SGP plans 2024 FID for Panama biorefinery
Final investment decision (FID) for the development of a $7.7bn biorefinery project in Panama to produce advanced biofuels is scheduled for the fourth quarter of next year.
The Golden City biorefinery project will operate on a zero-waste ecosystem strategy, chief executive of US integrated bioenergy products development company SGP Bioenergy, Randy Delbert Letang, told Argus.
The biorefinery will use non-narcotic industrial hemp oil as feedstock as well as other fats and greases to produce advanced biofuels using a process technology from Danish company Topsoe.
The plant is expected to have a capacity of 180,000 b/d and will mostly produce sustainable aviation fuels (SAF), renewable diesel and green marine diesel.
Some by-products produced at the plant will include green naphtha, which will then be used to produce secondary products such as green hydrogen. The company is targeting around 405,000 t/yr of the fuel once the project is completed.
Green hydrogen could be used at a later stage to produce tertiary products such as e-kerosene or green ammonia, but the company's decision to go ahead with the production of these fuels will depend on demand from the market, according to Letang.
The main objective of the project is to reuse every by-product produced as much as possible to minimize waste. "We'll utilize the by-product of each product we'll be making until we expire as much of the CO2 in the product as possible," Letang said. "You are going to have some sort of carbon waste but our goal is to use that [carbon] waste as much as possible with existing technologies to produce other products. This is the closest path to net zero," he added.
The plant will be developed in three phases of 60,000 b/d of capacity each. The first phase is estimated to be completed in the first quarter of 2027. The following phases will be completed within 15-18 months each.
The total cost of the project is $7.7bn but the company is focusing on attracting financing for the first phase that will cost around $3.1bn. The firm recently announced a $250mn equity commitment from Global Emerging Markets (GEM), a European private alternative investment group. SGP hopes to secure more investment from private capital, private equity funds and standard development institutions.
Although SGP has not yet signed any supply agreement with customers for the fuels, it has received interest from prospective clients, Letang said. Sovereigns and large original equipment manufacturers are the main target.
"Under the Paris Climate Agreement, and more recently, the Global Biofuels Alliance promoted by India, it is the sovereigns who have made the commitments to the energy transition," he said. "They also possess the creditworthiness and ability to uptake significantly larger volumes than individual companies for their industries."
On the feedstock side, SGP most recently signed an agreement with the Latino Farmers and Ranchers International (LFRI) organization to grow and supply 10mn acres of industrial hemp in 10 years.
Financial viability
The ability that the company has to obtain revenue through the entire supply chain, combined with the leverage of existing infrastructure, makes the project economically viable, according to Letang.
"Our goal is to drive down the cost of [sustainable] fuels for the end customers as close to parity as possible to their potential conventional petroleum counterpart," he said. "We are looking to accelerate the velocity of adoption [of sustainable fuels] in the market place."
On top of that, political and economic stability, combined with the use of the US dollar and the ability to operate within existing logistics and infrastructure with access to over 1,900 ports, will allow the firm to reach the global market for exports.
"Having the advantage of the Panama Canal, ports and channels, allows us to execute the logistics more efficiently," he said.
| SGP Golden City biorefinery project | ||
| Phase | Capacity b/d | Commissioning date |
| 1 | 60,000 | 2027 |
| 2 | 60,000 | To be determined |
| 3 | 60,000 | To be determined |
| — SGP Bioenergy | ||
Related news posts
EU crushing up in August on rapeseed, US soy harvest
EU crushing up in August on rapeseed, US soy harvest
London, 25 September (Argus) — EU and UK mills crushed more soybeans and rapeseed in August compared with the previous month and a year earlier, as inclement weather caused earlier harvests this year in Europe, increasing EU supplies. But total refined oil production levels were unchanged on the month. Fewer sunflower seeds (SFS) were crushed in August than in July, as high SFS prices lowered margins for crushers. Total oilseed crush levels increased on the month by 7pc to 3.5mn t in August, led by greater volumes of crushed soybeans and rapeseed, which increased by 6pc and 13pc, respectively. The UK and EU imported 135,000t less oilseeds on the month in August as the European harvest began, resulting in about 1.35mn t of imports in total. Production of semi-refined oil — typically used in the biodiesel sector — increased by 7pc on the month. But fully-refined oil — typically for the food sector — fell by 4pc, leaving total refined oil production virtually unchanged on the month. Rapeseed crushing rose by 13pc on the month in August and by 5pc on the year, as Ukraine, the UK and the EU began harvesting their 2024-25 harvests 3-4 weeks earlier than usual, given the crop's earlier flowering and ripening with unfavourable weather conditions. Soybean crushing continued to