Asian demand might cap WTI availability for Europe

: Crude oil
24/11/04

Asia-Pacific refiners have increased their intake of US light sweet WTI crude for November loading and could remain keen buyers in December, potentially limiting supply for Europe.

Asian refiners have bought around 1.3mn b/d of WTI loading in November, traders say, up from roughly 800,000 b/d loading in October, and surpassing average flows of 1.15mn b/d to the region this year. Arbitrage economics from the US to Asia are better than those to Europe at present, traders say. And firmer refining margins for naphtha-rich crudes in Asia-Pacific could prompt refiners to maintain high purchases of WTI in December. Asian buyers tend to seek WTI around two weeks before European refiners owing to the longer shipping times, affecting availability of the grade in Europe.

European interest in November-loading WTI has been limited by refinery maintenance, exacerbated by an abundance of cheap light sweet crude in the region following the sudden restart of Libyan crude exports in October. The rebound in Libyan supply after a period of disruption pressured differentials for competing light sweet grades from the North Sea and Mediterranean regions. North Sea Forties and Ekofisk and Algerian Saharan Blend fell to their lowest in at least two months against North Sea Dated in mid-October.

At the same time, delivered WTI has been supported by high freight rates. Shipping costs to take an Aframax from the US Gulf coast to Europe were 62pc higher on average in October than in September, narrowing WTI's discount to North Sea light sweet crudes. Abundant and affordable WTI has tended to act as a cap on light sweet crude prices in the region. But the higher freight costs have meant that WTI has been one of the more expensive crudes in the North Sea Dated basket. WTI was at parity to light sweet Oseberg in early October, up from a discount of around $1/bl a month earlier. WTI has set the benchmark as the lowest-priced crude only six times in the past two months, compared with 26 occasions over the same period last year.

But European demand for crude is expected to rebound in December, as regional refineries ramp up following autumn maintenance. Ekofisk has already added around 60¢/bl relative to WTI since mid-October, briefly moving from a discount to a premium to the US grade over 25-29 October. Any WTI supply tightness in the final weeks of the year, and continued firm demand in Asia, could limit WTI flows to Europe and support light sweet crude prices.

Arbitrage effects

For some Asia-Pacific refiners, a workable WTI arbitrage has helped pressure the price of alternative supplies. Indian refiner IOC opted to buy two cargoes of WTI in a tender which closed on 17 October instead of the west African crude it typically favours. The refiner bought a cargo of WTI each from US-based Occidental Petroleum and Japanese trading company Mitsui for delivery in December and January to the western port of Vadinar and eastern port of Paradip, market participants say. Lacklustre interest from Indian and European buyers, and plentiful light sweet crude supply, have since combined to pressure some Nigerian crude differentials, pushing them down by 20¢-$1.15/bl against North Sea Dated in October.

This has helped reinvigorate demand and clear more November shipments on the eve of the December-loading cycle. IOC subsequently bought a shipment each of Nigerian Agbami from Chevron and Angolan Nemba from an undisclosed seller in a tender which closed on 24 October. But up to a dozen November-loading Nigerian cargoes remained unsold as of 29 October, according to traders.

By Lina Bulyk

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/01/13

US tariffs on Canada likely, oil cut-off not: Alberta

Calgary, 13 January (Argus) — Tariffs threatened by the US against Canada will become a reality, according to the premier of oil-rich Alberta , but any retaliation will not entail cutting off energy exports. "They're likely to come in on January 20th," Alberta premier Danielle Smith said of the tariffs on Monday after she met with US president-elect Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida over the weekend. "I haven't seen anything that suggests that he's changing course." Trump in late-November said he plans to impose a 25pc tariff against all imports from Canada, citing inadequate border controls and a US trade deficit. Canada has since pledged to spend more money on border security while Smith reckons Canada would have a deficit if not for energy trade. "We actually buy more goods and services from the US than they buy from us," Smith said in an online interview with reporters. "We actually have $58bn in a trade deficit with the Americans when you take energy out." Smith wanted assurances the US is still interested in buying Canadian oil and gas, with her province being the heart of the country's energy sector. "Oil and gas is going to be key for being able to get a breakthrough, once the tariffs do come in, in getting them off," said Smith. Canadian foreign affairs minister Mélanie Joly said in a 12 January interview broadcast on CTV that the country could consider stopping the flow of Canadian energy in retaliation to tariffs. But Smith said that would not happen since the oil are owned by the province, not the federal government. "[The federal government] will have a national unity crisis on their hands at the same time as having a crisis with our US trade partners," said Smith. About 80pc of Canada's 5mn b/d of crude production is consumed by refineries in the US, with many in the Midcontinent having no practical alternative , according to the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM). The region imported 2.7mn b/d of Canadian crude in October, the latest data point from the Energy Information Administration (EIA). "I hope cooler heads prevail," said Smith, adding that Trump seemed interested in buying more oil and gas. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Mexico’s industrial output up 0.1pc in November

