Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

EU metal industry takes stock of high energy costs

  • Spanish Market: Electricity, Metals, Natural gas
  • 21/09/21

Europe's metal industry is taking stock of surging energy costs, with some market participants unperturbed but others implementing or considering output cuts and bracing for a challenging fourth quarter as power prices show little sign of dropping in the near term.

As of yesterday, the Dutch TTF front-month gas market had risen to around €73.750/MWh from around €41.975/MWh at the beginning of August, while the UK NBP front-month market had risen to 186.25p/th from 106.72p/th over the same period. The steep hikes are underpinned by a combination of factors including rising global demand as economies bounce back from Covid-19 lockdowns, heavier-than-usual summer maintenance at North Sea gas platforms and reduced imports of LNG amid unrelenting global competition for cargoes. Furthermore, surging fuel costs have meant that some gas-fired power generation has been slower to rise since August — German gas-fired generation is on course for its fifth month of year-on-year declines, with output averaging 4.7GW, against 7.4GW in all of September 2020.

Meanwhile in the power market, the UK over-the-counter (OTC) base-load day-ahead price stood at £173/MWh (€201.50/MWh) yesterday, down following sharp spikes last week but still up from £113/MWh at the start of August. The German base-load day-ahead price has risen to €152/MWh from €98/MWh over the same period. Power prices are also being supported by other elements, including unseasonably slow wind speeds in September and a fire last week that has knocked out the 2GW IFA interconnector between the UK and France until 13 October.

The rise in energy costs has been so rapid that many metals market participants and manufacturers are still taking stock of the situation — voicing concern but not taking any drastic action as yet. Several market participants told Argus that they are monitoring the situation but so far do not see any major adjustments being made, either to their own operations or those of companies with whom they do business.

A German market participant confirmed that conversion costs for producing ferro-alloys have risen, but said that higher energy costs are only one of the factors at play. For ferro-molybdenum, increased energy costs are "primarily driving the costs for the reducing agents [such as ferro-silicon and aluminium]" but high molybdenum oxide prices relative to ferro-molybdenum prices are also playing a major role in driving the market in the near term, he said.

So far, Europe's silicon and aluminium sectors have been most acutely affected. Last week, Spain's Ferroglobe idled a silicon metal furnace at its Sabon plant in Galicia, in part because of high electricity costs. It does not plan to suspend any other operations, but it is being squeezed and the increased costs are being passed downstream, according to a source close to the company. European silicon metal prices are already surging because of Chinese production cuts, and this additional tightening of regional supply is only likely to add to the upward momentum.

In the aluminium market, producers are voicing concerns about the rising cost of gas for their furnaces and their other power costs — particularly as they are also being squeezed by sharp price hikes for silicon, magnesium and scrap. On 17 September, prices for aluminium wheels scrap jumped to £1,700-1,750/t delivered to UK smelters, up from £1,550-1,650/t a week earlier. Old rolled scrap rose to £1,050-1,100/t from £1,000-1,100/t, and commercial turnings rose to £900-950/t from £850-950/t.

Some UK aluminium suppliers have said they are considering stoppages, but as yet there are no indications that they plan to go ahead with them. That said, they are unlikely to be operating at full capacity.

On the steel side, some UK plants are having to suspend operations because of "extortionate" energy costs, industry association UK Steel warned last week. "While prices have risen across Europe, wholesale prices have quadrupled in the UK and merely tripled in Germany, when accounting for carbon costs," director-general Gareth Stace said. "This exacerbated the already grossly unequal electricity price disparity between UK steelmakers and our European competitors." The situation is increasingly urgent, with spot prices exceeding £2,000/MWh and winter approaching, he added.

Firm 4Q outlook for energy costs

Metal market participants are bracing for the likely continuation of high energy costs for the remainder of this year, based on forward curves and fundamentals.

