Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Senate quietly finetuning US climate package

  • : Electricity, Emissions, Hydrogen
  • 22/05/27

US lawmakers may yet pass the clean energy proposals in President Joe Biden's reconciliation package, one of the Senate's top climate change policy advocates said.

Discussions around the long-languishing Build Back Better Act are ongoing, according to US senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island), who said yesterday he remains optimistic that some version of it will ultimately clear the legislative gauntlet.

The bill cleared the US House of Representatives last year, but has since stalled in the Senate as a consequence of Democrat's narrow majority. While the deadline for passing the bill is 30 September, lawmakers will have to do the lion's share of the work before their August recess, Whitehouse said at the Climate Leadership Conference hosted by the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions and the Climate Registry.

After leaving for the recess "there is very little likelihood that we will come back in time before the September 30th deadline to do much," he said. "So, we really as a practical matter have to have this resolved by August, and there is a lot of activity quietly happening in the Senate right now to try to get that squared away."

Biden's package features a number of climate-related measures, including updates and extensions to tax credits that would boost not only more established technologies like wind and solar, but also burgeoning ones like hydrogen. Trade group the American Clean Power Association estimates that the package would bring clean energy investment to $750bn over the next 10 years, enabling the US to reach 750,000MW of wind, solar and battery storage capacity by 2030, while cutting power sector emissions by around 70pc from 2005 levels.

The package also features a methane fee that would target emissions from selected entities in the oil and gas industry, with the version approved by the House calling for a price of $900/metric tonne, which would increase to $1,500/t after two years. It would be the first federally imposed, direct fee on greenhouse gas emissions, according to the Congressional Research Service.

Whitehouse said details around that fee in the Senate appear to be "negotiated to everyone's satisfaction," with the language "stable and ready to be dropped into a bill."

He also said the final package could include some form of carbon border adjustment, an idea that has gained steam on both sides of the aisle.

"Next week, we will be dropping, in final legislative language, a carbon border adjustment bill with a carbon price in it," Whitehouse said, adding that it would all be "subject to negotiation."

Although Whitehouse said "chances are perfectly good" for the carbon fees, he acknowledged that the contentious political environment and responses, ranging from ostensible disinterest to outright opposition, from industry groups ranging from banking to fossil fuels, make its prospects difficult to predict.

And incentives for zero-emissions vehicles could also be a sticking point.

"There is objection to some of the electric vehicle credits," Whitehouse said, adding that details are "to be negotiated."


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/04/14

IMO GHG pricing not yet Paris deal-aligned: EU

IMO GHG pricing not yet Paris deal-aligned: EU

Brussels, 14 April (Argus) — The International Maritime Organisation's (IMO) global greenhouse gas (GHG) pricing mechanism "does not yet ensure the sector's full contribution to achieving the Paris Agreement goals", the European Commission has said. "Does it have everything for everybody? For sure, it doesn't," said Anna-Kaisa Itkonen, the commission's climate and energy spokesperson said. "This is often the case as an outcome from international negotiations, that not everybody gets the most optimal outcome." The IMO agreement reached last week will need to be confirmed by the organisation in October, the EU noted, even if it is a "strong foundation" and "meaningful step" towards net zero GHG emissions in global shipping by 2050. The commission will have 18 months following the IMO mechanism's formal approval to review the directive governing the bloc's emissions trading system (ETS), which currently includes maritime emissions for intra-EU voyages and those entering or leaving the bloc. By EU law, the commission will also have to report on possible "articulation or alignment" of the bloc's FuelEU Maritime regulation with the IMO, including the need to "avoid duplicating regulation of GHG emissions from maritime transport" at EU and international levels. That report should be presented, "without delay", following formal adoption of an IMO global GHG fuel standard or global GHG intensity limit. Finland's head representative at the IMO delegation talks, Anita Irmeli, told Argus that the EU's consideration of whether the approved Marpol amendments are ambitious enough won't be until "well after October". Commenting on the IMO agreement, the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) pointed to the "neutral" approach to feedstocks, including first generation biofuels. "The EBB welcomes this agreement, where all feedstocks and pathways have a role to play," EBB secretary general Xavier Noyon said. Faig Abbasov, shipping director at non-governmental organisation Transport and Environment, called for better incentives for green hydrogen. "The IMO deal creates a momentum for alternative marine fuels. But unfortunately it is the forest-destroying first generation biofuels that will get the biggest push for the next decade," he said. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

