Latest market news

German coal supply restrictions support January prices

  • : Electricity
  • 18/11/29

The German January power contract has stepped higher, with expectations for a strong call on older gas-fired power plants and high coal-fired output costs owing to restricted coal deliveries because of low river levels.

Clean dark and spark spreads for base-load delivery in January have risen in the second half of this month as a result of the risk that tight coal supply will persist in the coming weeks. The situation could curb coal-fired power generation over the winter, lifting gas-fired output at times when demand for German fossil-fuel generation is firm.

Persistently dry weather in Germany has restricted coal barge movements since late summer. The December contract has, in recent days, resisted upside pressure from tight fuel supply to a number of German coal-fired plants. This is because daily average wind power generation was forecast to be at firm levels of 14.5GW-23.6GW on 1-4 December. This would limit the call on gas-fired units and allow affected coal-fired plants to scale back production without affecting German wholesale power prices, as the need for fossil-fuel generation would fall on strong renewables output.

And industrial power demand in the last week of December is typically low because of the Christmas holiday season. The week 52 contract — the week covering the Christmas period — ended yesterday's session at €39.75/MWh, a level at which even modern 59pc-efficient gas-fired plants would not be able to recoup marginal costs, currently at €43.18/MWh, for base-load generation.

But the January contract has increased as the market expects coal and gas-fired generation demand to rise if wind power output is around average.

Low water levels on the Rhine river have increased coal barge rates from the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) trading hub to Mannheim in south Germany to around €40-41/t this week, and to up to €40/t since mid-October. This compares with a typical rate of €5-6/t. A barge rate of €40/t adds around €14/MWh to the cost of operating a 40pc-efficient coal-fired plant. Clean dark spreads for January base-load delivery ended yesterday's session at €20.13/MWh, suggesting that affected coal-fired units would continue to recoup positive generation margins at times when they can opt out of scaling back production to optimise their coal stocks. And clean spark spreads for older 49.13pc-efficient gas plants closed yesterday at €3.83/MWh. Working day-ahead clean spark spreads for such gas-fired plants were positive on 20 out of 40 days so far this winter, since 1 October, including on 11 days so far this month when coal supply to German plants deteriorated further and amid lower wind power generation on several days.

Coal supply squeeze

Rhine water levels at the Kaub measuring station — the narrowest point for coal barges travelling from ARA to south Germany — stood at 31cm at midday today and are forecast to be around 29cm-33cm on 29 November-1 December. At that level, less than 20pc of barges can pass Kaub.

German railway firm DB Cargo has received higher demand for coal deliveries by rail as a result of low Rhine levels, a spokesman said. DB Cargo will provide 10 additional trains a week to deliver coal from Dutch ports to power plants in Germany from December. On average, each train can carry around 2,700t of coal, DB Cargo said.

From next week, the 10 additional trains will increase deliveries by 27,000 t/week compared with the norm. But barges that can still pass Kaub can load significantly below maximum capacity. Smaller barges capable of loading 2,500t can now take around 10-20pc of capacity, which means that the barges load around 2,250-2,000t less per delivery compared with normal weather conditions and unrestricted shipping. So additional trains are unlikely to completely offset lower deliveries by barges should the situation persist.

German coal-fired power generator GKM, which operators units with a combined capacity of 2GW in Mannheim, cannot exclude a further drop in coal supply unless the situation improves significantly, despite optimising its coal supply options and fully exploiting all supply routes, the firm said. GKM has increased its coal receipts by railway since the summer.

Low Rhine levels also occurred at the end of 2016, the beginning of last year and in September-November 2015. But the difference this year is that rainfall levels have been well below average over a much longer period. Notable barging restrictions typically set in when Kaub water levels drop to around 90-100cm, compared with around 30cm now. Since January 2010, Kaub levels have risen by 60cm or more over a 30-day period in 23 out of 108 months, suggesting that this significant recovery is far from impossible but statistically less likely than a moderate increase. This has contributed to the strength of the German January base-load contract and underlying clean dark and spark spreads.

Optimisation measures

The situation has predominately affected coal-fired plants in south and in central west Germany (see table), with some plant operators announcing as early as late July and the beginning of August that low water levels were restricting supply to their units.

But Swedish state-owned utility Vattenfall late last week notified the market that output at three of its coal-fired combined heat and power (CHP) plants in Berlin, with a combined capacity of around 775MW, will be restricted beyond must-run capacity needed to meet district heating demand because of insufficient coal supply.