increase in August. But the share of soybeans in total oilseed imports has fallen — from 78.5pc in July to 71pc in August. The EU and the UK imported 200,000 fewer tonnes of soybeans in August than in July — or about 960,500t of soybeans in total. SFS crushing fell by 14pc in August to 0.4mn t on high SFS prices and limited stocks in the EU and Ukraine, as new-crop SFS arrivals — for the 2024-25 marketing year — do not start before this month. Nevertheless, SFS crushing increased by 17pc across the first seven months of this year on the back of greater EU crushing capacity. The strongest seed crushing growth expected by the USDA is in Romania, Bulgaria and Hungary, and to a lesser extent in Germany and Italy. By Madeleine Jenkins EU + UK crushing volumes mn t Aug-24 Jul-24 m-o-m change Aug-23 y-o-y change Jan-Aug 24 Jan-Aug 23 y-o-y change Soybean 1.21 1.14 6% 1.15 5% 9.5 9.6 -1% Sunflower seed 0.39 0.45 -14% 0.37 5% 4.0 3.4 17% Rapeseed 1.88 1.67 13% 1.72 9% 13.3 12.6 5% Semi-refined 0.35 0.33 7% 0.34 3% 2.7 2.6 5% Fully-refined 0.60 0.62 -4% 0.57 4% 4.9 4.5 8% Total Total oilseed 3.48 3.25 7% 3.24 7% 26.8 25.6 5% Total refined 0.95 0.95 0% 0.91 4% 7.5 7.0 7% Fediol Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Japan pushes abatement approach to energy transition
Japan pushes abatement approach to energy transition
Tokyo, 23 September (Argus) — Japan is keen to promote its energy transition approach, focused on carbon abatement technologies, to the wider coal-reliant Asia-Pacific region. The country has accelerated development of carbon abatement technologies to keep fossil fuels in its energy mix and boost energy security and economic growth. Japan, with its G7 counterparts, pledged to phase out "unabated" coal-fired plants by 2035, or "in a timeline consistent with keeping a limit of a 1.5°C temperature rise within reach, in line with countries' net zero pathways". This is a major step for Japan, a resource-poor country. But legislative progress aimed at developing value chains for carbon capture and storage (CCS) and cleaner fuels, such as hydrogen and ammonia, might have encouraged Tokyo to commit, especially since the G7 text allows for some wiggle room. To ensure continued use of its abated thermal power plants, trade and industry ministry has requested ¥11.2bn ($79mn) to support CCS projects, including exploration of CO2 storage sites, for 2025-26, up sharply from the ¥1.2bn budgeted for 2024-25. Japan has yet to set a date to achieve the phase-out target. But it had already promised not to build new unabated coal-fired plants at last year's UN Cop 28 climate talks, while pledging to phase out "inefficient" coal-fired plants by 2030. Less than 5pc of Japan's operational coal fleet has a planned retirement year, according to analysis by Global Energy Monitor, and these might comprise the oldest and least efficient plants. Coal capacity built in the last decade, following the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear disaster, is unlikely to receive a retirement date without a countrywide policy that calls for a coal exit. Japan's coal demand could decline, to some extent, under global divestment pressure. But the fuel remains key, as the government sees renewables and nuclear as insufficient to meet rising power demand driven by the growth of data centres needed to enable artificial intelligence. Continental divide The country is keen to extend its vision for "various" and "practical" pathways, including abatement technologies, to coal-reliant southeast Asia. This stems from Tokyo's sceptical view about promoting a more European approach to the energy transition — driven by wind and solar power — to Asian countries. Japan stresses the importance of more diversified pathways, including thermal power with abatement. The country aims to spur decarbonisation in Asia-Pacific through a platform called the Asia Zero Emission Community (Azec) initiated in 2022. Asia-Pacific accounts for more than half of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, at 17.178bn t of CO2 equivalent, according to the IEA. In Jakarta last month, 11 Azec countries emphasised the need to co-operate "to decarbonise coal power generation". The platform sets out options such as biogas, hydrogen and ammonia, and retrofitting with CCS and carbon capture, utilisation and storage. Japan's industries have already committed to carbon abatement at coal-fired plants in Asia, leveraging their technological know-how. Tokyo has pledged to provide about $70bn to support decarbonisation globally. This funding is part of wider financial assistance to help mobilise the estimated $28 trillion that Asia requires. To secure the funding, Japan has already issued part of a $139bn climate transition bond and aims to strengthen the financial support through the Asia Zero Emission Centre, the latest Azec initiative, under which transitional finance will be studied further, a trade and industry ministry official told Argus . Japan is on track to reduce its GHG emissions by 46pc by the April 2030-March 2031 fiscal year from its 2013-14 level, and hit its net zero emissions goal by 2050. By Motoko Hasegawa and Yusuke Maekawa Japan CO2 emissions by sector Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Equinor halts Norway-Germany H2 pipeline planning
Equinor halts Norway-Germany H2 pipeline planning
