S Korea outlines clean hydrogen certification system
South Korea outlined its clean hydrogen certification system at a briefing session on 17 April, with a proposed emissions standard for clean hydrogen and support measures.
The clean hydrogen certification system will certify that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the process of producing or importing hydrogen were below a certain level and will support incentives, according to the country's trade and industry ministry (Motie).
Motie noted that other countries have also been promoting clean hydrogen through their policies, such as the US' Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that provides tax credits for clean hydrogen production and the EU's carbon border adjustment system that includes hydrogen.
The GHG emissions standard to be certified as clean hydrogen in South Korea was proposed at 4kg of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) for every kg of hydrogen produced, with emissions to be calculated from the extraction of feedstock to hydrogen production. But emissions from ships will be temporarily excluded. This is largely in line with proposed emissions standards for clean hydrogen in other countries at 4kg of CO2e for the US, 3.38kg for the EU and 3.4kg in Japan.
There were also two different types of support measures proposed for clean hydrogen in South Korea, a differential rate or a flat rate support measure. The UK, Germany and Japan designed and announced differential support measures to support clean hydrogen's lack of economic feasibility in its early stages, while the US is providing flat rate support through the IRA. South Korea will decide on a support method after studying the two proposals.
Motie also in March revealed more details on a hydrogen power bidding market that is scheduled to open by June. It said then that the clean hydrogen market will open in early 2024 after the clean hydrogen certification system and relevant laws are enacted.
The ministry previously in 2022 announced plans to implement the hydrogen certification system by 2024. An amendment to the Hydrogen Act was passed in 2022 to establish a legal basis for the creation of a clean hydrogen market, Motie said.
Related news posts
Eurogas disappointed in hydrogen target scaling back
Eurogas disappointed in hydrogen target scaling back
Brussels, 25 June (Argus) — New Eurogas president and Eni's director for global gas and LNG Cristian Signoretto told Argus of his disappointment in an apparent scaling back in EU renewable hydrogen production targets, but said that he remains confident that a cheaper pathway exists for the fuel. He called for a technologically neutral approach while demand shifts to decarbonised gas over the long term. Do you see decarbonisation shifting to a slower pace over the next few years? We have clear decarbonisation targets for 2050. This continues to be a challenge that the gas industry wants to meet. And if you look at delivering security of supply and affordable energy, then you end up with a system that needs molecules. Gas is obviously part of that solution. What do you think about the apparent scaling back in the EU's 2040 impact assessment of the EU's 10mn t/yr of renewable hydrogen imports by 2030? We are a little disappointed, but there is still a lot of work to be done on the EU's 2040 targets. We are working on our own analysis and study setting out the best way to get to the 2040 overall decarbonisation targets. We are confident it will show a cheaper and more resilient pathway to reach those targets with the help of gas molecules. What are your key asks when the EU implements revised gas and hydrogen laws? For the gas and hydrogen package, we are focusing on several themes such as the implementation of the methane regulation. Methane has a major impact for climate change. We need to cover methane in exporting and producing countries and also in transmission and distribution. Another theme is ensuring definitions of low carbon gases and green gases are standardised as much as possible. We believe in a technology neutral approach to decarbonisation. It is not for policymakers to choose winners. Can the EU do more to help wean central and eastern European countries off Russian gas? Flows have to change to phase-out Russian gas. Transmission system operators (TSOs) have already done a lot, but there are still bottlenecks on networks. Flows will change further if Ukrainian transit is phased out at the end of this year. But Europe needs to avoid regulatory barriers, such as the German storage tariffs on gas moving through to other EU countries. On the whole, energy markets and systems have been fairly successful in overcoming the Russian crisis, in particular revising the European gas grid over 18 months to ensure gas flows are now no longer going only east to west. Another positive sign is that gas prices are very much aligned within Europe in a clear sign that the single market for gas is functioning, apparently more so than the European power market, as evidenced by the strong differentials among national markets. Is imposing an EU methane intensity limit in 2030 not a risk for energy security? Gas is a global business. We need to import gas. But Europe also wants gas imports that follow certain standards. There has to be correct timing and proper engagement between the EU and producing countries and we need to make sure other countries follow suit with Europe's decarbonisation target. We cannot solve all the issues on our own early on while we wait for climate leadership to possibly become a competitive advantage for Europe in the future. Are 2030 climate and energy goals set in stone if China, India, and others do not make equivalent efforts? European competitiveness is a very important issue, up there with defence, energy and climate change. It is not about backing down. But all other polluting countries need to be tackling climate change. Otherwise Europe runs the risk of finding itself isolated and not solving the climate issue alone. Would a more flexible approach to CO2-neutral fuels used in internal combustion engines maintain a pathway for gas in transport? An electric vehicle or an internal combustion engine vehicle with low carbon gas or low carbon fuel should be treated in the same way. We should take a technologically neutral approach as long as CO2 emissions are equivalent. Major shipowners are investing heavily in dual-fuel engines to also run on LNG. From a technology perspective, LNG is a route to decarbonisation in the short term. It is also a cheaper option today and will become decarbonised gas in the long term. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Global e-methanol capacity plans exceed 10mn t/yr
Global e-methanol capacity plans exceed 10mn t/yr
