Latest market news

US west coast refiners boost Canadian TMX intake

  • : Crude oil
  • 24/11/18

US west coast refiners have increased heavy Canadian crude purchases by almost 75pc since the 590,000 b/d Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) pipeline started operations in May, but imminent California refinery closures threaten demand.

The 590,000 b/d TMX project nearly tripled the capacity of Trans Mountain's pipeline system to 890,000 b/d when it opened on 1 May. The line runs from Alberta's oil sands to Vancouver on Canada's west coast, giving direct access to lucrative Asian markets, where buyers are eager for heavy sour crude.

About 305,000 b/d of mostly heavy sour Canadian crude has loaded at the Westridge terminal in Vancouver in the six months since the pipeline made its debut, according to analytics firm Vortexa, hitting a record of nearly 415,000 b/d in October (see graph). US west coast refiners received just over 150,000 b/d during this period, up from less than 40,000 b/d a year earlier, and deliveries rose to a high of nearly 205,000 b/d last month (see graph). Most TMX crude destined for the US west coast has gone to Californian refiners, with Marathon, Chevron and Phillips 66 emerging as consistent buyers.

Proximity to Vancouver and cheaper prices are attracting west coast buyers to TMX grades. The voyage time to California takes four days, compared with 10-14 days for Ecuadorean grades and over a month for Saudi crude.

The new flows have undermined west coast interest in Mideast Gulf and Latin American supply. West coast imports from the Mideast Gulf fell by 25pc on the year to just under 260,000 b/d in the first six months of TMX operations, Vortexa data show. Crude arrivals from Saudi Arabia have been hardest hit, falling to only 40,000 b/d over the period, a third of the 2023 amount.

Refiners are also turning away from Latin American grades. Mexican crude imports have dropped by 65pc since TMX started up, while imports of Ecuadorean heavy sour Napo and Oriente have fallen by 14pc.

Napo differentials have weakened as a result, dropping to a $9.70/bl discount to Nymex WTI for October from a $6.70/bl discount for May. Oriente fell by $1.20/bl to a $5.70/bl discount to WTI between May and October.

Alaskan ANS differentials have also come under pressure. December-delivery ANS averaged a $1.09/bl premium to Ice calendar-month average Brent, down from $4.30/bl a year earlier (see graph). But that drop has bolstered west coast demand for Alaskan crude, and spot ANS sales to the region rose by 8pc on the year to 1.6mn bl in May-December, Argus data show.

Lower-priced ANS is also attracting interest from further afield — almost 1.2mn bl loaded for delivery to China in September, the highest such flows since April 2021, according to Vortexa.

Rising tide

Canadian crude remains plentifully supplied to refiners in the US midcontinent, despite earlier concerns that the TMX line would constrain availabilities. Rising Canadian oil sands output has meant that Enbridge's 3.1mn b/d Mainline system from west Canada to the US midcontinent has been operating at full capacity, and 2.9mn b/d flowed to the region in July, the highest for the month since 1993, US EIA data show. August imports fell to 2.6mn b/d after wildfires limited production in Canada's key upstream province Alberta.

West coast demand for TMX crude could be undermined over the longer term by refinery closures. Phillips 66 aims to shut its 139,000 b/d Los Angeles refinery in late 2025. US west coast operators say more plants will close after then, citing a "hostile regulatory environment" in California and increased costs as the state government tightens the regulations governing refineries and production.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/11/18