25/01/13

Mexico’s industrial output up 0.1pc in November

Mexico City, 13 January (Argus) — Mexico's industrial production edged up 0.1pc in November, as gains in autos and other manufacturing offset weaker construction, national statistics agency Inegi said. Mexican bank Banorte described the monthly increase as "rather small," noting it followed a 1.1pc decline in October and was largely driven by base comparison effects. The bank added that the overall industrial outlook remained "fragile." Manufacturing, which represents 63pc of Inegi's seasonally adjusted industrial activity indicator (IMAI), increased by 0.7pc in November, though it failed to fully recover from a 1.7pc drop in October. Transportation manufacturing, a key subsector accounting for 12pc of the sector, rose by 3.8pc after a steep 4.3pc decline the prior month. Despite recent volatility, Mexico's auto sector achieved record annual light vehicle production in 2024, reaching 3.99mn units. Yet, automaker association AMIA warned of potential challenges in 2025 because of economic uncertainty, which could affect investment and demand. Mining, which makes up 12pc of the IMAI, increased by 0.1pc in November following a 1.1pc decline in October. Growth was driven by a 41.4pc jump in mining-related services, while oil and gas output fell by 2.4pc, marking a fifth consecutive monthly decline for hydrocarbons. Construction, representing 19pc of the IMAI, contracted by 1.8pc in November after modest gains of 0.2pc in October and 1.1pc in September. As industry eyes potential policy shifts under US president-elect Donald Trump, Banorte projected a weak start to 2025 for Mexico's industrial output. But it expects momentum to build as government spending on priority infrastructure projects "moves more decisively." By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Trudeau exit may spur Canadian energy growth

