". It also notes that developed countries will "take the lead". It sets out that the finance could come from multilateral development banks (MDBs) too. "It has been a significant lift over the past decade to meet the prior, smaller goal... $250bn will require even more ambition and extraordinary reach," a US official said. "This goal will need to be supported by ambitious bilateral action, MDB contributions and efforts to better mobilise private finance, among other critical factors," the official added. India had indicated earlier this week that the country was seeking around $600bn/yr for a public finance layer from developed countries. Developing countries had been asking for $1.3 trillion/yr in climate finance from developed countries, a sum which the new text instead calls for "all actors" to work toward. The draft text acknowledges the need to "enable the scaling up of financing… from all public and private sources" to that figure. On the contributor base — which developed countries have long pushed to expand — the text indicates that climate finance contributions from developing countries could supplement the finance goal. It is unclear how this language will land with developing nations. China yesterday reiterated that "the voluntary support" of the global south is not part of the goal. The global stocktake draft largely focuses on the initiatives set out by the Cop 29 presidency, on enhancing power grids and energy storage, though it does stress the "urgent need for accelerated implementation of domestic mitigation measures". It dropped a previous option, opposed by Saudi Arabia, that mentioned actions aimed at "transitioning away from fossil fuels". Mitigation, or cutting emissions, and climate finance have been the overriding issues at Cop 29. Developing countries have long said they cannot decarbonise or implement an energy transition without adequate finance. Developed countries are calling for substantially stronger global action on emissions reduction. By Georgia Gratton and Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Singapore light distillate stocks hit seven-week high

24/11/22

Singapore light distillate stocks hit seven-week high

Singapore, 22 November (Argus) — Singapore light distillate and middle distillate inventories rose to multi-week highs while residual fuel stocks fell to a three-week low for the week ending 20 November, according to Enterprise Singapore. Singapore's light distillates stocks rose to a seven-week high, boosted by increased naphtha imports and an onslaught of gasoline cargoes from Saudi Arabia into the city-state. Naphtha imports rose by 21pc on the week to 1.98mn bl. Kuwait, India, and the UAE were the top three suppliers to Singapore this week. Kuwait likely exported more naphtha to Asia this month, as an issue at its reformer resulted in more spare naphtha on hand for exports. More Saudi Arabian gasoline cargoes entered Singapore, adding to stocks. Singapore received another 800,000 bl of gasoline from the Mideast Gulf nation after already receiving similar volumes last week. Middle distillates stocks rose further to a six-week high, as jet fuel exports fell while imports rose. Swing supplies of jet fuel continued to arrive from India, with a 494,000 bl India jet fuel cargo imported into Singapore in the past week. Singapore's onshore fuel oil inventories retreated to a three-week low after climbing for two consecutive weeks, as imports fell sharply this week. But total inventories for November remained marginally higher at 17.78 mn bl,compared to 17.55 mn bl last month. Brazil, Indonesia, and Iraq were the top origin countries for fuel oil arrivals, while the majority of exports were bound for the Philippines and Hong Kong. No exports were recorded to China this week. By Aldric Chew, Asill Bardh, Cara Wong and Lu Yawen Singapore onshore stocks (week to 20 November '24) Volume ± w-o-w ± w-o-w (%) Light distillates Stocks 15.16 1.04 7.37 Naphtha imports 1.98 0.35 21.36 Naphtha exports 0.61 0.60 8,689.57 Gasoline imports 3.04 -0.53 -14.91 Gasoline exports 4.74 -0.35 -6.91 Middle distillates Stocks 10.27 0.63 6.56 Gasoil imports 0.61 -1.12 -64.79 Gasoil exports 3.48 1.36 63.82 Jet fuel imports 0.5 0.1 39.34 Jet fuel exports 0.20 -0.28 -58.34 Residual fuels Stocks 16.98 -1.37 -7.45 Fuel oil imports 2.19 -4.36 -66.61 Fuel oil exports 1.23 -2.04 -62.53 Source: Enterprise Singapore Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Pemex's lean Zama spending undercuts goals

24/11/21

Pemex's lean Zama spending undercuts goals

Mexico City, 21 November (Argus) — State-owned oil company Pemex's limited budget for developing one of Mexico's most-promising new oil fields is putting Mexico's crude production and refining goals at risk through 2030. First production from the Zama field will likely not start until at least 2028 instead of late next year, as forecast earlier, based on a timeline in a recent presentation from Pemex. Pemex continues to work on the basic engineering for the Zama field because of the lack of cash, staff of hydrocarbon regulator CNH said last week. The latest delay on Zama echoes criticism from when Pemex took over operating the field in 2022 that it did not have sufficient experience or funds to carry on with the project, said industry sources. "Unfortunately, the Pemex budget is always a shadowy mystery," said a person close to the project who asked not to be named. "There is no transparency or certainty regarding when they do and do not honor payment commitments." Zama is a shallow-water field unified in 2022 between Pemex area AE-152-Uchukil and the discovery made in 2017 by a consortium led by US oil company Talos Energy. Pemex holds 50.4pc of the Zama project while Talos and Slim's subsidiary Grupo Carso have 17.4pc, German company Wintershall Dea 17.4pc and British company Harbour Energy 12.4pc. The state-owned company expects to spend $370.8mn to develop Zama in 2025, 64pc less than the original $1.05bn budget proposed by Pemex for next year, according to data from CNH. The regulator cleared the change last week, but commissioners questioned the CNH staff about the new delays. Pemex's original development plan showed that the company forecast the first crude production by December 2025, with 2,000 b/d and about 4mn cf/d of gas. The original plan forecast Zama hitting peak production of 180,000 b/d in 2029, making it Mexico's second-largest crude producer, only under the Maloob field. President Claudia Sheinbaum and Pemex's new new chief executive Victor Rodriguez flagged the importance of shallow-water field Zama and ultra deep field Trion to support Pemex's oil production target of 1.8mn b/d in the upcoming six years in a presentation last week. Pemex's new plan is focused on feeding its own refining system rather than crude exports. The company expects to increase gasoline, diesel and jet fuel production by 343,000 b/d, according to the plan, but it did not give a timeline. Pemex produced 491,000 b/d of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel in the first nine months of 2024. Mexico's proposed 2025 federal budget also shows lower spending for Zama, at Ps3.1bn ($154mn) for 2025, even less than the figure approved by CNH on 14 November. Neither Pemex not Talos responded to requests for additional comment. "Zama is the story of the triumph of ideology over practicality," said a Pemex source who asked not to be named. The state-owned company is studying how to bring in new investors to the project once congress approves secondary laws to implement recent energy reforms, the source said. But uncertainty over the legal framework and the general deterioration of Mexico's business climate will make this more difficult, the Pemex source added. The involvement of Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim, who acquired 49.9pc of Talos Energy share in Zama last year, brought new hopes that work at Zama could finally accelerate. Instead, Slim's entrance slowed the project, as the new partner had to review the project, a former regulator who asked not to be named said. Talos Energy, the lead operator when the field was discovered over seven years ago, is now "frustrated" by the poor progress of the project. "We have Mexico, a great discovery in Zama, we're seven years into it, and still have not made a final investment decision on it," said Talos Energy interim chief executive Joseph Mills, in a conference call with investors last week. "So a lot of frustration there, as you can imagine." By Édgar Sígler Pemex 2024 crude output, throughput '000 b/d Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more