Cop: Progress on actions to cut emissions uncertain

Cop: Progress on actions to cut emissions uncertain

Baku, 18 November (Argus) — Progress on mitigation — actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions — is uncertain at the UN Cop 29 climate summit, as talks on a specific text related to the issue are risk to be pushed back ito 2025, losing any progress made in the past year. Some countries had proposed using the mitigation work programme — a workstream focused on reducing emissions — to work towards the commitment made at Cop 28 in 2023 to "transition away" from fossil fuels. But talks have stalled and could end without a conclusion at the summit. Developed countries as well as developing nations including some small island states and countries in Latin America — such as Brazil, Colombia, Peru, Mexico — have expressed disappointment about how mitigation talks were going. New Zealand called on countries to follow up on last year's decision on mitigation at Cop 28 and Norway added that these issues deserved "more than silence on mitigation". Switzerland complained that mitigation was "held up by a select few", and said that the discussion was critical for increased commitments for next year's 2035 Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). NDCs are countries' climate plans that include emissions reduction targets. Cop parties are due to submit new versions by February 2025. The US also said that Cop 29 needed to "reaffirm the historical Global Stocktake decision" taken last year. And developed nations, led by the EU, called for discussion to continue this week — the second week of Cop 29. But countries including Bolivia, Iran and Saudi Arabia, for the Arab Group, pushed back on this. The mitigation work programme is "not… open to reinterpretation", Saudi Arabia's representative said today. The country said earlier that it did not want new targets to be imposed, complaining about the "top-down approach" taken by developed countries in mitigation talks. India reminded developed countries that they have yet to deliver on their new finance commitment — a crucial step for more ambitious NDCs in developing nations. But "Cop 29 cannot and will not be silent on mitigation", the summit's president, Mukhtar Babayev said today. "On mitigation we have been clear that we must make progress, "he said, adding that he has asked ministers from Norway and South Africa to consult on what an outcome on mitigation could look like. EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra today said that it is "imperative that we send a strong signal this week for the next round of NDCs", he said. Points related to mitigation — including transitioning away from fossil fuels and phasing out inefficient fossil fuels subsidies — are currently mentioned in the draft text for the new finance goal, known as the new collective quantified goal (NCQG). It is the key issue at Cop 29. Developed countries agreed to deliver $100bn/yr in climate finance to developing nations over 2020-25, and Cop parties must decide on the next stage — including the amount. Developed countries are likely push for the fossil fuel language to stay in the finance goal text, especially if mitigation talks stall elsewhere. But countries such as Saudi Arabia have long opposed this, while developed countries have received some criticism for still not having given an amount for the new finance target. By Georgia Gratton, Prethika Nair and Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Cop: G20 momentum key to Cop climate finance outcome


24/11/18
24/11/18

Cop: G20 momentum key to Cop climate finance outcome

Baku, 18 November (Argus) — The outcome of the G20 leaders' summit in Brazil taking place on Monday and Tuesday on climate financing will be key to the success of the UN Cop 29 climate conference in Baku, Azerbaijan, summit president Mukhtar Babayev said today. "We cannot succeed without [the G20], and the world is waiting to hear from them," Babayev said. The leaders' summit takes place at the beginning of the second week of the Cop 29 conference. Progress at Cop 29 last week towards agreeing a new climate finance target for developing countries — the so-called NCQG — was not sufficient, Babayev said. He is concerned that parties are not moving towards each other fast enough. Little progress was made in the first week on three main areas of disagreement: the amount of climate finance which should be provided, how it should be structured, and which countries should contribute. Babayev urged G20 leaders, including US president Joe Biden who will be present in Brazil, to send a "positive signal of commitment to solving the climate crisis," and deliver clear mandates for Cop 29. The talks in Baku move from the technical to the political phase this week. Ministers typically have more authority to move red lines. But parties should focus on wrapping up less contentious issues early in the week so as to leave time for major political decisions, according to Simon Stiell, executive secretary of UN climate body the UNFCCC. Babayev expects talks on the amount of climate financing which will be on the table to continue until the last day of the summit at the end of this week, he said. The Cop presidency has invited former and upcoming Cop hosts the UK and Brazil to advise and "ensure an ambitious and balanced package of negotiated outcomes." Both countries have in the past week communicated more ambitious emissions reduction targets, which have been broadly welcomed. The EU today called for the Cop presidency to step up its role in the process. "We do need a presidency to lead, to steer us in the direction of a safe landing ground," European commissioner for climate action Wopke Hoekstra said. Hoekstra declined to be drawn on the amount of climate financing that the EU would like to see. Developing countries have pushed for a high goal of $1.3 trillion/yr, well above the previous target of $100bn/yr. The EU today reiterated instead its desire for the base of contributor countries to be enlarged beyond the current roster of countries defined as developed under the UNFCCC, and for as much private finance to be mobilised as possible to add to public finance. By Rhys Talbot Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Canadian TMX crude finds favour in China