25/01/13

Trudeau exit may spur Canadian energy growth

Calgary, 13 January (Argus) — Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau's place in federal politics is winding down after nine years of driving change in climate policy, but those environmental advances came at a cost for the world's fourth-largest oil producer, helping to stifle foreign investment in the country's oil and gas sector. Support for Trudeau fell nationwide over the past year, as inflation and rising housing costs fueled by a relaxed immigration policy and carbon taxes became too much for many to bear. Trudeau, seemingly immune to scandal and high-profile exits on his team, was dealt his biggest blow when his deputy prime minister and finance minister Chrystia Freeland resigned in December, citing his approach to the "aggressive economic nationalism" of US president-elect Donald Trump's threatened trade tariffs, prompting his 6 January decision to step down. Canadian crude producers still managed to lift output by 30pc during Trudeau's tenure since 2015, even as major foreign players abandoned the oil sands for friendlier jurisdictions and upstream projects and pipelines were either mothballed or cancelled outright. Provincial jurisdiction over resources prompted frequent fights between Trudeau and Albertan premiers who guarded their claim to energy and the right to explore and extract within their borders. "We could've done so much more," Alberta premier Danielle Smith said hours after Trudeau's announcement, lamenting missed opportunities for Canada's oil patch over the past decade, including the failed Energy East, Northern Gateway and Keystone XL export pipelines. A tanker ban, tighter regulation and an onerous project approval process were among the tools Trudeau used to try to rein in the oil and gas sector, saying in 2017 that Canada's oil sands needed to be "phased out" before naming a former Greenpeace director as his environment minister. Smith did give Trudeau a nod for his commitment to keeping midstream giant Enbridge's Line 5 pipeline from shutting down, and for helping to get the massive Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) pipeline and Coastal GasLink export projects from Alberta to Canada's Pacific coast across the finish line. But while Smith welcomes Trudeau's resignation, Canada now faces a period of lame duck leadership before it holds federal elections, while cross-border tensions are rising. Your new best frenemy Its largest trading partner is quickly becoming its newest antagonist, with Trump threatening a 25pc tariff on all imports from Canada and Mexico. Unencumbered movement of oil is critical on both sides of the border, with 80pc of Canada's 5mn b/d of crude production aimed at refineries in the US. Many landlocked Canadian producers have no practical alternative, like refiners in the US midcontinent connected by pipeline. As political chaos unfolds in Ottawa, Trump has lobbed insults at Trudeau and made calls for the northern neighbour to become the US' "51st state", a taunt that has struck a nerve in Canada. "There isn't a snowball's chance in hell that Canada would become part of the US," Trudeau said on X on 7 January. "Trump's comments show a complete lack of understanding of what makes Canada a strong country," wrote minister of foreign affairs Melanie Joly. Trump will have spotted Canada's weakness months ago, with support for Trudeau tumbling to the benefit of the Conservative Party and its leader Pierre Poilievre. Recent polls indicate the centre-right party would win a majority of seats in the House of Commons if an election were held today. That is likely to happen in May, assuming opposition parties bring down the government when Parliament resumes in late March. Should Poilievre win, Trump will have a partner better aligned on more policies than Trudeau was, but the suggestion that Canada could become part of the US will get the same response. "We will never be the 51st state. Period," Poilievre said. His primary ambitions are to undo Trudeau's work, with the federal carbon tax being the first to go. Rescinding the tanker ban, killing proposed emissions caps and promoting pipeline construction are also on the agenda. Poilievre plans to "take back control" of Canada's resources through permitting and cutting taxes on pipeline and LNG projects to become less reliant on the US. "Canadians will give me a mandate to take the country in a completely opposite direction," Poilievre said on the Jordan B Peterson Podcast earlier this month, describing how vanquishing Trudeau's energy policy will "cause a massive resource boom in our country." The lengthy exchange touched on minimising government, artificial intelligence and immigration, and was shared by Trump's ally, Tesla chief executive Elon Musk, who called it a "great interview". Priming for another Pacific pipeline Canada's energy industry has returned to profit and received a much-needed boost from the federally owned 590,000 b/d TMX pipeline, but rising oil sands production means the newly commissioned system is destined to fill up soon. The prospect of an industry-friendly federal government reinvigorating a relatively dormant midstream sector is positive for investment in Canada, and the US could play an unintended role in deciding where any pipelines are proposed. Enbridge and the Alberta government are teaming up to find ways to expand pipeline capacity. Smith singled out the US as a customer she wants to enhance ties with amid looming tariff threats, but those threats may prompt a revival of pipeline projects to Canada's west coast to reduce dependence on the US market. Enbridge's Northern Gateway pipeline was approved in 2014, but a Liberal Party led by Trudeau came to power in 2015 with sweeping changes for the oil and gas sector, including a tanker ban on the country's Pacific coast, effectively killing the project. The C$7.9bn ($7.3bn) Northern Gateway was not in the interest of local communities, Trudeau said in late 2016, when he officially reversed the previous government's approval. The pipeline would have shipped 525,000 b/d of diluted bitumen westward and 193,000 b/d of imported condensate eastbound to the oil sands region for blending. Construction would have avoided large populations and was seen as the most practical option for getting more Canadian crude to Asia-Pacific. Its northern terminal may not have had the same tanker limitations as TMX faces at Vancouver, and could have seen reduced voyage times. Enbridge now has added support from the Alberta government by way of crude volumes the province collects as tax from some oil companies in lieu of cash payments. These in-kind barrels would be the first to backstop a major pipeline expansion by Enbridge, giving both the midstream company and other producers something to latch onto to advance a future project. This is a new approach for Alberta, after sacrificing C$1.5bn it paid in a last-ditch effort to keep the doomed 830,000 b/d Keystone XL project to the US alive. Outgoing US president Joe Biden revoked that troubled line's permit in 2021. Like Keystone XL, Northern Gateway is no more. Reviving such a project would still require significant stakeholder engagement along any route, and face substantially higher construction costs than a decade ago. The C$34bn TMX put into service in May 2024 was originally pegged at C$5.4bn in 2013, even less than Northern Gateway as TMX was the twinning of an existing system. This would be a big hurdle to clear, even if governments were to allay regulatory concerns. But with an unpredictable Trump returning to the White House, the prospect of shipping more Canadian crude west might soon hold a heightened appeal. By Brett Holmes Canadian oil production Canadian upstream investment Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US issues 45Z tax guidance for low-carbon fuels

