Asia-Pacific faces $815bn/yr green financing shortfall
Asia-Pacific holds significant investment opportunities in the energy transition, but obstacles such as insufficient public funding, lack of regulation and investment risks have resulted in a financing shortfall in the region.
The Asia-Pacific region needs at least $1.1 trillion/yr in climate financing, but actual investment falls short by at least $815bn/yr, said Singapore's ambassador for climate action Ravi Menon at a conference in Singapore last week, referencing data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
There is existing green funding in the region such as from the Asian Development Bank (ADB), which estimated its investments amounted to $10.7bn in 2023, and bilateral arrangements like the $600mn India-Japan fund, established by India's National Investment and Infrastructure Fund and Japan Bank for International Co-operation in October 2023.
But this is insufficient, especially as the region's energy demand is only set to rise further. Energy demand in Asia is growing by 2.9pc/yr, the highest of any region in the world, said Menon. Renewables such as solar and wind are now more cost-competitive than fossil fuels, but the region needs more grid connectivity and capacity to make renewable energy a viable option. Building transmission lines and energy storage in the region alone will cost about $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years, added Menon.
Obstacles to capital flows
Total energy investment worldwide is expected to exceed $3 trillion in 2024, with about $2 trillion going to clean technologies and slightly over $1 trillion toward fossil fuels, according to the IEA's World Energy Investment 2024 report.
Fossil fuel financing by the world's 60 largest banks rose to $705bn in 2023, up by 4.8pc from $673bn in 2022, with the rise largely driven by LNG financing.
The continued investments in fossil fuels and fossil fuel-based technologies will lead to more carbon-intensive infrastructure, divert capital from clean energy alternatives and undermine climate targets, derailing Asia-Pacific from its energy transition goals.
Emerging economies typically have "many developmental needs" to take care of, hence public financing in these countries cannot shoulder the overall trajectory of growth of energy transition financing, said the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis' (IEEFA) sustainable finance and climate risk research lead Shantanu Srivastava at the IEEFA Energy Finance 2024 conference earlier this month. Many smaller economies rely on financing from multilateral development banks (MDBs), but this comes in "bits and pieces" and with many strings attached, he added.
It is hence essential to bring in private capital, but the region faces challenges in attracting private investments. The lack of a sound climate information architecture hampers accurate assessment and tracking of climate risks, which impedes investors' ability to make decisions and prevents the scale-up of climate finance, according to the IMF.
Other measurable risks — such as political risk, credit risk, and foreign exchange risk — often significantly raise the risk premium of investments into the region. Investors tend to expect higher returns on investments with higher risk premiums, but there are limited investment opportunities available which would provide such returns and this prevents foreign capital from scaling, according to Srivastava.
Insufficient regulatory and government measures in the region as well as the inconsistency of existing ones also deter private investors, as these increase project execution risks. Policy continuity and long-term visibility of what the country is going to do is essential as a "policy flip-flop" deters investor confidence, Srivastava said.
Tools to attract more climate finance
Blended finance is necessary to mobilise private capital for Asia's energy transition, according to Menon. Governments and development finance institutions could provide concessional or risk capital in the form of grants and limited guarantees, while MDBs can provide technical assistance in the form of development expertise, capacity building and institutional support, he said.
Finance can also be encouraged through sovereign sustainable bonds, which can stimulate local sustainable bond markets by setting long-term price benchmarks, boosting liquidity, and serving as models for private issuers, according to IEEFA. The issuance of these bonds also signal a dedicated government commitment to sustainability goals and can drive the development of a robust and transparent regulatory environment, IEEFA added. This is crucial for the long-term growth and stability of the region's sustainable bond markets, which is essential for boosting investors' confidence.
Another method is through revenue generation tools, such as carbon pricing and carbon taxes, according to the Financing Just Transition Through Emission Trading Systems report released earlier this month by think-tank Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI). Carbon pricing sends a strong signal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and indicates the government's intent to intensify efforts related to energy transition, which encourages private capital flow, stated the ASPI report. Carbon pricing also has the potential to generate substantial revenue, which can be allocated to climate funds to support low-carbon technology innovation and aid enterprises in making green investments, to aid low-carbon transition efforts, the ASPI report added.