Uncertainty about fourth-quarter gas availability remains high, with European gas stocks still 22 percentage points lower than a year ago and little clarity about when Russian imports through the Nord Stream 2 pipeline will begin, as a number of regulatory hurdles remain. Even after Nord Stream 2 starts up, it may not bring additional gas to Europe as Russian state-controlled Gazprom could use the link to redirect flows from other routes. In addition, strong global competition for LNG means that European buyers would need to pay a premium to attract flexible cargoes to Europe.

There is limited potential to bring more coal-fired power generation on line, partly because there is less capacity available in Europe after various closures, but also because gas-to-coal switching price levels were passed some time ago. The unprecedented premium of TTF gas prices to coal-switching levels and the size of winter clean dark spreads suggests that Europe's capacity to balance winter power fundamentals with coal has already reached its limit, with the market now signalling that other non-coal related supply and demand responses will be needed if prices are to soften.

Soaring day-ahead power prices mean that the whole German coal fleet — from the lowest 30pc-efficient units to the highest 46pc-efficient plants — have theoretically been profitable to run since 10 September. As a result, German coal-fired generation has averaged around 8.1GW this month — representing around 69pc of available capacity — up from 5.5GW a year earlier and 3.2GW last month.

The greatest unknown is, of course, the weather. European temperatures are above average for the time of year and are expected to remain so in the very near term. If temperatures are higher than expected in the autumn, energy consumption will drop and allow for more gas to be put into storage, potentially softening the pricing outlook.

Conversely, if the winter brings unusually low temperatures, this could encourage some gas-to-oil switching for power generation and industrial use — also pushing up oil prices and related costs. US bank Goldman Sachs estimates that if winter temperatures are below average, European and global LNG markets can manage through gas-to-coal switching and higher supply, but said that gas inventories are so tight that there is a risk that "these adjustments would be insufficient to prevent a stock-out in gas inventories by the end of winter".

The US' National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration forecasts a 79pc probability of a La Nina weather event in November-January. If this materialises, it would greatly increase the likelihood of cold weather in Asia-Pacific this winter, increasing regional demand for gas and LNG and further supporting prices.

Power prices volatile but trending higher

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

09/04/25

What do tariffs mean for the global gas market?

What do tariffs mean for the global gas market?

