Alliance pipeline seeks new rate structure

: Natural gas
14/10/10

The long-haul Alliance pipeline has asked Canada's National Energy Board (NEB) to approve a new toll structure that would divide the pipeline into three rate zones, a major change that the pipeline said is needed for its long term economic survival.

The new structure would allow some shippers to share the risk of basis changes in the price of gas between western Canada and the Chicago market, which spiked substantially in the winter of 2013-14 as prices at Chicago Citygates peaked at above $42/mmBtu.

The NEB has set a schedule for the rate case and recently released a list of participants in the proceedings. The agency plans to make a final decision in April.

Alliance, a 2,311-mile (3,719km) system, carries liquids-rich natural gas from western Canada and the US midcontinent to the Great Lakes market. It was constructed primarily as a bullet line to ship gas from a single basin to the Aux Sable gas processing and fractionation plant at the pipeline's terminus in Channahon, Illinois. But Alliance also has found itself well-positioned to carry liquids-rich gas from developing unconventional formations such as the Bakken shale, primarily in North Dakota.

The pipeline said that changes in the natural gas market, including declining production in western Canada and increased use of gas in the Alberta oil sands industry, have decreased the overall availability of gas for export.

In addition, growing production from northeast US shale fields, including the Marcellus and the Utica, have greatly increased competition for western Canadian gas, including in the Great Lakes region, Alliance said in its NEB application filed in May.

"The development of both formations has and will continue to impact the overall natural gas supply and demand balance at the Chicago energy hub and in eastern Canada, requiring that Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin producers compete in these markets with Marcellus and Utica shale gas supply," Alliance said.

Alliance is a relatively new pipeline. It has been in commercial service since December 2000. The construction and operation of the Alliance system was supported by 15-year firm service contracts from 37 shippers.

In 2010, the majority of the pipeline's shippers declined to exercise their renewal rights under the transportation contracts. As a result, effective 1 December 2015, about 92pc of previously contracted capacity will become available to the market, Alliance said.

In an effort to attract shippers, the pipeline's new rate structure will offer new services and tolling flexibility, moving from a traditional cost of service model to a "market based model," Alliance said.

Tolling on the Canadian portion of the pipeline will be divided into three zones – two for receipt and one for delivery to the US-Canada border.

Zone 1, the gathering zone in Alberta, includes all receipt points downstream of the Blueberry Hill compressor station near the Alberta-British Columbia border. Zone 2 is the gathering zone in British Columbia, including all points downstream of Blueberry Hill.

Gas received in zones 1 and 2 will be delivered through to the US-Canada border through a new Alliance delivery zone. The three zones can be levied separately for services or added together for service to the US border.

The new toll structure also includes changes to the calculations of certain revenues including depreciation, return on equity and capital structure and a toll proposal that allows shippers to share with Alliance the risk of regional gas price changes.

Under the proposal, shippers agreeing to a minimum 5-year commitment would pay a lower floor toll, plus a risk-sharing mechanism based on a 50pc share of the increase above the toll floor of the western Canada‐Chicago basis.

The spot gas price premium at Chicago Citygates against the NIT/AECO hub in Alberta averaged $2.90/mmBtu during winter 2013-14 as several bouts of extreme cold caused record high prices in the Great Lakes region. Chicago's premium to NIT/AECO peaked at $37.95/mmBtu on 27 January.

The premium has narrowed significantly during the injection season, as mild temperatures and growing inventories put downward pressure on midcontinent prices. Chicago's premium to NIT/AECO from 1 April to 8 October averaged 32¢/mmBtu, down by 67pc from the same period a year earlier.

Alliance is taking on significant risk under the new rate proposal, but has little choice because "they have to attract shippers somehow," said Cameron Gingrich, director of gas services at the Calgary-based consultant group Ziff Energy.

Gingrich said that increasing competition in the Chicago market, including the planned partial reversal of the Rockies Express (Rex) pipeline, leaves little market share for a liquids-rich pipeline such as Alliance.

Several companies have applied to be a part of the rate case proceedings, including BP, which objected to Alliance's original application, saying that it was incomplete.