Related news posts
Biden touts climate legacy
Biden touts climate legacy
New York, 25 September (Argus) — US president Joe Biden made the case for his climate legacy on Tuesday, casting the Inflation Reduction Act as part of a "new economic playbook" and warning of environmental and economic repercussions if former president Donald Trump returns to the White House. The 2022 law, which included a raft of tax credits to subsidize clean energy technologies, was the "most significant climate law passed in the history of the world," Biden said in a speech at the Bloomberg Global Business Forum, an event on the sidelines of the UN general assembly and Climate Week NYC. The market for clean energy is "booming" because of the law, Biden said, pointing to investments made after its passage in battery technology, nuclear energy, hydrogen, and what the administration terms "climate-smart agriculture." Most of those benefits are flowing to Republican-led states, he noted. While analysts see some provisions in the law as less vulnerable than others, including tax credits for hydrogen and carbon capture popular among oil and gas companies, Republicans have said they want to repeal much of the law. Trump-era tax cuts are set to expire in 2025, teeing up a major legislative fight over tax policy next year regardless of which party controls the US Congress and the White House. Although Biden argued that his climate policies have already had substantial impacts, he also said that Trump could halt much of that progress. Manufacturing facilities and businesses that have started up because of the law's incentives would "shut down" if it was repealed, he said. The US shifting course on energy policy could also have spillover effects on other countries' climate ambitions, Biden said, pointing to his administration's support for language agreed to at last year's UN Cop 28 climate summit around transitioning away from fossil fuels. "If we didn't lead, who the hell leads? Who fills the vacuum without America leading?" he said. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Brazil’s carbon market will not start before 2030
Brazil’s carbon market will not start before 2030
New York, 24 September (Argus) — Brazil's carbon trading market will not be fully implemented in this decade, according to think tank Centro Brasil no Clima. The creation of the carbon market is a long process that starts with passing a law to create a carbon market. But environmental groups and others have criticized Brazil's carbon market bill that the lower house approved at the end of last year as too complex. The senate has yet to set a timeline to debate the lower house's proposal but is expected to make significant changes to the bill, meaning that it will need to return to the lower legislature for a final round of voting. Still, there is a growing expectation in the public and private sectors that the bill will pass ahead of the UN's Cop 29 climate conference later this year. The think tank estimates that the implementation phase of the carbon market would take around 5-6 years under the current draft bill. The preparation and legal framework for the creation of the market may take from 1-2 years. Pilot testing and initial rollout of the carbon market would take around a year. The submission of monitoring plans and emissions reporting would also be completed within 1-2 years after the pilot testing. But there is no clarity on a deadline for the phase that involves testing of the market with a full allocation of carbon credits, said William Wills, technical director at the think tank. Only 25pc of the emissions produced in Brazil will be cover in the carbon market, he said. This includes emissions from energy, waste and industries, but the agriculture sector, which accounted for 27pc of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions produced in the country in 2022, will be excluded. Brazil's largest source of GHG emissions comes from land use change and forestry, accounting for 48pc of emissions in the same period. By Jacqueline Echevarria Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US-led offset idea earns more corporate support
US-led offset idea earns more corporate support
New York, 24 September (Argus) — More companies registered support today for a US-backed carbon offsetting initiative that is hoping to steer funds toward the decarbonization of developing countries' power sectors. The Energy Transition Accelerator (ETA) — a project of the US State Department and two philanthropies, the Bezos Earth Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation — said that 19 companies support the general idea of the initiative, that "high-integrity carbon credits" can support "an accelerated and just clean energy transition." As part of an announcement tied to Climate Week NYC, 14 companies, including some that had previously not registered interest, signed onto a letter saying they were committed to working with the ETA as the initiative advances. The letter notes, however, that the companies are not pledging any "obligation of funding" for the initiative, which has an unclear timeline for getting projects up-and-running. The ETA previously set plans for formally launch this past April but instead said then that it would spend this year "building" on a framework for