25/01/10

US issues 45Z tax guidance for low-carbon fuels

Washington, 10 January (Argus) — US producers of low-carbon fuels can start claiming the "45Z" tax credit providing up to $1/USG for road use and $1.75/USG for aviation, following the US Treasury Department's release today of proposed guidance for the credit. The guidance includes proposed regulations and other tools to determine the eligibility of fuels for the 45Z tax credit, which was created by the Inflation Reduction Act to replace a suite of incentives for biofuels that expired at the end of last year. Biofuel producers have been clamoring for guidance from the US Treasury Department so they can start claiming the tax credit, which is available for fuels produced from 1 January 2025 through the end of 2027. "This guidance will help put America on the cutting-edge of future innovation in aviation and renewable fuel while also lowering transportation costs for consumers," US deputy treasury secretary Wally Adeymo said. "Decarbonizing transportation and lowering costs is a win-win for America." The creation of the 45Z tax credit has already prompted a change in US biofuels markets by shifting federal subsidies from blenders to producers. Because the value of tax credit increases for fuels with the lowest lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, it could encourage refiners to source more waste feedstocks such as used cooking oil, rather than conventional crop-based feedstocks. While the guidance is still just a proposal, taxpayers are able to "immediately" use the guidance to claim the 45Z tax credit, until Treasury issues additional guidance, an administration official said. The guidance on 45Z released today affirms that only the producer for the fuel is eligible to claim the credit, not blenders. To be eligible for the tax credit, the fuel must have a "practical or commercial fitness for use in a highway vehicle or aircraft" by itself or when blended into a mixture, Treasury said. Marine diesel and methanol suitable for highway or aircraft use are also eligible for 45Z, as is renewable natural gas that can be used as a transportation fuel. Treasury also released an "annual emissions rate table" offering providers a methodology for determining the lifecycle GHG of fuel. Treasury said a key emissions model from the US Department of Energy, called 45ZCF-GREET, used to calculate the value of the 45Z tax credit is anticipated to be released today, although industry officials said it may be delayed until next week. Treasury said it intends to propose regulations at "a future date" for calculating the GHG emissions benefits of "climate smart agriculture" practices for "cultivating domestic corn, soybeans, and sorghum as feedstocks" for fuel. Those regulations could lower the calculated lifecycle emissions of fuel from those crop-based feedstocks and increase the relative 45Z tax credit. US biofuel producers said they are still awaiting key details on the 45Z tax credit, including the update to the GREET model. Among the outstanding questions is if the guidance released today provides "enough certainty to negotiate feedstock and fuel offtake agreements going forward", said the Clean Fuels America Alliance, an industry group that represents the biodiesel, renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel industries. It is unclear how president-elect Donald Trump intends to approach this proposed approach for the 45Z credit, which will be subject to a 90-day public comment period. Trump has promised to "rescind all unspent funds" from the Inflation Reduction Act. But outright repealing 45Z would leave biofuels producers and farmers without a subsidy they say is needed to sustain growth, after the expiration last year of a $1/USG blender tax credit and a tax credit of up to $1.75/USG for sustainable aviation fuel. Biofuel and soybean groups were unsuccessful in a push last year to extend the expiring biofuel tax credits. The 45Z credit is likely to be debated in Congress this year, as Republicans consider repealing parts of the Inflation Reduction Act. House Republicans have already asked for input on revisions to the 45Z credit, signaling they could modify the incentive. In a tightly divided Congress, farm-state lawmakers may hold enough leverage to ensure some type of biofuel incentive — and potentially one friendlier to agricultural producers than 45Z — survives. By Chris Knight and Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Opec+ aims to reverse output falls in 2025