The firm's Remit notice had initially been in place until today. But Vattenfall yesterday extended the notification until 7 January amid expectations that the situation will not significantly improve over the next few weeks. The CHP units in Berlin are the first coal-fired plants in more northerly locations to be severely affected by the situation. They are connected to the 50Hertz grid.

In total, Remit notifications on restricted coal supply has been issued for coal-fired plants with a combined capacity of 7.7GW, of which 4.4GW alone are connected to the control area of south German transmission system operator (TSO) TransnetBW. Around 2.1GW are connected to the Amprion and 510MW to the Tennet grid. Total coal-fired power capacity operated in the German wholesale power market stands at around 21.4GW this winter compared with 22.7GW in the 2017-18 winter, as a number of units shut down or moved into the German grid reserve. This means that nearly 36pc of Germany's market-based coal-fired generation capacity is now significantly affected by coal supply limitations.

Coal-fired power generation has been trending lower in the TransnetBW grid month on month in the off-peak morning period — the first eight hours of the day — and the off-peak evening hours from hours 20-23, while generation during peak-hours has been largely steady on the month. In the Amprion grid, off-peak power sector coal burn on 1-27 November has also been lower compared with October, although peak-load generation at 4.1GW is well above the daily average of 3.7GW last month.

In the Tennet and 50Hertz grids, coal-fired power generation has been higher month on month throughout the day. Overall, daily average German coal-fired generation on 1-27 November reached the highest for off-peak hours — at 9.1GW in the morning and 10.6GW in the evening — for any month since February and the highest for peak-load output, at 12.8GW, so far this year. This highlights that coal plants in the Tennet and 50Hertz grids have more than offset lower off-peak generation from units in the TransnetBW and Amprion areas, where most of the plants hit by the coal barge restrictions are located.

But with tight coal supply now reaching more northerly locations such as Vattenfall's CHP plants in Berlin, plant optimisation measures might have to increase not only in south and central west Germany but across the country to manage coal stock levels through the winter should dry weather conditions persist. For CHP plants, the situation is exacerbated as they need to operate at must-run power capacity to meet district heating supply which means that they can manage their coal stocks only by limiting power generation beyond must run, as Vattenfall indicated it would do at its Berlin plant sites. From the 7.7GW of coal capacity now affected by tight coal supply, nearly 6.3GW are also CHP plants.

With little reprieve in sight in the near term for affected coal plant operators, optimisation measures could last into and even intensify in January should there not be significant rainfall, which would lift output beyond must-run from gas-fired CHP units and non-CHP gas units on days with lower wind power generation.

German coal-fired plants affected by low river levels*
Plant operator UnitCapacity in MW Grid connection River Efficiency %CHP Date of first Remit notificationRemit Note
Coal supply restrictions
RWEWestfalen E 764AmprionRhine 46 (official)No25-JulCoal supply affected due to low water
EnBWAlbach/Deizisau HKW 2336TransnetBWNeckar42 (assumed)Yes8-AugCoal supply affected due to low water
EnBWHeilbronn 7778TransnetBWNeckar40 (assumed)Yes8-AugCoal supply affected due to low water
EnBWRDK 7517TransnetBWRhine 41 (assumed)Yes8-AugCoal supply affected due to low water
EnBWRDK 8834TransnetBWRhine 46 (official)Yes8-AugCoal supply affected due to low water
RWEGersteinwerk K2614AmprionRhine 42 (official)No10-AugCoal supply affected due to low water
GKMGKM 6255TransnetBWRhine 38 (assumed)Yes18-OctCoal supply affected due to low water
GKMGKM 7425TransnetBWRhine 40 (assumed)Yes18-OctCoal supply affected due to low water
GKMGKM 8435TransnetBWRhine 43 (assumed)Yes18-OctCoal supply affected due to low water
GKMGKM 9843TransnetBWRhine 46 (official)Yes18-OctCoal supply affected due to low water
UniperStaudinger 5510TennetMain43( assumed)Yes25-OctCoal supply affected due to low water
UniperScholven B345AmprionRhine 35 (assumed)Yes22-NovCoal stock levels severely affected by tight coal delivery
UniperScholven C 345AmprionRhine 35 (assumed)Yes22-NovCoal stock levels severely affected by tight coal delivery
VattenfallReuter West D28250HertzSpree42 (assumed)Yes22-NovPower production beyond must run restricted due to insuffiient coal supply
Vattenfall Reuter West E28250HertzSpree 42 (assumed)Yes22-NovPower production beyond must run restricted due to insuffiient coal supply
VattenfallMoabit A89Distribution gridSpree42 (assumed)Yes22-NovPower production beyond must run restricted due to insuffiient coal supply
*as of 28 November 2018