24/11/18
24/11/18

Canadian TMX crude finds favour in China

London, 18 November (Argus) — Canadian heavy crude exported from the country's west coast has become a steady supply source for Chinese refiners in the six months since the opening of the Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) pipeline in May, even as refiners elsewhere in Asia-Pacific have been more cautious about embracing the new flows. China-bound exports of Canadian heavy sour crude delivered along the TMX pipeline to Vancouver climbed to a fresh high of around 240,000 b/d in October, analytics platform Vortexa data show (see graph). This left average TMX loadings to China at around 150,000 b/d in June-October. The 590,000 b/d TMX project started loading cargoes in May. While Chinese refiners have been quick to embrace the convenience of the shortened time to import crude from Canada's Pacific coast, this has not been the case for other Asian refiners. China looked set to absorb all the October TMX exports to Asia-Pacific. Exports to other Asian destinations — South Korea, India, Japan and Brunei — averaged just 37,000 b/d in June-October. Weak refining margins may have encouraged Chinese buyers to turn to TMX-shipped crude, which has become their cheapest supply source not under sanctions. Private-sector Rongsheng has become a key buyer to meet its spot requirements of 4mn-6mn bl/month for the 800,000 b/d ZPC refinery in Zhejiang. The firm now buys between three and seven cargoes a month, or 53,000-125,000 b/d, of TMX crude, mainly Access Western Blend (AWB), a heavy sour grade with a higher total acid number (TAN) than Cold Lake, the other heavy sour TMX export. China's largest state-owned refiner Sinopec has also been a consistent buyer of AWB for its 470,000 b/d Maoming and 540,000 b/d Zhenhai refineries, and the increased Chinese buying of Canadian crude has displaced some of the country's usual intake from the Mideast Gulf . Rongsheng in the past bought large amounts of UAE grades including medium sour Upper Zakum through monthly spot tenders. Upper Zakum exports to China fell to around 380,000 b/d in June-October from just over 430,000 b/d in January-May and 615,000 b/d in 2023. The steep drop from last year might also be down to lower availabilities after Abu Dhabi's state-owned Adnoc started to divert more Upper Zakum to its domestic Ruwais refinery late last year as part of its crude flexibility project. But Iraqi Basrah Heavy flows to China have risen this year from 2023, defying early expectations that the heavy sour grade would be squeezed out by TMX crude. Traders in Asia-Pacific say medium sour grades have been most affected, including US Mars, with Asian imports this year falling to the lowest since the grade started moving to the region in 2017. Stuttering start Demand for TMX crude has not picked up as quickly elsewhere in Asia. Early interest surfaced from India, with private-sector Reliance Industries receiving a 2mn bl cargo of AWB in July, but no crude shipments have left Vancouver for India since then. Indian refiners may be wary of AWB's high TAN and the logistical challenges facing shipments. The July cargo made its way to India after three ship-to-ship transfers and the voyage took nearly two months. Reliance may instead prefer even cheaper Venezuelan crude. Flows to South Korea appear to have dried up after just under 3mn bl of Cold Lake loaded in July-August for the country, with Vortexa data showing no departures for South Korea since. A cargo of Cold Lake was exported in August to Japan, and another in September to Brunei. Interest from Asian refiners other than China and India is likely to be focused on Cold Lake rather than the more acidic AWB, which would be harder to process at their plants. By Fabian Ng TMX Vancouver exports to Asia-Pacific Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Q&A: Chevron sees global exploration revival