projects released last year . The ETA is hoping to create a "jurisdictional-scale" carbon crediting standard, steering funds toward efforts such as accelerating the retirement of coal-fired power plants, building new renewable generation, and improving the electric grid in developing countries. The idea is that buyers would be able to finance offset projects with more tangible climate benefits, hopefully avoiding the reputational risks associated with much of the voluntary carbon market. Prices for some major nature-based carbon offsets have fallen over the past year, as concerns about their integrity have deterred prospective buyers . The initiative's goals for this year are working to build "a community of buyers and sellers," said Nat Keohane, president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions think tank at the Xpansiv Climate Week Summit on Monday. Chile, the Dominican Republic, and Nigeria have expressed interest in serving as ETA pilot countries, while the Philippines this year signed on as an observer country rather than as a direct participant. Ahead of the UN's Cop 29 climate summit this year in Azerbaijan, the ETA wants to demonstrate the progress interested countries have been able to make and to collaborate with the World Bank on economic analysis and modeling to understand what future projects and investment plans might look like, Keohane said. Winrock International, which runs the American Carbon Registry, was tasked by the ETA last year with developing a standard and methodology for crediting emissions reductions. Keohane expects that to be out "next year," he said at the event. Winrock did not immediately respond to requests for comment for more clarity on its timeline. "There are also some other crediting standards coming out, and ETA will be evaluating those against the criteria that we put out in our framework last year," Keohane said. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Carbon ‘market structure’ next phase: ICVCM
Carbon ‘market structure’ next phase: ICVCM
New York, 24 September (Argus) — The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM) is broadening its focus and plans to offer guidance around improving "market structure," the chair of the private sector initiative said this week. The group is "going to turn to market structure issues," bringing key players from the still relatively small voluntary carbon market together to examine what would be needed to supporter a larger, more liquid market, ICVCM chair Annette Nazareth said at the Xpansiv Climate Week Summit, a Climate Week NYC side event. The council currently assesses carbon offset project types and carbon crediting programs, which has allowed for the sale this year of credits labeled as meeting the group's "core carbon principles" for project quality. The group has sought to standardize the largely unregulated market, potentially boosting trust among prospective corporate buyers that are worried about the reputational and legal risks of funding offset projects that might reduce emissions less than they claim. ICVCM said Nazareth was referring to previously announced "continuous improvement work programs," which involve studying issues that could feature in the next edition of the group's core carbon principles rulebook that is due for implementation in 2-3 years. Some of these study groups are underway, including ones on how to align projects with national climate commitments and strengthen requirements around the permanence of emissions reductions, while others are set to start later this year. Some topics Nazareth mentioned could make the market — which is largely an over-the-counter one today — less opaque for prospective buyers. She said there was interest in looking at encouraging price transparency and trade reporting, better integration of data, and addressing the fragmentation of carbon registries to allow for more "interoperability" and potentially encouraging a "meta-registry." Other topics on the ICVCM's agenda involve equity concerns, such as setting best practices around disclosing and sharing revenues with local communities and also making it easier for small developers to access funds for starting up projects. "Do we need to create databases on the performance of project developers? Would it help to have some sort of platform where lenders and project developers can find each other? There's a lot of interesting things that we could look at," Nazareth said. Proponents of more guidance, which has come over the last year from various private groups and from regulators like the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, hope that clearer standards will assuage doubts about the market and scale up investments in climate change mitigation projects. But there is still deep disagreement about the ultimate role of carbon offsets, which some environmental groups fear is deterring companies from reducing emissions within their own operations. The Science Based Targets Initiative, a private sector group that assesses corporate climate goals, said earlier this year that companies can meet its standards even if they use carbon credits to offset emissions from their supply chain, but the group later backtracked and said it was still debating the issue. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more