Hamburg, 24 June (Argus) — Global e-methanol production capacity plans have increased to over 10mn t/yr after proposals for new plants were announced earlier this month in China, Spain and Brazil. The combined capacity of operational and planned projects has reached 10.4mn t/yr, Argus data show , up by around 1mn t/yr from the start of this year . The majority of this is in the early stages and most projects are still a long way from commissioning. Only around 216,000 t/yr of capacity is operational, almost all of which is in China. Another 708,000 t/yr is under construction or has reached a final investment decision. China also makes up the bulk of this capacity. Most of the announced capacity is slated to come online later this decade, although not all facilities have a set start-up year. Europe accounts for over half of the announced capacity, with plans for 5.5mn t/yr. Spain and Denmark are the leading countries on the continent. Asia-Pacific comes in second, with 2.6mn t/yr of planned capacity. China accounts for the majority of this, but there are also plans for several facilities in India. The project pipeline rose above the 10mn t/yr mark after several recent announcements. A consortium of three companies announced plans for a 200,000 t/yr project in China , while Spanish developer HyFive said it wants to build a 100,000 t/yr site in Asturias and French firm Arhyze is looking to set up a same-sized facility in the Brazilian port of Suape . By Stefan Krumpelmann Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Brazil’s senate approves extra R5bn in H2 tax credits
Brazil’s senate approves extra R5bn in H2 tax credits
London, 20 June (Argus) — Brazil's senate has approved the hydrogen regulatory framework draft bill including an additional 5bn reals ($917mn) for the tax credit scheme for production and consumption of renewable hydrogen. The amount brings the total budget allocated for tax credits to R18.3bn, which will run for five years from 2028 until 2032 ( see table ). This could support around 2.8mn t of hydrogen production at a credit of R6.58 per kg, which would be given to first production projects according to the draft from last month . The final values of the credits are yet to be agreed. The tax credits are set to benefit electrolytic hydrogen produced with renewable hydrogen given that the scheme will prioritise projects with lowest emission of greenhouse gases. The bill also establishes incentives that will be available for low-carbon hydrogen production pathways such as natural gas with carbon capture and storage (CCS) and from biofuels. These include tax exemptions on imported products, raw materials and equipment. The bill will go for voting at the Chamber of Deputies before becoming law. Amendments to the bill such as the definitions of "renewable" and "green" hydrogen will continue to be discussed. By Pamela Machado Cap on proposed H2 tax credits funds - Updated Cap Brazilian Reals US Dollars 2028 1.7bn 312mn 2029 2.9bn 532mn 2030 4.2bn 771mn 2031 4.5bn 826mn 2032 5.0bn 917mn Brazil Senate Dollar conversion as of 20 June Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
EU faces tougher path to climate legislation
EU faces tougher path to climate legislation
Right-wing parties' strong showing in the European Parliament elections are likely to mean a looser embrace of the Green Deal, writes Dafydd ab Iago Brussels, 14 June (Argus) — The European Parliament elections have resulted in a workable majority for parties that supported the EU's 2030 climate and energy strategy. But political uncertainty in the EU's two largest countries, Germany and France, could add to the difficulties the bloc faces in legislating for its2040 target of cutting net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 90pc, compared with 1990 levels. Outgoing member of the European Parliament Markus Pieper sees the majority paving the way for a more pragmatic approach in 2024-29, with internal combustion engine vehicles staying on the roads beyond 2035, and more flexible rules for CO2-neutral fuels such as low-carbon hydrogen, e-fuels, and biofuels. The newly constituted parliament's first plenary session is scheduled to take place in Strasbourg on 16-19 July, when members will choose the parliament's next president and vice-presidents and decide on committee memberships. Awaiting legislation for 2040 climate goals, members from the influential environment and energy committees have a range of technical legislation to approve related to the bloc's 2030 climate goals. This begins with the approval of legislation defining vehicles running "exclusively" on . A little further down the line, the environment committee will weigh in on legislation setting methane intensity classes for producers and companies selling oil, gas and coal in the EU by 2030. Passing legislation for the 2040 GHG targets will depend on parliamentary and member state approval. Overseeing the legal proposals will be the European Commission president, with Ursula von der Leyen eyeing re-election to this post after her centre-right EPP won 189 seats in parliament. Together with centre-left and liberal parties, von der Leyen's EPP group could form a comfortable majority for climate and energy legislation, with over 400 of the 720 seats. This does not include the Greens, who lost 19 seats and are now down to 53, nor the 135 centre-left socialists. The election results have undoubtably strengthened von der Leyen's bid to be re-elected as commission president, and EU leaders are due to meet on 17 June for their first formal discussions on the matter. The parliament as a whole must approve the EU leaders' choice of commission president, along with the 27 commissioners, including those responsible for energy and climate, that are to take office by the end of the year. Green knights Von der Leyen oversaw the implementation of the Green Deal — the overarching set of policies aimed at cutting EU GHG emissions by 55pc by 2030 compared with 1990 levels. Environment committee member Michael Bloss says it is "absurd" that the Greens now appear to have to come to von der Leyen's aid to rescue her Green Deal, and that he fears the prospect of von der Leyen's EPP group forming majorities in parliament with the conservative ECR and far-right groups. "The Green Deal is not dead," Bloss says. If reappointed, von der Leyen will find herself contending with national capitals more willing to oppose ambitious climate and energy targets. In response to strong gains by the far-right, eurosceptic National Rally party in the EU elections, French president Emmanuel Macron dissolved parliament and called snap National Assembly elections for 30 June and 7 July. And Germany's far-right opposition AfD party outperformed chancellor Olaf Scholz's centre-left SPD, altering Berlin's coalition politics. With Germany's Bundestag election on the horizon in September or October 2025, sensitive coalition politics could well hinder approval of more ambitious, and costly, EU climate legislation. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more