24/11/18
24/11/18

Q&A: Chevron sees global exploration revival

London, 18 November (Argus) — US major Chevron and its peers are taking a more prominent role in global frontier exploration as they push for scale and value in oil and gas output in the face of an uncertain energy transition. Chevron vice-president of global exploration Liz Schwarze spoke to Aydin Calik at the African Energy Week conference in Cape Town, South Africa, earlier this month, Edited highlights follow: How much of a role do you think exploration will play for Chevron and the wider sector in the next 10 years? We believe the future of energy is lower carbon, and we're leveraging our strengths to grow energy delivery to an energy-hungry world. We see oil and gas being part of the energy mix for longer, investing to reduce the carbon intensity of our existing operations. Growing our oil and gas for longer, because it's a declining business — as you produce it, you have to replace it. We replace our resources to underpin our future in three ways. Exploration is one; M&A, buying other companies, is another; and then technology is the third. So think in terms of shale and tight development in the US, with drilling and completions technologies; and the Anchor technology, bringing on the world's first 20k [20,000 lb/inch², ultra-high pressure deepwater] production platform in the Gulf of Mexico. That's technology. It's a new development, but it will help in the long term. For exploration, at Chevron, we invest in exploring in our existing assets — if we can find new oil and gas pools that we can tie into existing infrastructure, it's a win... it comes on faster, creates a lot of value, leverages existing infrastructure — but we're [also] increasing our investment in more frontier areas, where we can build big, material positions at scale, early and if successful, really build new businesses. That's what you see us doing in places we've added acreage recently, like Brazil and Uruguay. We have the block in Namibia, we're going to drill, and we're in Egypt and so forth. So exploration is a very important part of Chevron's future, and because it's a bit of a long-cycle game, yes, for exploration, 10 years is an easy horizon. And do you think things might change in terms of what you're exploring for — more oil, more gas? Oil is relatively straightforward to get to markets, because there's a global market for liquids. If we're going to explore for gas, it'll be in a place that has either an existing market or existing assets to market, for the most part. Sometimes you explore for oil and you find gas. Sometimes search for gas and you find oil — because it's model based particularly in these frontier areas. So, you know, whatever mix we find we have to look at the development scenario for that, so that we can bring as much of that product to market with the highest returns possible for our shareholders. What are the biggest challenges for explorers today? We'll focus on the frontier first. Chevron looks at entering a new country or a new basin for exploration, really looking for four things to be there. First, of course, are the rocks — a compelling hypothesis that there are hydrocarbons at commercial scale. Second is a supportive fiscal environment, with which, upon discovery, you'd have the opportunity to create value for everyone. The third is access — the country has to offer a way for an operator like Chevron to enter, whether that's through a competitive bid round or through a direct negotiation; we'll also do farm-ins to other people's acreage. And regular access. That hypothesis of where hydrocarbons are can change through time. Having regular, predictable opportunities to access acreage is important, and it is sometimes a challenge. Some countries have opportunities for a while, and then they'll take things off the market, and then you don't really have another way to invest, and that creates a challenge. And then the fourth consideration is just the overall welcomeness for us to deliver the work programme that we commit to — functioning governmental organisations, all the way from environmental to operational permitting. Where is the most exciting place to explore at the moment? Are there any new Namibias around the corner? I hope so! Everywhere we enter, we have a story. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't work. But we've got a well drilling in in Egypt now, so west of the Nile in the Herodotus basin — it's called the Khendjer well. So Egypt, we're excited. Namibia, it's the hot story of the past few years. In the Orange basin, we're in PEL90, and that well will start notionally [on a] December timeframe. Think of a big deepwater exploration well. Think of 90 days as an average. [We are] really very keen to see what our block holds. Certainly, high hopes. And then we've added new acreage in Brazil, the South Santos and the Pelotas basin, we signed a block last week in Uruguay. And so, you know, some of that geology is what we call conjugate margin in Namibia. And Angola and Nigeria. There are places in the world that are very successful hydrocarbon provinces that are still under explored and we think have a tremendous potential. And Nigeria deepwater is one. We had a lovely discovery on the Nigeria shelf a few weeks ago — the Meji well. And then we added two blocks in Angola earlier this year, deepwater. I'm getting a sense, not just from Chevron, that exploration around the world is picking up? I think this is true across the board. And one of the reasons that you explore is the idea that there's likely a further advantaged barrel relative to some of the existing discoveries. So there are a lot of stranded discoveries — either cost-prohibitive, geopolitically challenged, any number of issues that prevent some of the really big discoveries around the world from coming to market. From an exploration standpoint, if you are able to discover at scale, develop that and then bring it to market, it will be lower in the supply stack from a breakeven perspective. And lower carbon intensity as well from the get go, and it will find a place in the market. On Namibia, what we have heard from some other operators is high gas content. This might make it more challenging. Have you thought about that? So when we're thinking about entering a new basin, and then when we're thinking about drilling the well, before we make those investments, we're always thinking about what the development scenario might look like. Because we've got to test that development scenario against our range of resource outcomes and test, you know, whether it's going to be economically viable. Or how would we make it economically viable? So for Namibia, we have considered, what would you do at various gas contents? The first, simplest, development is that you bring your production flow to your FPSO, compress the gas and reinject it. You can do that, given the resource volumes at a commercial outcome, Over time, I think it'll be interesting to see if there's a broader-basin scale gas solution that comes to bear, whether that's pipe to shore or LNG. It depends on the GOR [gas-oil ratio] and then it'll depend upon the gas terms that the government provides. In the eastern Mediterranean, is Egypt your main exploration prospect? Our focus is Egypt for exploration. When we go into an area like Egypt, we try to pick something at scale, and then high-grade from there. And so you relinquish the leases that, with additional data, don't look as prospective as the other ones. Right now, our focus is on block four. We're going to drill, and then we're also in [a block] north of that, that someone else operates on our behalf, and we have a minority interest. What about Algeria and its shale potential? To what extent do you think you'll be able exploit those resources? And will you be signing something soon? Chevron has been in conversations with the ministry, upstream regulator Alnaft and Sonatrach since 2020. We signed MOUs, that was in the news. And then the big milestone was 13 June of this year, where we aligned on two areas of interest. And we signed heads of agreement to negotiate Chevron's entry into these two areas of interest. And so that's ongoing now, and that's all I can say about that. We have two areas, one in the Ahnet and one in the Berkine, and seeing if there's a negotiated agreement that would have Chevron enter the country, working with Sontrach to explore and develop those. Algeria is, again, one of these very hydrocarbon-rich countries in Africa. A tremendous gas resource. So we think it's a really strategic opportunity for Chevron, if we can get to a negotiated agreement that's amenable to both parties. You know, significant resources in an existing, vibrant oil and gas sector, access to markets through pipelines and LNG for the gas. And so we believe at Chevron that we can bring our global experience, and in particular our shale and tight expertise to bear in Algeria. To help them explore and ultimately develop. But you think you can do shale development there? Yes. I mean, the first piece would be exploration, right? So, you know, even in shale and tight, the molecules are there, or you're fairly confident the molecules are there. It's just, are the molecules producible at a commercial scale? And so that's always the first phase — you drill some pilots, look at your flow back, then optimise. And we believe everything that we do in the Permian is potentially applicable, especially from a factory perspective, right? And then the challenges are going to be things like supply chain. How much more exploration potential is there left in the Gulf of Mexico? Would you say, is it mature, or is it still much to play for? The Gulf of Mexico tends to reinvent itself. So we still see plenty of potential there. What's going on in the Gulf of Mexico right now are two critical technologies. One is on the geophysics side — ocean bottom node acquisition for exploration, which is giving us much better images of very complicated geology. That's a critical technology evolution. And we believe that that will help discern between prospects — point the way of where not to drill, and where maybe to drill. And then the other one is, of course, the Anchor platform, which is the world's first 20k. We are currently the only operator in the world that's operating a 20k field, and so I don't know where that technology would be applicable globally yet. But you know what we see? You've got to build the technology, you put it on production, and then you realise, oh, okay, now I can use this to really unlock some other areas. Still pretty, pretty excited about the Gulf of Mexico. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Trump taps oil services head as US energy secretary


