Latest market news

EU ETS aviation cap set at 28mn t of CO2e for 2024

  • : Biofuels, Emissions
  • 23/11/01

The cap for aviation-sector emissions under the EU emissions trading system (ETS) will stand at just under 29mn t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) next year.

A European Commission decision adopted this week sets the 2024 emissions cap for aviation operators at 28.9mn allowances. Each carbon allowance under the EU ETS is worth 1t of CO2e.

The calculation adjusts the sector's allocation down in line with the scheme's linear reduction factor, which decreases the overall EU ETS supply cap annually. The rate of reduction was raised to 4.3pc for 2024-27, from 2.2pc now, as part of efforts to align the system with a stricter target to cut EU emissions by at least 55pc by 2030, compared with 1990 levels.

Until now, 85pc of this cap was allocated free to airlines and the remaining 15pc auctioned. This would have constituted free allocations of 24.5mn allowances in 2024, according to the decision.

But free allocations for the sector will be gradually phased out by 2026, meaning a quarter of the 85pc allocation will be auctioned in 2024, rising to half in 2025 and 100pc in 2026, with the exception of a maximum of 25mn allowances that could be put towards sustainable aviation fuels or innovation support each year.

The EU ETS applies to all flights within the European Economic Area (EEA) — which includes all of the bloc's member states, along with Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway — as well as those departing from the EEA to Switzerland and the UK.

The sector emitted about 47.4mn t of CO2e last year, commission data show, up from 27.7mn t of CO2e in 2021, as aviation activity continued to rebound from the slump at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

Carbon management a must for EU clean industry: ZEP


25/01/06
25/01/06

Carbon management a must for EU clean industry: ZEP

Brussels, 6 January (Argus) — The European Commission must move beyond just renewables and electrification to a more holistic approach to decarbonisation, Zero Emissions Platform (ZEP) secretary-general Eadbhard Pernot told Argus ahead of the commission's expected Clean Industrial Deal proposal on 26 February. How important is this Clean Industrial Deal? The industrial sector is directly responsible for some 20-25pc of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally. If you factor in all energy emissions linked to the industrial sector — whether in power or other sectors — then you're looking at 40-45pc of GHG emissions. Under existing tools like the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), globally traded industrial products such as steel or aluminium will still be imported at lower cost from other regions, such as China, with massive oversupply. In many cases, exporters will shift existing clean production to Europe and send other carbon-intensive products elsewhere. Or they will simply import finished products like cars here without accounting for those emissions. It's a lose-lose. What other specific concrete adjustments can the EU or Clean Industrial Deal bring? Creating a market for decarbonised cement, fertilisers, steel and aluminium, for example, should be on the list of things in the Clean Industrial Deal. In many cases, governments themselves are the ones procuring products — think of bridges and other major infrastructure. That entails reform of EU procurement rules and having long-term offtake agreements. We've got a lot of industrial sites that are going to start producing decarbonised products within the next year or so. If we look at Norway's Longship Project — with multiple emitters, including the Norcem cement plant in Brevik, fertiliser producer Yara, and Haflsund's waste to energy facility — multiple industrial producers are going to be producing decarbonised products and services in the next years, built around common infrastructure projects. We have to ensure a market exists for them. How do you see the wider industrial carbon management strategy unfolding? With the EU elections in June and the start of a new commission, 2024 wasn't an ordinary year. But things are moving in the background. So far, there's been a particular focus on where the best areas are in Europe to develop commercial carbon capture and storage (CCS) sites, like the North Sea, but now it's clear that CCS is essential for the whole of Europe. Central, eastern and southern European countries are taking action. What other legislative solutions do you want to see? Currently, there are no clear EU-wide rules on how the CCS market functions — unlike for gas, power and hydrogen. So we need to secure a regulatory framework for CO2 transport, tackling competitive issues, pricing, ownership of infrastructure and third-party access. We need rules of the game for emitters, storage sites, pipelines and shippers. We hope to see that EU framework within the next 18 months. This is really important for investors and lenders too. At the moment, we only have a patchwork with the 2009 CCS Directive. And the only country with a detailed comprehensive framework is outside the EU — the UK. Do you think the EU really has the political will to push for CCS? Given the role that CCS and carbon capture and use (CCU) will have to play in emissions reductions as well as removals, industrial carbon management is essential to meet the EU's net 90pc GHG CO2 reduction target for 2040. It's non-negotiable, and politicians recognise this now across the political spectrum. Can hydrogen help decarbonise industry? Clean hydrogen certainly has the potential to decarbonise some hard-to-abate industrial processes in the long term. The hydrogen industry is also currently responsible for a significant chunk of European emissions, and that isn't discussed enough. When making grey hydrogen, we need to stop venting CO2 into the atmosphere that could otherwise just be permanently geologically stored. Our focus in the recent EU delegated act on low-carbon hydrogen was to ensure the criteria for carbon stored outside Europe meet the same standard as ours in the EU. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