German power sector gas burn by control area MW

German coal-fired generation by control area MW

Rhine Kaub water levels cm

German January clean dark, spark spreads €/MWh

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/11/25

Uruguay's left-wing candidate wins presidency

Uruguay's left-wing candidate wins presidency

Montevideo, 25 November (Argus) — The left-wing opposition Frente Amplio will return to power in Uruguay after winning a hard-fought run-off election on 24 November. Yamandu Orsi, former mayor of the Canalones department, was elected president with close to 51pc of valid votes. He defeated Alvaro Delgado, of the ruling Partido Nacional. The Frente will control the senate, but will have a minority in the lower chamber. It last governed from 2015-2020. Orsi will take office on 1 March in one of Latin America's most stable economies, with the World Bank forecasting growth at 3.2pc for this year, much higher than the 1.9pc regional average. He will also inherit a country that has been making strides to implement a second energy transition geared toward continued decarbonization and new technologies, such as SAF and low-carbon hydrogen. He will also have to decide on future oil and natural gas exploration. Uruguay does not produce oil or gas, but has hopes that its offshore mimics that of Nambia, because of similar geology. TotalEnergies has made a major find there. The Frente's government plan states that it "will deepen the energy transition, focusing on the use of renewable energy, and decarbonization of the economy and transportation … gradually regulating so that public and cargo transportation can operate with hydrogen." On to hydrogen Uruguay is already the regional leader with renewable energy, with renewables covering 100pc of power demand on 24 November, according to the state-run power company, UTE. Wind accounted for 49pc, hydro 35pc, biomass 10pc and solar 6pc. Orsi will need to make decisions regarding high-profile projects for low-carbon hydrogen, as well as a push by the state-run Ancap to get private companies to ramp up oil and gas exploration on seven offshore blocks. The industry, energy and mining ministry lists four planned low-carbon hydrogen projects, including one between Chile's HIF and Ancap subsidiary Alur that would have a 1GW electrolyzer. Germany's Enertrag is working on an e-methanol project with a 150MW electrolyzer, while two Uruguayan groups are working on small projects with 2MW and 5MW electrolyzers, respectively. The Orsi government will also need to decide if it continues with Ancap's planned bidding process for four offshore blocks, each between 600-800km² (232-309 mi²), to generate up to 3.2GW of wind power to produce 200,000 t/yr of green hydrogen on floating platforms. The Frente has been noncommittal about the future of seven offshore oil and gas blocks, including three held by Shell, two by the UK's Challenger — which recently farmed in Chevron — and one each by Argentina's state-owned YPF and US-based APA Corporation. The Frente's government plan states that "a national dialogue will be called to analyze the impacts and alternatives to exploration and extraction of fossil fuels." By Lucien Chauvin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Cop 29 goes into overtime on finance deadlock


24/11/22
24/11/22

Cop 29 goes into overtime on finance deadlock

Developing countries' discontent over the climate finance offer is meeting a muted response, writes Caroline Varin Baku, 22 November (Argus) — As the UN Cop 29 climate conference went into overtime, early reactions of consternation towards a new climate finance draft quickly gave way to studious silence, and some new numbers floated by developing nations. Parties are negotiating a new collective quantified goal — or climate finance target — building on the $100bn/yr that developed countries agreed to deliver to developing countries over 2020-25. The updated draft of the new finance goal text — the centrepiece of this Cop — proposes a figure of $250bn/yr by 2035, "from a wide variety of sources, public and private, bilateral and multilateral, including alternative sources". This is the developed country parties' submission, the Cop 29 presidency acknowledged. Developing nations have been waiting for this number for months, and calling on developed economies to come up with one throughout this summit. They rejected the offer instantly. "The [$250bn/yr] offered by developed countries is a spit in the face of vulnerable nations like mine," Panama's lead climate negotiator, Juan Carlos Monterrey Gomez, said. Negotiating group the Alliance of Small Island States called it "a cap that will severely stagnate climate action efforts". The African Group of Negotiators and Colombia called it "unacceptable". This is far off the mark for developing economies, which earlier this week floated numbers of $440bn-600bn/yr for a public finance layer. They also called for $1.3 trillion/yr in total climate finance from developed countries, a sum which the new text instead calls for "all actors" to work toward. China reiterated on 21 November that "the voluntary support" of the global south was not to be counted towards the goal. A UN-mandated expert group indicated that the figure put forward by developed countries "is too low" and not consistent with the Paris Agreement goals. The new finance goal for developing countries, based on components that it covers, should commit developed countries to provide at least $300bn/yr by 2030 and $390bn/yr by 2035, it said. Brazil indicated that it is now pushing for these targets. The final amount for the new finance goal could potentially be around $300bn-350bn/yr, a Somalian delegate told Argus . A goal of $300bn/yr by 2035 is achievable with projected finance, further reforms and shareholder support at multilateral development banks (MDBs), and some growth in bilateral funding, climate think-tank WRI's finance programme director, Melanie Robinson, said. "Going beyond [$300bn/yr] would even be possible if a high proportion of developing countries' share of MDB finance is included," she added. All eyes turn to the EU Unsurprisingly, developed nations offered more muted responses. "It has been a significant lift over the past decade to meet the prior goal [of $100bn/yr]," a senior US official said, and the new goal will require even more ambition and "extraordinary reach". The US has just achieved its target to provide $11bn/yr in climate finance under the Paris climate agreement by 2024. But US climate funding is likely to dry up once president-elect Donald Trump, a climate sceptic who withdrew the US from the Paris accord during his first term, takes office. Norway simply told Argus that the delegation was "happier" with the text. The EU has stayed silent, with all eyes on the bloc as the US' influence wanes. The EU contributed €28.6bn ($29.8bn) in climate finance from public budgets in 2023. Developed nations expressed frustration towards the lack of progress on mitigation — actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Mentions of fossil fuels have been removed from new draft texts, including "transitioning away" from fossil fuels. This could still represent a potential red line for them. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Cop: Drafts point to trade-off on finance, fossil fuels


