G7 backs incentives, market driven GHG emissions cuts
The G7 group of industrialised nations is looking to make the most of incentives and carbon pricing mechanisms to drive the global energy transition towards a 2050 net zero emissions goal.
The G7 clean energy economy action plan, which was published on 20 May at Hiroshima, Japan during the G7 leaders' summit, outlined the necessity of providing new incentives and enhancing market schemes to tackle climate change and spur sustainable growth.
"Our joint efforts to lead the transition to a clean energy economy will be based on our collective commitments to engage in policies that effectively incentivise partners", the action plan said. The G7 recognises achieving the goals of the UN Paris climate agreement urgently requires significant new incentives along with industrial policies and public-private investments to lower costs globally.
The incentives should ensure achieving an ambitious clean transition of their economies, lifting workers, supporting marginalised communities, protecting the environment and upholding and strengthening the rules-based multilateral system.
G7 leaders separately promised to support the policy mix of carbon pricing and non-pricing mechanisms to effectively tackle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction. "We reaffirm the important role of high-integrity carbon markets and carbon pricing to foster cost-efficient reductions in emission levels, drive innovation and enable a transformation to net zero, through the optimal use of a range of policy levers to price carbon", the G7 leaders' communique said.
But they failed to form a co-ordinated measure to implement those policies as "these could vary reflecting country-specific circumstances".
The G7 also agreed to use trade policy as drivers to accelerate decarbonisation "by spurring markets to account for embedded emissions in traded goods", the action plan said, adding that "environmental standards should not be lowered to unfairly gain competitive advantage".
Such trade policies are in line with import regulations independently under way.
Japan, which hosted the 19-21 May G7 leaders' summit at Hiroshima, has enacted its so-called green transformation bill. This will allow Tokyo to issue energy transition bonds along with its carbon pricing scheme, such as the carbon levy on fossil fuel imports and a carbon emissions trading system.
The European Parliament on 18 May approved its carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM). The CBAM will be introduced gradually over 2026-34, initially covering aluminium, cement, iron, steel, electricity, fertilizers, ammonia, hydrogen and certain downstream products. The US is also working on a carbon border tariff bill for energy-intensive imports.
The G7 consists of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK and the US. The EU is a non-enumerated member.
Related news posts
Biden touts climate legacy
Biden touts climate legacy
New York, 25 September (Argus) — US president Joe Biden made the case for his climate legacy on Tuesday, casting the Inflation Reduction Act as part of a "new economic playbook" and warning of environmental and economic repercussions if former president Donald Trump returns to the White House. The 2022 law, which included a raft of tax credits to subsidize clean energy technologies, was the "most significant climate law passed in the history of the world," Biden said in a speech at the Bloomberg Global Business Forum, an event on the sidelines of the UN general assembly and Climate Week NYC. The market for clean energy is "booming" because of the law, Biden said, pointing to investments made after its passage in battery technology, nuclear energy, hydrogen, and what the administration terms "climate-smart agriculture." Most of those benefits are flowing to Republican-led states, he noted. While analysts see some provisions in the law as less vulnerable than others, including tax credits for hydrogen and carbon capture popular among oil and gas companies, Republicans have said they want to repeal much of the law. Trump-era tax cuts are set to expire in 2025, teeing up a major legislative fight over tax policy next year regardless of which party controls the US Congress and the White House. Although Biden argued that his climate policies have already had substantial impacts, he also said that Trump could halt much of that progress. Manufacturing facilities and businesses that have started up because of the law's incentives would "shut down" if it was repealed, he said. The US shifting course on energy policy could also have spillover effects on other countries' climate ambitions, Biden said, pointing to his administration's support for language agreed to at last year's UN Cop 28 climate summit around transitioning away from fossil fuels. "If we didn't lead, who the hell leads? Who fills the vacuum without America leading?" he said. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Brazil’s carbon market will not start before 2030
Brazil’s carbon market will not start before 2030
New York, 24 September (Argus) — Brazil's carbon trading market will not be fully implemented in this decade, according to think tank Centro Brasil no Clima. The creation of the carbon market is a long process that starts with passing a law to create a carbon market. But environmental groups and others have criticized Brazil's carbon market bill that the lower house approved at the end of last year as too complex. The senate has yet to set a timeline to debate the lower house's proposal but is expected to make significant changes to the bill, meaning that it will need to return to the lower legislature for a final round of voting. Still, there is a growing expectation in the public and private sectors that the bill will pass ahead of the UN's Cop 29 climate conference later this year. The think tank estimates that the implementation phase of the carbon market would take around 5-6 years under the current draft bill. The preparation and legal framework for the creation of the market may take from 1-2 years. Pilot testing and initial rollout of the carbon market would take around a year. The submission of monitoring plans and emissions reporting would also be completed within 1-2 years after the pilot testing. But there is no clarity on a deadline for the phase that involves testing of the market with a full allocation of carbon credits, said William Wills, technical director at the think tank. Only 25pc of the emissions produced in Brazil will be cover in the carbon market, he said. This includes emissions from energy, waste and industries, but the agriculture sector, which accounted for 27pc of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions produced in the country in 2022, will be excluded. Brazil's largest source of GHG emissions comes from land use change and forestry, accounting for 48pc of emissions in the same period. By Jacqueline Echevarria Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US-led offset idea earns more corporate support