S Korea’s SK Energy supplies first SAF cargo to Europe


25/01/06
25/01/06

S Korea’s SK Energy supplies first SAF cargo to Europe

Singapore, 6 January (Argus) — South Korean refiner SK Energy has exported its first sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) cargo to Europe, describing itself as the first refinery in the country to do so. The cargo was exported four months after the refiner started commercial co-processing of SAF, SK Energy said today. SK Energy completed a dedicated SAF production line at its 840,000 b/d Ulsan refinery in September 2024. The refiner has established a production capacity of around 80,000 t/yr of SAF and around 20,000 t/yr of other low-carbon products such as bio-naphtha, using bio-feedstocks such as used cooking oil (UCO) and animal fats with traditional oil production processes. SK Energy works with its affiliate SK On Trading International to secure waste-based raw material as feedstock. It is one of three South Korean refineries which are producing SAF through co-processing, with the other two being S-Oil and Hyundai Oilbank. A fourth refiner GS Caltex has not announced plans to produce SAF, but is likely studying options including co-processing. It previously supplied around 5,000 kilolitres of SAF to Japan's Narita airport via Japanese trading firm Itochu on 13 September 2024. South Korea plans to require all international flights departing from its airports to use a mix of 1pc SAF from 2027 , with a target for the country to capture 30pc of the global blended SAF export market, it announced in August 2024. It remains unclear if co-processed SAF will be allowed to meet the country's mandate, but some South Korean refineries are optimistic. The country also said in August it planned to establish a national standard, certification and testing method for SAF beginning in December 2024, but no updates have surfaced as of 6 January 2025. By Deborah Sun Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Landmark legal opinion on climate expected in 2025


25/01/03
25/01/03

Landmark legal opinion on climate expected in 2025

The ICJ guidance will inform the growing number of national and international climate cases, writes Georgia Gratton London, 3 January (Argus) — Last year saw historic outcomes in international legal cases centred on climate change, from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to the world's highest court for marine protection, Itlos. And 2025 could see more, as the visible impacts of a heating planet increase. The UN International Court of Justice (ICJ) is expected to reach an outcome in 2025 that is likely be a "watershed moment for international climate governance", think-tank IISD's Earth Negotiations Bulletin (ENB) says. Hearings for the ICJ proceedings wrapped up in mid-December. The court — which all 193 UN member states are party to — will issue an advisory opinion on states' responsibilities with regard to climate change. ICJ advisory opinions are not legally binding, but the outcome will "serve as definitive guidance from the world's highest court", environment organisation ClientEarth lawyer Lea Main-Klingst tells Argus . The issue under consideration at the ICJ was originally spearheaded by the small island state of Vanuatu, and led to a UN General Assembly request for the ICJ's advisory opinion on states' obligation to "ensure the protection of the climate system and other parts of the environment from anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases for states and for present and future generations". It also seeks the ICJ's opinion on the legal consequences for states when they "by their acts and omissions, have caused significant harm to the climate system and other parts of the environment". Countries gave verbal evidence outside the negotiating blocs typically seen at forums such as Cop climate summits, meaning countries "were free to articulate their own positions, often with surprising divergences from other speakers in the same negotiating group", according to ENB. Countries and some organisations will also be able to submit written evidence on topics including fossil fuel production and mitigation — actions to cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Case study The ICJ proceedings "will be very relevant to all climate-related cases both at the domestic and international level — and the number of these cases is only growing", Main-Klingst says. The ECHR ruled in April that signatories to the European Convention on Human Rights must protect their citizens from "serious adverse effects of climate change". And the Itlos outcome in May — another advisory opinion — was similar, finding that states have an obligation to reduce their GHG emissions to protect oceans. The UK could prove to be a case study. The country's Supreme Court ruled in June — days before the current Labour government took power — that consent for an oil development in southern England was unlawful as it had not taken into account downstream emissions. The new government had already pledged to issue no new oil and gas permits, but it has since used the ruling to kick-start an overhaul of environmental guidance for oil and gas firms, which could have implications for previously approved developments. The damage caused by climate change is growing, making it more crucial to settle legal parameters. Scientists are in agreement that 2024 will be the hottest on record, smashing the current record set in 2023. And insured losses from natural catastrophes — proven to be made more intense by climate change — easily broke the $100bn mark in 2024, for a fifth consecutive year, reinsurance firm Swiss Re says. This does not take into account the scale of uninsured assets, which are often in the most vulnerable countries. These factors put further pressure on international courts to clarify and set expectations on an issue that is not confined to national borders. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US Congress begins with focus on energy, taxes