Some countries are considering retaliatory tariffs, while others hope to reduce their trade deficit in order to negotiate lower rates London, 9 April (Argus) — Newly announced US tariffs on goods entering the country and some of the countermeasures already announced by large trade partners are unlikely to cause any direct disruptions to global gas markets. But the indirect effects on gas supply and demand may be huge, stemming from a weaker macroeconomic outlook, fuel substitution and inflationary pressures on infrastructure development. US president Donald Trump on 2 April imposed a minimum 10pc tax on all foreign imports from 5 April,with much higher tariffs on selected countries that briefly came into force on 9 April, before Trump announced a 90-day pause. China is the only exception. It has announced retaliatory tariffs that could disrupt US energy exports, resulting in an escalation that has already brought up the respective levies to 125pc in the US and 84pc in China. These are unlikely to have any direct impact on LNG trade flows, as China had already stopped importing US LNG earlier this year. But disruptions to trade between the world's two largest economies may weigh heavily on manufacturing activity in China, in turn reducing industrial gas demand. And the ripple effects of disruptions to US LPG exports to China may alter fuel-switching economics in the region and beyond. Most other countries in Asia-Pacific have opted not to follow China's lead by retaliating against US tariffs, even though many have warned about the potential for long-term economic disruption. The Japanese government intends to negotiate a better tariff deal and is considering investing in the US' proposed 20mn t/yr Alaska LNG export project as part of wider efforts to reduce its trade surplus with the US. Countries in Asia-Pacific have been hit with some of the highest of Trump's targeted duties. The EU is keeping retaliatory measures on the table, but these are unlikely to include any levy on US LNG. Europe has become much more reliant on LNG imports after losing the bulk of its Russian pipeline supply, and imposing tariffs on energy imports would only reignite inflationary pressures that European countries have tried to curb over the past three years. The bloc says it is ready to negotiate on possibly increasing its US LNG imports to reduce its trade surplus and would zero out its tariffs on industrial imports if the US agrees to do the same. But Trump says this offer is not enough, citing the EU's upcoming Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as one of the "unfair trade practices" that justifies a tariff response. Nerves of steel Much greater risks for gas markets may stem from rising infrastructure costs in the US' upstream and midstream sectors, particularly as a result of earlier tariffs imposed on steel and aluminum imports. These present an immediate risk for US LNG developers, particularly for the five projects under construction and the six others expected to reach final investment decisions this year. Metals account for up to 30pc of the cost of building an LNG export plant. An LNG terminal can cost $5bn-25bn to build, depending on its size, with steel used for pipelines, tanks and other structural frameworks. US facilities can be built using some domestic metal, but higher prices for this may lead to construction and final investment decision delays for the country's planned liquefaction projects. US tariffs' primary effect on the domestic gas market stems from duties levied on non-energy goods used by the oil and gas industry, including steel and specialised pipeline components such as valves and compressors, which are imported from overseas. The US remains a net natural gas importer from Canada , but these flows are unlikely to be affected by trade tariffs given the lack of alternative supply sources available to some northern US states. US LNG project pipeline mn t/yr Project Capacity Expected start/FID Under construction Plaquemines 19.2 2025 Corpus Christi stage 3 12.0 2025 Golden Pass 18.1 2026 Rio Grande 17.6 2027 Port Arthur 13.5 2027 Waiting for final investment decision Delfin FLNG 1 13.2 mid-2025 Texas LNG 4.0 2025 Calcasieu Pass 2 28.0 mid-2025 Corpus Christi train 8-9 3.3 2025 Louisiana LNG 16.5 mid-2025 Cameron train 4 6.8 mid-2025 Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Delta pulls full-year forecast amid US tariffs: Update


09/04/25
09/04/25

Delta pulls full-year forecast amid US tariffs: Update

Adds details from earnings call throughout. Houston, 9 April (Argus) — Delta Air Lines pulled its full-year 2025 financial guidance today, citing US tariff-related uncertainty. "Given the lack of economic clarity, it is premature at this time to provide an updated full-year outlook," the airline said Wednesday in an earnings call. Delta said it hoped the growing US tariff war with the world would be resolved through trade negotiations, but that it also told its main aircraft manufacturer, Airbus, that it would not purchase any aircraft that includes a tariff fee. "If you start to put a 20pc incremental cost on top of an aircraft, it gets very difficult to make that math work," chief executive Ed Bastion said in an earnings call today. In the meantime, Delta is protecting margins and cash flow by focusing on what it can control, including reducing planned capacity growth in the second half of the year to flat compared to last year, while also managing costs and capital expenses, Bastion said. Delta expects revenue in the second quarter of 2025 to be either 2pc higher or 2pc lower from the year earlier period with continued resilience in premium, loyalty and international bookings offsetting softness in domestic and standard flights. Punitive taxes on imports from key US trading partners were implemented on Wednesday despite President Donald Trump's claims of multiple trade deals in the making. Trump's 10pc baseline tariff on imports from nearly every country already went into effect on 5 April. The higher, "reciprocal" taxes went into effect today, although at midday Wednesday he announced a 90-day pause on most of the higher tariffs, while increasing tariffs on Chinese imports even higher. The company reported a profit of $240mn in the first quarter of 2025, up from $37mn in the first quarter of 2024. Confidence craters in 1Q Corporate travel started the year with momentum, but a reduction in corporate confidence stalled growth in February and March, Delta said. For the first quarter, corporate sales were up by low-single digits compared to the prior year, with strength led by the banking and technology sectors. The company's fuel expenses were down by 7pc in the first quarter of 2025 compared to the prior year period. The average price Delta paid for jet fuel was $2.45/USG, down by 11pc to the prior year period. Delta said it has seen "a significant drop off in bookings" out of Canada amid the trade disputes with that country which started earlier than the broader US tariffs. Meanwhile, Mexico is "a mixed bag," the company said. Delta is considering reducing capacity levels in Mexico and Canada in the future. The company reported a profit of $240mn in the first quarter of 2025, up from $37mn in the first quarter of 2024. By Eunice Bridges Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Delta pulls full-year forecast on tariff uncertainty