US-led offset idea earns more corporate support
New York, 24 September (Argus) — More companies registered support today for a US-backed carbon offsetting initiative that is hoping to steer funds toward the decarbonization of developing countries' power sectors. The Energy Transition Accelerator (ETA) — a project of the US State Department and two philanthropies, the Bezos Earth Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation — said that 19 companies support the general idea of the initiative, that "high-integrity carbon credits" can support "an accelerated and just clean energy transition." As part of an announcement tied to Climate Week NYC, 14 companies, including some that had previously not registered interest, signed onto a letter saying they were committed to working with the ETA as the initiative advances. The letter notes, however, that the companies are not pledging any "obligation of funding" for the initiative, which has an unclear timeline for getting projects up-and-running. The ETA previously set plans for formally launch this past April but instead said then that it would spend this year "building" on a framework for projects released last year . The ETA is hoping to create a "jurisdictional-scale" carbon crediting standard, steering funds toward efforts such as accelerating the retirement of coal-fired power plants, building new renewable generation, and improving the electric grid in developing countries. The idea is that buyers would be able to finance offset projects with more tangible climate benefits, hopefully avoiding the reputational risks associated with much of the voluntary carbon market. Prices for some major nature-based carbon offsets have fallen over the past year, as concerns about their integrity have deterred prospective buyers . The initiative's goals for this year are working to build "a community of buyers and sellers," said Nat Keohane, president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions think tank at the Xpansiv Climate Week Summit on Monday. Chile, the Dominican Republic, and Nigeria have expressed interest in serving as ETA pilot countries, while the Philippines this year signed on as an observer country rather than as a direct participant. Ahead of the UN's Cop 29 climate summit this year in Azerbaijan, the ETA wants to demonstrate the progress interested countries have been able to make and to collaborate with the World Bank on economic analysis and modeling to understand what future projects and investment plans might look like, Keohane said. Winrock International, which runs the American Carbon Registry, was tasked by the ETA last year with developing a standard and methodology for crediting emissions reductions. Keohane expects that to be out "next year," he said at the event. Winrock did not immediately respond to requests for comment for more clarity on its timeline. "There are also some other crediting standards coming out, and ETA will be evaluating those against the criteria that we put out in our framework last year," Keohane said. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Carbon ‘market structure’ next phase: ICVCM
Carbon ‘market structure’ next phase: ICVCM
New York, 24 September (Argus) — The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM) is broadening its focus and plans to offer guidance around improving "market structure," the chair of the private sector initiative said this week. The group is "going to turn to market structure issues," bringing key players from the still relatively small voluntary carbon market together to examine what would be needed to supporter a larger, more liquid market, ICVCM chair Annette Nazareth said at the Xpansiv Climate Week Summit, a Climate Week NYC side event. The council currently assesses carbon offset project types and carbon crediting programs, which has allowed for the sale this year of credits labeled as meeting the group's "core carbon principles" for project quality. The group has sought to standardize the largely unregulated market, potentially boosting trust among prospective corporate buyers that are worried about the reputational and legal risks of funding offset projects that might reduce emissions less than they claim. ICVCM said Nazareth was referring to previously announced "continuous improvement work programs," which involve studying issues that could feature in the next edition of the group's core carbon principles rulebook that is due for implementation in 2-3 years. Some of these study groups are underway, including ones on how to align projects with national climate commitments and strengthen requirements around the permanence of emissions reductions, while others are set to start later this year. Some topics Nazareth mentioned could make the market — which is largely an over-the-counter one today — less opaque for prospective buyers. She said there was interest in looking at encouraging price transparency and trade reporting, better integration of data, and addressing the fragmentation of carbon registries to allow for more "interoperability" and potentially encouraging a "meta-registry." Other topics on the ICVCM's agenda involve equity concerns, such as setting best practices around disclosing and sharing revenues with local communities and also making it easier for small developers to access funds for starting up projects. "Do we need to create databases on the performance of project developers? Would it help to have some sort of platform where lenders and project developers can find each other? There's a lot of interesting things that we could look at," Nazareth said. Proponents of more guidance, which has come over the last year from various private groups and from regulators like the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, hope that clearer standards will assuage doubts about the market and scale up investments in climate change mitigation projects. But there is still deep disagreement about the ultimate role of carbon offsets, which some environmental groups fear is deterring companies from reducing emissions within their own operations. The Science Based Targets Initiative, a private sector group that assesses corporate climate goals, said earlier this year that companies can meet its standards even if they use carbon credits to offset emissions from their supply chain, but the group later backtracked and said it was still debating the issue. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more