24/11/22
24/11/22

Cop: Drafts point to trade-off on finance, fossil fuels

Baku, 22 November (Argus) — The new draft on the climate finance goal from the UN Cop 29 climate summit presidency has developed nations contributing $250bn/yr by 2035, while language on fossil fuels has been dropped, indicating work towards a compromise on these two central issues. There is no mention of fossil fuels in either the new draft text on the global stocktake — which follows up the outcome of Cop 28 last year, including "transitioning away" from fossil fuels — or in the new draft for the climate finance goal. Developed countries wanted a reference to moving away from fossil fuels included, indicating that not having one would be a red line. The new draft text on the climate finance goal would mark a substantial compromise for developing countries, with non-profit WRI noting that this is "the bridging text". Parties are negotiating the next iteration of the $100bn/yr that developed countries agreed to deliver to developing nations over 2020-25 — known as the new collective quantified goal (NCQG). The new draft sets out a figure of $250bn/yr by 2035, "from a wide variety of sources, public and private, bilateral and multilateral, including alternative sources". It also notes that developed countries will "take the lead". It sets out that the finance could come from multilateral development banks (MDBs) too. "It has been a significant lift over the past decade to meet the prior, smaller goal... $250bn will require even more ambition and extraordinary reach," a US official said. "This goal will need to be supported by ambitious bilateral action, MDB contributions and efforts to better mobilise private finance, among other critical factors," the official added. India had indicated earlier this week that the country was seeking around $600bn/yr for a public finance layer from developed countries. Developing countries had been asking for $1.3 trillion/yr in climate finance from developed countries, a sum which the new text instead calls for "all actors" to work toward. The draft text acknowledges the need to "enable the scaling up of financing… from all public and private sources" to that figure. On the contributor base — which developed countries have long pushed to expand — the text indicates that climate finance contributions from developing countries could supplement the finance goal. It is unclear how this language will land with developing nations. China yesterday reiterated that "the voluntary support" of the global south is not part of the goal. The global stocktake draft largely focuses on the initiatives set out by the Cop 29 presidency, on enhancing power grids and energy storage, though it does stress the "urgent need for accelerated implementation of domestic mitigation measures". It dropped a previous option, opposed by Saudi Arabia, that mentioned actions aimed at "transitioning away from fossil fuels". Mitigation, or cutting emissions, and climate finance have been the overriding issues at Cop 29. Developing countries have long said they cannot decarbonise or implement an energy transition without adequate finance. Developed countries are calling for substantially stronger global action on emissions reduction. By Georgia Gratton and Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Japan’s Taketoyo to resume biomass co-firing in 2027