German Green party warns on climate policy for heating


25/04/14
25/04/14

German Green party warns on climate policy for heating

Berlin, 14 April (Argus) — Germany's soon-to-be opposition Green party today warned against the prospective new government's plans for the heating sector, which the Greens say will lead to Germany incurring high fines under the EU's effort-sharing regulation (ESR), particularly as the coalition also seeks to "deliberately delay" the EU's buildings directive. The expected new government coalition parties CDU/CSU and SPD pledged in their coalition treaty more openness and the use of "scope for implementation" to achieve energy efficiency, while emphasising their commitment to reaching climate neutrality by 2045. The coalition also agreed to end the outgoing government's building energy act, with its focus on mandatory renewable energies shares, and instead focus on "achievable CO2 avoidance" as a key performance indicator in the heating sector. In "deliberately" delaying "urgently needed" action, Germany could incur high EU fines while still making heating more expensive for users, the Greens warned, as people are driven into "fossil fuel dependencies" and "cost traps". And the lax implementation of the EU's energy performance of buildings directive (EPBD) threatens to delay refurbishment and energy efficiency, the party said. German energy efficiency association Deneff similarly warned against a delayed implementation of the EPBD and the "vague" role accorded to the carbon price in the building sector. But Deneff commended the coalition's backing of existing energy efficiency support programmes, despite the envisaged end to the buildings energy act. The act was the brainchild of the Green-led outgoing economy ministry, fiercely criticised by the then-opposition CDU/CSU and only half-heartedly supported by outgoing chancellor Olaf Scholz's SPD party. A recent study found that prices under the upcoming EU emissions trading system covering buildings and road transport (EU ETS 2) could turn out much higher than anticipated by the European Commission. Cologne University-based research institute EWI in a recent paper warned that carbon prices under the ETS 2 could climb from about €120/t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) in 2027 to more than €200/t CO2e by 2035, significantly higher than the current price of €55/t CO2e under Germany's domestic carbon pricing scheme for the sectors. This is because of the sectors' high short-term marginal abatement costs, with necessary investments such as heat pumps and building renovations being cost-intensive and progressing slowly. The Greens on 11 April slammed the coalition treaty for advocating the use of "dubious foreign emissions reductions ", its "excessive" focus on carbon capture and storage technology and touting an "overcapacity" of new gas-fired plants that could lead to a "fossil lock-in". The lower house of parliament the Bundestag on 6 May will elect CDU leader Friedrich Merz as Germany's chancellor, assuming the CDU and SPD parties give the coalition the green light as the CSU did last week. By Chloe Jardine Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Bio-LNG could boom by early 2030s under IMO deal


25/04/14
25/04/14

Bio-LNG could boom by early 2030s under IMO deal

London, 14 April (Argus) — Compliance with the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) newly agreed global greenhouse gas (GHG) two-tier pricing mechanism will require LNG-powered ships to transition to bio-LNG by 2029 under the encouraged 'direct compliance' tier, or by 2033 for the minimum 'base target' tier, or else potentially incur heavy costs. The pricing mechanism was approved by IMO delegates on 11 April in London. Formal adoption will be decided in October, at the next Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) meeting, when a two-thirds majority vote will be required. The text says ships must reduce their fuel intensity by a "base target" of 4pc in 2028 (see table) against 93.3g CO2e/MJ, the latter representing the average GHG fuel intensity value of international shipping in 2008. This gradually tightens to 30pc by 2035. The text defines a "direct compliance target", that starts at 17pc for 2028 and grows to 43pc by 2035. Well-to-wake emissions for LNG diesel-type engines at dual fuel slow speed are equal to 76.08g CO2e/MJ, an 18.4pc emission reduction from the IMO's 2008 benchmark. In theory, this means the average LNG-vessel is compliant with the IMO's scheme until 2029 under both maximum and minimum tiers, or until 2033 under the base target. Waste-based bio-LNG carries a GHG intensity of between 30 and -100g CO2e/MJ depending on feedstock and production, which translates to between 68.09-206.4pc GHG emissions savings, making it compliant across all tiers. However, the uptake of bio-LNG may be capped. Many LNG-capable vessels run on dual-fuel engines, meaning ship-owners may be more inclined to adopt biodiesel, ammonia or other diesel-engine applicable fuels, depending on price levels and other real-world drawbacks. The pricing mechanism establishes a levy for excessive emissions at $380 per tonne of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) for ships compliant with the 'base' target, called Tier 2. For ships in Tier 1 — those compliant with the base target but that still have emission levels higher than the direct compliance target — the price was set at $100/tCO2e. Instead of physically transitioning to a greener fuel, ships could meet targets using 'surplus units', which will be allocated to over-compliant vessels equal to their positive compliance balance, expressed in tCO2e, and valid for two years after emission. Ships then will be able to use the surplus units in the following reporting periods, transfer to other vessels as a credit, or voluntarily cancel as a mitigation contribution. This could give rise to an entirely new ticket market or emissions trading scheme (ETS) common in many European markets for other transport fuel sectors. LNG vessels accounted for more than 2pc of the active global shipping fleet as of October last year, according to energy industry coalition SEA-LNG, but make up the majority of new-build alternative marine vessel orders over the next 10 years. By Madeleine Jenkins IMO GHG reduction targets Year Base Target Direct Compliance Target 2028 4% 17% 2029 6% 19% 2030 8% 21% 2031 12% 25% 2032 17% 30% 2033 21% 34% 2034 26% 39% 2035 30% 43% Source: IMO Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Malaysian Fathopes to reach SAF plant FID by 1Q 2026


