Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Maryland lawmakers mull more SRECs for small projects

  • : Electricity, Emissions
  • 24/02/08

Maryland lawmakers may allow small photovoltaic projects to generate more solar renewable energy certificates (SRECs) in a bid to keep developers in the state as a soft price ceiling for the credits begins to decline.

Lawmakers could as much as double the number of SRECs that new solar projects up to 2MW could generate over the next three and a half years, according to legislation filed last week by Maryland state Senate Democrats.

The proposal represents six years of work with insights taken from the solar, environmental and labor group stakeholders, according to state senator Sarah Elfreth (D), the bill's primary sponsor. It aims to refine the "nuts and bolts" of Maryland's renewable portfolio standard (RPS), as the state is not on pace to meet its 2030 target.

"We are not on track to meet it for a couple of reasons — permitting and the grid is just not prepared for this quite yet," Elfreth told Argus. "Another reason is that we just do not have the proper incentives to incentivize solar generally but also to incentivize solar where it makes more sense and can be built faster."

Maryland's RPS requires utilities to use solar generation for 14.5pc of their retail sales by 2030. Industry groups have warned that the state is not building new systems fast enough to meet that target, with the looming decline of the alternative compliance payment (ACP) for SRECs representing another potential stumbling block.

The fee, which utilities have to pay for each megawatt-hour by which they fall short of their annual obligations, serves as a theoretical price ceiling for SRECs, meaning as it declines, the incentive available to project developers is likely to decline as well. Since 2022, the ACP for the solar carve-out has been $60/MWh, but it will fall in 2025 to $55/MWh and ratchet down to $22.50/MWh by 2030 and beyond. Beyond project financing, SREC values also figure into the tacit competition for developers' attention with neighboring states, where incentive levels are often higher. The lowest incentive level in New Jersey's SREC-II program, for example, is $85/MWh.

An attempt by lawmakers last year to address the issue by indefinitely maintaining the solar ACP at $60/MWh died in committee.

The new multipliers would tackle the problem from a different angle. The state Public Service Commission would establish a program for in-state solar projects up to 2MW that come on line from 1 July 2024 to 1 January 2028. Qualifying projects would receive 1.5 SRECs for each megawatt-hour of electricity generated, rather than one SREC. Qualifying systems on brownfields, parking canopies and rooftops would receive two SRECs for each megawatt-hour. In both cases, the multipliers would last for the system's entire lifecycle, and the SRECs generated would have a five-year eligibility toward compliance.

In essence, the changes would increase the value of generation from new, small projects — which have a shorter development cycle compared to utility-scale systems — without raising the price ceiling on the entire SREC market. The program would be capped at 330MW for systems smaller than 20kW and at 300MW for systems between 20kW and 2MW.

The bill would also set tax incentives for non-residential solar and update rules in the state's net metering program to make it "more efficient."

"Is it the long-term answer?" Elfreth said. "No. But it is a short-term answer until we figure out the longer-term issue with the RPS."

Those updates will require a "longer-term conversation," she said.

The Senate's Education, Energy, and the Environment Committee will take up the bill on 29 February, which could serve as a preview of the bill's prospects.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/04/07