24/11/17
24/11/17

Trump taps oil services head as US energy secretary

Washington, 17 November (Argus) — President-elect Donald Trump intends to nominate oil services company Liberty Energy's chief executive Chris Wright to lead the US Department of Energy (DOE), giving him oversight over LNG export facilities and a vast portfolio of federally-backed energy projects. Wright also will serve on Trump's planned Council of National Energy, which will oversee policies across the federal government affecting energy production, permitting, transportation and regulation. Trump said he wants Wright to work alongside North Dakota governor Doug Burgum, who Trump has nominated as US interior secretary, to oversee "the path to US ENERGY DOMINANCE" by cutting regulations and supporting investments from the private sector. "As Secretary of Energy, Chris will be a key leader, driving innovation, cutting red tape, and ushering in a new 'Golden Age of American Prosperity and Global Peace,'" Trump said. Liberty Energy, which was founded in 2011, focuses on hydraulic fracturing services and earned $1.2bn last year. Wright has downplayed the urgency for the world to address climate change or transition away from fossil fuels. He has criticized the use of phrases like "climate crisis" and "carbon pollution", which he says are impeding projects that could alleviate energy poverty. Those terms "are not only deceptive, they are in fact destructive deceptions," Wright said in a video he posted last year on YouTube. "Destructive because they drive centrist politicians and regulators to oppose life-critical infrastructure, like building pipelines and natural gas export terminals." If confirmed by the US Senate, Wright would be responsible for deciding how to resolve a "pause" on US LNG export licensing that President Joe Biden put in place in January. DOE has been studying whether allowing more gas exports would exacerbate climate change or hurt consumers by increasing domestic natural gas prices. The vast majority of DOE's budget goes to maintaining the US stockpile of nuclear weapons and cleaning up contaminated nuclear sites. DOE also manages the four facilities that make up the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which currently holds 387.8mn bl of crude, and oversees 17 national laboratories that are spread across the US. In the last four years, the US Congress substantially increased DOE's role in energy. DOE is currently managing billions of dollars in funds provided by the 2021 infrastructure law, such as an $8bn initiative meant to support "hydrogen hubs" and a $2.5bn carbon capture demonstration program. The Inflation Reduction Act expanded DOE authority to issue loans for clean energy projects by about $100bn. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more