25/01/10

Opec+ aims to reverse output falls in 2025

London, 10 January (Argus) — Opec+ production cuts in 2024 saw the alliance reduce its crude output to lower than even in the pandemic-hit years of 2021 and 2022. And while Opec+ plans to start unwinding some of these cuts this year, it is far from clear that there will be sufficient room in the market for this additional supply. Opec+ members subject to targets reduced crude output by 1.66mn b/d to 33.96mn b/d in 2024, Argus estimates. This was an even bigger decrease than 2023's 1.44mn b/d and means that the alliance has taken 3.1mn b/d off line over the past two years — equal to about 3pc of global oil supply. Saudi Arabia cut production by 650,000 b/d to 8.96mn b/d last year, the lowest since 2010. Russian production fell by 430,000 b/d to 9.15mn b/d, the lowest since at least 2010. Other big falls came from Kuwait, whose output dropped by 190,000 b/d to 2.43mn b/d, and Iraq, where production declined by 160,000 b/d to 4.13mn b/d — although this was still well above its 4mn b/d target. Opec+ can at least claim that it has so far achieved its stated objective of ensuring oil market stability — average prices for Atlantic basin benchmark North Sea Dated in 2024 were only around $2/bl lower than in 2023 at around $80/bl. But this has come at a cost. While Opec+ has capped its output, countries outside the alliance have continued to boost production — eating into Opec+ market share. Whether Opec+ will stick to this approach is a key factor to watch in 2025. Pressure has been building from some members who want to increase output as soon as possible. As things stand, Opec+ members are set to start unwinding 2.2mn b/d of voluntary crude production cuts starting in April over an 18-month period. But this is not certain, given that most forecasts show a market surplus this year. Opec+ continues to stress that the return of 2.2mn b/d — one of three cuts it is implementing — will depend on market conditions. For now, the alliance is in wait-and-see mode, particularly given the uncertainties associated with the return of Donald Trump as US president and its impact on the global economy. As always, the extent to which Opec+ members complied with their individual output targets was a big issue in 2024. But on balance, the alliance's output last year was 40,000 b/d under its collective target. While serial overproducers such as Iraq, Kazakhstan and Russia attracted a lot of scrutiny and pledged to compensate for exceeding their targets, members such as Azerbaijan, South Sudan and Nigeria produced well below their own targets. Without target Another key development in 2024 was growing production from members of the group that do not adhere to targets — Iran, Libya and Venezuela. Iran boosted output by 380,000 b/d to 3.32mn b/d, the highest since 2018, despite the continuation of US sanctions on its oil exports. Similarly, sanctions-hit Venezuela increased production by 110,000 b/d to a six-year high of 870,000 b/d. Libya saw its production fall by 60,000 b/d to 1.11mn b/d — mostly owing to politically motivated shutdowns — but it ended the year at 1.4mn b/d, the highest in over a decade. On a monthly basis, members subject to cuts saw very little change in their collective output in December, with production edging up by 10,000 b/d to 33.57mn b/d. This was 270,000 b/d below the group's target for the month. Notable changes included a 50,000 b/d increase from Nigeria, which saw its output climb to 1.54mn b/d — the highest since July 2020 — while Kuwaiti output increased by 40,000 b/d to 2.44mn b/d. But these increases were almost entirely offset by a drop from the UAE, whose production fell by 120,000 b/d to 2.85mn b/d owing to maintenance at one of its onshore fields. Opec+ crude production mn b/d Dec Nov* Dec target† ± target Opec 9 21.23 21.22 21.23 +0.00 Non-Opec 9 12.34 12.36 12.62 -0.28 Total 33.57 33.58 33.85 -0.28 *revised †includes additional cuts where applicable Opec wellhead production mn b/d Dec Nov* Dec target† ± target Saudi Arabia 8.91 8.93 8.98 -0.07 Iraq 3.99 3.98 4.00 -0.01 Kuwait 2.44 2.40 2.41 +0.03 UAE 2.85 2.97 2.91 -0.06 Algeria 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.00 Nigeria 1.55 1.50 1.50 +0.05 Congo (Brazzaville) 0.27 0.25 0.28 -0.01 Gabon 0.24 0.22 0.17 +0.07 Equatorial Guinea 0.07 0.06 0.07 +0.00 Opec 9 21.23 21.22 21.23 +0.00 Iran 3.40 3.36 na na Libya 1.31 1.24 na na Venezuela 0.90 0.88 na na Total Opec 12^ 26.84 26.70 na na *revised †includes additional cuts where applicable ^Iran, Libya and Venezuela are exempt from production targets Non-Opec crude production mn b/d Dec Nov* Dec target† ± target Russia 8.97 8.97 8.98 -0.01 Oman 0.75 0.75 0.76 -0.01 Azerbaijan 0.48 0.49 0.55 -0.07 Kazakhstan 1.44 1.45 1.47 -0.03 Malaysia 0.36 0.36 0.40 -0.04 Bahrain 0.18 0.18 0.20 -0.02 Brunei 0.08 0.08 0.08 -0.00 Sudan 0.02 0.02 0.06 -0.04 South Sudan 0.06 0.06 0.12 -0.06 Total non-Opec 12.34 12.36 12.62 -0.28 *revised †includes additional cuts where applicable Opec+ crude production* Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more