Colombia's renewables grow, but gap looms

Colombia's renewables grow, but gap looms

Bogota, 7 April (Argus) — Development of non-conventional renewable (NCRE) generation has picked up in Colombia, but the pace is still not fast enough to cover a projected generation shortage by 2027-2028. Colombia will likely reach 2.55GW in installed NCRE such as solar and wind — excluding large hydropower — by the end of 2025, up from 1.88GW at the end of 2024, Colombian renewable association SER director Alexandra Hernandez told Argus at the Colombia Genera conference held last week in Cartagena. About 670MW from 19 medium and large NCRE plants worth $500mn will likely come online in 2025, Hernandez noted. Of that total, 30MW in two projects came online in January, and the balance of 640MW are under construction, according to Hernandez. The plants will reduce emissions by 1.1mn metric tonnes (t) CO2/yr compared with conventional generation. For 2026, 419MW in NCRE could come online. NCRE will comprise a 12pc share of Colombia's generation capacity in 2025, up from 10pc in 2024. Despite that, Colombia will fail to meet its target of 6GW in NCRE by August 2026, when the administration of President Gustavo Petro ends, former minister of mines and energy Amylkar Acosta said. Colombia will likely will end 2026 with 3GW, Hernandez noted. This comes despite Petro's support for renewable energy and attempts to phase out hydrocarbons use. Much of this development is focused on the dry, windswept department of La Guajira that borders Venezuela and juts into the Caribbean. US firm AES' will start building the first 259MW phase of its 1.1GW Jemeiwaa Ka'I wind complex there later this year, AES's general manager Federico Echavarria said at the Colombia Genera conference. "Our biggest bet is La Guajira," Echavarria said. Last year, Colombia's environmental regulator Anla approved a transmission line connecting 648MW of planned wind capacity in the La Guajira area to the national grid. The 500kV Casa Electrica-Colectora transmission line and substation will connect with Grupo de Energia de Bogota's 500kV Colectora transmission line. Colectora has begun construction and should come online in 2026, a delay from its original 2022 start date. La Guajira has Colombia's greatest renewable power potential, including 21GW of wind power potential, according to state planning agency UPME. But delays to key transmission projects and lengthy community consultations impeded development. Italian power company Enel suspended indefinitely construction of a 205MW wind farm in the Windpeschi region, but state-controlled oil company Ecopetrol is seeking authorization to buy it. Projects advancing in other departments include the 200MW Orquidea solar project in the Caribbean province of Bolivar, which recently earned an environmental permit that clears the way for construction. Running out of time But this new generation capacity will not cover an expected supply shortfall. Colombia is forecast to have a gap of around 2,000MW by 2027-2028 assuming baseline consumption, and 3,000MW-6,000MW if demand rises further, several electricity associations have said. Renewables could help fill this gap, as the construction is fairly quick once permits as security, the renewables group SER said. But 47pc of renewable power companies were unable to complete their planned investments in 2024, with permitting delays among the top reason, the group found in a member survey. Permits from the government's mining and planning unit UPME takes nine months, compared with the two months stipulated by the law. Regional entities take twice as long to issue a permit than the legal limit. The government will push to do more, energy and mines minister Edwin Palma said in Cartagena. "We are convinced and committed to ensuring that expansion projects are carried out," he said. "We will work with the ministry of the interior to expedite licenses." By Diana Delgado Colombia's power generation mix % Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EU sees no credibility issue in 2040 GHG target delay


25/04/04
25/04/04

EU sees no credibility issue in 2040 GHG target delay

Brussels, 4 April (Argus) — The lack of a proposal for a 2040 greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target is not a credibility issue for the European Commission, officials said. The commission will have an "ambitious" 2040 GHG proposal in time to derive a 2035 climate plan for the EU "well in time" for the UN Cop 30 climate talks in Belem, Brazil, over 10-21 November. The commission was expected to make a legislative proposal for a 2040 EU climate target no later than six months after the conclusion of the first global stocktake under the Paris climate agreement, which concluded at Cop 28 in December 2023, as per the bloc's European Climate Law. The process is "quite late nationally and also globally", the commission acknowledged. But officials insist that the update to the climate law, setting a 2040 GHG target, will come "well in time" for the Cop process. The EU will then derive its nationally determined contribution (NDC) to the Paris deal for 2035 from 2040. The official deadline for parties to submit their updated NDC was 10 February, but only 12 countries made timely submissions. "The credibility issue is much less to do with the agenda now," climate spokesperson Anna-Kaisa Itkonen said. EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra has made "very, very clear" that the commission is preparing for an "ambitious climate law". "Ninety per cent is currently in the political guidelines," Itkonen said. "It is the starting point for these discussions," she added, underlining the extreme importance of presenting a 2040 proposal that has a "substantial majority". Another EU source noted that the commission is discussing various options and scenarios with EU member states and the European Parliament. "We want to keep the ambition as high as possible. So our starting point of discussion is 90pc," the source said. Discussion of 2040 flexibility — such as following a weaker trajectory toward climate neutrality, or using international credits — would have "severely negative" implications for the EU's standing in international climate action, NGO Bellona Europa's senior manager for carbon accounting, Mark Preston Aragones, said. "The commission should not come with an already watered-down proposal even before negotiations formally begin with the European Parliament and EU member states," he said. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