BP said in a filing to the NEB that the application lacked "solid and detailed evidence of substantial commercial support, such as a negotiated settlement, that demonstrates that the proposed tolls would be just and reasonable."

Other shippers on Alliance, including Noble Americas Gas & Power, Tenaska Marketing Canada, and Canadian Natural Resources filed letters in support of the rate proposal.

The NEB last month issued a list of participants in the proceedings, including BP Canada, TransCanada, Apache, Encana, Shell Canada, Talisman Energy, Aux Sable Liquids Products, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, Canadian Natural Resources, and the Alberta provincial government.

emb/dcb/fn

Send comments to feedback@argusmedia.com

If you would like to review other ArgusMedia.com content options, request more information about Argus' energy news, data and analysis services.

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/05/02

Shell says can deliver solid returns below $50/bl

London, 2 May (Argus) — Shell can pull on several levers to maintain shareholder returns in a sub-$50/bl oil price environment, including adjusting capital expenditure (capex), chief financial officer Sinead Gorman said today. Shell is facing questions about contingency plans for lower oil prices after Ice Brent crude futures briefly dipped below $60/bl in intraday trading earlier this week for only the second time in more than four years. Oil prices are not only under pressure from weakening global economic growth prospects due to US import tariffs, but also from the Opec+ group's decision to bring back production faster than previously flagged. At $50/bl, Shell's commitment to return 40-50pc of its cash flows to shareholders would mean $8bn/yr of dividends and $6bn-7bn/yr of share buybacks, while only having to pull back "a little bit" on capex, Gorman said. In a $40/bl oil price environment, Gorman expects Shell's operating cash flow to still cover the $8bn/yr in dividends. "But of course, for us, the important thing is to be able to try and maintain the buyback for as long as we can," she said. At these lower oil prices, Shell can make use of its comparatively strong balance sheet to support share buybacks. Shell's debt gearing remained below 19pc at the end of the first quarter despite the company increasing its net debt during the period. "Are we comfortable leaning on the balance sheet? Yes," chief executive Wael Sawan said. The balance sheet has been positioned so it can be used to generate shareholder value, "whether that shareholder value is best created through more buybacks, or whether that shareholder value is created through an inorganic [investment] or the like", he said. For now, Shell is sticking to its $20bn-$22bn capex budget for 2025 and expects to carry on with planned investments in projects and other commitments. But the company has demonstrated in the recent past "a strong ability to be able to pull many levers" should oil prices fall futher, Gordon said, referencing the reduction in capex to below $18bn during the Covid pandemic. "So, the flex is there, but that's not the position we're in at the moment. We don't need to do that and we see great opportunities for value," she said, pointing to the company's announcement earlier this year that it is raising its stake in the Ursa oil project in the US Gulf of Mexico. Earlier today, Shell said it is maintaining its quarterly dividend at 35.8¢/share and will continue to buy back its shares at a rate of $3.5bn/quarter, despite a 35pc drop in its first-quarter profit to $4.8bn. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Shell’s 1Q European gas production up

25/05/02

Shell’s 1Q European gas production up

London, 2 May (Argus) — Shell's European gas production for sale in January-March slightly stepped up on the year, but the company expects works to limit global oil and gas production this quarter. Shell produced 24.9mn m³/d in the first quarter, up from 24.8mn m³/d a year earlier but below the 25.2mn m³/d in fourth-quarter 2024. Shell has stakes in UK and Dutch fields, as well as a 17.8pc share in Norway's Ormen Lange field and an 8.1pc stake in the giant Troll field. Output from the two Norwegian fields was down on the year in January-February, the latest months for which data are available. Ormen Lange produced 19.8mn m³/d in January-February, down from 22.6mn m³/d a year earlier. Troll production averaged 123.6mn m³/d over those two months, also down from 126.2mn m³/d a year earlier. Shell's integrated gas business was the company's top performing segment with profits of $2.8bn, slightly higher on the year. Lighter maintenance at the Pearl gas-to-liquids plant in Qatar supported production, but unplanned works and weather constraints in Australia left the company's LNG volumes at 6.6mn t in January-March from 7.6mn t a year earlier, Shell said. Meanwhile, Shell's upstream division posted $2.1bn in profit, down 8.5pc on the year earlier but double compared with the fourth quarter 2024. The segment was hit with a $509mn tax bill related to the UK's Energy Profits Levy in the first quarter, partially offset by gains from asset sales. Across the entire company, Shell reported first-quarter profits adjusted for inventory valuation effects and one-off items of $5.6bn, surpassing analysts' expectations of $5.3bn . Shell's first-quarter worldwide oil, liquids and gas production was 2.84mn boe/d, down from 2.91mn boe/d a year earlier but up from 2.82mn boe/d in the previous quarter. The company expects lower oil and gas production this quarter in a 2.45mn-2.71mn boe/d range because of maintenance across its integrated gas portfolio and an absence of volumes from its SPDC business in Nigeria, which Shell sold off in March. By Aleksandra Godlewska and Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Shell’s 1Q profit falls but beats expectations