24/11/22
24/11/22

Japan’s Taketoyo to resume biomass co-firing in 2027

Tokyo, 22 November (Argus) — Japan's largest electricity producer Jera aims to resume coal and biomass co-firing at the 1.1GW Taketoyo plant in 2027's first quarter, after a fire halted plant operations in January. Jera announced on 22 November that the thermal power plant in central Japan's Aichi prefecture would resume co-firing wood pellets with coal at a rate of 8pc, around the end of the 2026-27 fiscal year ending in March. This will come after its safety measures are completed. The plant's co-firing rate was 17pc before the serious fire, which was caused by an explosion of dust from wood pellets. The company will consider increasing the co-firing rate again in the future, provided safety can be ensured. But the plant will restart coal-only combustion in early January 2025, operating mainly during the summer and winter seasons, when electricity demand is high. Jera will keep operation rates low at Taketoyo and other coal-fired plants when electricity demand is low and rely more on gas-fired generation, to achieve its initial plan to cut CO2 emissions through co-firing at Taketoyo. Taketoyo started co-firing operations in August 2022 and burned around 500,000 t/yr of wood pellets imported from the US and Vietnam. It will burn 200,000 t/yr after it resumes co-firing at 8pc. The plant will slow down the speed of wood pellet conveyors to reduce friction as a part of safety measures, which means it must also reduce its coal and biomass co-firing rate. It is also currently working on other safety measures, such as installing air pressure conveying facilities dedicated to wood pellets and explosion suppressor systems to inject fire extinguishing agents. The outage at Taketoyo has encouraged Jera to boost replacement gas-fired generation, with the extra gas-fired costs accounting for most of the estimated cost resulting from the shutdown, which could be tens of billion yen in the 2024-25 fiscal year ending in March. By Takeshi Maeda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Cop: Talks in Baku torn between mitigation and finance


24/11/21
24/11/21

Cop: Talks in Baku torn between mitigation and finance

Edinburgh, 21 November (Argus) — Developing and developed nations remain at loggerheads on what progress on climate finance and mitigation — actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions — should look like at the UN Cop 29 climate summit. But Cop 30 host Brazil has reminded parties that they need to stick to the brief, which is finance for developing countries. Concluding a plenary where parties, developed and developing, listed grievances, environment minister Marina Silva recognised "the excellent progress achieved" on mitigation at Cop 28. She listed paragraphs of the Cop 28 deal, including the energy package and its historic call to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems. "We are on the right track," she said, talking about mitigation, but "our greatest obligation at this moment is to make progress with regard to financing". "This is the core of financing that will pave our collective path in ambition and implementation at Cop 30," Silva said, adding that $1.3 trillion for developing countries should be "the guiding star of this Cop". Parties are negotiating a new collective quantified goal (NCQG) — a new climate finance target — building on the $100bn/yr that developed countries agreed to deliver to developing countries over 2020-25. But developed countries insist that a precise number for a goal can only be produced if there is progress on mitigation and financing structure for the NCQG. "Otherwise you have a shopping basket but you don't know what's in there," EU energy commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said. Some developing nations said they need the "headline number first". Some developing countries, including Latin American and African nations as well as island states, have also complained about the lack of mitigation ambition. Cop is facing one of the "weakest mitigation texts we have ever seen," Panama said. But they also indicated that financial support was missing to implement action. Developed countries at Cop 29 seek the implementation of the energy pledges made last year. "What we had on our agenda was not just to restate the [Cop 28] consensus but actually to enhance and to operationalise that," but the text goes in the opposite direction, Hoekstra said, talking about the latest draft on finance. Whether hints that Brazil has mitigation in focus for next year's summit will be enough to assuage concerns from developed countries at Cop 29 on fossil fuel ambitions remains to be seen. The communique of the G20, which the country hosted, does not explicitly mention the goal to transition away from fossil fuels either. The developed countries' mitigation stance grew firmer after talks on a work programme dedicated to mitigation, the obvious channel for fossil fuel language, was rescued from the brink of collapse last week. Discussions have stalled, but another text — the UAE dialogue which is meant to track progress on the outcomes of Cop 28 — still has options referring to fossil fuels. But in these negotiations too, divisions remain. "The UAE dialogue contains some positive optional language on deep, rapid and sustained emissions reductions and the [Cop 28] energy package, climate think-tank E3G said. But Saudi Arabia has made clear that this was unacceptable, while India, which worked to water down a coal deal at Cop 26, is pushing back on the 1.5°C temperature limit of the Paris Agreement. Negotiators are starting to run out of time. Draft after draft, the divide fails to be breached with no agreement on an amount for the finance deal. "We cannot talk about a lower or higher number because there is no number," noted Colombia's environment minister Susana Muhamad. The next iteration should have numbers based on the Cop 29 presidency's "view of possible landing zones". The fact that the draft text on finance has no bridging proposal is a concern, non-profit WRI director of international climate action David Waskow said. Finance was always meant to be the centrepiece of Cop 29. Parties have not formally discussed the goal in 15 years, and have been trying to prepare for a new deal through technical meetings for the past two years. But the discussion needs to end in Baku. By Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more