New tariffs could upend US tallow imports


25/04/03
25/04/03

New tariffs could upend US tallow imports

New York, 3 April (Argus) — New US tariffs on nearly all foreign products could deter further imports of beef tallow, a fast-rising biofuel feedstock and food ingredient that had until now largely evaded President Donald Trump's efforts to reshape global trade. Tallow was the most used feedstock for US biomass-based diesel production in January for the first month ever, with consumption by pound rising month to month despite sharp declines in actual biorefining and in use of competing feedstocks. The beef byproduct benefits from US policies, including a new federal tax credit known as "45Z", that offer greater subsidies to fuel derived from waste than fuel derived from first-generation crops. Much of that tallow is sourced domestically, but the US also imported more than 880,000t of tallow last year, up 29pc from just two years earlier. The majority of those imports last year came from Brazil, which until now has faced a small 0.43¢/kg (19.5¢/lb) tariff, and from Australia, which was exempt from any tallow-specific tariffs under a free trade agreement with US. But starting on 5 April, both countries will be subject to at least the new 10pc charge on foreign imports. There are some carveouts from tariffs for certain energy products, but animal fats are not included. Some other major suppliers — like Argentina, Uruguay, and New Zealand — will soon have new tariffs in place too, although tallow from Canada is for now unaffected because it is covered by the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement. Brazil tallow shipments to the US totaled around 300,000t in 2024, marking an all-time high, but tallow shipments during the fourth quarter of 2024 fell under the 2023 levels as uncertainty about future tax policy slowed buying interest. Feedstock demand in general in the US has remained muted to start this year because of poor biofuel production margins, and that has extended to global tallow flows. Tallow suppliers in Brazil for instance were already experiencing decreased interest from US producers before tariffs. Brazil tallow prices for export last closed at $1,080/t on 28 March, rising about 4pc year-to-date amid support from the 45Z guidance and aid from Brazil's growing biodiesel industry, which is paying a hefty premium for tallow compared to exports. While the large majority of Brazilian tallow exports end up in the US, Australian suppliers have more flexibility and could send more volume to Singapore instead if tariffs deter US buyers. Export prices out of Australia peaked this year at $1,185/t on 4 March but have since trended lower to last close at $1,050/t on 1 April. In general, market participants say international tallow suppliers would have to drop offers to keep trade flows intact. Other policy shifts affect flows Even as US farm groups clamored for more muscular foreign feedstock limits over much of the last year, tallow had until now largely dodged any significant restrictions. Recent US guidance around 45Z treats all tallow, whether produced in the US or shipped long distances to reach the US, the same. Other foreign feedstocks were treated more harshly, with the same guidance providing no pathway at all for road fuels from foreign used cooking oil and also pinning the carbon intensity of canola oil — largely from Canada — as generally too high to claim any subsidy. But tariffs on major suppliers of tallow to the US, and the threat of additional charges if countries retaliate, could give refiners pause. Demand could rise for domestic animal fats or alternatively for domestic vegetable oils that can also be refined into fuel, especially if retaliatory tariffs cut off global markets for US farm products like soybean oil. There is also risk if Republicans in the Trump administration or Congress reshape rules around 45Z to penalize foreign feedstocks. At the same time, a minimum 10pc charge for tallow outside North America is a more manageable price to pay compared to other feedstocks — including a collection of charges amounting to a possible 69.5pc tax on Chinese used cooking oil. And if the US sets biofuel blend mandates as high as some oil and farm groups are pushing , strong demand could leave producers with little choice but to continue importing at least some feedstock from abroad to continue making fuel. Not all US renewable diesel producers will be equally impacted by tariffs either. Diamond Green Diesel operates Gulf Coast biorefineries in foreign-trade zones, which allow companies to avoid tariffs on foreign inputs for products that are ultimately exported. Biofuel producers in these zones could theoretically refine foreign tallow, claim a 45Z subsidy, and avoid feedstock tariffs as long as they ship the fuel abroad. Jurisdictions like the EU and UK, where sustainable aviation fuel mandates took effect this year, are attractive destinations. And there is still strong demand from the US food sector, with edible tallow prices in Chicago up 18pc so far this year. Trump allies, including his top health official, have pushed tallow as an alternative to seed oils. By Cole Martin and Jamuna Gautam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Trump to 'stand firm' on tariffs as markets crash