25/05/02

Shell’s 1Q profit falls but beats expectations

London, 2 May (Argus) — Shell's Integrated Gas business segment delivered a solid performance in the first quarter, helping the UK major exceed analysts' earnings estimates despite ongoing struggles in its downstream Chemicals and Products business. Shell reported a first-quarter profit of $4.8bn, down from $7.4bn a year earlier. Adjusted for inventory valuation effects and one-off items, profit was $5.6bn, surpassing analysts' expectations of $5.3bn. Integrated Gas was Shell's top-performing segment, with a profit of $2.8bn, slightly higher than the first quarter of 2024. Production was down by 6.6pc year-on-year at 927,000 b/d oil equivalent (boe/d), but up 2pc from the previous quarter. Less maintenance at the Pearl gas-to-liquids plant in Qatar had a positive impact on production, Shell said. But the company's LNG volumes were affected by unplanned maintenance and weather constraints in Australia, falling to 6.6mn t from 7.6mn t a year earlier. The Upstream segment posted a profit of $2.1bn, down by 8.5pc on a year earlier but double what it made in the fourth quarter of 2024. The segment was hit with a $509mn tax charge related to the UK's Energy Profits Levy in the first quarter, partially offset by gains from asset sales. Production for the segment was slightly down compared to a year earlier at 1.86mn boe/d, partly due to the divestment of Shell's SPDC business in Nigeria. Overall, Shell's first-quarter production was 2.84mn boe/d, down from 2.91mn boe/d a year earlier but up from 2.82mn boe/d in the previous quarter. Shell expects lower production in the current quarter, ranging from 2.45mn boe/d to 2.71mn boe/d due to maintenance across its Integrated Gas portfolio and the absence of volumes from the SPDC business. The Chemicals and Products segment reported a $77mn loss for the first quarter, compared to a $1.3bn profit a year earlier. Refinery runs were down by 4.8pc year-on-year, and chemicals sales volumes were marginally lower. Despite persistent low margins in the downstream, Shell noted that refining and chemicals margins improved compared to the fourth quarter. Shell expects capital spending for 2025 to be within a $20bn-$22bn range, in line with last year's spending. The company is maintaining its dividend at 35.8¢/share and its share buyback programme at $3.5bn a quarter. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia's Coalition eyes power, resource funding cuts