25/04/14
25/04/14

Malaysian Fathopes to reach SAF plant FID by 1Q 2026

Singapore, 14 April (Argus) — Malaysian biofuel feedstock supplier Fathopes Energy's planned sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) plant will reach a final investment decision (FID) in the first quarter of 2026, it said. Intital engineering design will be done from July to December 2025, Fathopes' director Eddy Leong said at an event on 10 April, speaking on behalf of the company's chief executive Vinesh Sinha. The plant's capacity is unconfirmed. Fathopes signed an initial agreement at the event with testing, inspection and certification company AmSpec Group. They aim to identify, assess and document feedstocks across Asia-Pacific, Australia and New Zealand that can be used at the planned plant. The agreement will take effect from 1 June. Besides used cooking oil (UCO), other waste feedstocks such as palm oil mill effluent (Pome) oil and spent bleaching earth oil (SBEO) will be explored. Fathopes will take the lead in collecting feedstock samples, while AmSpec will analyse their suitability for SAF production. Amspec will help develop an on-site SAF laboratory at the plant to ensure compliance with industry standards and environmental regulations. Fathopes had signed an initial agreement with Danish technology firm Topsoe in February, in which Topsoe agreed to provide catalysts and engineering expertise to assess feasibility of building the refinery. By Sarah Giam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Japan’s Renova boosts renewable power sales in March


25/04/14
25/04/14

Japan’s Renova boosts renewable power sales in March

Tokyo, 14 April (Argus) — Japanese renewable energy developer Renova's electricity sales rose in March from a year earlier, according to data published by the company on 11 April. Renova sold around 256GWh of renewable electricity in March, including solar, biomass, and geothermal. This is up by around 26pc from the same month in 2024. Electricity sales generated by biomass-fired power plants totalled around 222GWh in March. Ronova's biomass-fired power capacity was 395GW with six plants at the end of March. The company sells electricity from the 75MW Sendai Gamo plant, the 75MW Kanda plant, the 75GW Omaezaki Kou plant, and the 75MW Tokushima Tsuda plant under Japan's feed in tariff (FiT) scheme. Electricity generated by the 75MW Ishinomaki Hibarino plant and the 21MW Akita plant is sold under the county's feed in premium (FiP) scheme, based on long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs). Renova delayed the start-up of the 50MW Karatsu plant in southern Japan's Saga prefecture, which is expected to generate up to 350GWh/yr of electricity, from March to September 2025 because of technical issues. The plant will sell electricity under the FiP scheme based on a long-term PPA with its client from the beginning of commercial operations, according to the company. By Takeshi Maeda Renova's biomass-fired electricity sales in March 2025 Capacity (MW) Electricity sales (GWh) Start of operations Akita 21 13 Jul-16 Ishinomaki Hibarino 75 37 Mar-24 Sendai Gamo 75 51 Nov-23 Tokushima Tsuda 75 41 Dec-23 Omaezaki Kou 75 30 Jan-25 Kanda 75 50 Jun-21 Total 395 222 Source : Renova Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more