09/04/25
09/04/25

Delta pulls full-year forecast on tariff uncertainty

Houston, 9 April (Argus) — Delta Air Lines pulled its full-year 2025 financial guidance today, citing US tariff-related uncertainty. "Given the lack of economic clarity, it is premature at this time to provide an updated full-year outlook," the airline said Wednesday in an earnings call. Delta said it hoped the growing tariff war woudl be resolved through trade negotiations, but that it also told its main aircraft manufacturer, Airbus, that it would not purchase any aircraft that includes a tariff fee. In the meantime, Delta is protecting margins and cash flow by focusing on what it can control, including reducing planned capacity growth in the second half of the year to flat compared to last year, while also managing costs and capital expenses, chief executive Ed Bastion said. The company reported a profit of $298mn in the first quarter of 2025, up slightly from $288mn in the first quarter of 2024. The company's fuel expenses were down by 7pc in the first quarter of 2025 compared to the prior year period. The average price Delta paid for jet fuel was $2.45/USG, down by 11pc to the prior year period. By Eunice Bridges Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

S Korea unveils auto industry support after US tariffs


09/04/25
09/04/25

S Korea unveils auto industry support after US tariffs

Singapore, 9 April (Argus) — South Korea has unveiled planned emergency measures to support its automobile industry given the sweeping US tariffs, turning towards its domestic market and outwards to the "global south" to generate demand. South Korea exported nearly $127.8bn of goods to the US in 2024,accounting for about 18.7pc of its total exports. About almost $34.7bn were from passenger automotives. It will provide around 3 trillion South Korean won ($2bn) of new emergency liquidity support, expand its policy finance by W2 trillion to a total of W15 trillion and hand out more car export support. South Korea will also extend the electric vehicle (EV) corporate discount subsidy policy until the end of the year, and it will now support between 30-80pc of EVs' price, up from previously 20-40pc. A focus on the domestic market will help respond to lower export volumes given the US' tariffs, said the country's trade and industry ministry (Motie). The country will cut the special consumption tax on new car purchases from 5pc to 3.5pc until June, while not ruling out any other necessary additional support. It will also push its public sector, public institutions and local governments to buy "business vehicles" within the first half of 2025, which will likely buoy eco-friendly vehicle sales. Eco-friendly vehicles in South Korea refer to hybrids, battery EVs, plug-in hybrids and hydrogen-fuelled vehicles. Eco-friendly vehicle domestic sales surged by 50pc on the year to about 60,350 units in February, while exports rose by 32pc to almost 69,000 units. It is also turning to new "global south" markets by offering an extra budget on export vouchers and trade insurance support until the end of 2025, citing its agreements and negotiations with countries such as the UAE, Mexico, the Philippines and Ecuador. The combined market share of three South Korean battery firms — LG Energy Solution (LGES), SK On and Samsung SDI — on global EV battery installations in has further declined in January-February, according to the latest data from South Korean market intelligence firm SNE Research. They now take up 17.7pc of the global market share, down by almost 5.5 percentage points compared to a year earlier. "It has become also important for K-trio to come up with strategic measures to increase their local production in North America and diversify raw material suppliers," said SNE, citing the US tariffs. LGES last year said it is looking to produce energy storage system cells in the US through its subsidiary LGES Vertech from 2025. SK On earlier this week told Argus that the tariffs will have "limited" potential impact on its business, with its manufacturing facility in the US state of Georgia, SK Battery America, supplying batteries for its US sales volumes . By Joseph Ho Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Tokyo may use Alaska LNG as leverage in US tariff talks