25/05/02

Australia's Coalition eyes power, resource funding cuts

Sydney, 2 May (Argus) — Australia's federal Coalition opposition has announced it will cut key energy rebates and resource sector subsidies, if elected on 3 May, to reduce forecast future budget deficits. The Peter Dutton-led opposition will cut programs, including the Labor government's A$20bn ($12.8bn) Rewiring the Nation transmission plan, and the A$15bn National Reconstruction Fund aimed at underwriting green manufacturing using domestic minerals. It will also unwind electric vehicle tax concessions to save A$3.2bn, and cancel planned production tax credits for critical minerals processing and green hydrogen estimated to cost A$14.7bn. Combined savings measures will improve the budget's position by A$13.9bn over the four years to 2028-29, the Coalition said on 1 May, cutting debt by A$40bn during the same timeframe. The announcement comes as opinion polls show Australia's next federal government is likely to force one of the two major parties into minority, after a campaign where cost-of-living relief promises have trumped economic reform policy. The centre-left Labor party is more likely than the conservative Coalition to form government at the 3 May poll. It holds a thin majority of just three seats in parliament's main chamber, the House of Representatives, meaning a swing against it would force it to deal with minor parties such as the Greens and independent groupings. Promising a stable government, as Australia emerged from Covid-19, Labor had benefited from a resources boom as Russia's invasion of Ukraine led LNG and coal receipts to skyrocket and China's emergence from lockdowns revitalised its demand for iron ore, which jointly form the nation's main commodity exports. But as markets adjust to a period of protectionist trade policy and predictions of a slowdown in global growth abound, economists have criticised the major parties' reluctance to embrace major reform on areas such as taxation, while continuing to spend at elevated levels post-pandemic. Australia's resource and energy commodity exports are forecast to fall to A$387bn in the fiscal year to 30 June 2025 from A$415bn in 2023–24. The Office of the Chief Economist is predicting further falls over the next five years, reaching A$343bn in 2029-30, lowering expected government revenue from company tax and royalties. Gas The Coalition has pledged a domestic reservation scheme for the east coast, forcing 50-100PJ (1.34bn-2.68bn m³/yr) into the grid by penalising spot LNG cargoes. Australia's upstream lobby has opposed this, but rapidly declining reserves offshore Victoria state mean gas may need to be imported to the nation's south, depending on the success of electrification efforts and an uncertain timeline for coal-fired power retirements. Labor has resisted such further gas interventions , but it is unclear how it will reverse a trend of rising gas prices and diminishing domestic supply, despite releasing a future gas plan last year. The party is promising 82pc renewables nationally by 2030, meaning it will have to nearly double the 2025 year-to-date figure of 42pc. This could require 15GW of gas-fired capacity by 2050 to firm the grid. On environmental policy, narrowing polls mean Labor's likely partners in government could be the anti-fossil fuel Greens and climate-focused independents — just some of the present crossbench of 16 out of a parliament of 151. The crossbench may drive a climate trigger requirement in any changes to environmental assessments, which could rule out new or brownfield coal and gas projects. Coal has been conspicuously absent from policy debates, but Labor has criticised the Coalition's nuclear energy policy as expensive and unproven, while the Coalition has said Labor's renewables-led grid would be unstable and costly because of new transmission requirements. The impact of the US tariff shock that dominated opening days of the month-long election campaign remains unclear. Unlike Canada, Australia is yet to be directly targeted by US president Trump's rhetoric on trade balances and barriers. But the global unease that has set in could assist Labor's prime minister Anthony Albanese, as he presents an image of continuity in an uncertain world economy. Australia's main exposure to Trump tariffs is via China, its largest trading partner and destination for about 35pc of exports, including metal concentrates, ores, coal and LNG. A downturn in the world's largest manufacturer would spell difficult times ahead for Australia, as it grapples with balancing its budget in a normalising commodity market. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Technical issue behind EIA gas report delay: Update

25/05/01

Technical issue behind EIA gas report delay: Update

Updates with report, EIA staff reduction. New York, 1 May (Argus) — The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) said a technical issue with third-party software was the reason a key natural gas storage report was delayed today. The Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report , which is closely watched by traders and often moves markets, did not appear until 2pm ET, later than its regular scheduled time of 10:30am ET. Inventories grew by 107 Bcf (3bn m³) in the week ended 25 April, according to the report. The latest delay comes amid a flurry of staff departures at the EIA, the energy statistics arm of the US government, as part of ongoing efforts by President Donald Trump's administration to slash the size of the federal work force and curb spending. Around a third of the agency's 350 staff have taken voluntary buyouts, according to a person familiar with the situation. The staff exodus raises concerns about the agency's ability to gather and report timely data and continue providing independent forecasts covering energy production, stocks, demand and prices. Last month, the EIA delayed its monthly Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) by two days to take into account significant changes in markets following Trump's sweeping tariffs. And the EIA's release of its 2025 Annual Energy Outlook did not include the in-depth analysis that usually accompanies the report. It was accompanied by a statement from the Department of Energy that said the report reflects the "disastrous path" US energy production was on under the administration of former president Joseph Biden. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more