25/01/03
25/01/03

US Congress begins with focus on energy, taxes

Some Republicans worry that their razor-thin House majority could soon see their caucus fractured, writes Chris Knight Washington, 3 January (Argus) — The new Republican majority in US Congress has set its sights on passing legislation to grow energy production, unwind climate policies and cut trillions of dollars in taxes, but doing so will require the party to overcome its history of infighting. That disharmony was on display last month, when Republicans in the House of Representatives nearly forced a government shutdown by scuttling a spending deal negotiated by their own leaders. Similar dynamics have been at play for the past two years, as rifts over how to govern made it difficult for House Republican leaders to use a tiny majority to extract policy concessions during negotiations. The first test of party unity in the 119th Congress — sworn in on 3 January — will come as House Republicans vote on whether to re-elect Mike Johnson as speaker with an even smaller majority than last year. Johnson can only afford to lose a handful of votes, assuming all Democrats vote against him, before Republicans risk a repeat of 2023, when far-right members ousted the last speaker but could not agree on a replacement for weeks. A lengthy voting impasse could delay the 6 January certification of the election victory of president-elect Donald Trump, who this week endorsed Johnson. Trump campaigned on passing legislation to allow industry to "drill, baby, drill" by increasing federal oil and gas lease sales, removing regulations and unwinding parts of outgoing president Joe Biden's signature Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Among the options are rescinding a fee on methane emissions that started at $900/t, and requiring more oil and gas lease sales in the US Gulf of Mexico. On taxes, Trump has proposed extending $4 trillion in cuts due to expire at the end of 2025, in addition to cutting corporate rates to as low as 15pc from 20pc, rescinding clean energy credits, and putting a 20pc tariff on all imports. Other items on Congress' to-do list include passing legislation to fund the government and raising the statutory limit on federal debt. Republicans also say they want to pass a bill to expedite federal permitting, after a bipartisan effort to do so failed to advance in December. Learning to two-step Republican leaders have floated a two-step plan to pass Trump's legislative agenda that would use "budget reconciliation" — a legislative manoeuvre that will prevent a Democratic filibuster in the Senate, but which limits the bill to provisions that will affect the federal budget. Senate majority leader John Thune, a Republican from Texas, has suggested packaging immigration, border security and energy policy into a first budget bill that would pass early this year. Republicans would then have more time to debate a separate — and far more complex — budget bill that would focus on taxes and spending. But some Republicans, mindful of a slim 220-215 House majority that will temporarily shrink because of upcoming vacancies, worry the two-part strategy could fracture the caucus. Republicans have yet to decide the changes to the IRA, which includes hundreds of billions of dollars of tax credits for wind, solar, electric vehicles, battery manufacturing, carbon capture and clean hydrogen. A group of 18 House Republicans last year said they opposed a "full repeal" of the law, which disproportionately benefits districts represented by Republicans. Republicans plan to use their expanded influence to push changes at all levels of government and the work it supports. Incoming Republican chairman of the Senate energy committee John Barrasso has issued a report urging OECD energy watchdog the IEA to revive the inclusion of a "business-as-usual" reference case in its annual World Energy Outlook. Barrasso says the IEA has lost its focus on energy security and instead become a "cheerleader" for the energy transition. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more