09/04/25
09/04/25

Tokyo may use Alaska LNG as leverage in US tariff talks

Osaka, 9 April (Argus) — Tokyo will likely use the possibility of purchases from the US' proposed 20mn t/yr Alaska LNG export project, as part of wider efforts to reduce the US' trade deficit with Japan, to negotiate for a better tariff deal. US president Donald Trump's 10pc tariff on imports from all countries took effect on 5 April, with exemptions for some commodities . The higher "reciprocal" taxes are due to enter into force at 12:01 ET (04:01 GMT) on 9 April, including Japan at 24pc. The Japanese government on 8 April held its first ministerial task force with prime minister Shigeru Ishiba attending, to discuss potential measures against new US tariffs. Details are still under consideration, but Ishiba is ready to use every possible method to mitigate the impact of looming US tariffs on the Japanese economy, as he sees this as a "national disaster". Japan, a long-standing ally of the US, is unlikely to respond in kind to the US tariff and will instead seek mutually beneficial solutions. Ishiba is aiming to present Trump with a package of measures across a wide range of issues, such as in the energy, agriculture, shipbuilding and automobile sectors, rather than piecemeal requests. The package could include Japan's stance on the Alaska LNG project and ethanol developments, Ishiba stated on 7 April when responding to questions in the Diet. Tokyo may use the Alaska LNG as part of its tariff negotiation, as buying more US LNG could ease Japan's trade surplus against the US. The trade imbalance between Japan and the US stood at ¥8.64 trillion in 2024, equivalent to about $58.6bn at current exchange rates, Japanese customs data show. Japan's LNG purchases from the US rose by 15pc on the year to 6.34mn t in 2024, accounting for nearly 10pc of the country's total LNG imports. Japan has committed to continuing strengthening energy security and co-operation with the US, as well as South Korea, leveraging US LNG along with other energy sources and technologies in a mutually beneficial manner, the countries said in a joint statement after the trilateral foreign ministers' meeting in Brussels on 3 April, just after Trump announced the baseline 10pc taxes on 2 April. Ishiba had already mentioned the idea of ramping up purchases of US LNG, as well as ethanol, ammonia and other resources, when he visited Trump in Washington in February . But he emphasised the importance of stable and reasonable prices for such LNG imports. Alaska LNG has made little progress in recent years and is yet to secure any offtake agreements. But it has drawn interest, after Trump devoted one of his first executive orders to the development of Alaskan energy. South Korea's energy minister expressed the country's interest in the project during a visit in late March , while Taiwan's state-owned CPC signed an initial agreement to invest in and purchase LNG from the project, according to Taiwan's Ministry of Economic Affairs . Auto deal But it remains unclear if a possible purchase of Alaska LNG alone would satisfy Washington and help reduce tariffs. The Trump administration has expressed strong dissatisfaction against Japanese non-tariff barriers on US car deliveries. "US automakers face a variety of non-tariff barriers that impede access to the Japanese and Korean automotive markets, including non-acceptance of certain US standards, duplicative testing and certification requirements, and transparency issues", the US government said on 2 April. Japan imported around 23,000 units of passenger vehicles from the US in 2023, according to the industry group Japan Automobile Importers Association, and this is near one-tenth of all deliveries from European nations. Tokyo appears to be struggling to find breakthrough solutions on this decades-long bilateral economic issue. There must be a variety of reasons on why American cars are not coming into the Japanese market, while Japanese cars are selling well in the US, said the Japanese minister for trade and industry Yoji Muto on 8 April. "We still need more time to figure that out." Ishiba on 8 April appointed the minister of state for Economic and Fiscal Policy, Ryosei Akazawa, as a negotiator for the trade talks with the US government. By Motoko Hasegawa and Yusuke Maekawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more