London, 20 September (Argus) — Norway's state-controlled Equinor said it has halted the development of a planned €4bn-6bn pipeline that would have exported hydrogen from Norway to Germany due to the lack of a viable business case. "There was no clarity on the regulatory side, there were no customers and there was no supply," an Equinor spokesperson told Argus . Equinor had said earlier this year that the pipeline was likely to follow in a later stage of development after its hydrogen production had started in mainland Europe, and that building the pipeline would be contingent on strong demand. "You don't invest in a pipeline €4bn-6bn just for transporting a few molecules," the company's director of hydrogen in northwest Europe, Henrik Solgaard Andersen, said at the time. "You need to believe in the market." Equinor announced a plan in early 2023 to supply hydrogen from Norway to German utility RWE for use in power plants. Equinor had envisaged making "significant quantities" of hydrogen from Norwegian gas with CO2 storage and eventually transitioning to renewable hydrogen. But Germany has shifted its plans for hydrogen power a couple of times since then. It also has ambitions to use hydrogen in sectors like steel, but companies have not yet taken firm investment decisions, meaning there is uncertainty about how much hydrogen demand will materialise and when. A joint study commissioned by the German and Norwegian governments last year and carried out by Norwegian state-owned offshore pipeline operator Gassco and the Germany Energy Agency (Dena) found the pipeline to be technically viable. Gassco was not immediately available to comment on whether it would continue developing the pipeline without Equinor. The loss of the pipeline from a current energy trading partner and close ally looks to have choked off one of the most plausible import corridors envisaged to meet Europe's expected demand. The pipeline capacity would have been 10GW by 2038, RWE and Equinor said previously, equating to 2.6mn t/yr of hydrogen based on its lower heating value. By Aidan Lea Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
LNG-burning vessels well positioned ahead of 2025
LNG-burning vessels well positioned ahead of 2025
New York, 19 September (Argus) — Vessels outfitted with dual-fuel LNG-burning engines are poised to have the lowest marine fuel expense heading into 2025 when the EU will tighten its marine EU emissions trading system (ETS) regulations and add a new regulation, " FuelEU", from 1 January 2025. Considering both regulations, at current price levels, fossil LNG (also known as grey LNG) will be priced the cheapest compared with conventional marine fuels and other commonly considered alternative fuels such as biodiesel and methanol. The EU's FuelEU maritime regulation will require ship operators traveling in, out and within EU territorial waters to gradually reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity on a lifecycle basis, starting with a 2pc reduction in 2025, 6pc in 2030 and so on until getting to an 80pc drop, compared with 2020 base year levels. The FuelEU GHG intensity maximum is set at 85.69 grams of CO2-equivalent per MJ (gCO2e/MJ) from 2030 to 2034, dropping to 77.94 gCO2e/MJ in 2035. Vessel pools exceeding the FuelEU's limits will be fined €2,400/t ($2,675/t) of very low-sulphur fuel oil (VLFSO) energy equivalent. GHG emissions from grey LNG vary depending on the type of marine engine used to burn the LNG, but ranges from about 76.3-92.3 gCO2e/MJ, according to non-governmental environmental lobby group Transport & Environment. This makes a number of LNG-burning, ocean-going vessels compliant with FuelEU regulation through 2034. The EU's ETS for marine shipping commenced this year and requires that ship operators pay for 40pc of their GHG generated on voyages within, in and out of the EU. Next year, the EU ETS emissions limit will increase to 70pc. Even with the added 70pc CO2 emissions cost, US Gulf coast grey LNG was assessed at $639/t VLSFOe, compared with the second cheapest VLSFO at $689/t, B30 biodiesel at $922/t and grey methanol at $931/t VLSFOe average from 1-18 September (see chart). "In 2025, we expect [US natural gas] prices to rise as [US] LNG exports increase while domestic consumption and production remain relatively flat for much of the year," says the US Energy Information Administration. "We forecast the Henry Hub price to average around $2.20/million British thermal units (mmBtu) in 2024 and $3.10/mmBtu in 2025." Provided that prices of biodiesel and methanol remain relatively flat, the projected EIA US 2025 LNG price gains would not affect LNG's price ranking, keeping it the cheapest alternative marine fuel option for ship owners traveling between the US Gulf coast and Europe. LNG for bunkering global consumption from vessels 5,000 gross tonnes and over reached 12.9mn t in 2023, according to the International Maritime Organization (IMO), up from 11mn t in 2022 and 12.6mn t in 2021. The maritime port authority of Singapore reported 111,000t of LNG bunker sales and the port authorities of Rotterdam and Antwerp reported 319,000t in 2023 from all size vessels. Among vessels 5,000 gross tonnes and over, LNG carriers accounted for 89pc of LNG bunker demand globally, followed by container ships at 3.6pc, according to the IMO. The large gap between LNG global and LNG Singapore, Rotterdam, and Antwerp bunker demand, is likely the result of most of the demand taking place at the biggest LNG export locations where LNG carriers call, such as the US Gulf coast, Qatar, Australia, Russia and Malaysia. By Stefka Wechsler USGC bunkers and bunker alternatives $/t VLSFOe Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more