25/04/03
25/04/03

Trump to 'stand firm' on tariffs as markets crash

Washington, 3 April (Argus) — President Donald Trump does not intend to back down from his plan for sweeping import tariffs that have already caused a sell-off in global equity markets and some commodities, administration officials say. The tariffs — which will start at 10pc for most imports on 5 April before steeper country-specific tariffs take effect on 9 April, with exceptions for some energy and mineral imports — have caused key stock indexes to drop by as much as 5pc, with even larger declines in crude futures, as investors brace for lower growth and a higher chance of a recession. Trump earlier today defended the tariffs, as he prepared to leave the White House for a dinner tonight at a golf tournament at one of his resorts in Florida. "THE OPERATION IS OVER! THE PATIENT LIVED, AND IS HEALING," Trump wrote in a social media post before major stock markets opened. Trump's cabinet has downplayed the short-term price effect of the tariffs, which they say will boost economic growth in the US and cause a resurgence in domestic manufacturing. US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick said he does not think there is "any chance" that Trump will rescind the tariffs, and said Trump will only begin to work on new trade deals once a country has "really, really changed their ways" on trade practices. "Trump is going to stand firm because he is reordering global trade," Lutnick said today in an interview with CNN. "Make no mistake about it, America has been exploited, and he is done allowing America to be exploited." Other administration officials have suggested a greater potential for lower tariffs in the near-term. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent has encouraged world leaders to "take a deep breath" and not to "panic" because the tariff rates that Trump announced were a "ceiling" that might come down, so long as there was no retaliation. "Don't immediately retaliate, let's see where this goes, because if you retaliate, that's how we get escalation," Bessent said on 2 April during interview on Fox News. The tariffs have caused bipartisan backlash on Capitol Hill, but so far legislative action has been symbolic and unlikely to become law. The US Senate, in a bipartisan vote on 2 April, approved a joint resolution that would end the justification Trump has used to put tariffs on Canada. US senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Maria Cantwell (D-Washington) introduced a bill today to eliminate most new presidential tariffs after 60 days without approval by the US Congress. Democrats say the tariffs will force consumers to pay far more on everyday goods, with revenue offsetting Republican plans to provide more than $5 trillion in tax cuts. "Donald Trump is using tariffs in the dumbest way imaginable. In fact, Donald Trump slapped tariffs on penguins and not on Putin," US Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) said today, in reference to Trump's decision to put a 10pc tariff on an island populated only with penguins. Trump has claimed his country-specific tariffs are "reciprocal" even though they have no relation to the tariffs each country charges on US imports. Instead, Trump's tariffs were calculated based on a universal equation that is set at half of the country's trade deficit with the US, divided by the country's imports from the US, with a minimum tariff rate of 10pc. Major US trading partners are preparing for retaliatory tariffs. Canada's prime minister Mark Carney said he would respond to Trump's tariffs on automobiles, which took effect today, by "matching the US approach" and imposing a 25pc tariff on auto imports that do not comply with the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement. China said it was preparing unspecified countermeasures to US tariffs that would be set at 54pc. Trump's cabinet today dismissed the market reaction to the tariffs. Stock markets are going through a "short-term adjustment" but the tariffs will ultimately result in more growth and additional investments, US Small Business Administration administrator Kelly Loeffler said today in an interview on Fox News "The gravy train is over for the globalist elites," said Loeffler, who previously was a top executive at US exchange operator ICE. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EU Parliament approves delay to climate policies


25/04/03
25/04/03

EU Parliament approves delay to climate policies

London, 3 April (Argus) — The European Parliament today voted to postpone the application of the corporate sustainability due diligence directive (CSDDD) and the corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD), with final approval now required from the European Council. The European Parliament has backed some of the key proposals from the European Commission's omnibus package submitted in February , which aims to delay the start of due diligence and sustainability reporting requirements by one and two years, respectively. The CSDDD would require large firms to adopt plans to mitigate their climate impact, keeping global temperatures within 1.5°C of pre-industrial levels, as per the Paris climate agreement. Under the new proposals, member states have until July 2027 to transpose the rules into national legislation, with the first wave of affected business required to be compliant from 2028. The CSRD came into force at the beginning of 2024, introducing mandatory climate and energy disclosures for some businesses. The use of certificates such as guarantees of origin and renewable power purchase agreements are the only ways recognised in the original text to document use of renewable energy. February's omnibus package sought to delay the start of reporting for companies with more than 250 employees as well as small and medium-sized enterprises by two years to 2028 and 2029, respectively. The next step in the legislative process requires formal approval from the European Council, which already indicated an agreement in an initial position adopted on 26 March. In addition to delaying the application dates, the commission is also seeking to amend the content and scope of both directives. Notably, for sustainability reporting, the changes would see 80pc of companies falling outside the initial scope . By Giulio Bajona Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more